Derivation of a no‐significant‐risk‐level for tetrabromobisphenol A based on a threshold non‐mutagenic cancer mode of action

A no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1 was derived for tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA). Uterine tumors (adenomas, adenocarcinomas, and malignant mixed Müllerian) observed in female Wistar Han rats from a National Toxicology Program 2‐year cancer bioassay were identified as the critical effect. Stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied toxicology 2018-06, Vol.38 (6), p.862-878
Hauptverfasser: Pecquet, Alison M., Martinez, Jeanelle M., Vincent, Melissa, Erraguntla, Neeraja, Dourson, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 878
container_issue 6
container_start_page 862
container_title Journal of applied toxicology
container_volume 38
creator Pecquet, Alison M.
Martinez, Jeanelle M.
Vincent, Melissa
Erraguntla, Neeraja
Dourson, Michael
description A no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1 was derived for tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA). Uterine tumors (adenomas, adenocarcinomas, and malignant mixed Müllerian) observed in female Wistar Han rats from a National Toxicology Program 2‐year cancer bioassay were identified as the critical effect. Studies suggest that TBBPA is acting through a non‐mutagenic mode of action. Thus, the most appropriate approach to derivation of a cancer risk value based on US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines is a threshold approach, akin to a cancer safe dose (RfDcancer). Using the National Toxicology Program data, we utilized Benchmark dose software to derive a benchmark dose lower limit (BMDL10) as the point of departure (POD) of 103 mg kg–1 day–1. The POD was adjusted to a human equivalent dose of 25.6 mg kg–1 day–1 using allometric scaling. We applied a composite adjustment factor of 100 to the POD to derive an RfDcancer of 0.26 mg kg–1 day–1. Based on a human body weight of 70 kg, the RfDcancer was adjusted to a no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1. This was compared to other available non‐cancer and cancer risk values, and aligns well with our understanding of the underlying biology based on the toxicology data. Overall, the weight of evidence from animal studies indicates that TBBPA has low toxicity and suggests that high doses over long exposure durations are needed to induce uterine tumor formation. Future research needs include a thorough and detailed vetting of the proposed adverse outcome pathway, including further support for key events leading to uterine tumor formation and a quantitative weight of evidence analysis. A non‐mutagenic threshold mode of action for tetrabromobisphenol A was utilized to derive a no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1 for uterine tumors (adenomas, adenocarcinomas, and malignant mixed Müllerian combined) observed in female Wistar Han rats from a National Toxicology Program 2‐year bioassay. The most recent available techniques were utilized, including literature review, benchmark dose software, mode of action analysis, and threshold extrapolation. The derived no‐significant‐risk‐level aligns well with other available non‐cancer and cancer risk values based on the biology of these tumors.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jat.3594
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6099322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2002218491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4384-75394aeaf44fcf717d697490e137b90d6ba5f36b5a7dafcd94885732a4b4a6e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtuFDEQhi0EIkNA4gTIEhs2Hfzq7vEGaZTwVCQ2QWJnVbvLMx667cHuHpQdCw7AGTkJniSEh8SqZPnzV1X-CXnM2QlnTDzfwnQia63ukAVnWldcNPIuWTDRsErJ9uMReZDzlrFyJ5b3yZHQSvFa6wX5dobJ72HyMdDoKNAQf3z9nv06eOcthKmcks-fShlwjwN1MdEJpwRdimPsfN5tMMSBrmgHGXtaPECnTcK8iUNfdKE8HecJ1hi8pUVpMdEx9njVzx46PyT3HAwZH93UY_Lh1cuL0zfV-fvXb09X55VVcqmqtpZaAYJTylnX8rZvdKs0Qy7bTrO-6aB2sulqaHtwttdquaxbKUB1Chqs5TF5ce3dzd2IvcVQ9hjMLvkR0qWJ4M3fN8FvzDruTVM-TgpRBM9uBCl-njFPZvTZ4jBAwDhnI0oYgi-V5gV9-g-6jXMKZb1CiVqzpqnZb6FNMeeE7nYYzswhWlOiNYdoC_rkz-FvwV9ZFqC6Br74AS__KzLvVhdXwp_sBrP7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2025906650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Derivation of a no‐significant‐risk‐level for tetrabromobisphenol A based on a threshold non‐mutagenic cancer mode of action</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Pecquet, Alison M. ; Martinez, Jeanelle M. ; Vincent, Melissa ; Erraguntla, Neeraja ; Dourson, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Pecquet, Alison M. ; Martinez, Jeanelle M. ; Vincent, Melissa ; Erraguntla, Neeraja ; Dourson, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>A no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1 was derived for tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA). Uterine tumors (adenomas, adenocarcinomas, and