Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand

Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Appetite 2018-10, Vol.129, p.155-161
Hauptverfasser: Mellis, Alexandra M., Athamneh, Liqa N., Stein, Jeffrey S., Sze, Yan Yan, Epstein, Leonard H., Bickel, Warren K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 161
container_issue
container_start_page 155
container_title Appetite
container_volume 129
creator Mellis, Alexandra M.
Athamneh, Liqa N.
Stein, Jeffrey S.
Sze, Yan Yan
Epstein, Leonard H.
Bickel, Warren K.
description Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6156798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195666318303817</els_id><sourcerecordid>2062838536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-1d62242ba9199732b3b496ebbd7972220d646c0ccf7f501c10693a9f854fd8ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModlv9BYLk0psd8zHJJIJCKVqFRW_0OmSSM9usO5Npkl3ovzfTrUVvFAI5Ic95z8eL0CtKGkqofLtr7DxDaRihqiGyIZw9QStKtFgrTtqnaEVojaWU_Ayd57wjhHDRdc_RGdNa1MNW6HYDOeOQ8RgTvMNfYWtLOAIOk4sj4HwT3c_lkcBmqOA4gg-2AJ4TDJBgcguLXYpVpqaM0Ydyh33ILh6mEqYttpPHQ4weexhr_AI9G-w-w8uH-wL9-PTx-9Xn9ebb9Zery83aCaHKmnrJWMt6q6nWHWc971stoe99pzvGGPGylY44N3SDINRRIjW3elCiHbyyPb9AH06686GvTTuYSrJ7M6cw2nRnog3m758p3JhtPBpJhey0qgJvHgRSvD1ALmasU8F-byeIh2wY5VTJlkrxf5RIprgSXFaUn9D7ldUlPnZEiVl8NTtz76tZfDVEmuprzXr95zCPOb-NrMD7EwB1pccAyWQXFnd8SOCK8TH8s8Avb-q3YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2062838536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mellis, Alexandra M. ; Athamneh, Liqa N. ; Stein, Jeffrey S. ; Sze, Yan Yan ; Epstein, Leonard H. ; Bickel, Warren K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mellis, Alexandra M. ; Athamneh, Liqa N. ; Stein, Jeffrey S. ; Sze, Yan Yan ; Epstein, Leonard H. ; Bickel, Warren K.</creatorcontrib><description>Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29959952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; bottled water ; Choice Behavior ; Cross-commodity ; Delay Discounting ; Demand ; Fast food ; Fast Foods ; Female ; health behavior ; Humans ; Impulsive Behavior ; Income ; Male ; Negative income shock ; Obesity ; purchasing ; Stress, Psychological</subject><ispartof>Appetite, 2018-10, Vol.129, p.155-161</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-1d62242ba9199732b3b496ebbd7972220d646c0ccf7f501c10693a9f854fd8ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-1d62242ba9199732b3b496ebbd7972220d646c0ccf7f501c10693a9f854fd8ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7466-8383 ; 0000-0002-3922-6934</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666318303817$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29959952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mellis, Alexandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athamneh, Liqa N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sze, Yan Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Leonard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickel, Warren K.</creatorcontrib><title>Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand</title><title>Appetite</title><addtitle>Appetite</addtitle><description>Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>bottled water</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cross-commodity</subject><subject>Delay Discounting</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Fast food</subject><subject>Fast Foods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>health behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impulsive Behavior</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Negative income shock</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>purchasing</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological</subject><issn>0195-6663</issn><issn>1095-8304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModlv9BYLk0psd8zHJJIJCKVqFRW_0OmSSM9usO5Npkl3ovzfTrUVvFAI5Ic95z8eL0CtKGkqofLtr7DxDaRihqiGyIZw9QStKtFgrTtqnaEVojaWU_Ayd57wjhHDRdc_RGdNa1MNW6HYDOeOQ8RgTvMNfYWtLOAIOk4sj4HwT3c_lkcBmqOA4gg-2AJ4TDJBgcguLXYpVpqaM0Ydyh33ILh6mEqYttpPHQ4weexhr_AI9G-w-w8uH-wL9-PTx-9Xn9ebb9Zery83aCaHKmnrJWMt6q6nWHWc971stoe99pzvGGPGylY44N3SDINRRIjW3elCiHbyyPb9AH06686GvTTuYSrJ7M6cw2nRnog3m758p3JhtPBpJhey0qgJvHgRSvD1ALmasU8F-byeIh2wY5VTJlkrxf5RIprgSXFaUn9D7ldUlPnZEiVl8NTtz76tZfDVEmuprzXr95zCPOb-NrMD7EwB1pccAyWQXFnd8SOCK8TH8s8Avb-q3YQ</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Mellis, Alexandra M.</creator><creator>Athamneh, Liqa N.</creator><creator>Stein, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Sze, Yan Yan</creator><creator>Epstein, Leonard H.</creator><creator>Bickel, Warren K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7466-8383</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-6934</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand</title><author>Mellis, Alexandra M. ; Athamneh, Liqa N. ; Stein, Jeffrey S. ; Sze, Yan Yan ; Epstein, Leonard H. ; Bickel, Warren K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-1d62242ba9199732b3b496ebbd7972220d646c0ccf7f501c10693a9f854fd8ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>bottled water</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cross-commodity</topic><topic>Delay Discounting</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Fast food</topic><topic>Fast Foods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>health behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impulsive Behavior</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Negative income shock</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>purchasing</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mellis, Alexandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athamneh, Liqa N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sze, Yan Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Leonard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickel, Warren K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Appetite</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mellis, Alexandra M.</au><au>Athamneh, Liqa N.</au><au>Stein, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Sze, Yan Yan</au><au>Epstein, Leonard H.</au><au>Bickel, Warren K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand</atitle><jtitle>Appetite</jtitle><addtitle>Appetite</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>129</volume><spage>155</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>155-161</pages><issn>0195-6663</issn><eissn>1095-8304</eissn><abstract>Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29959952</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.032</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7466-8383</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-6934</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6663
ispartof Appetite, 2018-10, Vol.129, p.155-161
issn 0195-6663
1095-8304
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6156798
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
bottled water
Choice Behavior
Cross-commodity
Delay Discounting
Demand
Fast food
Fast Foods
Female
health behavior
Humans
Impulsive Behavior
Income
Male
Negative income shock
Obesity
purchasing
Stress, Psychological
title Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T13%3A01%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Less%20is%20more:%20Negative%20income%20shock%20increases%20immediate%20preference%20in%20cross%20commodity%20discounting%20and%20food%20demand&rft.jtitle=Appetite&rft.au=Mellis,%20Alexandra%20M.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=129&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=155-161&rft.issn=0195-6663&rft.eissn=1095-8304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2062838536%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2062838536&rft_id=info:pmid/29959952&rft_els_id=S0195666318303817&rfr_iscdi=true