The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage

Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro Sequoia plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (−196°C) Sequoia shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biological physics 2017-09, Vol.43 (3), p.367-379
Hauptverfasser: Halmagyi, A., Surducan, E., Surducan, V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 379
container_issue 3
container_start_page 367
container_title Journal of biological physics
container_volume 43
creator Halmagyi, A.
Surducan, E.
Surducan, V.
description Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro Sequoia plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (−196°C) Sequoia shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included: (a) in vitro plants grown in regular conditions (at 24 ± 1°C during a 16-h light photoperiod with a light intensity of 39.06 μEm −2 s −1 photosynthetically active radiation), (b) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with controlled environment without microwave irradiation, and (c) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with LPM irradiation for various times (5, 15, 30, 40 days). In comparison to control plants, significant differences in shoot multiplication and growth parameters (length of shoots and roots) were observed after 40 days of LPM exposure. An opposite effect was achieved regarding the content of total soluble proteins, which decreased with increasing exposure time to LPM. HPM irradiation was tested as a novel rewarming method following storage in liquid nitrogen. To our knowledge, this is the first report using this type of rewarming method. Although, shoot tips subjected to HPM exposure showed 28% recovery following cryostorage compared to 44% for shoot tips rewarmed in liquid medium at 22 ± 1 °C, we consider that the method represent a basis and can be further improved. The results lead to the overall conclusion that LPM had a stimulating effect on growth and multiplication of in vitro Sequoia plants, while the HPM used for rewarming of cryopreserved apices was not effective to achieve high rates of regrowth after liquid nitrogen exposure.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10867-017-9457-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6104903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1931552108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-92a48051a00198b1d3bfb63110269be764cc0c2ce22f86fa2de292480ccd00be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFvFCEUxonR2LX6B3gxJF68oA9mhpm5mJjGqkmTHtqeCcO8maGZhS0wu9mD_7tstzbVpIQEyPe9Hzw-Qt5z-MwB6i-RQyNrBrxmbVnVrHxBVryqCwayaV-SFUAr8h7kCXkT4y3kcyOq1-RENLKs81iR39cTUhwGNIn6gc5-x6h2PZ3sOLGN32Gga2uC3-ktUhuC7q1O1juap3V0a1PwdMy6o1d4t3ir6WbWLsV7SprQBhrQ-C2GPdVDyjwT9j4mH_SIb8mrQc8R3z2sp-Tm_Pv12U92cfnj19m3C2bKGhJrhS4bqLgG4G3T8b7ohk4WnIOQbYe1LI0BIwwKMTRy0KJH0YpcYkwP0GFxSr4euZulW2Nv0KWgZ7UJdq3DXnlt1b-Ks5Ma_VZJDmULRQZ8egAEf7dgTGpto8E5t4p-iYq3vGiKQkCZrR__s976JbjcXnYVvKpETi27-NGV_zbGgMPjYzioQ7jqGK7K4apDuOpA_vC0i8eKv2lmgzgaYpbciOHJ1c9S_wBAGbHY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1931552108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Halmagyi, A. ; Surducan, E. ; Surducan, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Halmagyi, A. ; Surducan, E. ; Surducan, V.</creatorcontrib><description>Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro Sequoia plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (−196°C) Sequoia shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included: (a) in vitro plants grown in regular conditions (at 24 ± 1°C during a 16-h light photoperiod with a light intensity of 39.06 μEm −2 s −1 photosynthetically active radiation), (b) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with controlled environment without microwave irradiation, and (c) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with LPM irradiation for various times (5, 15, 30, 40 days). In comparison to control plants, significant differences in shoot multiplication and growth parameters (length of shoots and roots) were observed after 40 days of LPM exposure. An opposite effect was achieved regarding the content of total soluble proteins, which decreased with increasing exposure time to LPM. HPM irradiation was tested as a novel rewarming method following storage in liquid nitrogen. To our knowledge, this is the first report using this type of rewarming method. Although, shoot tips subjected to HPM exposure showed 28% recovery following cryostorage compared to 44% for shoot tips rewarmed in liquid medium at 22 ± 1 °C, we consider that the method represent a basis and can be further improved. The results lead to the overall conclusion that LPM had a stimulating effect on growth and multiplication of in vitro Sequoia plants, while the HPM used for rewarming of cryopreserved apices was not effective to achieve high rates of regrowth after liquid nitrogen exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-0606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0689</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10867-017-9457-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28647777</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biochemistry ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biophysics ; Complex Fluids and Microfluidics ; Complex Systems ; Cryogenic engineering ; Cryopreservation ; Exposure ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Irradiation ; Light intensity ; Liquid nitrogen ; Microwave radiation ; Microwaves ; Neurosciences ; Original Paper ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Power plants ; Radiation ; Shoots ; Soft and Granular Matter</subject><ispartof>Journal of biological physics, 2017-09, Vol.43 (3), p.367-379</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Biological Physics is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-92a48051a00198b1d3bfb63110269be764cc0c2ce22f86fa2de292480ccd00be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-92a48051a00198b1d3bfb63110269be764cc0c2ce22f86fa2de292480ccd00be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104903/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104903/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28647777$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halmagyi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surducan, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surducan, V.