Assessing Model Characterization of Single Source Secondary Pollutant Impacts Using 2013 SENEX Field Study Measurements

Aircraft measurements made downwind from specific coal fired power plants during the 2013 Southeast Nexus field campaign provide a unique opportunity to evaluate single source photochemical model predictions of both O3 and secondary PM2.5 species. The model did well at predicting downwind plume plac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2017-04, Vol.51 (7), p.3833-3842
Hauptverfasser: Baker, Kirk R, Woody, Matthew C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3842
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3833
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 51
creator Baker, Kirk R
Woody, Matthew C
description Aircraft measurements made downwind from specific coal fired power plants during the 2013 Southeast Nexus field campaign provide a unique opportunity to evaluate single source photochemical model predictions of both O3 and secondary PM2.5 species. The model did well at predicting downwind plume placement. The model shows similar patterns of an increasing fraction of PM2.5 sulfate ion to the sum of SO2 and PM2.5 sulfate ion by distance from the source compared with ambient based estimates. The model was less consistent in capturing downwind ambient based trends in conversion of NO X to NO Y from these sources. Source sensitivity approaches capture near-source O3 titration by fresh NO emissions, in particular subgrid plume treatment. However, capturing this near-source chemical feature did not translate into better downwind peak estimates of single source O3 impacts. The model estimated O3 production from these sources but often was lower than ambient based source production. The downwind transect ambient measurements, in particular secondary PM2.5 and O3, have some level of contribution from other sources which makes direct comparison with model source contribution challenging. Model source attribution results suggest contribution to secondary pollutants from multiple sources even where primary pollutants indicate the presence of a single source.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.6b05069
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6145072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1873403315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-d13e12e28e6d75d8c271572d130dd6d59bb9f378045bbb46ac941811d1699c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1rFDEUxYModlt99k0Cvggy23xOkhehLFsttCpshb6FTHK3nTIz2SYzSvvXm3XX-gE-Xcj9nXNz70HoFSVzShg9dj7PIY_zuiGS1OYJmlHJSCW1pE_RjBDKK8PrqwN0mPMtIYRxop-jA6aZ0MSoGfp-kjPk3A7X-CIG6PDixiXnR0jtgxvbOOC4xqvS7gCv4pR8KeDjEFy6x19i102jG0Z81m-KKOOvP51YmYtXy0_LK3zaQhfwapzCPb4Al6cEPQxjfoGerV2X4eW-HqHL0-Xl4mN1_vnD2eLkvHJCqrEKlANlwDTUQcmgPVNUKlaeSQh1kKZpzJorTYRsmkbUzhtBNaWB1sZ4wo_Q-53tZmp6CL6MTq6zm9T2ZQEbXWv_7gztjb2O32xNhSSKFYO3e4MU76Zyatu32UPXuQHilC3VigvCOZUFffMPelsONpTtCmWMEEwoU6jjHeVTzDnB-vEzlNhtprZkarfqfaZF8frPHR75XyEW4N0O2Cp_z_yP3Q-jq62D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899442479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Model Characterization of Single Source Secondary Pollutant Impacts Using 2013 SENEX Field Study Measurements</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Baker, Kirk R ; Woody, Matthew C</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Kirk R ; Woody, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><description>Aircraft measurements made downwind from specific coal fired power plants during the 2013 Southeast Nexus field campaign provide a unique opportunity to evaluate single source photochemical model predictions of both O3 and secondary PM2.5 species. The model did well at predicting downwind plume placement. The model shows similar patterns of an increasing fraction of PM2.5 sulfate ion to the sum of SO2 and PM2.5 sulfate ion by distance from the source compared with ambient based estimates. The model was less consistent in capturing downwind ambient based trends in conversion of NO X to NO Y from these sources. Source sensitivity approaches capture near-source O3 titration by fresh NO emissions, in particular subgrid plume treatment. However, capturing this near-source chemical feature did not translate into better downwind peak estimates of single source O3 impacts. The model estimated O3 production from these sources but often was lower than ambient based source production. The downwind transect ambient measurements, in particular secondary PM2.5 and O3, have some level of contribution from other sources which makes direct comparison with model source contribution challenging. Model source attribution results suggest contribution to secondary pollutants from multiple sources even where primary pollutants indicate the presence of a single source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05069</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28248097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants ; Aircraft ; Coal-fired power plants ; Electric power generation ; Electric power plants ; Emissions ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Monitoring ; Impact analysis ; Mathematical models ; Measurement ; Models, Theoretical ; Photochemicals ; Photochemistry ; Pollutants ; Pollution sources ; Power plants ; Predictions ; Sulfates ; Sulfur dioxide ; Titration</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2017-04, Vol.51 (7), p.3833-3842</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 U.S. Government</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Apr 4, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-d13e12e28e6d75d8c271572d130dd6d59bb9f378045bbb46ac941811d1699c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-d13e12e28e6d75d8c271572d130dd6d59bb9f378045bbb46ac941811d1699c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4417-6799</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.6b05069$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6b05069$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,2766,27080,27928,27929,56742,56792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28248097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Kirk R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woody, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Model Characterization of Single Source Secondary Pollutant Impacts Using 2013 SENEX Field Study Measurements</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Aircraft measurements made downwind from specific coal fired power plants