Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer
The Multi-Rule Quality Control System (MRQCS) is a tool currently employed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate and compare laboratory performance. We have applied the MRQCS to a comparison of instructor-led and computer-led prelaboratory instruction for a supplemental...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical education 2017-08, Vol.94 (8), p.1094-1097 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1097 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1094 |
container_title | Journal of chemical education |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Carter, Melissa D Pierce, Sarah S Dukes, Albert D Brown, Rebecca H Crow, Brian S Shaner, Rebecca L Heidari, Leila Isenberg, Samantha L Perez, Jonas W Graham, Leigh Ann Thomas, Jerry D Johnson, Rudolph C Gerdon, Aren E |
description | The Multi-Rule Quality Control System (MRQCS) is a tool currently employed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate and compare laboratory performance. We have applied the MRQCS to a comparison of instructor-led and computer-led prelaboratory instruction for a supplemental learning experiment. Students in general chemistry and analytical chemistry from both two- and four-year institutions performed two laboratory experiments as part of their normal laboratory curriculum. The first laboratory experiment was a foundational learning experiment in which all of the students were introduced to the Beer–Lambert law and spectrophotometric light absorbance measurements. The foundational learning experiment was instructor-led only, and participant performance was evaluated against a mean characterized value. The second laboratory experiment was a supplemental learning experiment in which students were asked to build upon the methodology they learned in the foundational learning experiment and apply it to a different analyte. The instruction type was varied randomly into two delivery modes, with participants receiving either instructor-led or computer-led prelaboratory instruction. The MRQCS was applied, and it was determined that there was no statistical difference between the quality control passing rates of the participants receiving instructor-led instruction and those receiving computer-led instruction. These findings demonstrate the successful application of the MRQCS to evaluate knowledge and technology transfer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6094388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1950078607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-429ca531d04d70ab1fdda5eb1ae8d2e2e583611102f27c5c379342f07b7bd0ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v0zAYxi0EYmXwCZCQJS67pPOfJLY5IFXTgIlOOzDO1hvbaVKldrCTon17zFoq4LCTLfv3PPbzPgi9pWRJCaOXYNJyazq3c3ZZN4SounyGFlRxWVDO5HO0IBkrVCXLM_QqpS0hlFVKvkRnPO-YUGSBhm_zOA7Zw08w4LWD6Hu_wb3HU-fwGpoQYQrx4QNeeXzjfdjD1O8dXo1jDGA63IaIr_cwzPk8C7_68HNwduMweItv3dQFi-8j-NS6-Bq9aGFI7s1xPUffP13fX30p1nefb65W6wJKwaeiZMpAxaklpRUEGtpaC5VrKDhpmWOukrymNA-hZcJUhgvFS9YS0YjGZp6fo48H33Fu8nRMDhdh0GPsdxAfdIBe_3vj-05vwl7XRJVcymxwcTSI4cfs0qR3fTJuGMC7MCfNiCJ5xKKmGX3_H7oNc_Q5nqaqIkTImohM8QNlYkgpuvb0GUr07zZ1blMf29THNrPq3d85Tpo_9WXg8gA8qk_vPmH5C-Zrr9M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1950078607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Carter, Melissa D ; Pierce, Sarah S ; Dukes, Albert D ; Brown, Rebecca H ; Crow, Brian S ; Shaner, Rebecca L ; Heidari, Leila ; Isenberg, Samantha L ; Perez, Jonas W ; Graham, Leigh Ann ; Thomas, Jerry D ; Johnson, Rudolph C ; Gerdon, Aren E</creator><creatorcontrib>Carter, Melissa D ; Pierce, Sarah S ; Dukes, Albert D ; Brown, Rebecca H ; Crow, Brian S ; Shaner, Rebecca L ; Heidari, Leila ; Isenberg, Samantha L ; Perez, Jonas W ; Graham, Leigh Ann ; Thomas, Jerry D ; Johnson, Rudolph C ; Gerdon, Aren E</creatorcontrib><description>The Multi-Rule Quality Control System (MRQCS) is a tool currently employed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate and compare laboratory performance. We have applied the MRQCS to a comparison of instructor-led and computer-led prelaboratory instruction for a supplemental learning experiment. Students in general chemistry and analytical chemistry from both two- and four-year institutions performed two laboratory experiments as part of their normal laboratory curriculum. The first laboratory experiment was a foundational learning experiment in which all of the students were introduced to the Beer–Lambert law and spectrophotometric light absorbance measurements. The foundational learning experiment was instructor-led only, and participant performance was evaluated against a mean characterized value. The second laboratory experiment was a supplemental learning experiment in which students were asked to build upon the methodology they learned in the foundational learning experiment and apply it to a different analyte. The instruction type was varied randomly into two delivery modes, with participants receiving either instructor-led or computer-led prelaboratory instruction. The MRQCS was applied, and it was determined that there was no statistical difference between the quality control passing rates of the participants receiving instructor-led instruction and