Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer

The Multi-Rule Quality Control System (MRQCS) is a tool currently employed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate and compare laboratory performance. We have applied the MRQCS to a comparison of instructor-led and computer-led prelaboratory instruction for a supplemental...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical education 2017-08, Vol.94 (8), p.1094-1097
Hauptverfasser: Carter, Melissa D, Pierce, Sarah S, Dukes, Albert D, Brown, Rebecca H, Crow, Brian S, Shaner, Rebecca L, Heidari, Leila, Isenberg, Samantha L, Perez, Jonas W, Graham, Leigh Ann, Thomas, Jerry D, Johnson, Rudolph C, Gerdon, Aren E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1097
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1094
container_title Journal of chemical education
container_volume 94
creator Carter, Melissa D
Pierce, Sarah S
Dukes, Albert D
Brown, Rebecca H
Crow, Brian S
Shaner, Rebecca L
Heidari, Leila
Isenberg, Samantha L
Perez, Jonas W
Graham, Leigh Ann
Thomas, Jerry D
Johnson, Rudolph C
Gerdon, Aren E
description The Multi-Rule Quality Control System (MRQCS) is a tool currently employed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate and compare laboratory performance. We have applied the MRQCS to a comparison of instructor-led and computer-led prelaboratory instruction for a supplemental learning experiment. Students in general chemistry and analytical chemistry from both two- and four-year institutions performed two laboratory experiments as part of their normal laboratory curriculum. The first laboratory experiment was a foundational learning experiment in which all of the students were introduced to the Beer–Lambert law and spectrophotometric light absorbance measurements. The foundational learning experiment was instructor-led only, and participant performance was evaluated against a mean characterized value. The second laboratory experiment was a supplemental learning experiment in which students were asked to build upon the methodology they learned in the foundational learning experiment and apply it to a different analyte. The instruction type was varied randomly into two delivery modes, with participants receiving either instructor-led or computer-led prelaboratory instruction. The MRQCS was applied, and it was determined that there was no statistical difference between the quality control passing rates of the participants receiving instructor-led instruction and those receiving computer-led instruction. These findings demonstrate the successful application of the MRQCS to evaluate knowledge and technology transfer.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6094388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1950078607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-429ca531d04d70ab1fdda5eb1ae8d2e2e583611102f27c5c379342f07b7bd0ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v0zAYxi0EYmXwCZCQJS67pPOfJLY5IFXTgIlOOzDO1hvbaVKldrCTon17zFoq4LCTLfv3PPbzPgi9pWRJCaOXYNJyazq3c3ZZN4SounyGFlRxWVDO5HO0IBkrVCXLM_QqpS0hlFVKvkRnPO-YUGSBhm_zOA7Zw08w4LWD6Hu_wb3HU-fwGpoQYQrx4QNeeXzjfdjD1O8dXo1jDGA63IaIr_cwzPk8C7_68HNwduMweItv3dQFi-8j-NS6-Bq9aGFI7s1xPUffP13fX30p1nefb65W6wJKwaeiZMpAxaklpRUEGtpaC5VrKDhpmWOukrymNA-hZcJUhgvFS9YS0YjGZp6fo48H33Fu8nRMDhdh0GPsdxAfdIBe_3vj-05vwl7XRJVcymxwcTSI4cfs0qR3fTJuGMC7MCfNiCJ5xKKmGX3_H7oNc_Q5nqaqIkTImohM8QNlYkgpuvb0GUr07zZ1blMf29THNrPq3d85Tpo_9WXg8gA8qk_vPmH5C-Zrr9M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1950078607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Carter, Melissa D ; Pierce, Sarah S ; Dukes, Albert D ; Brown, Rebecca H ; Crow, Brian S ; Shaner, Rebecca L ; Heidari, Leila ; Isenberg, Samantha L ; Perez, Jonas W ; Graham, Leigh Ann ; Thomas, Jerry D ; Johnson, Rudolph C ; Gerdon, Aren E</creator><creatorcontrib>Carter, Melissa D ; Pierce, Sarah S ; Dukes, Albert D ; Brown, Rebecca H ; Crow, Brian S ; Shaner, Rebecca L ; Heidari, Leila ; Isenberg, Samantha L ; Perez, Jonas W ; Graham, Leigh Ann ; Thomas, Jerry D ; Johnson, Rudolph C ; Gerdon, Aren E</creatorcontrib><description>The Multi-Rule Quality Control System (MRQCS) is a tool currently employed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate and compare laboratory performance. We have applied the MRQCS to a comparison of instructor-led and computer-led prelaboratory instruction for a supplemental learning experiment. Students in general chemistry and analytical chemistry from both two- and four-year institutions performed two laboratory experiments as part of their normal laboratory curriculum. The first laboratory experiment was a foundational learning experiment in which all of the students were introduced to the Beer–Lambert law and spectrophotometric light absorbance measurements. The foundational learning experiment was instructor-led only, and participant performance was evaluated against a mean characterized value. The second laboratory experiment was a supplemental learning experiment in which students were asked to build upon the methodology they learned in the foundational learning experiment and apply it to a different analyte. The instruction type was varied randomly into two delivery modes, with participants receiving either instructor-led or computer-led prelaboratory instruction. The MRQCS was applied, and it was determined that there was no statistical difference between the quality