Graft-Recipient Anteroposterior Mismatch Does Not Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle
Objectives: For the treatment of femoral condyle cartilage defects, anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimension matching in osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) pairs donor and recipient condyles to minimize articular incongruity. This aims to reduce the potential risk of graft fai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2018-07, Vol.6 (7_suppl4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7_suppl4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Coxe, Francesca R. Wang, Dean Balazs, George Christian Chang, Brenda Jones, Kristofer J. Rodeo, Scott A. Williams, Riley J. |
description | Objectives:
For the treatment of femoral condyle cartilage defects, anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimension matching in osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) pairs donor and recipient condyles to minimize articular incongruity. This aims to reduce the potential risk of graft failure and improve clinical outcomes. However, size matching restricts the number of compatible osteochondral allografts, which has a number of disadvantages including delayed surgical treatment and prolonged graft storage. Some surgeons match donor-to-recipient exclusively using the ML dimension to ensure that an adequately sized dowel can be harvested, while ignoring AP mismatch. Because a large AP mismatch can lead to radius of curvature differences between graft and host and potential articular incongruity after implantation, this study aimed to evaluate the association between AP mismatch and clinical outcomes of OCA.
Methods:
A retrospective review of patients treated with OCA for femoral condyle cartilage defects from 2000 to 2015 was conducted. A minimum follow-up of 2 years was required for analysis. Graft characteristics, including AP and ML dimensions, were gathered from vendor-specific allograft offering documents. Patient condyle dimensions were measured from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (Figure 1). Reoperations and patient responses to validated outcome measures were reviewed. Failure was defined by any partial removal/revision of the allograft or conversion to knee arthroplasty. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association of AP mismatch with OCA failure while adjusting for patient age, sex, number of previous ipsilateral knee surgeries, and number of lesions treated.
Results:
A total of 69 knees (mean age, 35.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Mean duration of follow-up was 4 years (range, 2-16 years). The average absolute AP mismatch between graft and patient was 6.7 mm (range, 0-20 mm) (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2325967118S00158 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6102759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2325967118S00158</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2376652771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2048-4c7d74bbccfcb2fa4af66f23d7c16331e8978a56e1bbb6314dacbe2ce7bf7c6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFq3DAQhk1IoSHJvUdBz04s2Za8l8CyTbaFpAttehaSPNpVsDWupA3kLfrIldmQpoHoMmLm-_-ZYYriE60uKBXiktWsXXBBafezqmjbHRUnc6qcc8ev_h-L8xgfqvy6li5qcVL8WQdlU_kDjJsc-ESWPkHACWMODgO5c3FUyezIF4RIvmMmrAWTSNoBWQ3OO6MGstkng2MG0JJNlqLZoe9DriyHAbdzD3IflI_ToHxSyaGf0dnjBkacwVUWPA1wVnywaohw_hxPi1831_err-XtZv1ttbwtDauarmyM6EWjtTHWaGZVoyznltW9MJTXNYVuITrVcqBaa17TpldGAzMgtBWG2_q0uDr4Tns9Qm_y7nkKOQU3qvAkUTn5f8W7ndzio-S0YqJdZIPPzwYBf-8hJvmA--DzzJLVgvOWCUEzVR0oEzDGAPalA63kfDv59nZZUh4kUW3hn-m7_F-i154e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376652771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Graft-Recipient Anteroposterior Mismatch Does Not Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Coxe, Francesca R. ; Wang, Dean ; Balazs, George Christian ; Chang, Brenda ; Jones, Kristofer J. ; Rodeo, Scott A. ; Williams, Riley J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coxe, Francesca R. ; Wang, Dean ; Balazs, George Christian ; Chang, Brenda ; Jones, Kristofer J. ; Rodeo, Scott A. ; Williams, Riley J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives:
For the treatment of femoral condyle cartilage defects, anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimension matching in osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) pairs donor and recipient condyles to minimize articular incongruity. This aims to reduce the potential risk of graft failure and improve clinical outcomes. However, size matching restricts the number of compatible osteochondral allografts, which has a number of disadvantages including delayed surgical treatment and prolonged graft storage. Some surgeons match donor-to-recipient exclusively using the ML dimension to ensure that an adequately sized dowel can be harvested, while ignoring AP mismatch. Because a large AP mismatch can lead to radius of curvature differences between graft and host and potential articular incongruity after implantation, this study aimed to evaluate the association between AP mismatch and clinical outcomes of OCA.
Methods:
A retrospective review of patients treated with OCA for femoral condyle cartilage defects from 2000 to 2015 was conducted. A minimum follow-up of 2 years was required for analysis. Graft characteristics, including AP and ML dimensions, were gathered from vendor-specific allograft offering documents. Patient condyle dimensions were measured from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (Figure 1). Reoperations and patient responses to validated outcome measures were reviewed. Failure was defined by any partial removal/revision of the allograft or conversion to knee arthroplasty. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association of AP mismatch with OCA failure while adjusting for patient age, sex, number of previous ipsilateral knee surgeries, and number of lesions treated.
