Additional Cervical Lymph Node Biopsy is Not a Significant Prognostic Factor for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Era: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis from an Epidemic Area
: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of cervical lymph node biopsy and whether different biopsy methods would lead different outcomes in NPC in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. : 1492 patients with biopsy-proven, non-metastatic NPC, and treated by IMRT with or without...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Cancer 2018-01, Vol.9 (16), p.2844-2851 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2851 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 2844 |
container_title | Journal of Cancer |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Yang, Xing-Li Wang, Yan Bao, Yong Liang, Shao-Bo He, Sha-Sha Chen, Dan-Ming Chen, Hai-Yang Lu, Li-Xia Chen, Yong |
description | : This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of cervical lymph node biopsy and whether different biopsy methods would lead different outcomes in NPC in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era.
: 1492 patients with biopsy-proven, non-metastatic NPC, and treated by IMRT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical lymph node biopsy was performed in 183 (12.3%) patients: 61(4.1%) by needle puncture and 118(7.9%) by excision biopsy. Propensity-score matching was used to match patients in both arms at an equal ratio. Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and nodal relapse-free survival (NRFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Independent prognostic factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model.
In the original cohort of 1492 patients, patients receiving cervical lymph node biopsy had comparable survival (OS:
= 0.736, DMFS:
= 0.749, LRFS:
= 0.538, NRFS:
= 0.093,) with patients receiving isolated napharynx biopsy. The results for the propensity-match cohort of 316 patients were similar. Interestingly, compared with the control group and needle puncture biopsy group, a slightly lower nodal recurrence rate was observed in the excision biopsy group (
= 0.082 and
= 0.072, respectively). Adjusting for the known prognostic factors in multivariate analysis, cervical biopsy did not cause a higher risk of death, distant metastasis, or nodal relapse.
Pretreatment cervical lymph node biopsy is not associated with impaired survival in NPC, suggesting the resist of the biopsy and more aggressive treatment after the biopsy may be unnecessary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7150/jca.25505 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6096379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2090296034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a4f8b11b28bf59083d144da47a55376ce3b76671a68761f671584ddf404e89183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUk1v1DAUjBCIVqUH_gDyEQ4pTvyVcEBaVluotBREy9l6sZ2Nq8QOtrdSfij_By9bqmLJ8lieN2_0PEXxusIXomL4_Z2Ci5oxzJ4Vp1VDRNlyTp8_wSfFeYx3OC_S1oKSl8UJwVVNCCOnxe-V1jZZ72BEaxPurcpgu0zzgK69NuiT9XNckI35mhCgG7tzts8sl9D34HfOx2QVugSVfEB93tcQ_TxAWNzOHEQhKOv8BMg6lAaDrlwyLtq0lF-93o-QjEY_QFs4uEC3gwkwL2gT4ANaHVrMRza6UT6YcoKkhlyxyoaXmG31wU8IHNrMVpspW1kFA6-KFz2M0Zw_nGfFz8vN7fpLuf32-Wq92paKCJZKoH3TVVVXN13PWtwQXVGqgQpgjAiuDOkE56IC3ghe9RmxhmrdU0xN0-YBnxUfj7rzvpuMVsalAKOcg53yAKQHK_9_cXaQO38vOW45EW0WePsgEPyvvYlJTjYqM47gjN9HWeMW1y3HhGbquyNVBR9jMP1jmwrLQxJkToL8m4TMffPU1yPz37-TP-5RssI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2090296034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Additional Cervical Lymph Node Biopsy is Not a Significant Prognostic Factor for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Era: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis from an Epidemic Area</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yang, Xing-Li ; Wang, Yan ; Bao, Yong ; Liang, Shao-Bo ; He, Sha-Sha ; Chen, Dan-Ming ; Chen, Hai-Yang ; Lu, Li-Xia ; Chen, Yong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xing-Li ; Wang, Yan ; Bao, Yong ; Liang, Shao-Bo ; He, Sha-Sha ; Chen, Dan-Ming ; Chen, Hai-Yang ; Lu, Li-Xia ; Chen, Yong</creatorcontrib><description>: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of cervical lymph node biopsy and whether different biopsy methods would lead different outcomes in NPC in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era.
