Physician Market Structure, Patient Outcomes, and Spending: An Examination of Medicare Beneficiaries

Objective To understand the impact of changes in physician market structure on clinical outcomes and health care utilization. Data Sources 2005–2012 Medicare fee‐for‐service claims and enrollment data. Study Design We consider the effect of cardiology market structure on utilization and health outco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health services research 2018-10, Vol.53 (5), p.3549-3568
Hauptverfasser: Koch, Thomas, Wendling, Brett, Wilson, Nathan E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3568
container_issue 5
container_start_page 3549
container_title Health services research
container_volume 53
creator Koch, Thomas
Wendling, Brett
Wilson, Nathan E.
description Objective To understand the impact of changes in physician market structure on clinical outcomes and health care utilization. Data Sources 2005–2012 Medicare fee‐for‐service claims and enrollment data. Study Design We consider the effect of cardiology market structure on utilization and health outcomes for four patient populations. We estimate the risk‐adjusted impact of competition using multivariate regression models. Principal Findings The study finds that an increase in consolidation leads to statistically and economically significant increases in negative health outcomes. For example, we find that moving from a zip code at the 25th percentile of cardiology market concentration to one at the 75th percentile would be associated with 5 to 7 percent increases in risk‐adjusted mortality for three of the sample populations. We also found higher expenditures in more concentrated markets. For example, moving from a zip code at the 25th percentile of cardiology market concentration to one at the 75th would be associated with 7 to 11 percent increases in expenditures, depending on sample population. Conclusions Our estimates indicate that increases in cardiology market concentration are associated with worse health outcomes and higher health care expenditures. Some effects may be attributed to vertical as well as horizontal changes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1475-6773.12825
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6153168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A558542156</galeid><sourcerecordid>A558542156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6855-2ad163ea619a6bda9ca9acd52278c6fc7d5063d20f2cd5da66b1a654c4ef06243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkvGL0zAUx4so3m76s79JQRCFddekTdreD8Ic807YscPpzyFLXrtom8ymPW__vamdY4WhCSTw8nnfPN77et4rFE6RW1coTkhAkySaIpxi8sQbHSNPvVEYoiTIEI4vvEtrv4dhmEZp_Ny7wFlESIbTkSfvt3urhOLav-P1D2j8dVO3omlrmPj3vFGgG3_VNsJUYCc-19Jf70BLpYtrf6b9xSOvlHac0b7J_TuQSvAa_I-gIe90awX2hfcs56WFl4d77H37tPg6vw2Wq5vP89kyEDQlJMBcIhoBpyjjdCN5JnjGhSQYJ6mguUgkCWkkcZhjF5Wc0g3ilMQihjykOI7G3oded9duKpDC1V7zku1qVfF6zwxXbPii1ZYV5oFRRCJEUyfw7iBQm58t2IZVygooS67BtJahLM0yFCWuf2PvTY8WvASmdG6couhwNiMkJTFGhDoqOEMVrjnue9O1yIUH_PQM77aESomzCe8HCY5p4LEpeGstS2-W_yrmwApTllAAc6OYr4b82xN-C7xsttaUbTdsOwQnJ-CmtUqDdYdVxbaxfS0D_KrHRW2srSE_TgiFrLM160zMOhOzP7Z2Ga9PB3vk__rYAbQHfrn-7P-nx24X6y-98m8Bev7W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989913729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physician Market Structure, Patient Outcomes, and Spending: An Examination of Medicare Beneficiaries</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Koch, Thomas ; Wendling, Brett ; Wilson, Nathan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koch, Thomas ; Wendling, Brett ; Wilson, Nathan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To understand the impact of changes in physician market structure on clinical outcomes and health care utilization. Data Sources 2005–2012 Medicare fee‐for‐service claims and enrollment data. Study Design We consider the effect of cardiology market structure on utilization and health outcomes for four patient populations. We estimate the risk‐adjusted impact of competition using multivariate regression models. Principal Findings The study finds that an increase in consolidation leads to statistically and economically significant increases in negative health outcomes. For example, we find that moving from a zip code at the 25th percentile of cardiology market concentration to one at the 75th percentile would be associated with 5 to 7 percent increases in risk‐adjusted mortality for three of the sample populations. We also found higher expenditures in more concentrated markets. For example, moving from a zip code at the 25th percentile of cardiology market concentration to one at the 75th would be associated with 7 to 11 percent increases in