during the 2013 Southeast Nexus field campaign provide a unique opportunity to evaluate single source photochemical model predictions of both O3 and secondary PM2.5 species. The model did well at predicting downwind plume placement. The model shows similar patterns of an increasing fraction of PM2.5 sulfate ion to the sum of SO2 and PM2.5 sulfate ion by distance from the source compared with ambient based estimates. The model was less consistent in capturing downwind ambient based trends in conversion of NO X to NO Y from these sources. Source sensitivity approaches capture near-source O3 titration by fresh NO emissions, in particular subgrid plume treatment. However, capturing this near-source chemical feature did not translate into better downwind peak estimates of single source O3 impacts. The model estimated O3 production from these sources but often was lower than ambient based source production. The downwind transect ambient measurements, in particular secondary PM2.5 and O3, have some level of contribution from other sources which makes direct comparison with model source contribution challenging. Model source attribution results suggest contribution to secondary pollutants from multiple sources even where primary pollutants indicate the presence of a single source.</description><subject>Air Pollutants</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Electric power plants</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Photochemicals</subject><subject>Photochemistry</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution sources</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Sulfur dioxide</subject><subject>Titration</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd1rFDEUxYModlt99k0Cvggy23xOkhehLFsttCpshb6FTHK3nTIz2SYzSvvXm3XX-gE-Xcj9nXNz70HoFSVzShg9dj7PIY_zuiGS1OYJmlHJSCW1pE_RjBDKK8PrqwN0mPMtIYRxop-jA6aZ0MSoGfp-kjPk3A7X-CIG6PDixiXnR0jtgxvbOOC4xqvS7gCv4pR8KeDjEFy6x19i102jG0Z81m-KKOOvP51YmYtXy0_LK3zaQhfwapzCPb4Al6cEPQxjfoGerV2X4eW-HqHL0-Xl4mN1_vnD2eLkvHJCqrEKlANlwDTUQcmgPVNUKlaeSQh1kKZpzJorTYRsmkbUzhtBNaWB1sZ4wo_Q-53tZmp6CL6MTq6zm9T2ZQEbXWv_7gztjb2O32xNhSSKFYO3e4MU76Zyatu32UPXuQHilC3VigvCOZUFffMPelsONpTtCmWMEEwoU6jjHeVTzDnB-vEzlNhtprZkarfqfaZF8frPHR75XyEW4N0O2Cp_z_yP3Q-jq62D</recordid><startdate>20170404</startdate><enddate>20170404</enddate><creator>Baker, Kirk R</creator><creator>Woody, Matthew C</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4417-6799</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170404</creationdate><title>Assessing Model Characterization of Single Source Secondary Pollutant Impacts Using 2013 SENEX Field Study Measurements</title><author>Baker, Kirk R ; Woody, Matthew C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a457t-d13e12e28e6d75d8c271572d130dd6d59bb9f378045bbb46ac941811d1699c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Electric power plants</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Photochemicals</topic><topic>Photochemistry</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution sources</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Sulfur dioxide</topic><topic>Titration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Kirk R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woody, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Kirk R</au><au>Woody, Matthew C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Model Characterization of Single Source Secondary Pollutant Impacts Using 2013 SENEX Field Study Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2017-04-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3833</spage><epage>3842</epage><pages>3833-3842</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>Aircraft measurements made downwind from specific coal fired power plants during the 2013 Southeast Nexus field campaign provide a unique opportunity to evaluate single source photochemical model predictions of both O3 and secondary PM2.5 species. The model did well at predicting downwind plume placement. The model shows similar patterns of an increasing fraction of PM2.5 sulfate ion to the sum of SO2 and PM2.5 sulfate ion by distance from the source compared with ambient based estimates. The model was less consistent in capturing downwind ambient based trends in conversion of NO X to NO Y from these sources. Source sensitivity approaches capture near-source O3 titration by fresh NO emissions, in particular subgrid plume treatment. However, capturing this near-source chemical feature did not translate into better downwind peak estimates of single source O3 impacts. The model estimated O3 production from these sources but often was lower than ambient based source production. The downwind transect ambient measurements, in particular secondary PM2.5 and O3, have some level of contribution from other sources which makes direct comparison with model source contribution challenging. Model source attribution results suggest contribution to secondary pollutants from multiple sources even where primary pollutants indicate the presence of a single source.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>28248097</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.6b05069</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4417-6799</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2017-04, Vol.51 (7), p.3833-3842
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6145072
source MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Air Pollutants
Aircraft
Coal-fired power plants
Electric power generation
Electric power plants
Emissions
Environmental impact
Environmental Monitoring
Impact analysis
Mathematical models
Measurement
Models, Theoretical
Photochemicals
Photochemistry
Pollutants
Pollution sources
Power plants
Predictions
Sulfates
Sulfur dioxide
Titration
title Assessing Model Characterization of Single Source Secondary Pollutant Impacts Using 2013 SENEX Field Study Measurements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T06%3A29%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Model%20Characterization%20of%20Single%20Source%20Secondary%20Pollutant%20Impacts%20Using%202013%20SENEX%20Field%20Study%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Baker,%20Kirk%20R&rft.date=2017-04-04&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3833&rft.epage=3842&rft.pages=3833-3842&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.6b05069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1873403315%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899442479&rft_id=info:pmid/28248097&rfr_iscdi=true