Exploring fasting practices for critical care patients – A web-based survey of UK intensive care units

Background Enteral nutrition delivery in the critically ill is frequently interrupted for surgical and airway procedures to avoid aspiration of stomach contents. Recurrent fasting leads to under delivery of enteral nutrition and this underfeeding is associated with worse outcomes. International fast...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Intensive Care Society 2018-08, Vol.19 (3), p.188-195
Hauptverfasser: Segaran, Ella, Lovejoy, Tracy D, Proctor, Charlie, Bispham, Wendy L, Jordan, Rebecca, Jenkins, Bethan, O’Neill, Eileen, Harkess, Sarah EJ, Terblanche, Marius
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 195
container_issue 3
container_start_page 188
container_title Journal of the Intensive Care Society
container_volume 19
creator Segaran, Ella
Lovejoy, Tracy D
Proctor, Charlie
Bispham, Wendy L
Jordan, Rebecca
Jenkins, Bethan
O’Neill, Eileen
Harkess, Sarah EJ
Terblanche, Marius
description Background Enteral nutrition delivery in the critically ill is frequently interrupted for surgical and airway procedures to avoid aspiration of stomach contents. Recurrent fasting leads to under delivery of enteral nutrition and this underfeeding is associated with worse outcomes. International fasting recommendations do not provide guidance for intubated patients receiving enteral nutrition. This study aimed to gain a detailed perspective of UK critical care fasting practices. Methods A web-based survey was sent to 232 UK intensive care units consisting of questions relating to fasting practices, presence of guidelines, average fasting times for common procedures and dietitian time per intensive care unit bed. Results A total of 176 intensive care units responded. Only 20% of units had guidelines and respondents stated that they were not consistently adhered to (mean compliance 66%). Units with greater dietetic involvement were more likely to have guidelines (p = 0.04). Fasting times were shorter for abdominal surgery (p = 0.002), non-abdominal surgery (p = 0.016) and radiology (p = 0.015) if a guideline was present. Fasting for extubation and tracheostomy was similar irrespective of the presence of a guideline. Considerable variation in fasting times was reported, usually due to inconsistencies in clinical decision-making. Conclusions This survey of national practice demonstrates that fasting times are varied and inconsistent, which may lead to under-delivery of enteral nutrition. More dietetic input was associated with increased likelihood of a fasting guideline.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1751143717748555
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6110026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1751143717748555</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2097586881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-3ea6161230c593b1d24a3fa1b9d136b37f47e52a34ffbf1b0d3edfa69c3658e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uctq3DAUFaWlGdLsuypaduNU17Jke1MIIX3QQDYJdCeu5auJgsdyJXvS7PoP-cN-STVMEtpCtLkS56HDPYy9BXEMUNcfoFYAlazzvWqUUi_YqhSqLqQW31-y1Q4udvgBO0rpRuSjQeqmec0OpADVCtGu2PXZz2kI0Y9r7jDNuzlFtLO3lLgLkdvo8wMHbjESn3D2NM6J__51z0_4LXVFh4l6npa4pTseHL_6xv0405j8lvaiZfRzesNeORwSHT3MQ3b56ezy9EtxfvH56-nJeWFl1apCEmrQUEphVSs76MsKpUPo2j6H72TtqppUibJyrnPQiV5S71C3VmrVkDxkH_e209JtqLc5bMTBTNFvMN6ZgN78i4z-2qzD1mgAIUqdDd4_GMTwY6E0m41PloYBRwpLMqVoa9XkNUKmij3VxpBSJPf0DQizq8j8X1GWvPs73pPgsZBMKPaEhGsyN2GJY97W84Z_ACE2m0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2097586881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring fasting practices for critical care patients – A web-based survey of UK intensive care units</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Segaran, Ella ; Lovejoy, Tracy D ; Proctor, Charlie ; Bispham, Wendy L ; Jordan, Rebecca ; Jenkins, Bethan ; O’Neill, Eileen ; Harkess, Sarah EJ ; Terblanche, Marius</creator><creatorcontrib>Segaran, Ella ; Lovejoy, Tracy D ; Proctor, Charlie ; Bispham, Wendy L ; Jordan, Rebecca ; Jenkins, Bethan ; O’Neill, Eileen ; Harkess, Sarah EJ ; Terblanche, Marius</creatorcontrib><description>Background Enteral nutrition delivery in the critically ill is frequently interrupted for surgical and airway procedures to avoid aspiration of stomach contents. Recurrent fasting leads to under delivery of enteral nutrition and this underfeeding is associated with worse outcomes. International fasting recommendations do not provide guidance for intubated patients receiving enteral nutrition. This study aimed to gain a detailed perspective of UK critical care fasting practices. Methods A web-based survey was sent to 232 UK intensive care units consisting of questions relating to fasting practices, presence of guidelines, average fasting times for