Human virus and microbial indicator occurrence in public-supply groundwater systems: meta-analysis of 12 international studies

Groundwater quality is often evaluated using microbial indicators. This study examines data from 12 international groundwater studies (conducted 1992–2013) of 718 public drinking-water systems located in a range of hydrogeological settings. Focus was on testing the value of indicator organisms for i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrogeology journal 2017-06, Vol.25 (4), p.903-919
Hauptverfasser: Fout, G. Shay, Borchardt, Mark A., Kieke, Burney A., Karim, Mohammad R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 919
container_issue 4
container_start_page 903
container_title Hydrogeology journal
container_volume 25
creator Fout, G. Shay
Borchardt, Mark A.
Kieke, Burney A.
Karim, Mohammad R.
description Groundwater quality is often evaluated using microbial indicators. This study examines data from 12 international groundwater studies (conducted 1992–2013) of 718 public drinking-water systems located in a range of hydrogeological settings. Focus was on testing the value of indicator organisms for identifying virus-contaminated wells. One or more indicators and viruses were present in 37 and 15% of 2,273 samples and 44 and 27% of 746 wells, respectively. Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) and somatic coliphage are 7–9 times more likely to be associated with culturable virus-positive samples when the indicator is present versus when it is absent, while F-specific and somatic coliphages are 8–9 times more likely to be associated with culturable virus-positive wells. However, single indicators are only marginally associated with viruses detected by molecular methods, and all microbial indicators have low sensitivity and positive predictive values for virus occurrence, whether by culturable or molecular assays, i.e., indicators are often absent when viruses are present and the indicators have a high false-positive rate. Wells were divided into three susceptibility subsets based on presence of (1) total coliform bacteria or (2) multiple indicators, or (3) location of wells in karst, fractured bedrock, or gravel/cobble settings. Better associations of some indicators with viruses were observed for (1) and (3). Findings indicate the best indicators are E. coli or somatic coliphage, although both indicators may underestimate virus occurrence. Repeat sampling for indicators improves evaluation of the potential for viral contamination in a well.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10040-017-1581-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6145489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1900035663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-e932b311095aa4f665c8be883e7745ae55e0d1a75f896915e8e0fd225467f0803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ksFu1DAQhi0EomXhAbggCy5cAp44ThwOlVAFFKkSFzhbXmeydZXYi8cp2gvPjpeUqiBxsa3xN_-MPT9jz0G8ASG6t1TWRlQCugqUhko9YKfQSFUiqnv4-wxVDV1zwp4QXYtCQycfsxMp6kaVjFP282KZbeA3Pi3EbRj47F2KW28n7sPgnc0x8ejckhIGhyXI98t28q6iZb-fDnyX4hKGHzZj4nSgjDO94zNmW9lgpwN54nHkUJfMggSbfSxxTnkZPNJT9mi0E-Gz233Dvn388PX8orr88unz-fvLyioQucJe1lsJIHplbTO2rXJ6i1pL7LpGWVQKxQC2U6Pu2x4UahTjUNeqabtRaCE37GzVLc3PODgMOdnJ7JOfbTqYaL35-yb4K7OLN6aFRjW6LwIvV4FI2RtyPqO7cjEEdNlAW8sWZIFe31ZJ8fuClM3syeE02YBxIVOXCahe64Jv2Kt_0Ou4lO-ZyEBfMKna9igIK1VmQpRwvOsYhDlawKwWMMUC5mgBo0rOi_tPvcv4M_MC1CtA5SrsMN0r_V_VX4oLvaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1900035663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human virus and microbial indicator occurrence in public-supply groundwater systems: meta-analysis of 12 international studies</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Fout, G. Shay ; Borchardt, Mark A. ; Kieke, Burney A. ; Karim, Mohammad R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fout, G. Shay ; Borchardt, Mark A. ; Kieke, Burney A. ; Karim, Mohammad R. ; US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Cincinnati, OH (United States) ; Oak Ridge Inst. for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Groundwater quality is often evaluated using microbial indicators. This study examines data from 12 international groundwater studies (conducted 1992–2013) of 718 public drinking-water systems located in a range of hydrogeological settings. Focus was on testing the value of indicator organisms for identifying virus-contaminated wells. One or more indicators and viruses were present in 37 and 15% of 2,273 samples and 44 and 27% of 746 wells, respectively. Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) and somatic coliphage are 7–9 times more likely to be associated with culturable virus-positive samples when the indicator is present versus when it is absent, while F-specific and somatic coliphages are 8–9 times more likely to be associated with culturable virus-positive wells. However, single indicators are only marginally associated with viruses detected by molecular methods, and all microbial indicators have low sensitivity and positive predictive values for virus occurrence, whether by culturable or molecular assays, i.e., indicators are often absent when viruses are present and the indicators have a high false-positive rate. Wells were divided into three susceptibility subsets based on presence of (1) total coliform bacteria or (2) multiple indicators, or (3) location of wells in karst, fractured bedrock, or gravel/cobble settings. Better associations of some indicators with viruses were observed for (1) and (3). Findings indicate the best indicators are E. coli or somatic coliphage, although both indicators may underestimate virus occurrence. Repeat sampling for indicators improves evaluation of the potential for viral contamination in a