Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems
The rich content of nutrients in human waste provides an outlook for turning it from pollutants to potential resources. The pilot-scale resource-oriented toilet with forward osmosis technology was demonstrated to have advantages to recover clean water, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, biogas, and he...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cleaner production 2018-09, Vol.196, p.1188-1197 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1197 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1188 |
container_title | Journal of cleaner production |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | Shi, Yilei Zhou, Lu Xu, Yangyu Zhou, Hongjie Shi, Lei |
description | The rich content of nutrients in human waste provides an outlook for turning it from pollutants to potential resources. The pilot-scale resource-oriented toilet with forward osmosis technology was demonstrated to have advantages to recover clean water, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, biogas, and heat from urine and feces. For the possibility of further full-scale implementation in different scenarios, six resource-oriented toilet systems and one conventional toilet system were designed in this study. The methodology of cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were applied to analyze the life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of these systems. As results indicated, resource-oriented toilets with forward osmosis technology concentrating urine proved to have both economic and environmental benefit. The economic net present value results of new resource-oriented toilets were much better than conventional toilet. The energy consumption in resource-oriented toilets contributes a lot to the environmental impacts while resource recovery such as the fertilizer production and fresh water harvest in resource-oriented toilet systems offsets a lot. Taking both life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability into consideration, the partial resource-oriented toilet (only recovering nutrients from urine) is the best choice, and the totally independent resource-oriented toilet could be applied to replace conventional toilets in areas without any external facilities such as sewer and water supply system etc.
[Display omitted]
•The forward osmosis technology was applied in resource-oriented toilets.•Cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were conducted on resource-oriented toilets.•Resource-oriented toilets have higher economic net present values and lower environmental cost.•The resource-oriented toilets have better economic feasibility and environmental sustainability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6106690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652618317797</els_id><sourcerecordid>2116878712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-f737bfd7469c005f03ef5aecaf09fb12fa1bfb58665565ac6f257800258c58c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV2r1DAQhoMonvXoT1B66U3rJG0-eqPIwS9YEEGvQ5pONEvbrJnuwv57s-x60CuFQEjyzJtJHsaec2g4cPVq1-z8hPucGgHcNKAaLvoHbMON7muujXrINtDLvlZSqBv2hGgHwDXo7jG7aUF0Uspuw75sY8DKn0pW5ROtlVvGCpdjzGmZcVndVDkiJDovqpBylZHSIXusU45lD8dqTXHCtaITrTjTU_YouInw2XW-Zd_ev_t697Hefv7w6e7ttvZStmsddKuHMOpO9R5ABmgxSIfeBejDwEVwfAiDNEpJqaTzKgipDYCQxpcB7S17fcndH4YZR196yW6y-xxnl082uWj_PlniD_s9Ha3ioFR_Dnh5Dcjp5wFptXMkj9PkFkwHsoJzZbTRXPwPynXXKm4KKi-oz4koY7jviIM9m7M7ezVnz-YsKFvMlboXfz7nvuq3qgK8uQBYPvUYMVvyRYDHMWb0qx1T_McVvwDch68y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2111743618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Shi, Yilei ; Zhou, Lu ; Xu, Yangyu ; Zhou, Hongjie ; Shi, Lei</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yilei ; Zhou, Lu ; Xu, Yangyu ; Zhou, Hongjie ; Shi, Lei</creatorcontrib><description>The rich content of nutrients in human waste provides an outlook for turning it from pollutants to potential resources. The pilot-scale resource-oriented toilet with forward osmosis technology was demonstrated to have advantages to recover clean water, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, biogas, and heat from urine and feces. For the possibility of further full-scale implementation in different scenarios, six resource-oriented toilet systems and one conventional toilet system were designed in this study. The methodology of cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were applied to analyze the life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of these systems. As results indicated, resource-oriented toilets with forward osmosis technology concentrating urine proved to have both economic and environmental benefit. The economic net present value results of new resource-oriented toilets were much better than conventional toilet. The energy consumption in resource-oriented toilets contributes a lot to the environmental impacts while resource recovery such as the fertilizer production and fresh water harvest in resource-oriented toilet systems offsets a lot. Taking both life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability into consideration, the partial resource-oriented toilet (only recovering nutrients from urine) is the best choice, and the totally independent resource-oriented toilet could be applied to replace conventional toilets in areas without any external facilities such as sewer and water supply system etc.
