Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study
Purpose To evaluate the reliability and validity of six PROMIS measures (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and sleep disturbance) telephone-administered to a diverse, population-based cohort of localized prostate cancer patients. Methods Newly diagnosed men were enr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Quality of life research 2016-11, Vol.25 (11), p.2811-2823 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2823 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 2811 |
| container_title | Quality of life research |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Quach, Caroleen W. Langer, Michelle M. Chen, Ronald C. Thissen, David Usinger, Deborah S. Emerson, Marc A. Reeve, Bryce B. |
| description | Purpose To evaluate the reliability and validity of six PROMIS measures (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and sleep disturbance) telephone-administered to a diverse, population-based cohort of localized prostate cancer patients. Methods Newly diagnosed men were enrolled in the North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study. PROMIS measures were telephone administered pre-treatment (baseline), and at 3-months and 12-months post-treatment initiation (N = 778). Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Dimensionality was examined with bifactor models and explained common variance (ECV). Ordinal logistic regression models were used to detect potential differential item functioning (DIF) for key demographic groups. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by correlations with the legacy instruments Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer and SF-12v2. Known-groups validity was examined by age, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, and treatment. Results Each PROMIS measure had high Cronbach's alpha values (0.86-0.96) and was sufficiently unidimensional. Floor effects were observed for anxiety, depression, and pain interference measures; ceiling effects were observed for physical function. No DIF was detected. Convergent validity was established with moderate to strong correlations between PROMIS and legacy measures (0.41-0.77) of similar constructs. Discriminant validity was demonstrated with weak correlations between measures of dissimilar domains (–0.20––0.31). PROMIS measures detected differences across age, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity groups; no differences were found by treatment. Conclusions This study provides support for the reliability and construct validity of six PROMIS measures in prostate cancer, as well as the utility of telephone administration for assessing HRQoL in low literacy and hard-to-reach populations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11136-016-1325-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6126915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44852729</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44852729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-52951455ab5ecc49ebfcbf6b33a59468bf6e0faa770fe207631f4049f4c4ae0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwAziALHHhsuDvjS9IVcVHpaKiAmfL651NHTl2sHeDwo1_jsOWqHDg5PHMO4898yL0lJJXlJD2daGUctUQqhrKmWz4PbSgsuUNU0LfRwuiFWs0F_wEPSplTQhZasIeohPWMkGEWC7Qz2sI3nY--HGPbezxzgbfHy5pwJ-urz5efMYbsGXKULDtNz76MkKGHnd7PEKA7U2KgH2syZ2H7zXCFocUV36ceh9tqBdXmT9qyzanMtoRsLPRQcalSvaP0YPBhgJPbs9T9PXd2y_nH5rLq_cX52eXjROajY1kWlIhpe0kuJqCbnDdoDrOrdRCLWsMZLC2bckAjLSK06HOqAfhhAXS8VP0ZuZup24DvYM4ZhvMNvuNzXuTrDd_V6K_Mau0M4oypamsgJe3gJy-TVBGs_HFQQg2QpqKoUumlGZUsyp98Y90naZcl_FbpUndveBVRWeVq3spGYbjZygxB4PNbLCpBpuDwebQ8_zuFMeOP45WAZsFpZbiCvKdp_9DfTY3rcuY8hFaebKCNf8FQLO9xA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1829004443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Quach, Caroleen W. ; Langer, Michelle M. ; Chen, Ronald C. ; Thissen, David ; Usinger, Deborah S. ; Emerson, Marc A. ; Reeve, Bryce B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Quach, Caroleen W. ; Langer, Michelle M. ; Chen, Ronald C. ; Thissen, David ; Usinger, Deborah S. ; Emerson, Marc A. ; Reeve, Bryce B.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the reliability and validity of six PROMIS measures (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and sleep disturbance) telephone-administered to a diverse, population-based cohort of localized prostate cancer patients. Methods Newly diagnosed men were enrolled in the North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study. PROMIS measures were telephone administered pre-treatment (baseline), and at 3-months and 12-months post-treatment initiation (N = 778). Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Dimensionality was examined with bifactor models and explained common variance (ECV). Ordinal logistic regression models were used to detect potential differential item functioning (DIF) for key demographic groups. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by correlations with the legacy instruments Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer and SF-12v2. Known-groups validity was examined by age, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, and treatment. Results Each PROMIS measure had high Cronbach's alpha values (0.86-0.96) and was sufficiently unidimensional. Floor effects were observed for anxiety, depression, and pain interference measures; ceiling effects were observed for physical function. No DIF was detected. Convergent validity was established with moderate to strong correlations between PROMIS and legacy measures (0.41-0.77) of similar constructs. Discriminant validity was demonstrated with weak correlations between measures of dissimilar domains (–0.20––0.31). PROMIS measures detected differences across age, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity groups; no differences were found by treatment. Conclusions This study provides support for the reliability and construct validity of six PROMIS measures in prostate cancer, as well as the utility of telephone administration for assessing HRQoL in low literacy and hard-to-reach populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1325-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27240448</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anxiety ; Cancer therapies ; Cohort analysis ; Comorbidity ; Cronbach's alpha ; Data collection ; Ethnicity ; Fatigue ; Global health ; Humans ; INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT ; Literacy ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Pain ; Patients ; Performance evaluation ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology ; Psychometrics - methods ; Public Health ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life Research ; Quantitative psychology ; Radiation ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sleep ; Sociology ; Telephone ; Telephones ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2016-11, Vol.25 (11), p.2811-2823</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing 2016</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-52951455ab5ecc49ebfcbf6b33a59468bf6e0faa770fe207631f4049f4c4ae0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-52951455ab5ecc49ebfcbf6b33a59468bf6e0faa770fe207631f4049f4c4ae0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44852729$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44852729$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,804,886,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27240448$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quach, Caroleen W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ronald C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thissen, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usinger, Deborah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emerson, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Bryce B.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the reliability and validity of six PROMIS measures (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and sleep disturbance) telephone-administered to a diverse, population-based cohort of localized prostate cancer patients. Methods Newly diagnosed men were enrolled in the North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study. PROMIS measures were telephone administered pre-treatment (baseline), and at 3-months and 12-months post-treatment initiation (N = 778). Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Dimensionality was examined with bifactor models and explained common variance (ECV). Ordinal logistic regression models were used to detect potential differential item functioning (DIF) for key demographic groups. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by correlations with the legacy instruments Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer and SF-12v2. Known-groups validity was examined by age, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, and treatment. Results Each PROMIS measure had high Cronbach's alpha values (0.86-0.96) and was sufficiently unidimensional. Floor effects were observed for anxiety, depression, and pain interference measures; ceiling effects were observed for physical function. No DIF was detected. Convergent validity was established with moderate to strong correlations between PROMIS and legacy measures (0.41-0.77) of similar constructs. Discriminant validity was demonstrated with weak correlations between measures of dissimilar domains (–0.20––0.31). PROMIS measures detected differences across age, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity groups; no differences were found by treatment. Conclusions This study provides support for the reliability and construct validity of six PROMIS measures in prostate cancer, as well as the utility of telephone administration for assessing HRQoL in low literacy and hard-to-reach populations.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Cronbach's alpha</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Global health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>Telephones</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwAziALHHhsuDvjS9IVcVHpaKiAmfL651NHTl2sHeDwo1_jsOWqHDg5PHMO4898yL0lJJXlJD2daGUctUQqhrKmWz4PbSgsuUNU0LfRwuiFWs0F_wEPSplTQhZasIeohPWMkGEWC7Qz2sI3nY--HGPbezxzgbfHy5pwJ-urz5efMYbsGXKULDtNz76MkKGHnd7PEKA7U2KgH2syZ2H7zXCFocUV36ceh9tqBdXmT9qyzanMtoRsLPRQcalSvaP0YPBhgJPbs9T9PXd2y_nH5rLq_cX52eXjROajY1kWlIhpe0kuJqCbnDdoDrOrdRCLWsMZLC2bckAjLSK06HOqAfhhAXS8VP0ZuZup24DvYM4ZhvMNvuNzXuTrDd_V6K_Mau0M4oypamsgJe3gJy-TVBGs_HFQQg2QpqKoUumlGZUsyp98Y90naZcl_FbpUndveBVRWeVq3spGYbjZygxB4PNbLCpBpuDwebQ8_zuFMeOP45WAZsFpZbiCvKdp_9DfTY3rcuY8hFaebKCNf8FQLO9xA</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Quach, Caroleen W.