Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network
BACKGROUND:Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement. OBJECTIVE:We describe and reflect on our patient stakehold...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical care 2018-10, Vol.56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1), p.S58-S63 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S63 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | S58 |
container_title | Medical care |
container_volume | 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1 |
creator | Warren, Nathaniel T Gaudino, James A Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja Dickerson, Kristin Robbins, Lynn Norman, Kathy Lind, John D’Amato, Sele Foley, Perry Gold, Rachel Bauer, Vance Fields, Scott A Cohen, Deborah J Clark, Khaya D DeVoe, Jennifer E |
description | BACKGROUND:Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement.
OBJECTIVE:We describe and reflect on our patient stakeholder groups, engagement framework, experiences, and lessons learned in engaging patients in research, from generating proposal ideas to disseminating findings.
SETTING:The ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network) clinical data research network is the nation’s largest clinical dataset on the safety net, with outpatient clinical data from 122 health systems (1109 clinics) in 23 states.
RESULTS:Patients stakeholders codeveloped the ADVANCE engagement framework and its implementation in partnership with network leaders. In phase I of ADVANCE, patients were involved with designing studies (input on primary outcome measures and methods) and usability testing (of the patient portal). In phase II, the network is prioritizing research training, dissemination opportunities, an “ambassador” program to pair more experienced patient stakeholders with those less experienced, and evaluation of engagement activities and impacts.
DISCUSSION:The ADVANCE framework for patient engagement has successfully involved a diverse group of patients in the design, implementation, and interpretation of comparative effectiveness research. Our experience and framework can be used by other organizations and research networks to support patient engagement activities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000791 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6136943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2083707603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3181-d4234b9b0ccd00e6705179f5271d4ca85082aab48395b2617cc0b2395cf9469d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyBkiQuXFH8mMQekJd0C0rag8nG1HMfZ9daxi5101X9fr7asSg_4Mh7NM69m5gXgNUYnGInq_fny8gQ9fJXAT8AMc1oVWLD6KZghRHhR5cIReJHSBiFcUU6egyOaaSY4nYHNp8m6zvoVPDfK59hPDn5XozV-hAu_Uisz7L7Ww0uTjIp6_QE2Khn4Y5y6W3gWwwDnp7_nF80CNs56q5WDp2pUBx5emHEb4tVL8KxXLplX9_EY_Dpb_Gy-FMtvn78282WhKa5x0TFCWStapHWHkCkrxHElek4q3DGtao5qolTLaip4S0pcaY1akhPdC1aKjh6Dj3vd66kdTKfz-FE5eR3toOKtDMrKfyveruUq3MgS01IwmgXe3QvE8GcyaZSDTdo4p7wJU5IE1TRftUQ79O0jdBOm6PN6kuASI17mQ2eK7SkdQ0rR9IdhMJI7M2U2Uz42M7e9ebjIoemvexmo98A2uNHEdOWmrYlybZQb1__XvgM3Waon</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161056074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Warren, Nathaniel T ; Gaudino, James A ; Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja ; Dickerson, Kristin ; Robbins, Lynn ; Norman, Kathy ; Lind, John ; D’Amato, Sele ; Foley, Perry ; Gold, Rachel ; Bauer, Vance ; Fields, Scott A ; Cohen, Deborah J ; Clark, Khaya D ; DeVoe, Jennifer E</creator><creatorcontrib>Warren, Nathaniel T ; Gaudino, James A ; Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja ; Dickerson, Kristin ; Robbins, Lynn ; Norman, Kathy ; Lind, John ; D’Amato, Sele ; Foley, Perry ; Gold, Rachel ; Bauer, Vance ; Fields, Scott A ; Cohen, Deborah J ; Clark, Khaya D ; DeVoe, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement.
OBJECTIVE:We describe and reflect on our patient stakeholder groups, engagement framework, experiences, and lessons learned in engaging patients in research, from generating proposal ideas to disseminating findings.