[Display omitted]
•The forward osmosis technology was applied in resource-oriented toilets.•Cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were conducted on resource-oriented toilets.•Resource-oriented toilets have higher economic net present values and lower environmental cost.•The resource-oriented toilets have better economic feasibility and environmental sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30245554</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>biogas ; Cost-benefit analysis ; economic feasibility ; energy ; environmental assessment ; environmental impact ; feces ; fertilizers ; Forward osmosis ; freshwater ; heat ; Life cycle assessment ; life cycle costing ; nitrogen ; nutrients ; osmosis ; phosphorus ; pollutants ; potassium ; Resource recovery ; Toilet ; urine ; water supply</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2018-09, Vol.196, p.1188-1197</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-f737bfd7469c005f03ef5aecaf09fb12fa1bfb58665565ac6f257800258c58c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-f737bfd7469c005f03ef5aecaf09fb12fa1bfb58665565ac6f257800258c58c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30245554$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yilei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hongjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Lei</creatorcontrib><title>Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><addtitle>J Clean Prod</addtitle><description>The rich content of nutrients in human waste provides an outlook for turning it from pollutants to potential resources. The pilot-scale resource-oriented toilet with forward osmosis technology was demonstrated to have advantages to recover clean water, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, biogas, and heat from urine and feces. For the possibility of further full-scale implementation in different scenarios, six resource-oriented toilet systems and one conventional toilet system were designed in this study. The methodology of cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were applied to analyze the life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of these systems. As results indicated, resource-oriented toilets with forward osmosis technology concentrating urine proved to have both economic and environmental benefit. The economic net present value results of new resource-oriented toilets were much better than conventional toilet. The energy consumption in resource-oriented toilets contributes a lot to the environmental impacts while resource recovery such as the fertilizer production and fresh water harvest in resource-oriented toilet systems offsets a lot. Taking both life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability into consideration, the partial resource-oriented toilet (only recovering nutrients from urine) is the best choice, and the totally independent resource-oriented toilet could be applied to replace conventional toilets in areas without any external facilities such as sewer and water supply system etc.
[Display omitted]
•The forward osmosis technology was applied in resource-oriented toilets.•Cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were conducted on resource-oriented toilets.•Resource-oriented toilets have higher economic net present values and lower environmental cost.•The resource-oriented toilets have better economic feasibility and environmental sustainability.</description><subject>biogas</subject><subject>Cost-benefit analysis</subject><subject>economic feasibility</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>environmental assessment</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>fertilizers</subject><subject>Forward osmosis</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>life cycle costing</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>nutrients</subject><subject>osmosis</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>pollutants</subject><subject>potassium</subject><subject>Resource recovery</subject><subject>Toilet</subject><subject>urine</subject><subject>water supply</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV2r1DAQhoMonvXoT1B66U3rJG0-eqPIwS9YEEGvQ5pONEvbrJnuwv57s-x60CuFQEjyzJtJHsaec2g4cPVq1-z8hPucGgHcNKAaLvoHbMON7muujXrINtDLvlZSqBv2hGgHwDXo7jG7aUF0Uspuw75sY8DKn0pW5ROtlVvGCpdjzGmZcVndVDkiJDovqpBylZHSIXusU45lD8dqTXHCtaITrTjTU_YouInw2XW-Zd_ev_t697Hefv7w6e7ttvZStmsddKuHMOpO9R5ABmgxSIfeBejDwEVwfAiDNEpJqaTzKgipDYCQxpcB7S17fcndH4YZR196yW6y-xxnl082uWj_PlniD_s9Ha3ioFR_Dnh5Dcjp5wFptXMkj9PkFkwHsoJzZbTRXPwPynXXKm4KKi-oz4koY7jviIM9m7M7ezVnz-YsKFvMlboXfz7nvuq3qgK8uQBYPvUYMVvyRYDHMWb0qx1T_McVvwDch68y</recordid><startdate>20180920</startdate><enddate>20180920</enddate><creator>Shi, Yilei</creator><creator>Zhou, Lu</creator><creator>Xu, Yangyu</creator><creator>Zhou, Hongjie</creator><creator>Shi, Lei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180920</creationdate><title>Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems</title><author>Shi, Yilei ; Zhou, Lu ; Xu, Yangyu ; Zhou, Hongjie ; Shi, Lei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-f737bfd7469c005f03ef5aecaf09fb12fa1bfb58665565ac6f257800258c58c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>biogas</topic><topic>Cost-benefit analysis</topic><topic>economic feasibility</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>environmental assessment</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>fertilizers</topic><topic>Forward osmosis</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>life cycle costing</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>nutrients</topic><topic>osmosis</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>pollutants</topic><topic>potassium</topic><topic>Resource recovery</topic><topic>Toilet</topic><topic>urine</topic><topic>water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yilei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hongjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Lei</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Yilei</au><au>Zhou, Lu</au><au>Xu, Yangyu</au><au>Zhou, Hongjie</au><au>Shi, Lei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><addtitle>J Clean Prod</addtitle><date>2018-09-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>196</volume><spage>1188</spage><epage>1197</epage><pages>1188-1197</pages><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>The rich content of nutrients in human waste provides an outlook for turning it from pollutants to potential resources. The pilot-scale resource-oriented toilet with forward osmosis technology was demonstrated to have advantages to recover clean water, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, biogas, and heat from urine and feces. For the possibility of further full-scale implementation in different scenarios, six resource-oriented toilet systems and one conventional toilet system were designed in this study. The methodology of cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were applied to analyze the life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of these systems. As results indicated, resource-oriented toilets with forward osmosis technology concentrating urine proved to have both economic and environmental benefit. The economic net present value results of new resource-oriented toilets were much better than conventional toilet. The energy consumption in resource-oriented toilets contributes a lot to the environmental impacts while resource recovery such as the fertilizer production and fresh water harvest in resource-oriented toilet systems offsets a lot. Taking both life cycle economic feasibility and environmental sustainability into consideration, the partial resource-oriented toilet (only recovering nutrients from urine) is the best choice, and the totally independent resource-oriented toilet could be applied to replace conventional toilets in areas without any external facilities such as sewer and water supply system etc.
[Display omitted]
•The forward osmosis technology was applied in resource-oriented toilets.•Cost-benefit analysis and life cycle assessment were conducted on resource-oriented toilets.•Resource-oriented toilets have higher economic net present values and lower environmental cost.•The resource-oriented toilets have better economic feasibility and environmental sustainability.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30245554</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-6526 |
ispartof | Journal of cleaner production, 2018-09, Vol.196, p.1188-1197 |
issn | 0959-6526 1879-1786 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6106690 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | biogas Cost-benefit analysis economic feasibility energy environmental assessment environmental impact feces fertilizers Forward osmosis freshwater heat Life cycle assessment life cycle costing nitrogen nutrients osmosis phosphorus pollutants potassium Resource recovery Toilet urine water supply |
title | Life cycle cost and environmental assessment for resource-oriented toilet systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T02%3A12%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20cycle%20cost%20and%20environmental%20assessment%20for%20resource-oriented%20toilet%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Shi,%20Yilei&rft.date=2018-09-20&rft.volume=196&rft.spage=1188&rft.epage=1197&rft.pages=1188-1197&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2116878712%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2111743618&rft_id=info:pmid/30245554&rft_els_id=S0959652618317797&rfr_iscdi=true |