Fecal microbiota transplant from a rational stool donor improves hepatic encephalopathy: A randomized clinical trial
Recurrent hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a leading cause of readmission despite standard of care (SOC) associated with microbial dysbiosis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may improve dysbiosis; however, it has not been studied in HE. We aimed to define whether FMT using a rationally derived...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2017-12, Vol.66 (6), p.1727-1738 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1738 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1727 |
container_title | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Bajaj, Jasmohan S. Kassam, Zain Fagan, Andrew Gavis, Edith A. Liu, Eric Cox, I. Jane Kheradman, Raffi Heuman, Douglas Wang, Jessica Gurry, Thomas Williams, Roger Sikaroodi, Masoumeh Fuchs, Michael Alm, Eric John, Binu Thacker, Leroy R. Riva, Antonio Smith, Mark Taylor‐Robinson, Simon D. Gillevet, Patrick M |
description | Recurrent hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a leading cause of readmission despite standard of care (SOC) associated with microbial dysbiosis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may improve dysbiosis; however, it has not been studied in HE. We aimed to define whether FMT using a rationally derived stool donor is safe in recurrent HE compared to SOC alone. An open‐label, randomized clinical trial with a 5‐month follow‐up in outpatient men with cirrhosis with recurrent HE on SOC was conducted with 1:1 randomization. FMT‐randomized patients received 5 days of broad‐spectrum antibiotic pretreatment, then a single FMT enema from the same donor with the optimal microbiota deficient in HE. Follow‐up occurred on days 5, 6, 12, 35, and 150 postrandomization. The primary outcome was safety of FMT compared to SOC using FMT‐related serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, cognition, microbiota, and metabolomic changes. Participants in both arms were similar on all baseline criteria and were followed until study end. FMT with antibiotic pretreatment was well tolerated. Eight (80%) SOC participants had a total of 11 SAEs compared to 2 (20%) FMT participants with SAEs (both FMT unrelated; P = 0.02). Five SOC and no FMT participants developed further HE (P = 0.03). Cognition improved in the FMT, but not the SOC, group. Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score transiently worsened postantibiotics, but reverted to baseline post‐FMT. Postantibiotics, beneficial taxa, and microbial diversity reduction occurred with Proteobacteria expansion. However, FMT increased diversity and beneficial taxa. SOC microbiota and MELD score remained similar throughout. Conclusion: FMT from a rationally selected donor reduced hospitalizations, improved cognition, and dysbiosis in cirrhosis with recurrent HE. (Hepatology 2017;66:1727–1738) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hep.29306 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6102730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1906466079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5096-797f899830ff658c07b87d8ff8dff53901f093a1e14434376e374d3dda2037ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rFTEUhoMo9lpd-Ack4EYX055MZvLholBKa4WCLnQdcvPhTckkYzK3cv315nprUcHV4XCevOfkfRF6SeCEAPSnGzef9JICe4RWZOx5R-kIj9EKeg6dJFQeoWe13gKAHHrxFB31YhSMELZCy5UzOuIpmJLXIS8aL0WnOkedFuxLnrDGRS8hp0bVJeeIbU654DDNJd-5itvyNjfYJePmjY65tZvdO3ze3iWbp_DDWWxiSGG_aClBx-foidexuhf39Rh9ubr8fHHd3Xx8_-Hi_KYzI0jWccm9kFJQ8J6NwgBfC26F98J6P1IJxIOkmjgyDHSgnDnKB0ut1T1Qvtb0GJ0ddOftenLWuNQ-F9VcwqTLTmUd1N-TFDbqa75TjDTrKDSBN_cCJX_burqoKVTjYnPH5W1VRAIbGAMuG_r6H_Q2b0tzbU8xRqTkYk-9PVDN7lqL8w_HEFD7LFWzU_3KsrGv_rz-gfwdXgNOD8D3EN3u_0rq-vLTQfInpXiqpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1966199789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fecal microbiota transplant from a rational stool donor improves hepatic encephalopathy: A randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bajaj, Jasmohan S. ; Kassam, Zain ; Fagan, Andrew ; Gavis, Edith A. ; Liu, Eric ; Cox, I. Jane ; Kheradman, Raffi ; Heuman, Douglas ; Wang, Jessica ; Gurry, Thomas ; Williams, Roger ; Sikaroodi, Masoumeh ; Fuchs, Michael ; Alm, Eric ; John, Binu ; Thacker, Leroy R. ; Riva, Antonio ; Smith, Mark ; Taylor‐Robinson, Simon D. ; Gillevet, Patrick M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bajaj, Jasmohan S. ; Kassam, Zain ; Fagan, Andrew ; Gavis, Edith A. ; Liu, Eric ; Cox, I. Jane ; Kheradman, Raffi ; Heuman, Douglas ; Wang, Jessica ; Gurry, Thomas ; Williams, Roger ; Sikaroodi, Masoumeh ; Fuchs, Michael ; Alm, Eric ; John, Binu ; Thacker, Leroy R. ; Riva, Antonio ; Smith, Mark ; Taylor‐Robinson, Simon D. ; Gillevet, Patrick M</creatorcontrib><description>Recurrent hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a