Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network

BACKGROUND:Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement. OBJECTIVE:We describe and reflect on our patient stakehold...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical care 2018-10, Vol.56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1), p.S58-S63
Hauptverfasser: Warren, Nathaniel T, Gaudino, James A, Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja, Dickerson, Kristin, Robbins, Lynn, Norman, Kathy, Lind, John, D’Amato, Sele, Foley, Perry, Gold, Rachel, Bauer, Vance, Fields, Scott A, Cohen, Deborah J, Clark, Khaya D, DeVoe, Jennifer E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S63
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page S58
container_title Medical care
container_volume 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1
creator Warren, Nathaniel T
Gaudino, James A
Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja
Dickerson, Kristin
Robbins, Lynn
Norman, Kathy
Lind, John
D’Amato, Sele
Foley, Perry
Gold, Rachel
Bauer, Vance
Fields, Scott A
Cohen, Deborah J
Clark, Khaya D
DeVoe, Jennifer E
description BACKGROUND:Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement. OBJECTIVE:We describe and reflect on our patient stakeholder groups, engagement framework, experiences, and lessons learned in engaging patients in research, from generating proposal ideas to disseminating findings. SETTING:The ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network) clinical data research network is the nation’s largest clinical dataset on the safety net, with outpatient clinical data from 122 health systems (1109 clinics) in 23 states. RESULTS:Patients stakeholders codeveloped the ADVANCE engagement framework and its implementation in partnership with network leaders. In phase I of ADVANCE, patients were involved with designing studies (input on primary outcome measures and methods) and usability testing (of the patient portal). In phase II, the network is prioritizing research training, dissemination opportunities, an “ambassador” program to pair more experienced patient stakeholders with those less experienced, and evaluation of engagement activities and impacts. DISCUSSION:The ADVANCE framework for patient engagement has successfully involved a diverse group of patients in the design, implementation, and interpretation of comparative effectiveness research. Our experience and framework can be used by other organizations and research networks to support patient engagement activities.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000791
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6136943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2083707603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3181-d4234b9b0ccd00e6705179f5271d4ca85082aab48395b2617cc0b2395cf9469d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyBkiQuXFH8mMQekJd0C0rag8nG1HMfZ9daxi5101X9fr7asSg_4Mh7NM69m5gXgNUYnGInq_fny8gQ9fJXAT8AMc1oVWLD6KZghRHhR5cIReJHSBiFcUU6egyOaaSY4nYHNp8m6zvoVPDfK59hPDn5XozV-hAu_Uisz7L7Ww0uTjIp6_QE2Khn4Y5y6W3gWwwDnp7_nF80CNs56q5WDp2pUBx5emHEb4tVL8KxXLplX9_EY_Dpb_Gy-FMtvn78282WhKa5x0TFCWStapHWHkCkrxHElek4q3DGtao5qolTLaip4S0pcaY1akhPdC1aKjh6Dj3vd66kdTKfz-FE5eR3toOKtDMrKfyveruUq3MgS01IwmgXe3QvE8GcyaZSDTdo4p7wJU5IE1TRftUQ79O0jdBOm6PN6kuASI17mQ2eK7SkdQ0rR9IdhMJI7M2U2Uz42M7e9ebjIoemvexmo98A2uNHEdOWmrYlybZQb1__XvgM3Waon</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161056074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Warren, Nathaniel T ; Gaudino, James A ; Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja ; Dickerson, Kristin ; Robbins, Lynn ; Norman, Kathy ; Lind, John ; D’Amato, Sele ; Foley, Perry ; Gold, Rachel ; Bauer, Vance ; Fields, Scott A ; Cohen, Deborah J ; Clark, Khaya D ; DeVoe, Jennifer E</creator><creatorcontrib>Warren, Nathaniel T ; Gaudino, James A ; Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja ; Dickerson, Kristin ; Robbins, Lynn ; Norman, Kathy ; Lind, John ; D’Amato, Sele ; Foley, Perry ; Gold, Rachel ; Bauer, Vance ; Fields, Scott A ; Cohen, Deborah J ; Clark, Khaya D ; DeVoe, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement. OBJECTIVE:We describe and reflect on our patient stakeholder groups, engagement framework, experiences, and lessons learned in engaging patients in research, from generating proposal ideas to disseminating findings. SETTING:The ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network) clinical data research network is the nation’s largest clinical dataset on the safety net, with outpatient clinical data from 122 health systems (1109 clinics) in 23 states. RESULTS:Patients stakeholders codeveloped the ADVANCE engagement framework and its implementation in partnership with network leaders. In phase I of ADVANCE, patients were involved with designing studies (input on primary outcome measures and methods) and usability testing (of the patient portal). In phase II, the network is prioritizing research training, dissemination opportunities, an “ambassador” program to pair more experienced patient stakeholders with those less experienced, and evaluation of engagement activities