: 1492 patients with biopsy-proven, non-metastatic NPC, and treated by IMRT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical lymph node biopsy was performed in 183 (12.3%) patients: 61(4.1%) by needle puncture and 118(7.9%) by excision biopsy. Propensity-score matching was used to match patients in both arms at an equal ratio. Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and nodal relapse-free survival (NRFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Independent prognostic factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model.
In the original cohort of 1492 patients, patients receiving cervical lymph node biopsy had comparable survival (OS:
= 0.736, DMFS:
= 0.749, LRFS:
= 0.538, NRFS:
= 0.093,) with patients receiving isolated napharynx biopsy. The results for the propensity-match cohort of 316 patients were similar. Interestingly, compared with the control group and needle puncture biopsy group, a slightly lower nodal recurrence rate was observed in the excision biopsy group (
= 0.082 and
= 0.072, respectively). Adjusting for the known prognostic factors in multivariate analysis, cervical biopsy did not cause a higher risk of death, distant metastasis, or nodal relapse.
Pretreatment cervical lymph node biopsy is not associated with impaired survival in NPC, suggesting the resist of the biopsy and more aggressive treatment after the biopsy may be unnecessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1837-9664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1837-9664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7150/jca.25505</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30123353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Ivyspring International Publisher</publisher><subject>Research Paper</subject><ispartof>Journal of Cancer, 2018-01, Vol.9 (16), p.2844-2851</ispartof><rights>Ivyspring International Publisher 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a4f8b11b28bf59083d144da47a55376ce3b76671a68761f671584ddf404e89183</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096379/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6096379/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xing-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Shao-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Sha-Sha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Dan-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hai-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Li-Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yong</creatorcontrib><title>Additional Cervical Lymph Node Biopsy is Not a Significant Prognostic Factor for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Era: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis from an Epidemic Area</title><title>Journal of Cancer</title><addtitle>J Cancer</addtitle><description>: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of cervical lymph node biopsy and whether different biopsy methods would lead different outcomes in NPC in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era.
: 1492 patients with biopsy-proven, non-metastatic NPC, and treated by IMRT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical lymph node biopsy was performed in 183 (12.3%) patients: 61(4.1%) by needle puncture and 118(7.9%) by excision biopsy. Propensity-score matching was used to match patients in both arms at an equal ratio. Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and nodal relapse-free survival (NRFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Independent prognostic factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model.
In the original cohort of 1492 patients, patients receiving cervical lymph node biopsy had comparable survival (OS:
= 0.736, DMFS:
= 0.749, LRFS:
= 0.538, NRFS:
= 0.093,) with patients receiving isolated napharynx biopsy. The results for the propensity-match cohort of 316 patients were similar. Interestingly, compared with the control group and needle puncture biopsy group, a slightly lower nodal recurrence rate was observed in the excision biopsy group (
= 0.082 and
= 0.072, respectively). Adjusting for the known prognostic factors in multivariate analysis, cervical biopsy did not cause a higher risk of death, distant metastasis, or nodal relapse.
Pretreatment cervical lymph node biopsy is not associated with impaired survival in NPC, suggesting the resist of the biopsy and more aggressive treatment after the biopsy may be unnecessary.