Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand
Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Appetite 2018-10, Vol.129, p.155-161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 161 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | Appetite |
container_volume | 129 |
creator | Mellis, Alexandra M. Athamneh, Liqa N. Stein, Jeffrey S. Sze, Yan Yan Epstein, Leonard H. Bickel, Warren K. |
description | Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.032 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6156798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195666318303817</els_id><sourcerecordid>2062838536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-1d62242ba9199732b3b496ebbd7972220d646c0ccf7f501c10693a9f854fd8ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModlv9BYLk0psd8zHJJIJCKVqFRW_0OmSSM9usO5Npkl3ovzfTrUVvFAI5Ic95z8eL0CtKGkqofLtr7DxDaRihqiGyIZw9QStKtFgrTtqnaEVojaWU_Ayd57wjhHDRdc_RGdNa1MNW6HYDOeOQ8RgTvMNfYWtLOAIOk4sj4HwT3c_lkcBmqOA4gg-2AJ4TDJBgcguLXYpVpqaM0Ydyh33ILh6mEqYttpPHQ4weexhr_AI9G-w-w8uH-wL9-PTx-9Xn9ebb9Zery83aCaHKmnrJWMt6q6nWHWc971stoe99pzvGGPGylY44N3SDINRRIjW3elCiHbyyPb9AH06686GvTTuYSrJ7M6cw2nRnog3m758p3JhtPBpJhey0qgJvHgRSvD1ALmasU8F-byeIh2wY5VTJlkrxf5RIprgSXFaUn9D7ldUlPnZEiVl8NTtz76tZfDVEmuprzXr95zCPOb-NrMD7EwB1pccAyWQXFnd8SOCK8TH8s8Avb-q3YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2062838536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mellis, Alexandra M. ; Athamneh, Liqa N. ; Stein, Jeffrey S. ; Sze, Yan Yan ; Epstein, Leonard H. ; Bickel, Warren K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mellis, Alexandra M. ; Athamneh, Liqa N. ; Stein, Jeffrey S. ; Sze, Yan Yan ; Epstein, Leonard H. ; Bickel, Warren K.</creatorcontrib><description>Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29959952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; bottled water ; Choice Behavior ; Cross-commodity ; Delay Discounting ; Demand ; Fast food ; Fast Foods ; Female ; health behavior ; Humans ; Impulsive Behavior ; Income ; Male ; Negative income shock ; Obesity ; purchasing ; Stress, Psychological</subject><ispartof>Appetite, 2018-10, Vol.129, p.155-161</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-1d62242ba9199732b3b496ebbd7972220d646c0ccf7f501c10693a9f854fd8ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-1d62242ba9199732b3b496ebbd7972220d646c0ccf7f501c10693a9f854fd8ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7466-8383 ; 0000-0002-3922-6934</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666318303817$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mellis, Alexandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athamneh, Liqa N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sze, Yan Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Leonard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickel, Warren K.</creatorcontrib><title>Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand</title><title>Appetite</title><addtitle>Appetite</addtitle><description>Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>bottled water</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cross-commodity</subject><subject>Delay Discounting</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Fast food</subject><subject>Fast Foods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>health behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impulsive Behavior</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Negative income shock</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>purchasing</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological</subject><issn>0195-6663</issn><issn>1095-8304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModlv9BYLk0psd8zHJJIJCKVqFRW_0OmSSM9usO5Npkl3ovzfTrUVvFAI5Ic95z8eL0CtKGkqofLtr7DxDaRihqiGyIZw9QStKtFgrTtqnaEVojaWU_Ayd57wjhHDRdc_RGdNa1MNW6HYDOeOQ8RgTvMNfYWtLOAIOk4sj4HwT3c_lkcBmqOA4gg-2AJ4TDJBgcguLXYpVpqaM0Ydyh33ILh6mEqYttpPHQ4weexhr_AI9G-w-w8uH-wL9-PTx-9Xn9ebb9Zery83aCaHKmnrJWMt6q6nWHWc971stoe99pzvGGPGylY44N3SDINRRIjW3elCiHbyyPb9AH06686GvTTuYSrJ7M6cw2nRnog3m758p3JhtPBpJhey0qgJvHgRSvD1ALmasU8F-byeIh2wY5VTJlkrxf5RIprgSXFaUn9D7ldUlPnZEiVl8NTtz76tZfDVEmuprzXr95zCPOb-NrMD7EwB1pccAyWQXFnd8SOCK8TH8s8Avb-q3YQ</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Mellis, Alexandra M.</creator><creator>Athamneh, Liqa N.</creator><creator>Stein, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Sze, Yan Yan</creator><creator>Epstein, Leonard H.</creator><creator>Bickel, Warren K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7466-8383</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-6934</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand</title><author>Mellis, Alexandra M. ; Athamneh, Liqa N. ; Stein, Jeffrey S. ; Sze, Yan Yan ; Epstein, Leonard H. ; Bickel, Warren K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-1d62242ba9199732b3b496ebbd7972220d646c0ccf7f501c10693a9f854fd8ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>bottled water</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cross-commodity</topic><topic>Delay Discounting</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Fast food</topic><topic>Fast Foods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>health behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impulsive Behavior</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Negative income shock</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>purchasing</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mellis, Alexandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athamneh, Liqa N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sze, Yan Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Leonard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickel, Warren K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Appetite</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mellis, Alexandra M.</au><au>Athamneh, Liqa N.</au><au>Stein, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Sze, Yan Yan</au><au>Epstein, Leonard H.</au><au>Bickel, Warren K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand</atitle><jtitle>Appetite</jtitle><addtitle>Appetite</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>129</volume><spage>155</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>155-161</pages><issn>0195-6663</issn><eissn>1095-8304</eissn><abstract>Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29959952</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.032</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7466-8383</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-6934</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6663 |
ispartof | Appetite, 2018-10, Vol.129, p.155-161 |
issn | 0195-6663 1095-8304 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6156798 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult bottled water Choice Behavior Cross-commodity Delay Discounting Demand Fast food Fast Foods Female health behavior Humans Impulsive Behavior Income Male Negative income shock Obesity purchasing Stress, Psychological |
title | Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T13%3A01%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Less%20is%20more:%20Negative%20income%20shock%20increases%20immediate%20preference%20in%20cross%20commodity%20discounting%20and%20food%20demand&rft.jtitle=Appetite&rft.au=Mellis,%20Alexandra%20M.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=129&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=155-161&rft.issn=0195-6663&rft.eissn=1095-8304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2062838536%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2062838536&rft_id=info:pmid/29959952&rft_els_id=S0195666318303817&rfr_iscdi=true |