leading cause of readmission despite standard of care (SOC) associated with microbial dysbiosis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may improve dysbiosis; however, it has not been studied in HE. We aimed to define whether FMT using a rationally derived stool donor is safe in recurrent HE compared to SOC alone. An open‐label, randomized clinical trial with a 5‐month follow‐up in outpatient men with cirrhosis with recurrent HE on SOC was conducted with 1:1 randomization. FMT‐randomized patients received 5 days of broad‐spectrum antibiotic pretreatment, then a single FMT enema from the same donor with the optimal microbiota deficient in HE. Follow‐up occurred on days 5, 6, 12, 35, and 150 postrandomization. The primary outcome was safety of FMT compared to SOC using FMT‐related serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, cognition, microbiota, and metabolomic changes. Participants in both arms were similar on all baseline criteria and were followed until study end. FMT with antibiotic pretreatment was well tolerated. Eight (80%) SOC participants had a total of 11 SAEs compared to 2 (20%) FMT participants with SAEs (both FMT unrelated; P = 0.02). Five SOC and no FMT participants developed further HE (P = 0.03). Cognition improved in the FMT, but not the SOC, group. Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score transiently worsened postantibiotics, but reverted to baseline post‐FMT. Postantibiotics, beneficial taxa, and microbial diversity reduction occurred with Proteobacteria expansion. However, FMT increased diversity and beneficial taxa. SOC microbiota and MELD score remained similar throughout. Conclusion: FMT from a rationally selected donor reduced hospitalizations, improved cognition, and dysbiosis in cirrhosis with recurrent HE. (Hepatology 2017;66:1727–1738)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-9139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hep.29306</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28586116</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antibiotics ; Cirrhosis ; Clinical trials ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Dysbacteriosis ; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ; Fecal microflora ; Female ; Hepatic encephalopathy ; Hepatic Encephalopathy - therapy ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Liver cirrhosis ; Liver diseases ; Male ; Metabolome ; Metabolomics ; Microbiota ; Middle Aged ; Standard of care ; Transplantation ; Transplants & implants ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2017-12, Vol.66 (6), p.1727-1738</ispartof><rights>2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5096-797f899830ff658c07b87d8ff8dff53901f093a1e14434376e374d3dda2037ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5096-797f899830ff658c07b87d8ff8dff53901f093a1e14434376e374d3dda2037ba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9828-7235</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhep.29306$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhep.29306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586116$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bajaj, Jasmohan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassam, Zain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fagan, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavis, Edith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, I. Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kheradman, Raffi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heuman, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurry, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikaroodi, Masoumeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alm, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Binu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacker, Leroy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riva, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor‐Robinson, Simon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillevet, Patrick M</creatorcontrib><title>Fecal microbiota transplant from a rational stool donor improves hepatic encephalopathy: A randomized clinical trial</title><title>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Hepatology</addtitle><description>Recurrent hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a leading cause of readmission despite standard of care (SOC) associated with microbial dysbiosis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may improve dysbiosis; however, it has not been studied in HE. We aimed to define whether FMT using a rationally derived stool donor is safe in recurrent HE compared to SOC alone. An open‐label, randomized clinical trial with a 5‐month follow‐up in outpatient men with cirrhosis with recurrent HE on SOC was conducted with 1:1 randomization. FMT‐randomized patients received 5 days of