Metal allergy in total-joint arthroplasty: Case report and literature review

Due to the low incidence and lack of effective diagnostic measures for the diagnosis of metal allergy in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), diagnosis relies mainly on the exclusion of other causes, in particular infection. It remains a relatively unpredictable and poorly understood...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2018-09, Vol.97 (38), p.e12475-e12475
Hauptverfasser: Bao, Wei, He, Yao, Fan, Yuanjun, Liao, Yueming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e12475
container_issue 38
container_start_page e12475
container_title Medicine (Baltimore)
container_volume 97
creator Bao, Wei
He, Yao
Fan, Yuanjun
Liao, Yueming
description Due to the low incidence and lack of effective diagnostic measures for the diagnosis of metal allergy in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), diagnosis relies mainly on the exclusion of other causes, in particular infection. It remains a relatively unpredictable and poorly understood cause of implant failure. At present, skin patch testing, leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT) and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT) are being commonly used to assess metal hypersensitivity.This report presents both a case and literature review. A 61-year-old female patient experienced continuous swelling and pain in the right knee joint for 9 months after a right-side total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We believe this is the case report of metal allergy in TKA. The following were the reasons for this. First, no definite symptoms of infection during revision arthroplasty were observed, but with obvious hyperplasia of synovium. Furthermore, a frozen biopsy revealed an extremely low neutrophil count, which was considered to be caused by chronic inflammation. Second, the results of repeated post-operation reexaminations indicate a clear increase in the number of eosinophils, while no bacteria were found in the tissue bacterial smear performed during the operation. Third, improvements were clearly observed in the patient following synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment. The patient underwent synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment. The patient's right knee remained mildly swollen; however, the pain has been relieved significantly. The range of motion could achieve 0 degrees of extension and 90 degrees of flexion. No consensus has been reached about the best diagnostic criteria for this disease, and most physicians would consider it to be a possibility when other diseases including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been excluded. Although this case followed the same course, the outcome following synovectomy and anti-anaphylactic treatment further confirmed our hypothesis.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MD.0000000000012475
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6160119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>30235744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3552-3980b198e49728001bfdc3e4e3c81ecad55dfeaec79087cb0100f5843292bc423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUNtOAjEQbYxGEP0CE7M_sNgr3fpgYsBbAvFFn5tudxYWyy7pFgh_bxHFy7xMcm4zOQhdEtwnWMnryaiPf4ZQLsUR6hLBBqlQA36MuhhTkUoleQedte08ipik_BR1GKZMSM67aDyBYFxinAM_3SZVnYQmAum8qeqQGB9mvlk604btTTI0LSQelo2PTF0krgrgTVj5HbquYHOOTkrjWrj42j309nD_OnxKxy-Pz8O7cWqZEDRlKsM5URlwJWkWv8rLwjLgwGxGwJpCiKIEA1YqnEmbY4JxKTLOqKK55ZT10O0-d7nKF1BYqIM3Ti99tTB-qxtT6b9MXc30tFnrARlgQlQMYPsA65u29VAevATrXbl6MtL_y42uq99nD57vNqOA7wWbxsVq2ne32oDXMzAuzD7zhFQ0pZhkWFGC04goyj4A2W-GDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metal allergy in total-joint arthroplasty: Case report and literature review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bao, Wei ; He, Yao ; Fan, Yuanjun ; Liao, Yueming</creator><creatorcontrib>Bao, Wei ; He, Yao ; Fan, Yuanjun ; Liao, Yueming</creatorcontrib><description>Due to the low incidence and lack of effective diagnostic measures for the diagnosis of metal allergy in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), diagnosis relies mainly on the exclusion of other causes, in particular infection. It remains a relatively unpredictable and poorly understood cause of implant failure. At present, skin patch testing, leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT) and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT) are being commonly used to assess metal hypersensitivity.This report presents both a case and literature review. A 61-year-old female patient experienced continuous swelling and pain in the right knee joint for 9 months after a right-side total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We believe this is the case report of metal allergy in TKA. The following were the reasons for this. First, no definite symptoms of infection during revision arthroplasty were observed, but with obvious hyperplasia of synovium. Furthermore, a frozen biopsy revealed an extremely low neutrophil count, which was considered to be caused by chronic inflammation. Second, the results of repeated post-operation reexaminations indicate a clear increase in the number of eosinophils, while no bacteria were found in the tissue bacterial smear performed during the operation. Third, improvements were clearly observed in the patient following synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment. The patient underwent synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment. The patient's right knee remained mildly swollen; however, the pain has been relieved significantly. The range of motion could achieve 0 degrees of extension and 90 degrees of flexion. No consensus has been reached about the best diagnostic criteria for this disease, and most physicians would consider it to be a possibility when other diseases including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been excluded. Although this case followed the same course, the outcome following synovectomy and anti-anaphylactic treatment further confirmed our hypothesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012475</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30235744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Clinical Case Report ; Female ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity - etiology ; Hypersensitivity - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Metals - adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; Polyethylene - adverse effects ; Prosthesis Failure - etiology ; Synovectomy ; Synovial Membrane - pathology</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2018-09, Vol.97 (38), p.e12475-e12475</ispartof><rights>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3552-3980b198e49728001bfdc3e4e3c81ecad55dfeaec79087cb0100f5843292bc423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160119/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160119/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30235744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bao, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Yuanjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yueming</creatorcontrib><title>Metal allergy in total-joint arthroplasty: Case report and literature review</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Due to the low incidence and lack of effective diagnostic measures for the diagnosis of metal allergy in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), diagnosis relies mainly on the exclusion of other causes, in particular infection. It remains a relatively unpredictable and poorly understood