The effects of haploid selection on Y chromosome evolution in two closely related dioecious plants

The evolution of sex chromosomes is usually considered to be driven by sexually antagonistic selection in the diploid phase. However, selection during the haploid gametic phase of the lifecycle has recently received theoretical attention as possibly playing a central role in sex chromosome evolution...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evolution letters 2018-08, Vol.2 (4), p.368-377
Hauptverfasser: Sandler, George, Beaudry, Felix E. G., Barrett, Spencer C. H., Wright, Stephen I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 377
container_issue 4
container_start_page 368
container_title Evolution letters
container_volume 2
creator Sandler, George
Beaudry, Felix E. G.
Barrett, Spencer C. H.
Wright, Stephen I.
description The evolution of sex chromosomes is usually considered to be driven by sexually antagonistic selection in the diploid phase. However, selection during the haploid gametic phase of the lifecycle has recently received theoretical attention as possibly playing a central role in sex chromosome evolution, especially in plants where gene expression in the haploid phase is extensive. In particular, male‐specific haploid selection might favor the linkage of pollen beneficial alleles to male sex determining regions on incipient Y chromosomes. This linkage might then allow such alleles to further specialize for the haploid phase. Purifying haploid selection is also expected to slow the degeneration of Y‐linked genes expressed in the haploid phase. Here, we examine the evolution of gene expression in flower buds and pollen of two species of Rumex to test for signatures of haploid selection acting during plant sex chromosome evolution. We find that genes with high ancestral pollen expression bias occur more often on sex chromosomes than autosomes and that genes on the Y chromosome are more likely to become enriched for pollen expression bias. We also find that genes with low expression in pollen are more likely to be lost from the Y chromosome. Our results suggest that sex‐specific haploid selection during the gametophytic stage of the lifecycle may be a major contributor to several features of plant sex chromosome evolution.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/evl3.60
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6121804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2328390850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3480-86959111b47208533841e3aec80258bcb7a463e8c8d7b988afd15947cc3e82b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9r2zAUxcVYWUMb9g2GoA8blLT6Z1t-GYyQtoNAX9rCnoQsXy8qspVKdkq-feUmLVlhIJC498e55-gi9JWSC0oIu4SN4xc5-YQmjGT5jBdCfD54H6NpjI-EECqFYDz7go45YZLnUk5QdbcCDE0Dpo_YN3il187bGkdwqWR9h9P5g80q-NZH3yZ4493w2rEd7p89Ns4neosDON1DjWvrwVg_RLx2uuvjKTpqtIsw3d8n6P5qcTe_mS1vr3_Pfy1nhgtJZjIvs5JSWomCEZlxLgUFrsFIwjJZmarQIucgjayLqpRSNzXNSlEYk4qsIvwE_dzproeqhdpA1wft1DrYVoet8tqqfzudXam_fqNyyqgkIgn82AsE_zRA7FVrowGXUkCKoxilI5pmJvTsA_roh9CleIrx9LdlSjA6-r6jTPAxBmjezVCixtWpcXUqH8lvh97fubdFJeB8BzxbB9v_6ajFw5InuReFDqI8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328390850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of haploid selection on Y chromosome evolution in two closely related dioecious plants</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sandler, George ; Beaudry, Felix E. G. ; Barrett, Spencer C. H. ; Wright, Stephen I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandler, George ; Beaudry, Felix E. G. ; Barrett, Spencer C. H. ; Wright, Stephen I.</creatorcontrib><description>The evolution of sex chromosomes is usually considered to be driven by sexually antagonistic selection in the diploid phase. However, selection during the haploid gametic phase of the lifecycle has recently received theoretical attention as possibly playing a central role in sex chromosome evolution, especially in plants where gene expression in the haploid phase is extensive. In particular, male‐specific haploid selection might favor the linkage of pollen beneficial alleles to male sex determining regions on incipient Y chromosomes. This linkage might then allow such alleles to further specialize for the haploid phase. Purifying haploid selection is also expected to slow the degeneration of Y‐linked genes expressed in the haploid phase. Here, we examine the evolution of gene expression in flower buds and pollen of two species of Rumex to test for signatures of haploid selection acting during plant sex chromosome evolution. We find that genes with high ancestral pollen expression bias occur more often on sex chromosomes than autosomes and that genes on the Y chromosome are more likely to become enriched for pollen expression bias. We also find that genes with low expression in pollen are more likely to be lost from the Y chromosome. Our results suggest that sex‐specific haploid selection during the gametophytic stage of the lifecycle may be a major contributor to several features of plant sex chromosome evolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-3744</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-3744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/evl3.60</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30283688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Bias ; Chromosomes ; Competition ; Degeneration ; Evolution ; Evolutionary genetics ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Gene expression ; Genomics ; Haploid selection ; Letter ; Letters ; Males ; Mutation ; ploidy ; Pollen ; pollen expressed genes ; recombination ; Retention ; Rumex ; sex chromosome evolution ; Sex chromosomes ; Y chromosomes</subject><ispartof>Evolution letters, 2018-08, Vol.2 (4), p.368-377</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB).</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3480-86959111b47208533841e3aec80258bcb7a463e8c8d7b988afd15947cc3e82b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3480-86959111b47208533841e3aec80258bcb7a463e8c8d7b988afd15947cc3e82b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121804/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121804/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandler, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudry, Felix E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Spencer C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Stephen I.