common procedures and dietitian time per intensive care unit bed. Results A total of 176 intensive care units responded. Only 20% of units had guidelines and respondents stated that they were not consistently adhered to (mean compliance 66%). Units with greater dietetic involvement were more likely to have guidelines (p = 0.04). Fasting times were shorter for abdominal surgery (p = 0.002), non-abdominal surgery (p = 0.016) and radiology (p = 0.015) if a guideline was present. Fasting for extubation and tracheostomy was similar irrespective of the presence of a guideline. Considerable variation in fasting times was reported, usually due to inconsistencies in clinical decision-making. Conclusions This survey of national practice demonstrates that fasting times are varied and inconsistent, which may lead to under-delivery of enteral nutrition. More dietetic input was associated with increased likelihood of a fasting guideline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-1437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1751143717748555</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30159009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2018-08, Vol.19 (3), p.188-195</ispartof><rights>The Intensive Care Society 2018</rights><rights>The Intensive Care Society 2018 2018 The Intensive Care Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-3ea6161230c593b1d24a3fa1b9d136b37f47e52a34ffbf1b0d3edfa69c3658e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-3ea6161230c593b1d24a3fa1b9d136b37f47e52a34ffbf1b0d3edfa69c3658e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110026/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110026/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30159009$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Segaran, Ella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, Tracy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proctor, Charlie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bispham, Wendy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Bethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Neill, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harkess, Sarah EJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terblanche, Marius</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring fasting practices for critical care patients – A web-based survey of UK intensive care units</title><title>Journal of the Intensive Care Society</title><addtitle>J Intensive Care Soc</addtitle><description>Background Enteral nutrition delivery in the critically ill is frequently interrupted for surgical and airway procedures to avoid aspiration of stomach contents. Recurrent fasting leads to under delivery of enteral nutrition and this underfeeding is associated with worse outcomes. International fasting recommendations do not provide guidance for intubated patients receiving enteral nutrition. This study aimed to gain a detailed perspective of UK critical care fasting practices. Methods A web-based survey was sent to 232 UK intensive care units consisting of questions relating to fasting practices, presence of guidelines, average fasting times for common procedures and dietitian time per intensive care unit bed. Results A total of 176 intensive care units responded. Only 20% of units had guidelines and respondents stated that they were not consistently adhered to (mean compliance 66%). Units with greater dietetic involvement were more likely to have guidelines (p = 0.04). Fasting times were shorter for abdominal surgery (p = 0.002), non-abdominal surgery (p = 0.016) and radiology (p = 0.015) if a guideline was present. Fasting for extubation and tracheostomy was similar irrespective of the presence of a guideline. Considerable variation in fasting times was reported, usually due to inconsistencies in clinical decision-making. Conclusions This survey of national practice demonstrates that fasting times are varied and inconsistent, which may lead to under-delivery of enteral nutrition. More dietetic input was associated with increased likelihood of a fasting guideline.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>1751-1437</issn><issn>2057-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1Uctq3DAUFaWlGdLsuypaduNU17Jke1MIIX3QQDYJdCeu5auJgsdyJXvS7PoP-cN-STVMEtpCtLkS56HDPYy9BXEMUNcfoFYAlazzvWqUUi_YqhSqLqQW31-y1Q4udvgBO0rpRuSjQeqmec0OpADVCtGu2PXZz2kI0Y9r7jDNuzlFtLO3lLgLkdvo8wMHbjESn3D2NM6J__51z0_4LXVFh4l6npa4pTseHL_6xv0405j8lvaiZfRzesNeORwSHT3MQ3b56ezy9EtxfvH56-nJeWFl1apCEmrQUEphVSs76MsKpUPo2j6H72TtqppUibJyrnPQiV5S71C3VmrVkDxkH_e209JtqLc5bMTBTNFvMN6ZgN78i4z-2qzD1mgAIUqdDd4_GMTwY6E0m41PloYBRwpLMqVoa9XkNUKmij3VxpBSJPf0DQizq8j8X1GWvPs73pPgsZBMKPaEhGsyN2GJY97W84Z_ACE2m0Q</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Segaran, Ella</creator><creator>Lovejoy, Tracy