Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems

The rich content of nutrients in human waste provides an outlook for turning it from pollutants to potential resources. The pilot-scale resource-oriented toilet with forward osmosis technology was demonstrated to have advantages to recover clean water, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, biogas, and he...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cleaner production 2018-09, Vol.196, p.1188-1197
Hauptverfasser: Shi, Yilei, Zhou, Lu, Xu, Yangyu, Zhou, Hongjie, Shi, Lei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1197
container_issue
container_start_page 1188
container_title Journal of cleaner production
container_volume 196
creator Shi, Yilei
Zhou, Lu
Xu, Yangyu
Zhou, Hongjie
Shi, Lei
description The rich content of nutrients in human waste provides an outlook for turning it from pollutants to potential resources. The pilot-scale resource-oriented toilet with forward osmosis technology was demonstrated to have advantages to recover clean water, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, biogas, and heat from urine and feces. For the possibility of further full-scale implementation in different scenarios, six resource-oriented toilet systems and one conventional toilet system were designed in this study. The methodology of cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were applied to analyze the life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of these systems. As results indicated, resource-oriented toilets with forward osmosis technology concentrating urine proved to have both economic and environmental benefit. The economic net present value results of new resource-oriented toilets were much better than conventional toilet. The energy consumption in resource-oriented toilets contributes a lot to the environmental impacts while resource recovery such as the fertilizer production and fresh water harvest in resource-oriented toilet systems offsets a lot. Taking both life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability into consideration, the partial resource-oriented toilet (only recovering nutrients from urine) is the best choice, and the totally independent resource-oriented toilet could be applied to replace conventional toilets in areas without any external facilities such as sewer and water supply system etc. [Display omitted] •The forward osmosis technology was applied in resource-oriented toilets.•Cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were conducted on resource-oriented toilets.•Resource-oriented toilets have higher economic net present values and lower environmental cost.•The resource-oriented toilets have better economic feasibility and environmental sustainability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6106690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652618317797</els_id><sourcerecordid>2116878712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-f737bfd7469c005f03ef5aecaf09fb12fa1bfb58665565ac6f257800258c58c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2r1DAQhoMonvXoT1B66U3rJG0-eqPIwS9YEEGvQ5pONEvbrJnuwv57s-x60CuFQEjyzJtJHsaec2g4cPVq1-z8hPucGgHcNKAaLvoHbMON7muujXrINtDLvlZSqBv2hGgHwDXo7jG7aUF0Uspuw75sY8DKn0pW5ROtlVvGCpdjzGmZcVndVDkiJDovqpBylZHSIXusU45lD8dqTXHCtaITrTjTU_YouInw2XW-Zd_ev_t697Hefv7w6e7ttvZStmsddKuHMOpO9R5ABmgxSIfeBejDwEVwfAiDNEpJqaTzKgipDYCQxpcB7S17fcndH4YZR196yW6y-xxnl082uWj_PlniD_s9Ha3ioFR_Dnh5Dcjp5wFptXMkj9PkFkwHsoJzZbTRXPwPynXXKm4KKi-oz4koY7jviIM9m7M7ezVnz-YsKFvMlboXfz7nvuq3qgK8uQBYPvUYMVvyRYDHMWb0qx1T_McVvwDch68y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2111743618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Shi, Yilei ; Zhou, Lu ; Xu, Yangyu ; Zhou, Hongjie ; Shi, Lei</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yilei ; Zhou, Lu ; Xu, Yangyu ; Zhou, Hongjie ; Shi, Lei</creatorcontrib><description>The rich content of nutrients in human waste provides an outlook for turning it from pollutants to potential resources. The pilot-scale resource-oriented toilet with forward osmosis technology was demonstrated to have advantages to recover clean water, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, biogas, and heat from urine and feces. For the possibility of further full-scale implementation in different scenarios, six resource-oriented toilet systems and one conventional toilet system were designed in this study. The methodology of cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were applied to analyze the life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of these systems. As results indicated, resource-oriented toilets with forward osmosis technology concentrating urine proved to have both economic and environmental benefit. The economic net present value results of new resource-oriented toilets were much better than conventional toilet. The energy consumption in resource-oriented toilets contributes a lot to the environmental impacts while resource recovery such as the fertilizer production and fresh water harvest in resource-oriented toilet systems offsets a lot. Taking both life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability into consideration, the partial resource-oriented toilet (only recovering nutrients from urine) is the best choice, and the totally independent resource-oriented toilet could be applied to replace conventional toilets in areas without any external facilities such as sewer and water supply system etc. [Display omitted] •The forward osmosis technology was applied in resource-oriented toilets.•Cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were conducted on resource-oriented toilets.•Resource-oriented toilets have higher economic net present values and lower environmental cost.•The resource-oriented toilets have better economic feasibility and environmental sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30245554</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>biogas ; Cost-benefit analysis ; economic feasibility ; energy ; environmental assessment ; environmental impact ; feces ; fertilizers ; Forward osmosis ; freshwater ; heat ; Life cycle assessment ; life cycle costing ; nitrogen ; nutrients ; osmosis ; phosphorus ; pollutants ; potassium ; Resource recovery ; Toilet ; urine ; water supply</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2018-09, Vol.196, p.1188-1197</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-f737bfd7469c005f03ef5aecaf09fb12fa1bfb58665565ac6f257800258c58c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-f737bfd7469c005f03ef5aecaf09fb12fa1bfb58665565ac6f257800258c58c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30245554$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yilei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hongjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Lei</creatorcontrib><title>Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><addtitle>J Clean Prod</addtitle><description>The rich content of nutrients in human waste provides an outlook for turning it from pollutants to potential resources. The pilot-scale resource-oriented toilet with forward osmosis technology was demonstrated to have advantages to recover clean water, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, biogas, and heat from urine and feces. For the possibility of further full-scale implementation in different scenarios, six resource-oriented toilet systems and one conventional toilet system were designed in this study. The methodology of cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were applied to analyze the life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of these systems. As results indicated, resource-oriented toilets with forward osmosis technology concentrating urine proved to have both economic and environmental benefit. The economic net present value results of new resource-oriented toilets were much better than conventional toilet. The energy consumption in resource-oriented toilets contributes a lot to the environmental impacts while resource recovery such as the fertilizer production and fresh water harvest in resource-oriented toilet systems offsets a lot. Taking both life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability into consideration, the partial resource-oriented toilet (only recovering nutrients from urine) is the best choice, and the totally independent resource-oriented toilet could be applied to replace conventional toilets in areas without any external facilities such as sewer and water supply system etc. [Display omitted] •The forward osmosis technology was applied in resource-oriented toilets.•Cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were conducted on resource-oriented toilets.•Resource-oriented toilets have higher economic net present values and lower environmental cost.•The resource-oriented toilets have better economic feasibility and environmental sustainability.</description><subject>biogas</subject><subject>Cost-benefit analysis</subject><subject>economic feasibility</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>environmental assessment</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>fertilizers</subject><subject>Forward osmosis</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>life cycle costing</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>nutrients</subject><subject>osmosis</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>pollutants</subject><subject>potassium</subject><subject>Resource recovery</subject><subject>Toilet</subject><subject>urine</subject><subject>water