New insights into leaf and fine‐root trait relationships: implications of resource acquisition among 23 xerophytic woody species
Functional traits of leaves and fine root vary broadly among different species, but little is known about how these interspecific variations are coordinated between the two organs. This study aims to determine the interspecific relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root traits to better...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology and evolution 2015-11, Vol.5 (22), p.5344-5351 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 5351 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 22 |
| container_start_page | 5344 |
| container_title | Ecology and evolution |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Li, Fang Lan Bao, Wei Kai |
| description | Functional traits of leaves and fine root vary broadly among different species, but little is known about how these interspecific variations are coordinated between the two organs. This study aims to determine the interspecific relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root traits to better understand plant strategies of resource acquisition. SLA (Specific leaf area), SRL (specific root length), mass‐based N (nitrogen) and P (phosphorus) concentrations of leaves and fine roots, root system, and plant sizes were measured in 23 woody species grown together in a common garden setting. SLA and SRL exhibited a strong negative relationship. There were no significant relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root nutrient concentrations. The interspecific variations in plant height and biomass were tightly correlated with root system size characteristics, including root depth and total root length. These results demonstrate a coordinated plant size‐dependent variation between shoots and roots, but for efficiency, plant resource acquisition appears to be uncoupled between the leaves and fine roots. The different patterns of leaf and fine‐root traits suggest different strategies for resource acquisition between the two organs. This provides insights into the linkage between above‐ and belowground subsystems in carbon and nutrient economy.
SLA and SRL exhibited a strong negative relationship. There were no significant relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root nutrient concentrations. The interspecific variations in both plant height and biomass were tightly correlated with root system size characteristics, including root depth and total root length. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.1794 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6102526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2095524685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f928bff3196fe30976b7951bea30d522a1dda1db929d9256b06e341bb90e47863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt1qFDEUxwdRbKm98AUk4I1ebJuPSbLxQpBlq0LRG70OmczJbspMMk1mXPdOfII-o09ixq2lCuKBkEP-P_7kfFTVU4LPCMb0HCywMyJV_aA6prjmCyn58uG9_Kg6zfkKlxCY1lg-ro4YJpwQJo6r7x9gh3zIfrMdc0nGiDowDpnQIucD_Ph2k2Ic0ZiMH1GCzow-hrz1Q36FfD903h5eUHRFznFKFpCx15PPfhaQ6WPYIMrQV0hx2O5Hb9EuxnaP8gDWQ35SPXKmy3B6e59Uny_Wn1bvFpcf375fvblc2FqKeuEUXTbOMaKEA4aVFI1UnDRgGG45pYa0bTmNoqpVlIsGC2A1aRqFoZZLwU6q1wffYWp6aC2EUlSnh-R7k_Y6Gq__VILf6k38ogXBlNPZ4MWtQYrXE-RR9z5b6DoTIE5ZU6w4p7VY8v-iRHJCscRcFfT5X-hVaWIondCUqjI1UqJQLw-UTTHnBO7u3wTreQ_0vAd63oPCPrtf6B35e-oFOD8AO9_B_t9Oer1as1-WPwFT5L8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290001111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New insights into leaf and fine‐root trait relationships: implications of resource acquisition among 23 xerophytic woody species</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Li, Fang Lan ; Bao, Wei Kai</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Fang Lan ; Bao, Wei Kai</creatorcontrib><description>Functional traits of leaves and fine root vary broadly among different species, but little is known about how these interspecific variations are coordinated between the two organs. This study aims to determine the interspecific relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root traits to better understand plant strategies of resource acquisition. SLA (Specific leaf area), SRL (specific root length), mass‐based N (nitrogen) and P (phosphorus) concentrations of leaves and fine roots, root system, and plant sizes were measured in 23 woody species grown together in a common garden setting. SLA and SRL exhibited a strong negative relationship. There were no significant relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root nutrient concentrations. The interspecific variations in plant height and biomass were tightly correlated with root system size characteristics, including root depth and total root length. These results demonstrate a coordinated plant size‐dependent variation between shoots and roots, but for efficiency, plant resource acquisition appears to be uncoupled between the leaves and fine roots. The different patterns of leaf and fine‐root traits suggest different strategies for resource acquisition between the two organs. This provides insights into the linkage between above‐ and belowground subsystems in carbon and nutrient economy.
SLA and SRL exhibited a strong negative relationship. There were no significant relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root nutrient concentrations. The interspecific variations in both plant height and biomass were tightly correlated with root system size characteristics, including root depth and total root length.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1794</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30151136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Belowground ecology ; carbon balance ; Ecosystems ; Experiments ; functional traits ; Growth rate ; Hypotheses ; Interspecific ; interspecific correlation ; Interspecific relationships ; Leaf area ; Leaves ; Morphology ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient concentrations ; nutrient economic ; Nutrients ; Organs ; Original Research ; Phosphorus ; Plant growth ; Plants ; Roots ; Shoots ; Species ; Subsystems ; Variation ; whole‐plant strategy</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2015-11, Vol.5 (22), p.5344-5351</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f928bff3196fe30976b7951bea30d522a1dda1db929d9256b06e341bb90e47863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f928bff3196fe30976b7951bea30d522a1dda1db929d9256b06e341bb90e47863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102526/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6102526/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Fang Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Wei Kai</creatorcontrib><title>New insights into leaf and fine‐root trait relationships: implications of resource acquisition among 23 xerophytic woody species</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Functional traits of leaves and fine root vary broadly among different species, but little is known about how these interspecific variations are coordinated between the two organs. This study aims to determine the interspecific relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root traits to better understand plant strategies of resource acquisition. SLA (Specific leaf area), SRL (specific root length), mass‐based N (nitrogen) and P (phosphorus) concentrations of leaves and fine roots, root system, and plant sizes were measured in 23 woody species grown together in a common garden setting. SLA and SRL exhibited a strong negative relationship. There were no significant relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root nutrient concentrations. The interspecific variations in plant height and biomass were tightly correlated with root system size characteristics, including root depth and total root length. These results demonstrate a coordinated plant size‐dependent variation between shoots and roots, but for efficiency, plant resource acquisition appears to be uncoupled between the leaves and fine roots. The different patterns of leaf and fine‐root traits suggest different strategies for resource acquisition between the two organs. This provides insights into the linkage between above‐ and belowground subsystems in carbon and nutrient economy.