well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1431-2174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10040-017-1581-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30245581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; Aquatic Pollution ; Aquifers ; Bacteria ; BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES ; Bedrock ; coliform bacteria ; Coliforms ; coliphages ; Contamination ; Drinking water ; E coli ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Enteric virus ; Escherichia coli ; Evaluation ; Fractures ; Geology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; GEOSCIENCES ; Gravel ; Groundwater ; Groundwater data ; Groundwater quality ; Groundwater studies ; Health ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Indicator species ; Indicators ; International ; International studies ; Karst ; karsts ; Meta-analysis ; Microbial indicators ; Microorganisms ; Pollution ; vertebrate viruses ; Viruses ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water quality ; Water Quality/Water Pollution ; Water Resources ; Water supply ; Wells</subject><ispartof>Hydrogeology journal, 2017-06, Vol.25 (4), p.903-919</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>Hydrogeology Journal is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-e932b311095aa4f665c8be883e7745ae55e0d1a75f896915e8e0fd225467f0803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-e932b311095aa4f665c8be883e7745ae55e0d1a75f896915e8e0fd225467f0803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10040-017-1581-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10040-017-1581-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30245581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1623613$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fout, G. Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borchardt, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieke, Burney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karim, Mohammad R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Cincinnati, OH (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge Inst. for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Human virus and microbial indicator occurrence in public-supply groundwater systems: meta-analysis of 12 international studies</title><title>Hydrogeology journal</title><addtitle>Hydrogeol J</addtitle><addtitle>Hydrogeol J</addtitle><description>Groundwater quality is often evaluated using microbial indicators. This study examines data from 12 international groundwater studies (conducted 1992–2013) of 718 public drinking-water systems located in a range of hydrogeological settings. Focus was on testing the value of indicator organisms for identifying virus-contaminated wells. One or more indicators and viruses were present in 37 and 15% of 2,273 samples and 44 and 27% of 746 wells, respectively. Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) and somatic coliphage are 7–9 times more likely to be associated with culturable virus-positive samples when the indicator is present versus when it is absent, while F-specific and somatic coliphages are 8–9 times more likely to be associated with culturable virus-positive wells. However, single indicators are only marginally associated with viruses detected by molecular methods, and all microbial indicators have low sensitivity and positive predictive values for virus occurrence, whether by culturable or molecular assays, i.e., indicators are often absent when viruses are present and the indicators have a high false-positive rate. Wells were divided into three susceptibility subsets based on presence of (1) total coliform bacteria or (2) multiple indicators, or (3) location of wells in karst, fractured bedrock, or gravel/cobble settings. Better associations of some indicators with viruses were observed for (1) and (3). Findings indicate the best indicators are E. coli or somatic coliphage, although both indicators may underestimate virus occurrence. Repeat sampling for indicators improves evaluation of the potential for viral contamination in a well.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Bedrock</subject><subject>coliform bacteria</subject><subject>Coliforms</subject><subject>coliphages</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Enteric virus</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>GEOSCIENCES</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater data</subject><subject>Groundwater quality</subject><subject>Groundwater studies</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Indicator species</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>International studies</subject><subject>Karst</subject><subject>karsts</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Microbial indicators</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>vertebrate viruses</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><subject>Water Resources</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Wells</subject><issn>1431-2174</issn><issn>1435-0157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ksFu1DAQhi0EomXhAbggCy5cAp44ThwOlVAFFKkSFzhbXmeydZXYi8cp2gvPjpeUqiBxsa3xN_-MPT9jz0G8ASG6t1TWRlQCugqUhko9YKfQSFUiqnv4-wxVDV1zwp4QXYtCQycfsxMp6kaVjFP282KZbeA3Pi3EbRj47F2KW28n7sPgnc0x8ejckhIGhyXI98t28q6iZb-fDnyX4hKGHzZj4nSgjDO94zNmW9lgpwN54nHkUJfMggSbfSxxTnkZPNJT9mi0E-Gz233Dvn388PX8orr88unz-fvLyioQucJe1lsJIHplbTO2rXJ6i1pL7LpGWVQKxQC2U6Pu2x4UahTjUNeqabtRaCE37GzVLc3PODgMOdnJ7JOfbTqYaL35-yb4K7OLN6aFRjW6LwIvV4FI2RtyPqO7cjEEdNlAW8sWZIFe31ZJ8fuClM3syeE02YBxIVOXCahe64Jv2Kt_0Ou4lO-ZyEBfMKna9igIK1VmQpRwvOsYhDlawKwWMMUC5mgBo0rOi_tPvcv4M_MC1CtA5SrsMN0r_V_VX4oLvaQ</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Fout, G. Shay</creator><creator>Borchardt, Mark A.</creator><creator>Kieke, Burney A.</creator><creator>Karim, Mohammad R.