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage</title><title>Journal of biological physics</title><addtitle>J Biol Phys</addtitle><addtitle>J Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro Sequoia plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (−196°C) Sequoia shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included: (a) in vitro plants grown in regular conditions (at 24 ± 1°C during a 16-h light photoperiod with a light intensity of 39.06 μEm −2 s −1 photosynthetically active radiation), (b) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with controlled environment without microwave irradiation, and (c) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with LPM irradiation for various times (5, 15, 30, 40 days). In comparison to control plants, significant differences in shoot multiplication and growth parameters (length of shoots and roots) were observed after 40 days of LPM exposure. An opposite effect was achieved regarding the content of total soluble proteins, which decreased with increasing exposure time to LPM. HPM irradiation was tested as a novel rewarming method following storage in liquid nitrogen. To our knowledge, this is the first report using this type of rewarming method. Although, shoot tips subjected to HPM exposure showed 28% recovery following cryostorage compared to 44% for shoot tips rewarmed in liquid medium at 22 ± 1 °C, we consider that the method represent a basis and can be further improved. The results lead to the overall conclusion that LPM had a stimulating effect on growth and multiplication of in vitro Sequoia plants, while the HPM used for rewarming of cryopreserved apices was not effective to achieve high rates of regrowth after liquid nitrogen exposure.</description><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Complex Fluids and Microfluidics</subject><subject>Complex Systems</subject><subject>Cryogenic engineering</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Light intensity</subject><subject>Liquid nitrogen</subject><subject>Microwave radiation</subject><subject>Microwaves</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>Soft and Granular Matter</subject><issn>0092-0606</issn><issn>1573-0689</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFvFCEUxonR2LX6B3gxJF68oA9mhpm5mJjGqkmTHtqeCcO8maGZhS0wu9mD_7tstzbVpIQEyPe9Hzw-Qt5z-MwB6i-RQyNrBrxmbVnVrHxBVryqCwayaV-SFUAr8h7kCXkT4y3kcyOq1-RENLKs81iR39cTUhwGNIn6gc5-x6h2PZ3sOLGN32Gga2uC3-ktUhuC7q1O1juap3V0a1PwdMy6o1d4t3ir6WbWLsV7SprQBhrQ-C2GPdVDyjwT9j4mH_SIb8mrQc8R3z2sp-Tm_Pv12U92cfnj19m3C2bKGhJrhS4bqLgG4G3T8b7ohk4WnIOQbYe1LI0BIwwKMTRy0KJH0YpcYkwP0GFxSr4euZulW2Nv0KWgZ7UJdq3DXnlt1b-Ks5Ma_VZJDmULRQZ8egAEf7dgTGpto8E5t4p-iYq3vGiKQkCZrR__s976JbjcXnYVvKpETi27-NGV_zbGgMPjYzioQ7jqGK7K4apDuOpA_vC0i8eKv2lmgzgaYpbciOHJ1c9S_wBAGbHY</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Halmagyi, A.</creator><creator>Surducan, E.</creator><creator>Surducan, V.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage</title><author>Halmagyi, A. ; Surducan, E. ; Surducan, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-92a48051a00198b1d3bfb63110269be764cc0c2ce22f86fa2de292480ccd00be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Complex Fluids and Microfluidics</topic><topic>Complex Systems</topic><topic>Cryogenic engineering</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Light intensity</topic><topic>Liquid nitrogen</topic><topic>Microwave radiation</topic><topic>Microwaves</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>Soft and Granular Matter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halmagyi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surducan, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surducan, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of biological physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halmagyi, A.</au><au>Surducan, E.</au><au>Surducan, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biological physics</jtitle><stitle>J Biol Phys</stitle><addtitle>J Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>367-379</pages><issn>0092-0606</issn><eissn>1573-0689</eissn><abstract>Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro Sequoia plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (−196°C) Sequoia shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included: (a) in vitro plants grown in regular conditions (at 24 ± 1°C during a 16-h light photoperiod with a light intensity of 39.06 μEm −2 s −1 photosynthetically active radiation), (b) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with controlled environment without microwave irradiation, and (c) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with LPM irradiation for various times (5, 15, 30, 40 days). In comparison to control plants, significant differences in shoot multiplication and growth parameters (length of shoots and roots) were observed after 40 days of LPM exposure. An opposite effect was achieved regarding the content of total soluble proteins, which decreased with increasing exposure time to LPM. HPM irradiation was tested as a novel rewarming method following storage in liquid nitrogen. To our knowledge, this is the first report using this type of rewarming method. Although, shoot tips subjected to HPM exposure showed 28% recovery following cryostorage compared to 44% for shoot tips rewarmed in liquid medium at 22 ± 1 °C, we consider that the method represent a basis and can be further improved. The results lead to the overall conclusion that LPM had a stimulating effect on growth and multiplication of in vitro Sequoia plants, while the HPM used for rewarming of cryopreserved apices was not effective to achieve high rates of regrowth after liquid nitrogen exposure.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>28647777</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10867-017-9457-4</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0092-0606
ispartof Journal of biological physics, 2017-09, Vol.43 (3), p.367-379
issn 0092-0606
1573-0689
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6104903
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biochemistry
Biological and Medical Physics
Biophysics
Complex Fluids and Microfluidics
Complex Systems
Cryogenic engineering
Cryopreservation
Exposure
Flowers & plants
Irradiation
Light intensity
Liquid nitrogen
Microwave radiation
Microwaves
Neurosciences
Original Paper
Physics
Physics and Astronomy
Power plants
Radiation
Shoots
Soft and Granular Matter
title The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A06%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20low-%20and%20high-power%20microwave%20irradiation%20on%20in%20vitro%20grown%20Sequoia%20plants%20and%20their%20recovery%20after%20cryostorage&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biological%20physics&rft.au=Halmagyi,%20A.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=367-379&rft.issn=0092-0606&rft.eissn=1573-0689&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10867-017-9457-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1931552108%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1931552108&rft_id=info:pmid/28647777&rfr_iscdi=true