expenditures, depending on sample population. Conclusions Our estimates indicate that increases in cardiology market concentration are associated with worse health outcomes and higher health care expenditures. Some effects may be attributed to vertical as well as horizontal changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-6773</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12825</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29355928</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Health Research and Educational Trust</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiology ; Cardiology - economics ; Competition ; Economic Competition - economics ; Fee-for-Service Plans - economics ; Female ; Health aspects ; Health care costs ; Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Medical care, Cost of ; Medical research ; Medicare ; Medicare - economics ; Medicare: Cost, Quality, and Utilization ; Medicine, Experimental ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; physicians ; Residence Characteristics ; United States</subject><ispartof>Health services research, 2018-10, Vol.53 (5), p.3549-3568</ispartof><rights>Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA</rights><rights>Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6855-2ad163ea619a6bda9ca9acd52278c6fc7d5063d20f2cd5da66b1a654c4ef06243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6855-2ad163ea619a6bda9ca9acd52278c6fc7d5063d20f2cd5da66b1a654c4ef06243</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5548-9796</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153168/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153168/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29355928$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koch, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendling, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Nathan E.</creatorcontrib><title>Physician Market Structure, Patient Outcomes, and Spending: An Examination of Medicare Beneficiaries</title><title>Health services research</title><addtitle>Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>Objective To understand the impact of changes in physician market structure on clinical outcomes and health care utilization. Data Sources 2005–2012 Medicare fee‐for‐service claims and enrollment data. Study Design We consider the effect of cardiology market structure on utilization and health outcomes for four patient populations. We estimate the risk‐adjusted impact of competition using multivariate regression models. Principal Findings The study finds that an increase in consolidation leads to statistically and economically significant increases in negative health outcomes. For example, we find that moving from a zip code at the 25th percentile of cardiology market concentration to one at the 75th percentile would be associated with 5 to 7 percent increases in risk‐adjusted mortality for three of the sample populations. We also found higher expenditures in more concentrated markets. For example, moving from a zip code at the 25th percentile of cardiology market concentration to one at the 75th would be associated with 7 to 11 percent increases in expenditures, depending on sample population. Conclusions Our estimates indicate that increases in cardiology market concentration are associated with worse health outcomes and higher health care expenditures. Some effects may be attributed to vertical as well as horizontal changes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiology - economics</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Economic Competition - economics</subject><subject>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care, Cost of</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicare - economics</subject><subject>Medicare: Cost, Quality, and Utilization</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>physicians</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0017-9124</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkvGL0zAUx4so3m76s79JQRCFddekTdreD8Ic807YscPpzyFLXrtom8ymPW__vamdY4WhCSTw8nnfPN77et4rFE6RW1coTkhAkySaIpxi8sQbHSNPvVEYoiTIEI4vvEtrv4dhmEZp_Ny7wFlESIbTkSfvt3urhOLav-P1D2j8dVO3omlrmPj3vFGgG3_VNsJUYCc-19Jf70BLpYtrf6b9xSOvlHac0b7J_TuQSvAa_I-gIe90awX2hfcs56WFl4d77H37tPg6vw2Wq5vP89kyEDQlJMBcIhoBpyjjdCN5JnjGhSQYJ6mguUgkCWkkcZhjF5Wc0g3ilMQihjykOI7G3oded9duKpDC1V7zku1qVfF6zwxXbPii1ZYV5oFRRCJEUyfw7iBQm58t2IZVygooS67BtJahLM0yFCWuf2PvTY8WvASmdG6couhwNiMkJTFGhDoqOEMVrjnue9O1yIUH_PQM77aESomzCe8HCY5p4LEpeGstS2-W_yrmwApTllAAc6OYr4b82xN-C7xsttaUbTdsOwQnJ-CmtUqDdYdVxbaxfS0D_KrHRW2srSE_TgiFrLM160zMOhOzP7Z2Ga9PB3vk__rYAbQHfrn-7P-nx24X6y-98m8Bev7W</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Koch, Thomas</creator><creator>Wendling, Brett</creator><creator>Wilson, Nathan E.