and impacts. DISCUSSION:The ADVANCE framework for patient engagement has successfully involved a diverse group of patients in the design, implementation, and interpretation of comparative effectiveness research. Our experience and framework can be used by other organizations and research networks to support patient engagement activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000791</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30074953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Case studies ; Community-Institutional Relations ; Comparative Effectiveness Research - organization &amp; administration ; Datasets ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Studies ; Measurement methods ; Medical research ; Original ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Patient Participation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Patient-Centered Care - organization &amp; administration ; Patients ; Social Networking ; Stakeholder Participation ; Stakeholders ; Test procedures ; United States</subject><ispartof>Medical care, 2018-10, Vol.56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1), p.S58-S63</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies Oct 2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3181-d4234b9b0ccd00e6705179f5271d4ca85082aab48395b2617cc0b2395cf9469d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30074953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warren, Nathaniel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudino, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lind, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Amato, Sele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Perry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Vance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Khaya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeVoe, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><title>Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network</title><title>Medical care</title><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement. OBJECTIVE:We describe and reflect on our patient stakeholder groups, engagement framework, experiences, and lessons learned in engaging patients in research, from generating proposal ideas to disseminating findings. SETTING:The ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network) clinical data research network is the nation’s largest clinical dataset on the safety net, with outpatient clinical data from 122 health systems (1109 clinics) in 23 states. RESULTS:Patients stakeholders codeveloped the ADVANCE engagement framework and its implementation in partnership with network leaders. In phase I of ADVANCE, patients were involved with designing studies (input on primary outcome measures and methods) and usability testing (of the patient portal). In phase II, the network is prioritizing research training, dissemination opportunities, an “ambassador” program to pair more experienced patient stakeholders with those less experienced, and evaluation of engagement activities and impacts. DISCUSSION:The ADVANCE framework for patient engagement has successfully involved a diverse group of patients in the design, implementation, and interpretation of comparative effectiveness research. Our experience and framework can be used by other organizations and research networks to support patient engagement activities.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Community-Institutional Relations</subject><subject>Comparative Effectiveness Research - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Studies</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Patient Participation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient-Centered Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Social Networking</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0025-7079</issn><issn>1537-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyBkiQuXFH8mMQekJd0C0rag8nG1HMfZ9daxi5101X9fr7asSg_4Mh7NM69m5gXgNUYnGInq_fny8gQ9fJXAT8AMc1oVWLD6KZghRHhR5cIReJHSBiFcUU6egyOaaSY4nYHNp8m6zvoVPDfK59hPDn5XozV-hAu_Uisz7L7Ww0uTjIp6_QE2Khn4Y5y6W3gWwwDnp7_nF80CNs56q5WDp2pUBx5emHEb4tVL8KxXLplX9_EY_Dpb_Gy-FMtvn78282WhKa5x0TFCWStapHWHkCkrxHElek4q3DGtao5qolTLaip4S0pcaY1akhPdC1aKjh6Dj3vd66kdTKfz-FE5eR3toOKtDMrKfyveruUq3MgS01IwmgXe3QvE8GcyaZSDTdo4p7wJU5IE1TRftUQ79O0jdBOm6PN6kuASI17mQ2eK7SkdQ0rR9IdhMJI7M2U2Uz42M7e9ebjIoemvexmo98A2uNHEdOWmrYlybZQb1__XvgM3Waon</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Warren, Nathaniel T</creator><creator>Gaudino, James A</creator><creator>Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja</creator><creator>Dickerson, Kristin</creator><creator>Robbins, Lynn</creator><creator>Norman, Kathy</creator><creator>Lind, John</creator><creator>D’Amato, Sele</creator><creator>Foley, Perry</creator><creator>Gold, Rachel</creator><creator>Bauer, Vance</creator><creator>Fields, Scott A</creator><creator>Cohen, Deborah J</creator><creator>Clark, Khaya D</creator><creator>DeVoe, Jennifer E</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network</title><author>Warren, Nathaniel T ; Gaudino, James A ; Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja ; Dickerson, Kristin ; Robbins, Lynn ; Norman, Kathy ; Lind, John ; D’Amato, Sele ; Foley, Perry ; Gold, Rachel ; Bauer, Vance ; Fields, Scott A ; Cohen, Deborah J ; Clark, Khaya D ; DeVoe, Jennifer E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3181-d4234b9b0ccd00e6705179f5271d4ca85082aab48395b2617cc0b2395cf9469d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Community-Institutional Relations</topic><topic>Comparative Effectiveness Research - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Studies</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Patient Participation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient-Centered Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Social Networking</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warren, Nathaniel T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudino, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lind, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Amato, Sele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Perry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Vance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Khaya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeVoe, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warren, Nathaniel T</au><au>Gaudino, James A</au><au>Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja</au><au>Dickerson, Kristin</au><au>Robbins, Lynn</au><au>Norman, Kathy</au><au>Lind, John</au><au>D’Amato, Sele</au><au>Foley, Perry</au><au>Gold, Rachel</au><au>Bauer, Vance</au><au>Fields, Scott A</au><au>Cohen, Deborah J</au><au>Clark, Khaya D</au><au>DeVoe, Jennifer E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network</atitle><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>S58</spage><epage>S63</epage><pages>S58-S63</pages><issn>0025-7079</issn><eissn>1537-1948</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Strategies to engage patients to improve and enhance research and clinical care are increasingly being implemented in the United States, yet little is known about best practices for or the impacts of meaningful patient engagement. OBJECTIVE:We describe and reflect on our patient stakeholder groups, engagement framework, experiences, and lessons learned in engaging patients in research, from generating proposal ideas to disseminating findings. SETTING:The ADVANCE (Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network) clinical data research network is the nation’s largest clinical dataset on the safety net, with outpatient clinical data from 122 health systems (1109 clinics) in 23 states. RESULTS:Patients stakeholders codeveloped the ADVANCE engagement framework and its implementation in partnership with network leaders. In phase I of ADVANCE, patients were involved with designing studies (input on primary outcome measures and methods) and usability testing (of the patient portal). In phase II, the network is prioritizing research training, dissemination opportunities, an “ambassador” program to pair more experienced patient stakeholders with those less experienced, and evaluation of engagement activities and impacts. DISCUSSION:The ADVANCE framework for patient engagement has successfully involved a diverse group of patients in the design, implementation, and interpretation of comparative effectiveness research. Our experience and framework can be used by other organizations and research networks to support patient engagement activities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>30074953</pmid><doi>10.1097/MLR.0000000000000791</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7079
ispartof Medical care, 2018-10, Vol.56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1), p.S58-S63
issn 0025-7079
1537-1948
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6136943
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Best practice
Case studies
Community-Institutional Relations
Comparative Effectiveness Research - organization & administration
Datasets
Humans
Interdisciplinary Studies
Measurement methods
Medical research
Original
Patient Outcome Assessment
Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data
Patient-Centered Care - organization & administration
Patients
Social Networking
Stakeholder Participation
Stakeholders
Test procedures
United States
title Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T02%3A55%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20Meaningful%20Patient%20Engagement%20in%20Research:%20Case%20Study%20From%20ADVANCE%20Clinical%20Data%20Research%20Network&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care&rft.au=Warren,%20Nathaniel%20T&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=56%20Suppl%2010%20Suppl%201&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=S58&rft.epage=S63&rft.pages=S58-S63&rft.issn=0025-7079&rft.eissn=1537-1948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000791&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2083707603%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161056074&rft_id=info:pmid/30074953&rfr_iscdi=true