control passing rates of the participants receiving instructor-led instruction and those receiving computer-led instruction. These findings demonstrate the successful application of the MRQCS to evaluate knowledge and technology transfer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30122790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; CAI ; College students ; Computer assisted instruction ; Computers ; Continuing education ; Disease control ; Distance learning ; Educational tests &amp; measurements ; Institutions ; Knowledge management ; Laboratory Experiments ; Learning ; Light emitting diodes ; Organic Chemistry ; Quality control ; Spectrophotometry ; Students ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Technology assessment ; Technology transfer</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2017-08, Vol.94 (8), p.1094-1097</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 8, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-429ca531d04d70ab1fdda5eb1ae8d2e2e583611102f27c5c379342f07b7bd0ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-429ca531d04d70ab1fdda5eb1ae8d2e2e583611102f27c5c379342f07b7bd0ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8530-0795</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carter, Melissa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Sarah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dukes, Albert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Rebecca H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crow, Brian S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaner, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidari, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isenberg, Samantha L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Jonas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Leigh Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jerry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Rudolph C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdon, Aren E</creatorcontrib><title>Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>The Multi-Rule Quality Control System (MRQCS) is a tool currently employed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate and compare laboratory performance. We have applied the MRQCS to a comparison of instructor-led and computer-led prelaboratory instruction for a supplemental learning experiment. Students in general chemistry and analytical chemistry from both two- and four-year institutions performed two laboratory experiments as part of their normal laboratory curriculum. The first laboratory experiment was a foundational learning experiment in which all of the students were introduced to the Beer–Lambert law and spectrophotometric light absorbance measurements. The foundational learning experiment was instructor-led only, and participant performance was evaluated against a mean characterized value. The second laboratory experiment was a supplemental learning experiment in which students were asked to build upon the methodology they learned in the foundational learning experiment and apply it to a different analyte. The instruction type was varied randomly into two delivery modes, with participants receiving either instructor-led or computer-led prelaboratory instruction. The MRQCS was applied, and it was determined that there was no statistical difference between the quality control passing rates of the participants receiving instructor-led instruction and those receiving computer-led instruction. These findings demonstrate the successful application of the MRQCS to evaluate knowledge and technology transfer.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>CAI</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Computer assisted instruction</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Continuing education</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational tests &amp; measurements</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Laboratory Experiments</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Light emitting diodes</subject><subject>Organic Chemistry</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v0zAYxi0EYmXwCZCQJS67pPOfJLY5IFXTgIlOOzDO1hvbaVKldrCTon17zFoq4LCTLfv3PPbzPgi9pWRJCaOXYNJyazq3c3ZZN4SounyGFlRxWVDO5HO0IBkrVCXLM_QqpS0hlFVKvkRnPO-YUGSBhm_zOA7Zw08w4LWD6Hu_wb3HU-fwGpoQYQrx4QNeeXzjfdjD1O8dXo1jDGA63IaIr_cwzPk8C7_68HNwduMweItv3dQFi-8j-NS6-Bq9aGFI7s1xPUffP13fX30p1nefb65W6wJKwaeiZMpAxaklpRUEGtpaC5VrKDhpmWOukrymNA-hZcJUhgvFS9YS0YjGZp6fo48H33Fu8nRMDhdh0GPsdxAfdIBe_3vj-05vwl7XRJVcymxwcTSI4cfs0qR3fTJuGMC7MCfNiCJ5xKKmGX3_H7oNc_Q5nqaqIkTImohM8QNlYkgpuvb0GUr07zZ1blMf29THNrPq3d85Tpo_9WXg8gA8qk_vPmH5C-Zrr9M</recordid><startdate>20170808</startdate><enddate>20170808</enddate><creator>Carter, Melissa D</creator><creator>Pierce, Sarah S</creator><creator>Dukes, Albert D</creator><creator>Brown, Rebecca H</creator><creator>Crow, Brian S</creator><creator>Shaner, Rebecca L</creator><creator>Heidari, Leila</creator><creator>Isenberg, Samantha L</creator><creator>Perez, Jonas W</creator><creator>Graham, Leigh Ann</creator><creator>Thomas, Jerry D</creator><creator>Johnson, Rudolph C</creator><creator>Gerdon, Aren E</creator><general>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8530-0795</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170808</creationdate><title>Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer</title><author>Carter, Melissa