those receiving computer-led instruction. These findings demonstrate the successful application of the MRQCS to evaluate knowledge and technology transfer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30122790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; CAI ; College students ; Computer assisted instruction ; Computers ; Continuing education ; Disease control ; Distance learning ; Educational tests & measurements ; Institutions ; Knowledge management ; Laboratory Experiments ; Learning ; Light emitting diodes ; Organic Chemistry ; Quality control ; Spectrophotometry ; Students ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Technology assessment ; Technology transfer</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2017-08, Vol.94 (8), p.1094-1097</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 8, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-429ca531d04d70ab1fdda5eb1ae8d2e2e583611102f27c5c379342f07b7bd0ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-429ca531d04d70ab1fdda5eb1ae8d2e2e583611102f27c5c379342f07b7bd0ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8530-0795</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carter, Melissa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Sarah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dukes, Albert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Rebecca H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crow, Brian S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaner, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidari, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isenberg, Samantha L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Jonas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Leigh Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jerry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Rudolph C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdon, Aren E</creatorcontrib><title>Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>The Multi-Rule Quality Control System (MRQCS) is a tool currently employed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate and compare laboratory performance. We have applied the MRQCS to a comparison of instructor-led and computer-led prelaboratory instruction for a supplemental learning experiment. Students in general chemistry and analytical chemistry from both two- and four-year institutions performed two laboratory experiments as part of their normal laboratory curriculum. The first laboratory experiment was a foundational learning experiment in which all of the students were introduced to the Beer–Lambert law and spectrophotometric light absorbance measurements. The foundational learning experiment was instructor-led only, and participant performance was evaluated against a mean characterized value. The second laboratory experiment was a supplemental learning experiment in which students were asked to build upon the methodology they learned in the foundational learning experiment and apply it to a different analyte. The instruction type was varied randomly into two delivery modes, with participants receiving either instructor-led or computer-led prelaboratory instruction. The MRQCS was applied, and it was determined that there was no statistical difference between the quality control passing rates of the participants receiving instructor-led instruction and those receiving computer-led instruction. These findings demonstrate the successful application of the MRQCS to evaluate knowledge and technology transfer.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>CAI</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Computer assisted instruction</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Continuing education</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational tests & measurements</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Laboratory Experiments</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Light emitting diodes</subject><subject>Organic Chemistry</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v0zAYxi0EYmXwCZCQJS67pPOfJLY5IFXTgIlOOzDO1hvbaVKldrCTon17zFoq4LCTLfv3PPbzPgi9pWRJCaOXYNJyazq3c3ZZN4SounyGFlRxWVDO5HO0IBkrVCXLM_QqpS0hlFVKvkRnPO-YUGSBhm_zOA7Zw08w4LWD6Hu_wb3HU-fwGpoQYQrx4QNeeXzjfdjD1O8dXo1jDGA63IaIr_cwzPk8C7_68HNwduMweItv3dQFi-8j-NS6-Bq9aGFI7s1xPUffP13fX30p1nefb65W6wJKwaeiZMpAxaklpRUEGtpaC5VrKDhpmWOukrymNA-hZcJUhgvFS9YS0YjGZp6fo48H33Fu8nRMDhdh0GPsdxAfdIBe_3vj-05vwl7XRJVcymxwcTSI4cfs0qR3fTJuGMC7MCfNiCJ5xKKmGX3_H7oNc_Q5nqaqIkTImohM8QNlYkgpuvb0GUr07zZ1blMf29THNrPq3d85Tpo_9WXg8gA8qk_vPmH5C-Zrr9M</recordid><startdate>20170808</startdate><enddate>20170808</enddate><creator>Carter, Melissa D</creator><creator>Pierce, Sarah S</creator><creator>Dukes, Albert D</creator><creator>Brown, Rebecca H</creator><creator>Crow, Brian S</creator><creator>Shaner, Rebecca L</creator><creator>Heidari, Leila</creator><creator>Isenberg, Samantha L</creator><creator>Perez, Jonas W</creator><creator>Graham, Leigh Ann</creator><creator>Thomas, Jerry D</creator><creator>Johnson, Rudolph C</creator><creator>Gerdon, Aren E</creator><general>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8530-0795</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170808</creationdate><title>Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer</title><author>Carter, Melissa