</description><subject>Research Paper</subject><issn>1837-9664</issn><issn>1837-9664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUk1v1DAUjBCIVqUH_gDyEQ4pTvyVcEBaVluotBREy9l6sZ2Nq8QOtrdSfij_By9bqmLJ8lieN2_0PEXxusIXomL4_Z2Ci5oxzJ4Vp1VDRNlyTp8_wSfFeYx3OC_S1oKSl8UJwVVNCCOnxe-V1jZZ72BEaxPurcpgu0zzgK69NuiT9XNckI35mhCgG7tzts8sl9D34HfOx2QVugSVfEB93tcQ_TxAWNzOHEQhKOv8BMg6lAaDrlwyLtq0lF-93o-QjEY_QFs4uEC3gwkwL2gT4ANaHVrMRza6UT6YcoKkhlyxyoaXmG31wU8IHNrMVpspW1kFA6-KFz2M0Zw_nGfFz8vN7fpLuf32-Wq92paKCJZKoH3TVVVXN13PWtwQXVGqgQpgjAiuDOkE56IC3ghe9RmxhmrdU0xN0-YBnxUfj7rzvpuMVsalAKOcg53yAKQHK_9_cXaQO38vOW45EW0WePsgEPyvvYlJTjYqM47gjN9HWeMW1y3HhGbquyNVBR9jMP1jmwrLQxJkToL8m4TMffPU1yPz37-TP-5RssI</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Yang, Xing-Li</creator><creator>Wang, Yan</creator><creator>Bao, Yong</creator><creator>Liang, Shao-Bo</creator><creator>He, Sha-Sha</creator><creator>Chen, Dan-Ming</creator><creator>Chen, Hai-Yang</creator><creator>Lu, Li-Xia</creator><creator>Chen, Yong</creator><general>Ivyspring International Publisher</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Additional Cervical Lymph Node Biopsy is Not a Significant Prognostic Factor for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Era: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis from an Epidemic Area</title><author>Yang, Xing-Li ; Wang, Yan ; Bao, Yong ; Liang, Shao-Bo ; He, Sha-Sha ; Chen, Dan-Ming ; Chen, Hai-Yang ; Lu, Li-Xia ; Chen, Yong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a4f8b11b28bf59083d144da47a55376ce3b76671a68761f671584ddf404e89183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Research Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xing-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Shao-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Sha-Sha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Dan-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hai-Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Li-Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Xing-Li</au><au>Wang, Yan</au><au>Bao, Yong</au><au>Liang, Shao-Bo</au><au>He, Sha-Sha</au><au>Chen, Dan-Ming</au><au>Chen, Hai-Yang</au><au>Lu, Li-Xia</au><au>Chen, Yong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Additional Cervical Lymph Node Biopsy is Not a Significant Prognostic Factor for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Era: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis from an Epidemic Area</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>J Cancer</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>2844</spage><epage>2851</epage><pages>2844-2851</pages><issn>1837-9664</issn><eissn>1837-9664</eissn><abstract>: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of cervical lymph node biopsy and whether different biopsy methods would lead different outcomes in NPC in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era.
: 1492 patients with biopsy-proven, non-metastatic NPC, and treated by IMRT with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical lymph node biopsy was performed in 183 (12.3%) patients: 61(4.1%) by needle puncture and 118(7.9%) by excision biopsy. Propensity-score matching was used to match patients in both arms at an equal ratio. Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and nodal relapse-free survival (NRFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Independent prognostic factors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model.
In the original cohort of 1492 patients, patients receiving cervical lymph node biopsy had comparable survival (OS:
= 0.736, DMFS:
= 0.749, LRFS:
= 0.538, NRFS:
= 0.093,) with patients receiving isolated napharynx biopsy. The results for the propensity-match cohort of 316 patients were similar. Interestingly, compared with the control group and needle puncture biopsy group, a slightly lower nodal recurrence rate was observed in the excision biopsy group (
= 0.082 and
= 0.072, respectively). Adjusting for the known prognostic factors in multivariate analysis, cervical biopsy did not cause a higher risk of death, distant metastasis, or nodal relapse.
Pretreatment cervical lymph node biopsy is not associated with impaired survival in NPC, suggesting the resist of the biopsy and more aggressive treatment after the biopsy may be unnecessary.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Ivyspring International Publisher</pub><pmid>30123353</pmid><doi>10.7150/jca.25505</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1837-9664 |
ispartof | Journal of Cancer, 2018-01, Vol.9 (16), p.2844-2851 |
issn | 1837-9664 1837-9664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6096379 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Research Paper |
title | Additional Cervical Lymph Node Biopsy is Not a Significant Prognostic Factor for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Era: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis from an Epidemic Area |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A31%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Additional%20Cervical%20Lymph%20Node%20Biopsy%20is%20Not%20a%20Significant%20Prognostic%20Factor%20for%20Nasopharyngeal%20Carcinoma%20in%20the%20Intensity-Modulated%20Radiation%20Therapy%20Era:%20A%20Propensity%20Score-matched%20Analysis%20from%20an%20Epidemic%20Area&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Cancer&rft.au=Yang,%20Xing-Li&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=2844&rft.epage=2851&rft.pages=2844-2851&rft.issn=1837-9664&rft.eissn=1837-9664&rft_id=info:doi/10.7150/jca.25505&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2090296034%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2090296034&rft_id=info:pmid/30123353&rfr_iscdi=true |