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Human virus and microbial indicator occurrence in public-supply groundwater systems: meta-analysis of 12 international studies</title><author>Fout, G. Shay ; Borchardt, Mark A. ; Kieke, Burney A. ; Karim, Mohammad R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-e932b311095aa4f665c8be883e7745ae55e0d1a75f896915e8e0fd225467f0803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Bedrock</topic><topic>coliform bacteria</topic><topic>Coliforms</topic><topic>coliphages</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Enteric virus</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>GEOSCIENCES</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater data</topic><topic>Groundwater quality</topic><topic>Groundwater studies</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Indicator species</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>International studies</topic><topic>Karst</topic><topic>karsts</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Microbial indicators</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>vertebrate viruses</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><topic>Water Resources</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fout, G. Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borchardt, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieke, Burney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karim, Mohammad R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Cincinnati, OH (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge Inst. for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hydrogeology journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fout, G. Shay</au><au>Borchardt, Mark A.</au><au>Kieke, Burney A.</au><au>Karim, Mohammad R.</au><aucorp>US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Cincinnati, OH (United States)</aucorp><aucorp>Oak Ridge Inst. for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human virus and microbial indicator occurrence in public-supply groundwater systems: meta-analysis of 12 international studies</atitle><jtitle>Hydrogeology journal</jtitle><stitle>Hydrogeol J</stitle><addtitle>Hydrogeol J</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>903</spage><epage>919</epage><pages>903-919</pages><issn>1431-2174</issn><eissn>1435-0157</eissn><abstract>Groundwater quality is often evaluated using microbial indicators. This study examines data from 12 international groundwater studies (conducted 1992–2013) of 718 public drinking-water systems located in a range of hydrogeological settings. Focus was on testing the value of indicator organisms for identifying virus-contaminated wells. One or more indicators and viruses were present in 37 and 15% of 2,273 samples and 44 and 27% of 746 wells, respectively. Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) and somatic coliphage are 7–9 times more likely to be associated with culturable virus-positive samples when the indicator is present versus when it is absent, while F-specific and somatic coliphages are 8–9 times more likely to be associated with culturable virus-positive wells. However, single indicators are only marginally associated with viruses detected by molecular methods, and all microbial indicators have low sensitivity and positive predictive values for virus occurrence, whether by culturable or molecular assays, i.e., indicators are often absent when viruses are present and the indicators have a high false-positive rate. Wells were divided into three susceptibility subsets based on presence of (1) total coliform bacteria or (2) multiple indicators, or (3) location of wells in karst, fractured bedrock, or gravel/cobble settings. Better associations of some indicators with viruses were observed for (1) and (3). Findings indicate the best indicators are E. coli or somatic coliphage, although both indicators may underestimate virus occurrence. Repeat sampling for indicators improves evaluation of the potential for viral contamination in a well.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>30245581</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10040-017-1581-5</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1431-2174
ispartof Hydrogeology journal, 2017-06, Vol.25 (4), p.903-919
issn 1431-2174
1435-0157
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6145489
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
Aquatic Pollution
Aquifers
Bacteria
BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Bedrock
coliform bacteria
Coliforms
coliphages
Contamination
Drinking water
E coli
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Enteric virus
Escherichia coli
Evaluation
Fractures
Geology
Geophysics/Geodesy
GEOSCIENCES
Gravel
Groundwater
Groundwater data
Groundwater quality
Groundwater studies
Health
Hydrogeology
Hydrology/Water Resources
Indicator species
Indicators
International
International studies
Karst
karsts
Meta-analysis
Microbial indicators
Microorganisms
Pollution
vertebrate viruses
Viruses
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
Water quality
Water Quality/Water Pollution
Water Resources
Water supply
Wells
title Human virus and microbial indicator occurrence in public-supply groundwater systems: meta-analysis of 12 international studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A13%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20virus%20and%20microbial%20indicator%20occurrence%20in%20public-supply%20groundwater%20systems:%20meta-analysis%20of%2012%20international%20studies&rft.jtitle=Hydrogeology%20journal&rft.au=Fout,%20G.%20Shay&rft.aucorp=US%20Environmental%20Protection%20Agency%20(EPA),%20Cincinnati,%20OH%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=903&rft.epage=919&rft.pages=903-919&rft.issn=1431-2174&rft.eissn=1435-0157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10040-017-1581-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1900035663%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1900035663&rft_id=info:pmid/30245581&rfr_iscdi=true