D</creator><creator>Proctor, Charlie</creator><creator>Bispham, Wendy L</creator><creator>Jordan, Rebecca</creator><creator>Jenkins, Bethan</creator><creator>O’Neill, Eileen</creator><creator>Harkess, Sarah EJ</creator><creator>Terblanche, Marius</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Exploring fasting practices for critical care patients – A web-based survey of UK intensive care units</title><author>Segaran, Ella ; Lovejoy, Tracy D ; Proctor, Charlie ; Bispham, Wendy L ; Jordan, Rebecca ; Jenkins, Bethan ; O’Neill, Eileen ; Harkess, Sarah EJ ; Terblanche, Marius</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-3ea6161230c593b1d24a3fa1b9d136b37f47e52a34ffbf1b0d3edfa69c3658e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Segaran, Ella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, Tracy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proctor, Charlie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bispham, Wendy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Bethan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Neill, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harkess, Sarah EJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terblanche, Marius</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Intensive Care Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Segaran, Ella</au><au>Lovejoy, Tracy D</au><au>Proctor, Charlie</au><au>Bispham, Wendy L</au><au>Jordan, Rebecca</au><au>Jenkins, Bethan</au><au>O’Neill, Eileen</au><au>Harkess, Sarah EJ</au><au>Terblanche, Marius</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring fasting practices for critical care patients – A web-based survey of UK intensive care units</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Intensive Care Society</jtitle><addtitle>J Intensive Care Soc</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>188-195</pages><issn>1751-1437</issn><eissn>2057-360X</eissn><abstract>Background Enteral nutrition delivery in the critically ill is frequently interrupted for surgical and airway procedures to avoid aspiration of stomach contents. Recurrent fasting leads to under delivery of enteral nutrition and this underfeeding is associated with worse outcomes. International fasting recommendations do not provide guidance for intubated patients receiving enteral nutrition. This study aimed to gain a detailed perspective of UK critical care fasting practices. Methods A web-based survey was sent to 232 UK intensive care units consisting of questions relating to fasting practices, presence of guidelines, average fasting times for common procedures and dietitian time per intensive care unit bed. Results A total of 176 intensive care units responded. Only 20% of units had guidelines and respondents stated that they were not consistently adhered to (mean compliance 66%). Units with greater dietetic involvement were more likely to have guidelines (p = 0.04). Fasting times were shorter for abdominal surgery (p = 0.002), non-abdominal surgery (p = 0.016) and radiology (p = 0.015) if a guideline was present. Fasting for extubation and tracheostomy was similar irrespective of the presence of a guideline. Considerable variation in fasting times was reported, usually due to inconsistencies in clinical decision-making. Conclusions This survey of national practice demonstrates that fasting times are varied and inconsistent, which may lead to under-delivery of enteral nutrition. More dietetic input was associated with increased likelihood of a fasting guideline.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30159009</pmid><doi>10.1177/1751143717748555</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-1437
ispartof Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2018-08, Vol.19 (3), p.188-195
issn 1751-1437
2057-360X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6110026
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SAGE Complete A-Z List; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Exploring fasting practices for critical care patients – A web-based survey of UK intensive care units
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T08%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20fasting%20practices%20for%20critical%20care%20patients%20%E2%80%93%20A%20web-based%20survey%20of%20UK%20intensive%20care%20units&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Intensive%20Care%20Society&rft.au=Segaran,%20Ella&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=188-195&rft.issn=1751-1437&rft.eissn=2057-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1751143717748555&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2097586881%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2097586881&rft_id=info:pmid/30159009&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1751143717748555&rfr_iscdi=true