SETTING:The ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network) clinical data research network is the nation’s largest clinical dataset on the safety net, with outpatient clinical data from 122 health systems (1109 clinics) in 23 states.
RESULTS:Patients stakeholders codeveloped the ADVANCE engagement framework and its implementation in partnership with network leaders. In phase I of ADVANCE, patients were involved with designing studies (input on primary outcome measures and methods) and usability testing (of the patient portal). In phase II, the network is prioritizing research training, dissemination opportunities, an “ambassador” program to pair more experienced patient stakeholders with those less experienced, and evaluation of engagement activities and impacts.
DISCUSSION:The ADVANCE framework for patient engagement has successfully involved a diverse group of patients in the design, implementation, and interpretation of comparative effectiveness research. Our experience and framework can be used by other organizations and research networks to support patient engagement activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000791</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30074953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Case studies ; Community-Institutional Relations ; Comparative Effectiveness Research - organization & administration ; Datasets ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Studies ; Measurement methods ; Medical research ; Original ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data ; Patient-Centered Care - organization & administration ; Patients ; Social Networking ; Stakeholder Participation ; Stakeholders ; Test procedures ; United States</subject><ispartof>Medical care, 2018-10, Vol.56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1), p.S58-S63</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies Oct 2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3181-d4234b9b0ccd00e6705179f5271d4ca85082aab48395b2617cc0b2395cf9469d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30074953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warren, Nathaniel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudino, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lind, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Amato, Sele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Perry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Vance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Khaya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeVoe, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><title>Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network</title><title>Medical care</title><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement.
OBJECTIVE:We describe and reflect on our patient stakeholder groups, engagement framework, experiences, and lessons learned in engaging patients in research, from generating proposal ideas to disseminating findings.
SETTING:The ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network) clinical data research network is the nation’s largest clinical dataset on the safety net, with outpatient clinical data from 122 health systems (1109 clinics) in 23 states.
RESULTS:Patients stakeholders codeveloped the ADVANCE engagement framework and its implementation in partnership with network leaders. In phase I of ADVANCE, patients were involved with designing studies (input on primary outcome measures and methods) and usability testing (of the patient portal). In phase II, the network is prioritizing research training, dissemination opportunities, an “ambassador” program to pair more experienced patient stakeholders with those less experienced, and evaluation of engagement activities and impacts.
DISCUSSION:The ADVANCE framework for patient engagement has successfully involved a diverse group of patients in the design, implementation, and interpretation of comparative effectiveness research. Our experience and framework can be used by other organizations and research networks to support patient engagement activities.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Community-Institutional Relations</subject><subject>Comparative Effectiveness Research - organization & administration</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Studies</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient-Centered Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Social Networking</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0025-7079</issn><issn>1537-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyBkiQuXFH8mMQekJd0C0rag8nG1HMfZ9daxi5101X9fr7asSg_4Mh7NM69m5gXgNUYnGInq_fny8gQ9fJXAT8AMc1oVWLD6KZghRHhR5cIReJHSBiFcUU6egyOaaSY4nYHNp8m6zvoVPDfK59hPDn5XozV-hAu_Uisz7L7Ww0uTjIp6_QE2Khn4Y5y6W3gWwwDnp7_nF80CNs56q5WDp2pUBx5emHEb4tVL8KxXLplX9_EY_Dpb_Gy-FMtvn78282WhKa5x0TFCWStapHWHkCkrxHElek4q3DGtao5qolTLaip4S0pcaY1akhPdC1aKjh6Dj3vd66kdTKfz-FE5eR3toOKtDMrKfyveruUq3MgS01IwmgXe3QvE8GcyaZSDTdo4p7wJU5IE1TRftUQ79O0jdBOm6PN6kuASI17mQ2eK7SkdQ0rR9IdhMJI7M2U2Uz42M7e9ebjIoemvexmo98A2uNHEdOWmrYlybZQb1__XvgM3Waon</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Warren, Nathaniel T</creator><creator>Gaudino, James