broad‐spectrum antibiotic pretreatment, then a single FMT enema from the same donor with the optimal microbiota deficient in HE. Follow‐up occurred on days 5, 6, 12, 35, and 150 postrandomization. The primary outcome was safety of FMT compared to SOC using FMT‐related serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, cognition, microbiota, and metabolomic changes. Participants in both arms were similar on all baseline criteria and were followed until study end. FMT with antibiotic pretreatment was well tolerated. Eight (80%) SOC participants had a total of 11 SAEs compared to 2 (20%) FMT participants with SAEs (both FMT unrelated; P = 0.02). Five SOC and no FMT participants developed further HE (P = 0.03). Cognition improved in the FMT, but not the SOC, group. Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score transiently worsened postantibiotics, but reverted to baseline post‐FMT. Postantibiotics, beneficial taxa, and microbial diversity reduction occurred with Proteobacteria expansion. However, FMT increased diversity and beneficial taxa. SOC microbiota and MELD score remained similar throughout. Conclusion: FMT from a rationally selected donor reduced hospitalizations, improved cognition, and dysbiosis in cirrhosis with recurrent HE. (Hepatology 2017;66:1727–1738)</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Cirrhosis</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Dysbacteriosis</subject><subject>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation</subject><subject>Fecal microflora</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatic encephalopathy</subject><subject>Hepatic Encephalopathy - therapy</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolome</subject><subject>Metabolomics</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Standard of care</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0270-9139</issn><issn>1527-3350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rFTEUhoMo9lpd-Ack4EYX055MZvLholBKa4WCLnQdcvPhTckkYzK3cv315nprUcHV4XCevOfkfRF6SeCEAPSnGzef9JICe4RWZOx5R-kIj9EKeg6dJFQeoWe13gKAHHrxFB31YhSMELZCy5UzOuIpmJLXIS8aL0WnOkedFuxLnrDGRS8hp0bVJeeIbU654DDNJd-5itvyNjfYJePmjY65tZvdO3ze3iWbp_DDWWxiSGG_aClBx-foidexuhf39Rh9ubr8fHHd3Xx8_-Hi_KYzI0jWccm9kFJQ8J6NwgBfC26F98J6P1IJxIOkmjgyDHSgnDnKB0ut1T1Qvtb0GJ0ddOftenLWuNQ-F9VcwqTLTmUd1N-TFDbqa75TjDTrKDSBN_cCJX_burqoKVTjYnPH5W1VRAIbGAMuG_r6H_Q2b0tzbU8xRqTkYk-9PVDN7lqL8w_HEFD7LFWzU_3KsrGv_rz-gfwdXgNOD8D3EN3u_0rq-vLTQfInpXiqpw</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Bajaj, Jasmohan S.</creator><creator>Kassam, Zain</creator><creator>Fagan, Andrew</creator><creator>Gavis, Edith A.</creator><creator>Liu, Eric</creator><creator>Cox, I. Jane</creator><creator>Kheradman, Raffi</creator><creator>Heuman, Douglas</creator><creator>Wang, Jessica</creator><creator>Gurry, Thomas</creator><creator>Williams, Roger</creator><creator>Sikaroodi, Masoumeh</creator><creator>Fuchs, Michael</creator><creator>Alm, Eric</creator><creator>John, Binu</creator><creator>Thacker, Leroy R.</creator><creator>Riva, Antonio</creator><creator>Smith, Mark</creator><creator>Taylor‐Robinson, Simon D.</creator><creator>Gillevet, Patrick M</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9828-7235</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Fecal microbiota transplant from a rational stool donor improves hepatic encephalopathy: A randomized clinical trial</title><author>Bajaj, Jasmohan S. ; Kassam, Zain ; Fagan, Andrew ; Gavis, Edith A. ; Liu, Eric ; Cox, I. Jane ; Kheradman, Raffi ; Heuman, Douglas ; Wang, Jessica ; Gurry, Thomas ; Williams, Roger ; Sikaroodi, Masoumeh ; Fuchs, Michael ; Alm, Eric ; John, Binu ; Thacker, Leroy R. ; Riva, Antonio ; Smith, Mark ; Taylor‐Robinson, Simon D. ; Gillevet, Patrick M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5096-797f899830ff658c07b87d8ff8dff53901f093a1e14434376e374d3dda2037ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Cirrhosis</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Dysbacteriosis</topic><topic>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation</topic><topic>Fecal microflora</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatic encephalopathy</topic><topic>Hepatic Encephalopathy - therapy</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolome</topic><topic>Metabolomics</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Standard of care</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bajaj, Jasmohan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassam, Zain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fagan, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavis, Edith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, I. Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kheradman, Raffi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heuman, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurry, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikaroodi, Masoumeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alm, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Binu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacker, Leroy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riva, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor‐Robinson, Simon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillevet, Patrick M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bajaj, Jasmohan S.</au><au>Kassam, Zain</au><au>Fagan, Andrew</au><au>Gavis, Edith A.</au><au>Liu, Eric</au><au>Cox, I. Jane</au><au>Kheradman, Raffi</au><au>Heuman, Douglas</au><au>Wang, Jessica</au><au>Gurry, Thomas</au><au>Williams, Roger</au><au>Sikaroodi, Masoumeh</au><au>Fuchs, Michael</au><au>Alm, Eric</au><au>John, Binu</au><au>Thacker, Leroy R.</au><au>Riva, Antonio</au><au>Smith, Mark</au><au>Taylor‐Robinson, Simon D.</au><au>Gillevet, Patrick M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fecal microbiota transplant from a rational stool donor improves hepatic encephalopathy: A randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Hepatology</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1727</spage><epage>1738</epage><pages>1727-1738</pages><issn>0270-9139</issn><eissn>1527-3350</eissn><abstract>Recurrent hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a leading cause of readmission despite standard of care (SOC) associated with microbial dysbiosis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may improve dysbiosis; however, it has not been studied in HE. We aimed to define whether FMT using a rationally derived stool donor is safe in recurrent HE compared to SOC alone. An open‐label, randomized clinical trial with a 5‐month follow‐up in outpatient men with cirrhosis with recurrent HE on SOC was conducted with 1:1 randomization. FMT‐randomized patients received 5 days of broad‐spectrum antibiotic pretreatment, then a single FMT enema from the same donor with the optimal microbiota deficient in HE. Follow‐up occurred on days 5, 6, 12, 35, and 150 postrandomization. The primary outcome was safety of FMT compared to SOC using FMT‐related serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, cognition, microbiota, and metabolomic changes. Participants in both arms were similar on all baseline criteria and were followed until study end. FMT with antibiotic pretreatment was well tolerated. Eight (80%) SOC participants had a total of 11 SAEs compared to 2 (20%) FMT participants with SAEs (both FMT unrelated; P = 0.02). Five SOC and no FMT participants developed further HE (P = 0.03). Cognition improved in the FMT, but not the SOC, group. Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score transiently worsened postantibiotics, but reverted to baseline post‐FMT. Postantibiotics, beneficial taxa, and microbial diversity reduction occurred with Proteobacteria expansion. However, FMT increased diversity and beneficial taxa. SOC microbiota and MELD score remained similar throughout. Conclusion: FMT from a rationally selected donor reduced hospitalizations, improved cognition, and dysbiosis in cirrhosis with recurrent HE. (Hepatology 2017;66:1727–1738)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</pub><pmid>28586116</pmid><doi>10.1002/hep.29306</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9828-7235</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-9139 |
ispartof | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2017-12, Vol.66 (6), p.1727-1738 |
issn | 0270-9139 1527-3350 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6102730 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Antibiotics Cirrhosis Clinical trials Cognition Cognition & reasoning Dysbacteriosis Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Fecal microflora Female Hepatic encephalopathy Hepatic Encephalopathy - therapy Hepatology Humans Liver cirrhosis Liver diseases Male Metabolome Metabolomics Microbiota Middle Aged Standard of care Transplantation Transplants & implants Treatment Outcome |
title | Fecal microbiota transplant from a rational stool donor improves hepatic encephalopathy: A randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T11%3A15%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fecal%20microbiota%20transplant%20from%20a%20rational%20stool%20donor%20improves%20hepatic%20encephalopathy:%20A%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Hepatology%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Bajaj,%20Jasmohan%20S.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1727&rft.epage=1738&rft.pages=1727-1738&rft.issn=0270-9139&rft.eissn=1527-3350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hep.29306&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1906466079%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1966199789&rft_id=info:pmid/28586116&rfr_iscdi=true |