Results:
A total of 69 knees (mean age, 35.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Mean duration of follow-up was 4 years (range, 2-16 years). The average absolute AP mismatch between graft and patient was 6.7 mm (range, 0-20 mm) (P <0.01). In contrast, the average absolute ML mismatch between graft and patient was 2.3 mm (range, 0-10 mm) (P = 0.33). At final follow-up, 19 knees had failed. There was no significant difference in the average absolute AP mismatch between failures (8.1 mm) and non-failures (6.2 mm) (P = 0.17). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that AP mismatch was not associated with graft failure (P = 0.15) (Table 1). At final follow-up, clinically significant improvements were noted in the pain (52.0 to 73.2) and physical functioning (60.1 to 80.1) subscales of the Short Form-36 (P <0.01 for both), International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (47.8 to 65.9; P <0.01), and Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living (64.2 to 82.0; P <0.01).
Conclusion:
OCA has consistently shown excellent long-term results in patients, including high-level athletes, with large chondral defects. Widespread use of OCA, however, is limited by the practice of procuring an appropriately sized allograft that matches the recipient hemicondyle in ML and AP dimensions. The results of the present study show no association between the magnitude of graft-patient AP mismatch and OCA failure. Most importantly, patient-reported outcome measures improved significantly over the course of follow-up, despite a wide range of AP mismatch between graft and patient. Our results suggest that AP length matching within the limits measured here is not a contraindication for graft acceptance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2325967118S00158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cartilage ; Clinical outcomes ; Defects ; Failure ; Knee ; Orthopedics ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2018-07, Vol.6 (7_suppl4)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018 2018 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102759/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102759/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coxe, Francesca R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balazs, George Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kristofer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodeo, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Riley J.</creatorcontrib><title>Graft-Recipient Anteroposterior Mismatch Does Not Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle</title><title>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</title><description>Objectives:
For the treatment of femoral condyle cartilage defects, anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimension matching in osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) pairs donor and recipient condyles to minimize articular incongruity. This aims to reduce the potential risk of graft failure and improve clinical outcomes. However, size matching restricts the number of compatible osteochondral allografts, which has a number of disadvantages including delayed surgical treatment and prolonged graft storage. Some surgeons match donor-to-recipient exclusively using the ML dimension to ensure that an adequately sized dowel can be harvested, while ignoring AP mismatch. Because a large AP mismatch can lead to radius of curvature differences between graft and host and potential articular incongruity after implantation, this study aimed to evaluate the association between AP mismatch and clinical outcomes of OCA.
Methods:
A retrospective review of patients treated with OCA for femoral condyle cartilage defects from 2000 to 2015 was conducted. A minimum follow-up of 2 years was required for analysis. Graft characteristics, including AP and ML dimensions, were gathered from vendor-specific allograft offering documents. Patient condyle dimensions were measured from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (Figure 1). Reoperations and patient responses to validated outcome measures were reviewed. Failure was defined by any partial removal/revision of the allograft or conversion to knee arthroplasty. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association of AP mismatch with OCA failure while adjusting for patient age, sex, number of previous ipsilateral knee surgeries, and number of lesions treated.
Results:
A total of 69 knees (mean age, 35.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Mean duration of follow-up was 4 years (range, 2-16 years). The average absolute AP mismatch between graft and patient was 6.7 mm (range, 0-20 mm) (P <0.01). In contrast, the average absolute ML mismatch between graft and patient was 2.3 mm (range, 0-10 mm) (P = 0.33). At final follow-up, 19 knees had failed. There was no significant difference in the average absolute AP mismatch between failures (8.1 mm) and non-failures (6.2 mm) (P = 0.17). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that AP mismatch was not associated with graft failure (P = 0.15) (Table 1). At final follow-up, clinically significant improvements were noted in the pain (52.0 to 73.2) and physical functioning (60.1 to 80.1) subscales of the Short Form-36 (P <0.01 for both), International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (47.8 to 65.9; P <0.01), and Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living (64.2 to 82.0; P <0.01).