</creator><creator>Langer, Michelle M.</creator><creator>Chen, Ronald C.</creator><creator>Thissen, David</creator><creator>Usinger, Deborah S.</creator><creator>Emerson, Marc A.</creator><creator>Reeve, Bryce B.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study</title><author>Quach, Caroleen W. ; Langer, Michelle M. ; Chen, Ronald C. ; Thissen, David ; Usinger, Deborah S. ; Emerson, Marc A. ; Reeve, Bryce B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-52951455ab5ecc49ebfcbf6b33a59468bf6e0faa770fe207631f4049f4c4ae0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Cronbach's alpha</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Global health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>Telephones</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quach, Caroleen W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ronald C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thissen, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usinger, Deborah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emerson, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Bryce B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quach, Caroleen W.</au><au>Langer, Michelle M.</au><au>Chen, Ronald C.</au><au>Thissen, David</au><au>Usinger, Deborah S.</au><au>Emerson, Marc A.</au><au>Reeve, Bryce B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2811</spage><epage>2823</epage><pages>2811-2823</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the reliability and validity of six PROMIS measures (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and sleep disturbance) telephone-administered to a diverse, population-based cohort of localized prostate cancer patients. Methods Newly diagnosed men were enrolled in the North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study. PROMIS measures were telephone administered pre-treatment (baseline), and at 3-months and 12-months post-treatment initiation (N = 778). Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Dimensionality was examined with bifactor models and explained common variance (ECV). Ordinal logistic regression models were used to detect potential differential item functioning (DIF) for key demographic groups. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by correlations with the legacy instruments Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer and SF-12v2. Known-groups validity was examined by age, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, and treatment. Results Each PROMIS measure had high Cronbach's alpha values (0.86-0.96) and was sufficiently unidimensional. Floor effects were observed for anxiety, depression, and pain interference measures; ceiling effects were observed for physical function. No DIF was detected. Convergent validity was established with moderate to strong correlations between PROMIS and legacy measures (0.41-0.77) of similar constructs. Discriminant validity was demonstrated with weak correlations between measures of dissimilar domains (–0.20––0.31). PROMIS measures detected differences across age, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity groups; no differences were found by treatment. Conclusions This study provides support for the reliability and construct validity of six PROMIS measures in prostate cancer, as well as the utility of telephone administration for assessing HRQoL in low literacy and hard-to-reach populations.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>27240448</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-016-1325-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0962-9343 |
| ispartof | Quality of life research, 2016-11, Vol.25 (11), p.2811-2823 |
| issn | 0962-9343 1573-2649 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6126915 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Aged Anxiety Cancer therapies Cohort analysis Comorbidity Cronbach's alpha Data collection Ethnicity Fatigue Global health Humans INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT Literacy Longitudinal Studies Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Pain Patients Performance evaluation Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology Psychometrics - methods Public Health Quality of life Quality of Life Research Quantitative psychology Radiation Reliability Reproducibility of Results Sleep Sociology Telephone Telephones Validity |
| title | Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T05%3A36%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20PROMIS%20measures%20administered%20by%20telephone%20interview%20in%20a%20longitudinal%20localized%20prostate%20cancer%20study&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Quach,%20Caroleen%20W.&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2811&rft.epage=2823&rft.pages=2811-2823&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-016-1325-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E44852729%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1829004443&rft_id=info:pmid/27240448&rft_jstor_id=44852729&rfr_iscdi=true |