Randomised comparison of three methods of administering a screening questionnaire to elderly people: findings from the MRC trial of the assessment and management of older people in the community

Abstract Objective: To compare three different methods of administering a brief screening questionnaire to elderly people: post, interview by lay interviewer, and interview by nurse. Design: Randomised comparison of methods within a cluster randomised trial. Setting: 106 general practices in the Uni...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ 2001-12, Vol.323 (7326), p.1403-1407
Hauptverfasser: Smeeth, Liam, Fletcher, Astrid E, Stirling, Susan, Nunes, Maria, Breeze, Elizabeth, Ng, Edmond, Bulpitt, Christopher J, Jones, Dee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective: To compare three different methods of administering a brief screening questionnaire to elderly people: post, interview by lay interviewer, and interview by nurse. Design: Randomised comparison of methods within a cluster randomised trial. Setting: 106 general practices in the United Kingdom. Participants: 32 990 people aged 75 years or over registered with participating practices. Main outcome measures: Response rates, proportion of missing values, prevalence of self reported morbidity, and sensitivity and specificity of self reported measures by method of administration of questionnaire for four domains. Results: The response rate was higher for the postal questionnaire than for the two interview methods combined (83.5% v 74.9%; difference 8.5%, 95% confidence interval 4.4% to 12.7%, P
ISSN:0959-8138
0959-8146
0959-535X
1468-5833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.323.7326.1403