malignant mixed Müllerian) observed in female Wistar Han rats from a National Toxicology Program 2‐year cancer bioassay were identified as the critical effect. Studies suggest that TBBPA is acting through a non‐mutagenic mode of action. Thus, the most appropriate approach to derivation of a cancer risk value based on US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines is a threshold approach, akin to a cancer safe dose (RfDcancer). Using the National Toxicology Program data, we utilized Benchmark dose software to derive a benchmark dose lower limit (BMDL10) as the point of departure (POD) of 103 mg kg–1 day–1. The POD was adjusted to a human equivalent dose of 25.6 mg kg–1 day–1 using allometric scaling. We applied a composite adjustment factor of 100 to the POD to derive an RfDcancer of 0.26 mg kg–1 day–1. Based on a human body weight of 70 kg, the RfDcancer was adjusted to a no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1. This was compared to other available non‐cancer and cancer risk values, and aligns well with our understanding of the underlying biology based on the toxicology data. Overall, the weight of evidence from animal studies indicates that TBBPA has low toxicity and suggests that high doses over long exposure durations are needed to induce uterine tumor formation. Future research needs include a thorough and detailed vetting of the proposed adverse outcome pathway, including further support for key events leading to uterine tumor formation and a quantitative weight of evidence analysis. A non‐mutagenic threshold mode of action for tetrabromobisphenol A was utilized to derive a no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1 for uterine tumors (adenomas, adenocarcinomas, and malignant mixed Müllerian combined) observed in female Wistar Han rats from a National Toxicology Program 2‐year bioassay. The most recent available techniques were utilized, including literature review, benchmark dose software, mode of action analysis, and threshold extrapolation. The derived no‐significant‐risk‐level aligns well with other available non‐cancer and cancer risk values based on the biology of these tumors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-437X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1099-1263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jat.3594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29441599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; benchmark dose ; Benchmarks ; Bioassays ; Body Weight ; Cancer ; cancer threshold ; Carcinogenicity Tests ; Carcinogens - toxicity ; CAS RN 79‐94‐7 ; Derivation ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Environmental protection ; Female ; Flame Retardants - toxicity ; Health risks ; Humans ; Mode of action ; Models, Biological ; NSRL ; Polybrominated Biphenyls - toxicity ; Rats, Wistar ; RfDcancer ; Risk ; Risk Assessment ; risk characterization ; Scaling ; Species Specificity ; TBBPA ; Tetrabromobisphenol A ; Time Factors ; Toxicity ; Toxicology ; Tumors ; Uterine cancer ; Uterine Neoplasms - chemically induced ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied toxicology, 2018-06, Vol.38 (6), p.862-878</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors Journal of Applied Toxicology Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4384-75394aeaf44fcf717d697490e137b90d6ba5f36b5a7dafcd94885732a4b4a6e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4384-75394aeaf44fcf717d697490e137b90d6ba5f36b5a7dafcd94885732a4b4a6e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8855-2261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjat.3594$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjat.3594$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pecquet, Alison M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Jeanelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erraguntla, Neeraja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dourson, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Derivation of a no‐significant‐risk‐level for tetrabromobisphenol A based on a threshold non‐mutagenic cancer mode of action</title><title>Journal of applied toxicology</title><addtitle>J Appl Toxicol</addtitle><description>A no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1 was derived for tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA). Uterine tumors (adenomas, adenocarcinomas, and malignant mixed Müllerian) observed in female Wistar Han rats from a National Toxicology Program 2‐year cancer bioassay were identified as the critical effect. Studies suggest that TBBPA is acting through a non‐mutagenic mode of action. Thus, the most appropriate approach to derivation of a cancer risk value based on US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines is a threshold approach, akin to a cancer safe dose (RfDcancer). Using the National Toxicology Program data, we utilized Benchmark dose