supply</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV2r1DAQhoMonvXoT1B66U3rJG0-eqPIwS9YEEGvQ5pONEvbrJnuwv57s-x60CuFQEjyzJtJHsaec2g4cPVq1-z8hPucGgHcNKAaLvoHbMON7muujXrINtDLvlZSqBv2hGgHwDXo7jG7aUF0Uspuw75sY8DKn0pW5ROtlVvGCpdjzGmZcVndVDkiJDovqpBylZHSIXusU45lD8dqTXHCtaITrTjTU_YouInw2XW-Zd_ev_t697Hefv7w6e7ttvZStmsddKuHMOpO9R5ABmgxSIfeBejDwEVwfAiDNEpJqaTzKgipDYCQxpcB7S17fcndH4YZR196yW6y-xxnl082uWj_PlniD_s9Ha3ioFR_Dnh5Dcjp5wFptXMkj9PkFkwHsoJzZbTRXPwPynXXKm4KKi-oz4koY7jviIM9m7M7ezVnz-YsKFvMlboXfz7nvuq3qgK8uQBYPvUYMVvyRYDHMWb0qx1T_McVvwDch68y</recordid><startdate>20180920</startdate><enddate>20180920</enddate><creator>Shi, Yilei</creator><creator>Zhou, Lu</creator><creator>Xu, Yangyu</creator><creator>Zhou, Hongjie</creator><creator>Shi, Lei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180920</creationdate><title>Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems</title><author>Shi, Yilei ; Zhou, Lu ; Xu, Yangyu ; Zhou, Hongjie ; Shi, Lei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-f737bfd7469c005f03ef5aecaf09fb12fa1bfb58665565ac6f257800258c58c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>biogas</topic><topic>Cost-benefit analysis</topic><topic>economic feasibility</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>environmental assessment</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>fertilizers</topic><topic>Forward osmosis</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>life cycle costing</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>nutrients</topic><topic>osmosis</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>pollutants</topic><topic>potassium</topic><topic>Resource recovery</topic><topic>Toilet</topic><topic>urine</topic><topic>water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yilei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hongjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Lei</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Yilei</au><au>Zhou, Lu</au><au>Xu, Yangyu</au><au>Zhou, Hongjie</au><au>Shi, Lei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><addtitle>J Clean Prod</addtitle><date>2018-09-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>196</volume><spage>1188</spage><epage>1197</epage><pages>1188-1197</pages><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>The rich content of nutrients in human waste provides an outlook for turning it from pollutants to potential resources. The pilot-scale resource-oriented toilet with forward osmosis technology was demonstrated to have advantages to recover clean water, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, biogas, and heat from urine and feces. For the possibility of further full-scale implementation in different scenarios, six resource-oriented toilet systems and one conventional toilet system were designed in this study. The methodology of cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were applied to analyze the life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of these systems. As results indicated, resource-oriented toilets with forward osmosis technology concentrating urine proved to have both economic and environmental benefit. The economic net present value results of new resource-oriented toilets were much better than conventional toilet. The energy consumption in resource-oriented toilets contributes a lot to the environmental impacts while resource recovery such as the fertilizer production and fresh water harvest in resource-oriented toilet systems offsets a lot. Taking both life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability into consideration, the partial resource-oriented toilet (only recovering nutrients from urine) is the best choice, and the totally independent resource-oriented toilet could be applied to replace conventional toilets in areas without any external facilities such as sewer and water supply system etc. [Display omitted] •The forward osmosis technology was applied in resource-oriented toilets.•Cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were conducted on resource-oriented toilets.•Resource-oriented toilets have higher economic net present values and lower environmental cost.•The resource-oriented toilets have better economic feasibility and environmental sustainability.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30245554</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-6526
ispartof Journal of cleaner production, 2018-09, Vol.196, p.1188-1197
issn 0959-6526
1879-1786
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6106690
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects biogas
Cost-benefit analysis
economic feasibility
energy
environmental assessment
environmental impact
feces
fertilizers
Forward osmosis
freshwater
heat
Life cycle assessment
life cycle costing
nitrogen
nutrients
osmosis
phosphorus
pollutants
potassium
Resource recovery
Toilet
urine
water supply
title Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T02%3A12%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20cycle%20cost%20and%20environmental%20assessment%20for%20resource-oriented%20toilet%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Shi,%20Yilei&rft.date=2018-09-20&rft.volume=196&rft.spage=1188&rft.epage=1197&rft.pages=1188-1197&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2116878712%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2111743618&rft_id=info:pmid/30245554&rft_els_id=S0959652618317797&rfr_iscdi=true