</creator><general>Health Research and Educational Trust</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5548-9796</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Physician Market Structure, Patient Outcomes, and Spending: An Examination of Medicare Beneficiaries</title><author>Koch, Thomas ; Wendling, Brett ; Wilson, Nathan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6855-2ad163ea619a6bda9ca9acd52278c6fc7d5063d20f2cd5da66b1a654c4ef06243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiology - economics</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Economic Competition - economics</topic><topic>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care, Cost of</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicare - economics</topic><topic>Medicare: Cost, Quality, and Utilization</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>physicians</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koch, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendling, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Nathan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koch, Thomas</au><au>Wendling, Brett</au><au>Wilson, Nathan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physician Market Structure, Patient Outcomes, and Spending: An Examination of Medicare Beneficiaries</atitle><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle><addtitle>Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3549</spage><epage>3568</epage><pages>3549-3568</pages><issn>0017-9124</issn><eissn>1475-6773</eissn><abstract>Objective To understand the impact of changes in physician market structure on clinical outcomes and health care utilization. Data Sources 2005–2012 Medicare fee‐for‐service claims and enrollment data. Study Design We consider the effect of cardiology market structure on utilization and health outcomes for four patient populations. We estimate the risk‐adjusted impact of competition using multivariate regression models. Principal Findings The study finds that an increase in consolidation leads to statistically and economically significant increases in negative health outcomes. For example, we find that moving from a zip code at the 25th percentile of cardiology market concentration to one at the 75th percentile would be associated with 5 to 7 percent increases in risk‐adjusted mortality for three of the sample populations. We also found higher expenditures in more concentrated markets. For example, moving from a zip code at the 25th percentile of cardiology market concentration to one at the 75th would be associated with 7 to 11 percent increases in expenditures, depending on sample population. Conclusions Our estimates indicate that increases in cardiology market concentration are associated with worse health outcomes and higher health care expenditures. Some effects may be attributed to vertical as well as horizontal changes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Health Research and Educational Trust</pub><pmid>29355928</pmid><doi>10.1111/1475-6773.12825</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5548-9796</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-9124
ispartof Health services research, 2018-10, Vol.53 (5), p.3549-3568
issn 0017-9124
1475-6773
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6153168
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Cardiology
Cardiology - economics
Competition
Economic Competition - economics
Fee-for-Service Plans - economics
Female
Health aspects
Health care costs
Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Medical care, Cost of
Medical research
Medicare
Medicare - economics
Medicare: Cost, Quality, and Utilization
Medicine, Experimental
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
physicians
Residence Characteristics
United States
title Physician Market Structure, Patient Outcomes, and Spending: An Examination of Medicare Beneficiaries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A43%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physician%20Market%20Structure,%20Patient%20Outcomes,%20and%20Spending:%20An%20Examination%20of%20Medicare%20Beneficiaries&rft.jtitle=Health%20services%20research&rft.au=Koch,%20Thomas&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3549&rft.epage=3568&rft.pages=3549-3568&rft.issn=0017-9124&rft.eissn=1475-6773&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-6773.12825&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA558542156%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989913729&rft_id=info:pmid/29355928&rft_galeid=A558542156&rfr_iscdi=true