The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage
Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro Sequoia plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (−196°C) Sequoia shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included:...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biological physics 2017-09, Vol.43 (3), p.367-379 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 379 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 367 |
container_title | Journal of biological physics |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Halmagyi, A. Surducan, E. Surducan, V. |
description | Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro
Sequoia
plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (−196°C)
Sequoia
shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included: (a) in vitro plants grown in regular conditions (at 24 ± 1°C during a 16-h light photoperiod with a light intensity of 39.06 μEm
−2
s
−1
photosynthetically active radiation), (b) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with controlled environment without microwave irradiation, and (c) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with LPM irradiation for various times (5, 15, 30, 40 days). In comparison to control plants, significant differences in shoot multiplication and growth parameters (length of shoots and roots) were observed after 40 days of LPM exposure. An opposite effect was achieved regarding the content of total soluble proteins, which decreased with increasing exposure time to LPM. HPM irradiation was tested as a novel rewarming method following storage in liquid nitrogen. To our knowledge, this is the first report using this type of rewarming method. Although, shoot tips subjected to HPM exposure showed 28% recovery following cryostorage compared to 44% for shoot tips rewarmed in liquid medium at 22 ± 1 °C, we consider that the method represent a basis and can be further improved. The results lead to the overall conclusion that LPM had a stimulating effect on growth and multiplication of in vitro
Sequoia
plants, while the HPM used for rewarming of cryopreserved apices was not effective to achieve high rates of regrowth after liquid nitrogen exposure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10867-017-9457-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6104903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1931552108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-92a48051a00198b1d3bfb63110269be764cc0c2ce22f86fa2de292480ccd00be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFvFCEUxonR2LX6B3gxJF68oA9mhpm5mJjGqkmTHtqeCcO8maGZhS0wu9mD_7tstzbVpIQEyPe9Hzw-Qt5z-MwB6i-RQyNrBrxmbVnVrHxBVryqCwayaV-SFUAr8h7kCXkT4y3kcyOq1-RENLKs81iR39cTUhwGNIn6gc5-x6h2PZ3sOLGN32Gga2uC3-ktUhuC7q1O1juap3V0a1PwdMy6o1d4t3ir6WbWLsV7SprQBhrQ-C2GPdVDyjwT9j4mH_SIb8mrQc8R3z2sp-Tm_Pv12U92cfnj19m3C2bKGhJrhS4bqLgG4G3T8b7ohk4WnIOQbYe1LI0BIwwKMTRy0KJH0YpcYkwP0GFxSr4euZulW2Nv0KWgZ7UJdq3DXnlt1b-Ks5Ma_VZJDmULRQZ8egAEf7dgTGpto8E5t4p-iYq3vGiKQkCZrR__s976JbjcXnYVvKpETi27-NGV_zbGgMPjYzioQ7jqGK7K4apDuOpA_vC0i8eKv2lmgzgaYpbciOHJ1c9S_wBAGbHY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1931552108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Halmagyi, A. ; Surducan, E. ; Surducan, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Halmagyi, A. ; Surducan, E. ; Surducan, V.</creatorcontrib><description>Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro
Sequoia
plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (−196°C)
Sequoia
shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included: (a) in vitro plants grown in regular conditions (at 24 ± 1°C during a 16-h light photoperiod with a light intensity of 39.06 μEm
−2
s
−1
photosynthetically active radiation), (b) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with controlled environment without microwave irradiation, and (c) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with LPM irradiation for various times (5, 15, 30, 40 days). In comparison to control plants, significant differences in shoot multiplication and growth parameters (length of shoots and roots) were observed after 40 days of LPM exposure. An opposite effect was achieved regarding the content of total soluble proteins, which decreased with increasing exposure time to LPM. HPM irradiation was tested as a novel rewarming method following storage in liquid nitrogen. To our knowledge, this is the first report using this type of rewarming method. Although, shoot tips subjected to HPM exposure showed 28% recovery following cryostorage compared to 44% for shoot tips rewarmed in liquid medium at 22 ± 1 °C, we consider that the method represent a basis and can be further improved. The results lead to the overall conclusion that LPM had a stimulating effect on growth and multiplication of in vitro
Sequoia
plants, while the HPM used for rewarming of cryopreserved apices was not effective to achieve high rates of regrowth after liquid nitrogen exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-0606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0689</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10867-017-9457-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28647777</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biochemistry ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biophysics ; Complex Fluids and Microfluidics ; Complex Systems ; Cryogenic engineering ; Cryopreservation ; Exposure ; Flowers & plants ; Irradiation ; Light intensity ; Liquid nitrogen ; Microwave radiation ; Microwaves ; Neurosciences ; Original Paper ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Power plants ; Radiation ; Shoots ; Soft and Granular Matter</subject><ispartof>Journal of biological physics, 2017-09, Vol.43 (3), p.367-379</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Biological Physics is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-92a48051a00198b1d3bfb63110269be764cc0c2ce22f86fa2de292480ccd00be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-92a48051a00198b1d3bfb63110269be764cc0c2ce22f86fa2de292480ccd00be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104903/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6104903/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28647777$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halmagyi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surducan, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surducan, V.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage</title><title>Journal of biological physics</title><addtitle>J Biol Phys</addtitle><addtitle>J Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro
Sequoia
plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (−196°C)
Sequoia
shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included: (a) in vitro plants grown in regular conditions (at 24 ± 1°C during a 16-h light photoperiod with a light intensity of 39.06 μEm
−2
s
−1
photosynthetically active radiation), (b) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with controlled environment without microwave irradiation, and (c) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with LPM irradiation for various times (5, 15, 30, 40 days). In comparison to control plants, significant differences in shoot multiplication and growth parameters (length of shoots and roots) were observed after 40 days of LPM exposure. An opposite effect was achieved regarding the content of total soluble proteins, which decreased with increasing exposure time to LPM. HPM irradiation was tested as a novel rewarming method following storage in liquid nitrogen. To our knowledge, this is the first report using this type of rewarming method. Although, shoot tips subjected to HPM exposure showed 28% recovery following cryostorage compared to 44% for shoot tips rewarmed in liquid medium at 22 ± 1 °C, we consider that the method represent a basis and can be further improved. The results lead to the overall conclusion that LPM had a stimulating effect on growth and multiplication of in vitro
Sequoia
plants, while the HPM used for rewarming of cryopreserved apices was not effective to achieve high rates of regrowth after liquid nitrogen exposure.</description><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Complex Fluids and Microfluidics</subject><subject>Complex Systems</subject><subject>Cryogenic engineering</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Light intensity</subject><subject>Liquid nitrogen</subject><subject>Microwave radiation</subject><subject>Microwaves</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>Soft and Granular Matter</subject><issn>0092-0606</issn><issn>1573-0689</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFvFCEUxonR2LX6B3gxJF68oA9mhpm5mJjGqkmTHtqeCcO8maGZhS0wu9mD_7tstzbVpIQEyPe9Hzw-Qt5z-MwB6i-RQyNrBrxmbVnVrHxBVryqCwayaV-SFUAr8h7kCXkT4y3kcyOq1-RENLKs81iR39cTUhwGNIn6gc5-x6h2PZ3sOLGN32Gga2uC3-ktUhuC7q1O1juap3V0a1PwdMy6o1d4t3ir6WbWLsV7SprQBhrQ-C2GPdVDyjwT9j4mH_SIb8mrQc8R3z2sp-Tm_Pv12U92cfnj19m3C2bKGhJrhS4bqLgG4G3T8b7ohk4WnIOQbYe1LI0BIwwKMTRy0KJH0YpcYkwP0GFxSr4euZulW2Nv0KWgZ7UJdq3DXnlt1b-Ks5Ma_VZJDmULRQZ8egAEf7dgTGpto8E5t4p-iYq3vGiKQkCZrR__s976JbjcXnYVvKpETi27-NGV_zbGgMPjYzioQ7jqGK7K4apDuOpA_vC0i8eKv2lmgzgaYpbciOHJ1c9S_wBAGbHY</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Halmagyi, A.</creator><creator>Surducan, E.</creator><creator>Surducan, V.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage</title><author>Halmagyi, A. ; Surducan, E. ; Surducan, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-92a48051a00198b1d3bfb63110269be764cc0c2ce22f86fa2de292480ccd00be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Complex Fluids and Microfluidics</topic><topic>Complex Systems</topic><topic>Cryogenic engineering</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Light intensity</topic><topic>Liquid nitrogen</topic><topic>Microwave radiation</topic><topic>Microwaves</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>Soft and Granular Matter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halmagyi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surducan, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surducan, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of biological physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halmagyi, A.</au><au>Surducan, E.</au><au>Surducan, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biological physics</jtitle><stitle>J Biol Phys</stitle><addtitle>J Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>367-379</pages><issn>0092-0606</issn><eissn>1573-0689</eissn><abstract>Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro
Sequoia
plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (−196°C)
Sequoia
shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included: (a) in vitro plants grown in regular conditions (at 24 ± 1°C during a 16-h light photoperiod with a light intensity of 39.06 μEm
−2
s
−1
photosynthetically active radiation), (b) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with controlled environment without microwave irradiation, and (c) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with LPM irradiation for various times (5, 15, 30, 40 days). In comparison to control plants, significant differences in shoot multiplication and growth parameters (length of shoots and roots) were observed after 40 days of LPM exposure. An opposite effect was achieved regarding the content of total soluble proteins, which decreased with increasing exposure time to LPM. HPM irradiation was tested as a novel rewarming method following storage in liquid nitrogen. To our knowledge, this is the first report using this type of rewarming method. Although, shoot tips subjected to HPM exposure showed 28% recovery following cryostorage compared to 44% for shoot tips rewarmed in liquid medium at 22 ± 1 °C, we consider that the method represent a basis and can be further improved. The results lead to the overall conclusion that LPM had a stimulating effect on growth and multiplication of in vitro
Sequoia
plants, while the HPM used for rewarming of cryopreserved apices was not effective to achieve high rates of regrowth after liquid nitrogen exposure.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>28647777</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10867-017-9457-4</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0092-0606 |
ispartof | Journal of biological physics, 2017-09, Vol.43 (3), p.367-379 |
issn | 0092-0606 1573-0689 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6104903 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biochemistry Biological and Medical Physics Biophysics Complex Fluids and Microfluidics Complex Systems Cryogenic engineering Cryopreservation Exposure Flowers & plants Irradiation Light intensity Liquid nitrogen Microwave radiation Microwaves Neurosciences Original Paper Physics Physics and Astronomy Power plants Radiation Shoots Soft and Granular Matter |
title | The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A06%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20low-%20and%20high-power%20microwave%20irradiation%20on%20in%20vitro%20grown%20Sequoia%20plants%20and%20their%20recovery%20after%20cryostorage&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biological%20physics&rft.au=Halmagyi,%20A.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=367-379&rft.issn=0092-0606&rft.eissn=1573-0689&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10867-017-9457-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1931552108%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1931552108&rft_id=info:pmid/28647777&rfr_iscdi=true |