software to derive a benchmark dose lower limit (BMDL10) as the point of departure (POD) of 103 mg kg–1 day–1. The POD was adjusted to a human equivalent dose of 25.6 mg kg–1 day–1 using allometric scaling. We applied a composite adjustment factor of 100 to the POD to derive an RfDcancer of 0.26 mg kg–1 day–1. Based on a human body weight of 70 kg, the RfDcancer was adjusted to a no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1. This was compared to other available non‐cancer and cancer risk values, and aligns well with our understanding of the underlying biology based on the toxicology data. Overall, the weight of evidence from animal studies indicates that TBBPA has low toxicity and suggests that high doses over long exposure durations are needed to induce uterine tumor formation. Future research needs include a thorough and detailed vetting of the proposed adverse outcome pathway, including further support for key events leading to uterine tumor formation and a quantitative weight of evidence analysis. A non‐mutagenic threshold mode of action for tetrabromobisphenol A was utilized to derive a no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1 for uterine tumors (adenomas, adenocarcinomas, and malignant mixed Müllerian combined) observed in female Wistar Han rats from a National Toxicology Program 2‐year bioassay. The most recent available techniques were utilized, including literature review, benchmark dose software, mode of action analysis, and threshold extrapolation. The derived no‐significant‐risk‐level aligns well with other available non‐cancer and cancer risk values based on the biology of these tumors.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>benchmark dose</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>cancer threshold</subject><subject>Carcinogenicity Tests</subject><subject>Carcinogens - toxicity</subject><subject>CAS RN 79‐94‐7</subject><subject>Derivation</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flame Retardants - toxicity</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mode of action</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>NSRL</subject><subject>Polybrominated Biphenyls - toxicity</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>RfDcancer</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>risk characterization</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>TBBPA</subject><subject>Tetrabromobisphenol A</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine cancer</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - chemically induced</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>0260-437X</issn><issn>1099-1263</issn><issn>1099-1263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtuFDEQhi0EIkNA4gTIEhs2Hfzq7vEGaZTwVCQ2QWJnVbvLMx667cHuHpQdCw7AGTkJniSEh8SqZPnzV1X-CXnM2QlnTDzfwnQia63ukAVnWldcNPIuWTDRsErJ9uMReZDzlrFyJ5b3yZHQSvFa6wX5dobJ72HyMdDoKNAQf3z9nv06eOcthKmcks-fShlwjwN1MdEJpwRdimPsfN5tMMSBrmgHGXtaPECnTcK8iUNfdKE8HecJ1hi8pUVpMdEx9njVzx46PyT3HAwZH93UY_Lh1cuL0zfV-fvXb09X55VVcqmqtpZaAYJTylnX8rZvdKs0Qy7bTrO-6aB2sulqaHtwttdquaxbKUB1Chqs5TF5ce3dzd2IvcVQ9hjMLvkR0qWJ4M3fN8FvzDruTVM-TgpRBM9uBCl-njFPZvTZ4jBAwDhnI0oYgi-V5gV9-g-6jXMKZb1CiVqzpqnZb6FNMeeE7nYYzswhWlOiNYdoC_rkz-FvwV9ZFqC6Br74AS__KzLvVhdXwp_sBrP7</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Pecquet, Alison M.</creator><creator>Martinez, Jeanelle M.</creator><creator>Vincent, Melissa</creator><creator>Erraguntla, Neeraja</creator><creator>Dourson, Michael</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8855-2261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Derivation of a no‐significant‐risk‐level for tetrabromobisphenol A based on a threshold non‐mutagenic cancer mode of action</title><author>Pecquet, Alison M. ; Martinez, Jeanelle M. ; Vincent, Melissa ; Erraguntla, Neeraja ; Dourson, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4384-75394aeaf44fcf717d697490e137b90d6ba5f36b5a7dafcd94885732a4b4a6e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>benchmark dose</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>cancer threshold</topic><topic>Carcinogenicity Tests</topic><topic>Carcinogens - toxicity</topic><topic>CAS RN 79‐94‐7</topic><topic>Derivation</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flame Retardants - toxicity</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mode of action</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>NSRL</topic><topic>Polybrominated Biphenyls - toxicity</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>RfDcancer</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>risk characterization</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>TBBPA</topic><topic>Tetrabromobisphenol A</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine cancer</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - chemically induced</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pecquet, Alison M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Jeanelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erraguntla, Neeraja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dourson, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pecquet, Alison M.