</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of haploid selection on Y chromosome evolution in two closely related dioecious plants</title><title>Evolution letters</title><addtitle>Evol Lett</addtitle><description>The evolution of sex chromosomes is usually considered to be driven by sexually antagonistic selection in the diploid phase. However, selection during the haploid gametic phase of the lifecycle has recently received theoretical attention as possibly playing a central role in sex chromosome evolution, especially in plants where gene expression in the haploid phase is extensive. In particular, male‐specific haploid selection might favor the linkage of pollen beneficial alleles to male sex determining regions on incipient Y chromosomes. This linkage might then allow such alleles to further specialize for the haploid phase. Purifying haploid selection is also expected to slow the degeneration of Y‐linked genes expressed in the haploid phase. Here, we examine the evolution of gene expression in flower buds and pollen of two species of Rumex to test for signatures of haploid selection acting during plant sex chromosome evolution. We find that genes with high ancestral pollen expression bias occur more often on sex chromosomes than autosomes and that genes on the Y chromosome are more likely to become enriched for pollen expression bias. We also find that genes with low expression in pollen are more likely to be lost from the Y chromosome. Our results suggest that sex‐specific haploid selection during the gametophytic stage of the lifecycle may be a major contributor to several features of plant sex chromosome evolution.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Degeneration</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Haploid selection</subject><subject>Letter</subject><subject>Letters</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>ploidy</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>pollen expressed genes</subject><subject>recombination</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Rumex</subject><subject>sex chromosome evolution</subject><subject>Sex chromosomes</subject><subject>Y chromosomes</subject><issn>2056-3744</issn><issn>2056-3744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9r2zAUxcVYWUMb9g2GoA8blLT6Z1t-GYyQtoNAX9rCnoQsXy8qspVKdkq-feUmLVlhIJC498e55-gi9JWSC0oIu4SN4xc5-YQmjGT5jBdCfD54H6NpjI-EECqFYDz7go45YZLnUk5QdbcCDE0Dpo_YN3il187bGkdwqWR9h9P5g80q-NZH3yZ4493w2rEd7p89Ns4neosDON1DjWvrwVg_RLx2uuvjKTpqtIsw3d8n6P5qcTe_mS1vr3_Pfy1nhgtJZjIvs5JSWomCEZlxLgUFrsFIwjJZmarQIucgjayLqpRSNzXNSlEYk4qsIvwE_dzproeqhdpA1wft1DrYVoet8tqqfzudXam_fqNyyqgkIgn82AsE_zRA7FVrowGXUkCKoxilI5pmJvTsA_roh9CleIrx9LdlSjA6-r6jTPAxBmjezVCixtWpcXUqH8lvh97fubdFJeB8BzxbB9v_6ajFw5InuReFDqI8</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Sandler, George</creator><creator>Beaudry, Felix E. G.</creator><creator>Barrett, Spencer C. H.</creator><creator>Wright, Stephen I.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>The effects of haploid selection on Y chromosome evolution in two closely related dioecious plants</title><author>Sandler, George ; Beaudry, Felix E. G. ; Barrett, Spencer C. H. ; Wright, Stephen I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3480-86959111b47208533841e3aec80258bcb7a463e8c8d7b988afd15947cc3e82b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Degeneration</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Haploid selection</topic><topic>Letter</topic><topic>Letters</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>ploidy</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>pollen expressed genes</topic><topic>recombination</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Rumex</topic><topic>sex chromosome evolution</topic><topic>Sex chromosomes</topic><topic>Y chromosomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandler, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaudry, Felix E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Spencer C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Stephen I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Evolution letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandler, George</au><au>Beaudry, Felix E. G.</au><au>Barrett, Spencer C. H.</au><au>Wright, Stephen I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of haploid selection on Y chromosome evolution in two closely related dioecious plants</atitle><jtitle>Evolution letters</jtitle><addtitle>Evol Lett</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>368-377</pages><issn>2056-3744</issn><eissn>2056-3744</eissn><abstract>The evolution of sex chromosomes is usually considered to be driven by sexually antagonistic selection in the diploid phase. However, selection during the haploid gametic phase of the lifecycle has recently received theoretical attention as possibly playing a central role in sex chromosome evolution, especially in plants where gene expression in the haploid phase is extensive. In particular, male‐specific haploid selection might favor the linkage of pollen beneficial alleles to male sex determining regions on incipient Y chromosomes. This linkage might then allow such alleles to further specialize for the haploid phase. Purifying haploid selection is also expected to slow the degeneration of Y‐linked genes expressed in the haploid phase. Here, we examine the evolution of gene expression in flower buds and pollen of two species of Rumex to test for signatures of haploid selection acting during plant sex chromosome evolution. We find that genes with high ancestral pollen expression bias occur more often on sex chromosomes than autosomes and that genes on the Y chromosome are more likely to become enriched for pollen expression bias. We also find that genes with low expression in pollen are more likely to be lost from the Y chromosome. Our results suggest that sex‐specific haploid selection during the gametophytic stage of the lifecycle may be a major contributor to several features of plant sex chromosome evolution.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30283688</pmid><doi>10.1002/evl3.60</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2056-3744
ispartof Evolution letters, 2018-08, Vol.2 (4), p.368-377
issn 2056-3744
2056-3744
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6121804
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central
subjects Alleles
Bias
Chromosomes
Competition
Degeneration
Evolution
Evolutionary genetics
Flowers & plants
Gene expression
Genomics
Haploid selection
Letter
Letters
Males
Mutation
ploidy
Pollen
pollen expressed genes
recombination
Retention
Rumex
sex chromosome evolution
Sex chromosomes
Y chromosomes
title The effects of haploid selection on Y chromosome evolution in two closely related dioecious plants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T15%3A19%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20haploid%20selection%20on%20Y%20chromosome%20evolution%20in%20two%20closely%20related%20dioecious%20plants&rft.jtitle=Evolution%20letters&rft.au=Sandler,%20George&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=368-377&rft.issn=2056-3744&rft.eissn=2056-3744&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/evl3.60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2328390850%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328390850&rft_id=info:pmid/30283688&rfr_iscdi=true