SLA and SRL exhibited a strong negative relationship. There were no significant relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root nutrient concentrations. The interspecific variations in both plant height and biomass were tightly correlated with root system size characteristics, including root depth and total root length.</description><subject>Belowground ecology</subject><subject>carbon balance</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>functional traits</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>interspecific correlation</subject><subject>Interspecific relationships</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>nutrient economic</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organs</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Subsystems</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>whole‐plant strategy</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt1qFDEUxwdRbKm98AUk4I1ebJuPSbLxQpBlq0LRG70OmczJbspMMk1mXPdOfII-o09ixq2lCuKBkEP-P_7kfFTVU4LPCMb0HCywMyJV_aA6prjmCyn58uG9_Kg6zfkKlxCY1lg-ro4YJpwQJo6r7x9gh3zIfrMdc0nGiDowDpnQIucD_Ph2k2Ic0ZiMH1GCzow-hrz1Q36FfD903h5eUHRFznFKFpCx15PPfhaQ6WPYIMrQV0hx2O5Hb9EuxnaP8gDWQ35SPXKmy3B6e59Uny_Wn1bvFpcf375fvblc2FqKeuEUXTbOMaKEA4aVFI1UnDRgGG45pYa0bTmNoqpVlIsGC2A1aRqFoZZLwU6q1wffYWp6aC2EUlSnh-R7k_Y6Gq__VILf6k38ogXBlNPZ4MWtQYrXE-RR9z5b6DoTIE5ZU6w4p7VY8v-iRHJCscRcFfT5X-hVaWIondCUqjI1UqJQLw-UTTHnBO7u3wTreQ_0vAd63oPCPrtf6B35e-oFOD8AO9_B_t9Oer1as1-WPwFT5L8E</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Li, Fang Lan</creator><creator>Bao, Wei Kai</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>New insights into leaf and fine‐root trait relationships: implications of resource acquisition among 23 xerophytic woody species</title><author>Li, Fang Lan ; Bao, Wei Kai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4764-f928bff3196fe30976b7951bea30d522a1dda1db929d9256b06e341bb90e47863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Belowground ecology</topic><topic>carbon balance</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>functional traits</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>interspecific correlation</topic><topic>Interspecific relationships</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>nutrient economic</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organs</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Subsystems</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>whole‐plant strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Fang Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Wei Kai</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Fang Lan</au><au>Bao, Wei Kai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New insights into leaf and fine‐root trait relationships: implications of resource acquisition among 23 xerophytic woody species</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>5344</spage><epage>5351</epage><pages>5344-5351</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Functional traits of leaves and fine root vary broadly among different species, but little is known about how these interspecific variations are coordinated between the two organs. This study aims to determine the interspecific relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root traits to better understand plant strategies of resource acquisition. SLA (Specific leaf area), SRL (specific root length), mass‐based N (nitrogen) and P (phosphorus) concentrations of leaves and fine roots, root system, and plant sizes were measured in 23 woody species grown together in a common garden setting. SLA and SRL exhibited a strong negative relationship. There were no significant relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root nutrient concentrations. The interspecific variations in plant height and biomass were tightly correlated with root system size characteristics, including root depth and total root length. These results demonstrate a coordinated plant size‐dependent variation between shoots and roots, but for efficiency, plant resource acquisition appears to be uncoupled between the leaves and fine roots. The different patterns of leaf and fine‐root traits suggest different strategies for resource acquisition between the two organs. This provides insights into the linkage between above‐ and belowground subsystems in carbon and nutrient economy.
SLA and SRL exhibited a strong negative relationship. There were no significant relationships between corresponding leaf and fine‐root nutrient concentrations. The interspecific variations in both plant height and biomass were tightly correlated with root system size characteristics, including root depth and total root length.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30151136</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.1794</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
| ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2015-11, Vol.5 (22), p.5344-5351 |
| issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6102526 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Belowground ecology carbon balance Ecosystems Experiments functional traits Growth rate Hypotheses Interspecific interspecific correlation Interspecific relationships Leaf area Leaves Morphology Nitrogen Nutrient concentrations nutrient economic Nutrients Organs Original Research Phosphorus Plant growth Plants Roots Shoots Species Subsystems Variation whole‐plant strategy |
| title | New insights into leaf and fine‐root trait relationships: implications of resource acquisition among 23 xerophytic woody species |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A51%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20insights%20into%20leaf%20and%20fine%E2%80%90root%20trait%20relationships:%20implications%20of%20resource%20acquisition%20among%2023%20xerophytic%20woody%20species&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Li,%20Fang%20Lan&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=5344&rft.epage=5351&rft.pages=5344-5351&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.1794&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2095524685%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290001111&rft_id=info:pmid/30151136&rfr_iscdi=true |