A</creator><creator>Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja</creator><creator>Dickerson, Kristin</creator><creator>Robbins, Lynn</creator><creator>Norman, Kathy</creator><creator>Lind, John</creator><creator>D’Amato, Sele</creator><creator>Foley, Perry</creator><creator>Gold, Rachel</creator><creator>Bauer, Vance</creator><creator>Fields, Scott A</creator><creator>Cohen, Deborah J</creator><creator>Clark, Khaya D</creator><creator>DeVoe, Jennifer E</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network</title><author>Warren, Nathaniel T ; Gaudino, James A ; Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja ; Dickerson, Kristin ; Robbins, Lynn ; Norman, Kathy ; Lind, John ; D’Amato, Sele ; Foley, Perry ; Gold, Rachel ; Bauer, Vance ; Fields, Scott A ; Cohen, Deborah J ; Clark, Khaya D ; DeVoe, Jennifer E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3181-d4234b9b0ccd00e6705179f5271d4ca85082aab48395b2617cc0b2395cf9469d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Community-Institutional Relations</topic><topic>Comparative Effectiveness Research - organization & administration</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Studies</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient-Centered Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Social Networking</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warren, Nathaniel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudino, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lind, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Amato, Sele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Perry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Vance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Khaya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeVoe, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warren, Nathaniel T</au><au>Gaudino, James A</au><au>Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja</au><au>Dickerson, Kristin</au><au>Robbins, Lynn</au><au>Norman, Kathy</au><au>Lind, John</au><au>D’Amato, Sele</au><au>Foley, Perry</au><au>Gold, Rachel</au><au>Bauer, Vance</au><au>Fields, Scott A</au><au>Cohen, Deborah J</au><au>Clark, Khaya D</au><au>DeVoe, Jennifer E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network</atitle><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>S58</spage><epage>S63</epage><pages>S58-S63</pages><issn>0025-7079</issn><eissn>1537-1948</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement.
OBJECTIVE:We describe and reflect on our patient stakeholder groups, engagement framework, experiences, and lessons learned in engaging patients in research, from generating proposal ideas to disseminating findings.
SETTING:The ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network) clinical data research network is the nation’s largest clinical dataset on the safety net, with outpatient clinical data from 122 health systems (1109 clinics) in 23 states.
RESULTS:Patients stakeholders codeveloped the ADVANCE engagement framework and its implementation in partnership with network leaders. In phase I of ADVANCE, patients were involved with designing studies (input on primary outcome measures and methods) and usability testing (of the patient portal). In phase II, the network is prioritizing research training, dissemination opportunities, an “ambassador” program to pair more experienced patient stakeholders with those less experienced, and evaluation of engagement activities and impacts.
DISCUSSION:The ADVANCE framework for patient engagement has successfully involved a diverse group of patients in the design, implementation, and interpretation of comparative effectiveness research. Our experience and framework can be used by other organizations and research networks to support patient engagement activities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>30074953</pmid><doi>10.1097/MLR.0000000000000791</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7079 |
ispartof | Medical care, 2018-10, Vol.56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1), p.S58-S63 |
issn | 0025-7079 1537-1948 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6136943 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Best practice Case studies Community-Institutional Relations Comparative Effectiveness Research - organization & administration Datasets Humans Interdisciplinary Studies Measurement methods Medical research Original Patient Outcome Assessment Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data Patient-Centered Care - organization & administration Patients Social Networking Stakeholder Participation Stakeholders Test procedures United States |
title | Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T02%3A55%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20Meaningful%20Patient%20Engagement%20in%20Research:%20Case%20Study%20From%20ADVANCE%20Clinical%20Data%20Research%20Network&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care&rft.au=Warren,%20Nathaniel%20T&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=56%20Suppl%2010%20Suppl%201&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=S58&rft.epage=S63&rft.pages=S58-S63&rft.issn=0025-7079&rft.eissn=1537-1948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000791&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2083707603%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161056074&rft_id=info:pmid/30074953&rfr_iscdi=true |