Conclusion:
OCA has consistently shown excellent long-term results in patients, including high-level athletes, with large chondral defects. Widespread use of OCA, however, is limited by the practice of procuring an appropriately sized allograft that matches the recipient hemicondyle in ML and AP dimensions. The results of the present study show no association between the magnitude of graft-patient AP mismatch and OCA failure. Most importantly, patient-reported outcome measures improved significantly over the course of follow-up, despite a wide range of AP mismatch between graft and patient. Our results suggest that AP length matching within the limits measured here is not a contraindication for graft acceptance.</description><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>2325-9671</issn><issn>2325-9671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFq3DAQhk1IoSHJvUdBz04s2Za8l8CyTbaFpAttehaSPNpVsDWupA3kLfrIldmQpoHoMmLm-_-ZYYriE60uKBXiktWsXXBBafezqmjbHRUnc6qcc8ev_h-L8xgfqvy6li5qcVL8WQdlU_kDjJsc-ESWPkHACWMODgO5c3FUyezIF4RIvmMmrAWTSNoBWQ3OO6MGstkng2MG0JJNlqLZoe9DriyHAbdzD3IflI_ToHxSyaGf0dnjBkacwVUWPA1wVnywaohw_hxPi1831_err-XtZv1ttbwtDauarmyM6EWjtTHWaGZVoyznltW9MJTXNYVuITrVcqBaa17TpldGAzMgtBWG2_q0uDr4Tns9Qm_y7nkKOQU3qvAkUTn5f8W7ndzio-S0YqJdZIPPzwYBf-8hJvmA--DzzJLVgvOWCUEzVR0oEzDGAPalA63kfDv59nZZUh4kUW3hn-m7_F-i154e</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Coxe, Francesca R.</creator><creator>Wang, Dean</creator><creator>Balazs, George Christian</creator><creator>Chang, Brenda</creator><creator>Jones, Kristofer J.</creator><creator>Rodeo, Scott A.</creator><creator>Williams, Riley J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Graft-Recipient Anteroposterior Mismatch Does Not Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle</title><author>Coxe, Francesca R. ; Wang, Dean ; Balazs, George Christian ; Chang, Brenda ; Jones, Kristofer J. ; Rodeo, Scott A. ; Williams, Riley J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2048-4c7d74bbccfcb2fa4af66f23d7c16331e8978a56e1bbb6314dacbe2ce7bf7c6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coxe, Francesca R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balazs, George Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kristofer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodeo, Scott A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Riley J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coxe, Francesca R.</au><au>Wang, Dean</au><au>Balazs, George Christian</au><au>Chang, Brenda</au><au>Jones, Kristofer J.</au><au>Rodeo, Scott A.</au><au>Williams, Riley J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Graft-Recipient Anteroposterior Mismatch Does Not Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>7_suppl4</issue><issn>2325-9671</issn><eissn>2325-9671</eissn><abstract>Objectives:
For the treatment of femoral condyle cartilage defects, anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimension matching in osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) pairs donor and recipient condyles to minimize articular incongruity. This aims to reduce the potential risk of graft failure and improve clinical outcomes. However, size matching restricts the number of compatible osteochondral allografts, which has a number of disadvantages including delayed surgical treatment and prolonged graft storage. Some surgeons match donor-to-recipient exclusively using the ML dimension to ensure that an adequately sized dowel can be harvested, while ignoring AP mismatch. Because a large AP mismatch can lead to radius of curvature differences between graft and host and potential articular incongruity after implantation, this study aimed to evaluate the association between AP mismatch and clinical outcomes of OCA.
Methods:
A retrospective review of patients treated with OCA for femoral condyle cartilage defects from 2000 to 2015 was conducted. A minimum follow-up of 2 years was required for analysis. Graft characteristics, including AP and ML dimensions, were gathered from vendor-specific allograft offering documents. Patient condyle dimensions were measured from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (Figure 1). Reoperations and patient responses to validated outcome measures were reviewed. Failure was defined by any partial removal/revision of the allograft or conversion to knee arthroplasty. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association of AP mismatch with OCA failure while adjusting for patient age, sex, number of previous ipsilateral knee surgeries, and number of lesions treated.
Results:
A total of 69 knees (mean age, 35.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Mean duration of follow-up was 4 years (range, 2-16 years). The average absolute AP mismatch between graft and patient was 6.7 mm (range, 0-20 mm) (P <0.01). In contrast, the average absolute ML mismatch between graft and patient was 2.3 mm (range, 0-10 mm) (P = 0.33). At final follow-up, 19 knees had failed. There was no significant difference in the average absolute AP mismatch between failures (8.1 mm) and non-failures (6.2 mm) (P = 0.17). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that AP mismatch was not associated with graft failure (P = 0.15) (Table 1). At final follow-up, clinically significant improvements were noted in the pain (52.0 to 73.2) and physical functioning (60.1 to 80.1) subscales of the Short Form-36 (P <0.01 for both), International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (47.8 to 65.9; P <0.01), and Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living (64.2 to 82.0; P <0.01).
Conclusion:
OCA has consistently shown excellent long-term results in patients, including high-level athletes, with large chondral defects. Widespread use of OCA, however, is limited by the practice of procuring an appropriately sized allograft that matches the recipient hemicondyle in ML and AP dimensions. The results of the present study show no association between the magnitude of graft-patient AP mismatch and OCA failure. Most importantly, patient-reported outcome measures improved significantly over the course of follow-up, despite a wide range of AP mismatch between graft and patient. Our results suggest that AP length matching within the limits measured here is not a contraindication for graft acceptance.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2325967118S00158</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2325-9671 |
ispartof | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2018-07, Vol.6 (7_suppl4) |
issn | 2325-9671 2325-9671 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6102759 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cartilage Clinical outcomes Defects Failure Knee Orthopedics Sports medicine |
title | Graft-Recipient Anteroposterior Mismatch Does Not Affect the Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Graft-Recipient%20Anteroposterior%20Mismatch%20Does%20Not%20Affect%20the%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20of%20Osteochondral%20Allograft%20Transplantation%20of%20the%20Femoral%20Condyle&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Coxe,%20Francesca%20R.&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=7_suppl4&rft.issn=2325-9671&rft.eissn=2325-9671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2325967118S00158&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2376652771%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376652771&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2325967118S00158&rfr_iscdi=true |