D ; Pierce, Sarah S ; Dukes, Albert D ; Brown, Rebecca H ; Crow, Brian S ; Shaner, Rebecca L ; Heidari, Leila ; Isenberg, Samantha L ; Perez, Jonas W ; Graham, Leigh Ann ; Thomas, Jerry D ; Johnson, Rudolph C ; Gerdon, Aren E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-429ca531d04d70ab1fdda5eb1ae8d2e2e583611102f27c5c379342f07b7bd0ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>CAI</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Computer assisted instruction</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Continuing education</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational tests & measurements</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Laboratory Experiments</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Light emitting diodes</topic><topic>Organic Chemistry</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carter, Melissa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Sarah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dukes, Albert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Rebecca H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crow, Brian S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaner, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidari, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isenberg, Samantha L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Jonas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Leigh Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jerry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Rudolph C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdon, Aren E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carter, Melissa D</au><au>Pierce, Sarah S</au><au>Dukes, Albert D</au><au>Brown, Rebecca H</au><au>Crow, Brian S</au><au>Shaner, Rebecca L</au><au>Heidari, Leila</au><au>Isenberg, Samantha L</au><au>Perez, Jonas W</au><au>Graham, Leigh Ann</au><au>Thomas, Jerry D</au><au>Johnson, Rudolph C</au><au>Gerdon, Aren E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2017-08-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1094</spage><epage>1097</epage><pages>1094-1097</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><abstract>The Multi-Rule Quality Control System (MRQCS) is a tool currently employed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate and compare laboratory performance. We have applied the MRQCS to a comparison of instructor-led and computer-led prelaboratory instruction for a supplemental learning experiment. Students in general chemistry and analytical chemistry from both two- and four-year institutions performed two laboratory experiments as part of their normal laboratory curriculum. The first laboratory experiment was a foundational learning experiment in which all of the students were introduced to the Beer–Lambert law and spectrophotometric light absorbance measurements. The foundational learning experiment was instructor-led only, and participant performance was evaluated against a mean characterized value. The second laboratory experiment was a supplemental learning experiment in which students were asked to build upon the methodology they learned in the foundational learning experiment and apply it to a different analyte. The instruction type was varied randomly into two delivery modes, with participants receiving either instructor-led or computer-led prelaboratory instruction. The MRQCS was applied, and it was determined that there was no statistical difference between the quality control passing rates of the participants receiving instructor-led instruction and those receiving computer-led instruction. These findings demonstrate the successful application of the MRQCS to evaluate knowledge and technology transfer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</pub><pmid>30122790</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8530-0795</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9584 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical education, 2017-08, Vol.94 (8), p.1094-1097 |
issn | 0021-9584 1938-1328 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6094388 |
source | ACS Publications |
subjects | Analytical chemistry CAI College students Computer assisted instruction Computers Continuing education Disease control Distance learning Educational tests & measurements Institutions Knowledge management Laboratory Experiments Learning Light emitting diodes Organic Chemistry Quality control Spectrophotometry Students Teachers Teaching Teaching Methods Technology assessment Technology transfer |
title | Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A53%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplemental%20Learning%20in%20the%20Laboratory:%20An%20Innovative%20Approach%20for%20Evaluating%20Knowledge%20and%20Method%20Transfer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Carter,%20Melissa%20D&rft.date=2017-08-08&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1094&rft.epage=1097&rft.pages=1094-1097&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1950078607%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1950078607&rft_id=info:pmid/30122790&rfr_iscdi=true |