D ; Pierce, Sarah S ; Dukes, Albert D ; Brown, Rebecca H ; Crow, Brian S ; Shaner, Rebecca L ; Heidari, Leila ; Isenberg, Samantha L ; Perez, Jonas W ; Graham, Leigh Ann ; Thomas, Jerry D ; Johnson, Rudolph C ; Gerdon, Aren E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a473t-429ca531d04d70ab1fdda5eb1ae8d2e2e583611102f27c5c379342f07b7bd0ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>CAI</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Computer assisted instruction</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Continuing education</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational tests &amp; measurements</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Laboratory Experiments</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Light emitting diodes</topic><topic>Organic Chemistry</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carter, Melissa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Sarah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dukes, Albert D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Rebecca H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crow, Brian S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaner, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidari, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isenberg, Samantha L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Jonas W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Leigh Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jerry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Rudolph C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerdon, Aren E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carter, Melissa D</au><au>Pierce, Sarah S</au><au>Dukes, Albert D</au><au>Brown, Rebecca H</au><au>Crow, Brian S</au><au>Shaner, Rebecca L</au><au>Heidari, Leila</au><au>Isenberg, Samantha L</au><au>Perez, Jonas W</au><au>Graham, Leigh Ann</au><au>Thomas, Jerry D</au><au>Johnson, Rudolph C</au><au>Gerdon, Aren E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2017-08-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1094</spage><epage>1097</epage><pages>1094-1097</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><abstract>The Multi-Rule Quality Control System (MRQCS) is a tool currently employed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate and compare laboratory performance. We have applied the MRQCS to a comparison of instructor-led and computer-led prelaboratory instruction for a supplemental learning experiment. Students in general chemistry and analytical chemistry from both two- and four-year institutions performed two laboratory experiments as part of their normal laboratory curriculum. The first laboratory experiment was a foundational learning experiment in which all of the students were introduced to the Beer–Lambert law and spectrophotometric light absorbance measurements. The foundational learning experiment was instructor-led only, and participant performance was evaluated against a mean characterized value. The second laboratory experiment was a supplemental learning experiment in which students were asked to build upon the methodology they learned in the foundational learning experiment and apply it to a different analyte. The instruction type was varied randomly into two delivery modes, with participants receiving either instructor-led or computer-led prelaboratory instruction. The MRQCS was applied, and it was determined that there was no statistical difference between the quality control passing rates of the participants receiving instructor-led instruction and those receiving computer-led instruction. These findings demonstrate the successful application of the MRQCS to evaluate knowledge and technology transfer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</pub><pmid>30122790</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8530-0795</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9584
ispartof Journal of chemical education, 2017-08, Vol.94 (8), p.1094-1097
issn 0021-9584
1938-1328
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6094388
source ACS Publications
subjects Analytical chemistry
CAI
College students
Computer assisted instruction
Computers
Continuing education
Disease control
Distance learning
Educational tests & measurements
Institutions
Knowledge management
Laboratory Experiments
Learning
Light emitting diodes
Organic Chemistry
Quality control
Spectrophotometry
Students
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Technology assessment
Technology transfer
title Supplemental Learning in the Laboratory: An Innovative Approach for Evaluating Knowledge and Method Transfer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T01%3A53%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplemental%20Learning%20in%20the%20Laboratory:%20An%20Innovative%20Approach%20for%20Evaluating%20Knowledge%20and%20Method%20Transfer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Carter,%20Melissa%20D&rft.date=2017-08-08&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1094&rft.epage=1097&rft.pages=1094-1097&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00964&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1950078607%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1950078607&rft_id=info:pmid/30122790&rfr_iscdi=true