</au><au>Martinez, Jeanelle M.</au><au>Vincent, Melissa</au><au>Erraguntla, Neeraja</au><au>Dourson, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Derivation of a no‐significant‐risk‐level for tetrabromobisphenol A based on a threshold non‐mutagenic cancer mode of action</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Toxicol</addtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>862</spage><epage>878</epage><pages>862-878</pages><issn>0260-437X</issn><issn>1099-1263</issn><eissn>1099-1263</eissn><abstract>A no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1 was derived for tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA). Uterine tumors (adenomas, adenocarcinomas, and malignant mixed Müllerian) observed in female Wistar Han rats from a National Toxicology Program 2‐year cancer bioassay were identified as the critical effect. Studies suggest that TBBPA is acting through a non‐mutagenic mode of action. Thus, the most appropriate approach to derivation of a cancer risk value based on US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines is a threshold approach, akin to a cancer safe dose (RfDcancer). Using the National Toxicology Program data, we utilized Benchmark dose software to derive a benchmark dose lower limit (BMDL10) as the point of departure (POD) of 103 mg kg–1 day–1. The POD was adjusted to a human equivalent dose of 25.6 mg kg–1 day–1 using allometric scaling. We applied a composite adjustment factor of 100 to the POD to derive an RfDcancer of 0.26 mg kg–1 day–1. Based on a human body weight of 70 kg, the RfDcancer was adjusted to a no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1. This was compared to other available non‐cancer and cancer risk values, and aligns well with our understanding of the underlying biology based on the toxicology data. Overall, the weight of evidence from animal studies indicates that TBBPA has low toxicity and suggests that high doses over long exposure durations are needed to induce uterine tumor formation. Future research needs include a thorough and detailed vetting of the proposed adverse outcome pathway, including further support for key events leading to uterine tumor formation and a quantitative weight of evidence analysis. A non‐mutagenic threshold mode of action for tetrabromobisphenol A was utilized to derive a no‐significant‐risk‐level of 20 mg day–1 for uterine tumors (adenomas, adenocarcinomas, and malignant mixed Müllerian combined) observed in female Wistar Han rats from a National Toxicology Program 2‐year bioassay. The most recent available techniques were utilized, including literature review, benchmark dose software, mode of action analysis, and threshold extrapolation. The derived no‐significant‐risk‐level aligns well with other available non‐cancer and cancer risk values based on the biology of these tumors.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29441599</pmid><doi>10.1002/jat.3594</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8855-2261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0260-437X
ispartof Journal of applied toxicology, 2018-06, Vol.38 (6), p.862-878
issn 0260-437X
1099-1263
1099-1263
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6099322
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Animals
benchmark dose
Benchmarks
Bioassays
Body Weight
Cancer
cancer threshold
Carcinogenicity Tests
Carcinogens - toxicity
CAS RN 79‐94‐7
Derivation
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Environmental protection
Female
Flame Retardants - toxicity
Health risks
Humans
Mode of action
Models, Biological
NSRL
Polybrominated Biphenyls - toxicity
Rats, Wistar
RfDcancer
Risk
Risk Assessment
risk characterization
Scaling
Species Specificity
TBBPA
Tetrabromobisphenol A
Time Factors
Toxicity
Toxicology
Tumors
Uterine cancer
Uterine Neoplasms - chemically induced
Uterus
title Derivation of a no‐significant‐risk‐level for tetrabromobisphenol A based on a threshold non‐mutagenic cancer mode of action
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Derivation%20of%20a%20no%E2%80%90significant%E2%80%90risk%E2%80%90level%20for%20tetrabromobisphenol%20A%20based%20on%20a%20threshold%20non%E2%80%90mutagenic%20cancer%20mode%20of%20action&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20toxicology&rft.au=Pecquet,%20Alison%20M.&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=862&rft.epage=878&rft.pages=862-878&rft.issn=0260-437X&rft.eissn=1099-1263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jat.3594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2002218491%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2025906650&rft_id=info:pmid/29441599&rfr_iscdi=true