cause of implant failure. At present, skin patch testing, leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT) and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT) are being commonly used to assess metal hypersensitivity.This report presents both a case and literature review. A 61-year-old female patient experienced continuous swelling and pain in the right knee joint for 9 months after a right-side total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We believe this is the case report of metal allergy in TKA. The following were the reasons for this. First, no definite symptoms of infection during revision arthroplasty were observed, but with obvious hyperplasia of synovium. Furthermore, a frozen biopsy revealed an extremely low neutrophil count, which was considered to be caused by chronic inflammation. Second, the results of repeated post-operation reexaminations indicate a clear increase in the number of eosinophils, while no bacteria were found in the tissue bacterial smear performed during the operation. Third, improvements were clearly observed in the patient following synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment. The patient underwent synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment. The patient's right knee remained mildly swollen; however, the pain has been relieved significantly. The range of motion could achieve 0 degrees of extension and 90 degrees of flexion. No consensus has been reached about the best diagnostic criteria for this disease, and most physicians would consider it to be a possibility when other diseases including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been excluded. Although this case followed the same course, the outcome following synovectomy and anti-anaphylactic treatment further confirmed our hypothesis.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical Case Report</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - etiology</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Metals - adverse effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Polyethylene - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure - etiology</subject><subject>Synovectomy</subject><subject>Synovial Membrane - pathology</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUNtOAjEQbYxGEP0CE7M_sNgr3fpgYsBbAvFFn5tudxYWyy7pFgh_bxHFy7xMcm4zOQhdEtwnWMnryaiPf4ZQLsUR6hLBBqlQA36MuhhTkUoleQedte08ipik_BR1GKZMSM67aDyBYFxinAM_3SZVnYQmAum8qeqQGB9mvlk604btTTI0LSQelo2PTF0krgrgTVj5HbquYHOOTkrjWrj42j309nD_OnxKxy-Pz8O7cWqZEDRlKsM5URlwJWkWv8rLwjLgwGxGwJpCiKIEA1YqnEmbY4JxKTLOqKK55ZT10O0-d7nKF1BYqIM3Ti99tTB-qxtT6b9MXc30tFnrARlgQlQMYPsA65u29VAevATrXbl6MtL_y42uq99nD57vNqOA7wWbxsVq2ne32oDXMzAuzD7zhFQ0pZhkWFGC04goyj4A2W-GDw</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Bao, Wei</creator><creator>He, Yao</creator><creator>Fan, Yuanjun</creator><creator>Liao, Yueming</creator><general>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Metal allergy in total-joint arthroplasty: Case report and literature review</title><author>Bao, Wei ; He, Yao ; Fan, Yuanjun ; Liao, Yueming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3552-3980b198e49728001bfdc3e4e3c81ecad55dfeaec79087cb0100f5843292bc423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical Case Report</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - etiology</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Metals - adverse effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Polyethylene - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure - etiology</topic><topic>Synovectomy</topic><topic>Synovial Membrane - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bao, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Yuanjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yueming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bao, Wei</au><au>He, Yao</au><au>Fan, Yuanjun</au><au>Liao, Yueming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Metal allergy in total-joint arthroplasty: Case report and literature review</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>38</issue><spage>e12475</spage><epage>e12475</epage><pages>e12475-e12475</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Due to the low incidence and lack of effective diagnostic measures for the diagnosis of metal allergy in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), diagnosis relies mainly on the exclusion of other causes, in particular infection. It remains a relatively unpredictable and poorly understood cause of implant failure. At present, skin patch testing, leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT) and lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT) are being commonly used to assess metal hypersensitivity.This report presents both a case and literature review. A 61-year-old female patient experienced continuous swelling and pain in the right knee joint for 9 months after a right-side total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We believe this is the case report of metal allergy in TKA. The following were the reasons for this. First, no definite symptoms of infection during revision arthroplasty were observed, but with obvious hyperplasia of synovium. Furthermore, a frozen biopsy revealed an extremely low neutrophil count, which was considered to be caused by chronic inflammation. Second, the results of repeated post-operation reexaminations indicate a clear increase in the number of eosinophils, while no bacteria were found in the tissue bacterial smear performed during the operation. Third, improvements were clearly observed in the patient following synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment. The patient underwent synovectomy, revision of the polyethylene insert and anti-anaphylactic treatment. The patient's right knee remained mildly swollen; however, the pain has been relieved significantly. The range of motion could achieve 0 degrees of extension and 90 degrees of flexion. No consensus has been reached about the best diagnostic criteria for this disease, and most physicians would consider it to be a possibility when other diseases including periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been excluded. Although this case followed the same course, the outcome following synovectomy and anti-anaphylactic treatment further confirmed our hypothesis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>30235744</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000012475</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7974
ispartof Medicine (Baltimore), 2018-09, Vol.97 (38), p.e12475-e12475
issn 0025-7974
1536-5964
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6160119
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects
Clinical Case Report
Female
Humans
Hypersensitivity - etiology
Hypersensitivity - surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Metals - adverse effects
Middle Aged
Polyethylene - adverse effects
Prosthesis Failure - etiology
Synovectomy
Synovial Membrane - pathology
title Metal allergy in total-joint arthroplasty: Case report and literature review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T08%3A00%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metal%20allergy%20in%20total-joint%20arthroplasty:%20Case%20report%20and%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Bao,%20Wei&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=38&rft.spage=e12475&rft.epage=e12475&rft.pages=e12475-e12475&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000012475&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E30235744%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/30235744&rfr_iscdi=true