Family Caregivers’ Characterization of Conversations Following an ACP Event

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) has been shown to benefit patients and families, yet little is known about how an ACP event impacts communication and conversation about end-of-life treatment wishes and the content of such conversations between patients and family caregivers. Objective: To ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hospice & palliative medicine 2018-09, Vol.35 (9), p.1161-1167
Hauptverfasser: Schubart, Jane R., Reading, Jean M., Penrod, Janice, Stewart, Renee R., Sampath, Ramya, Lehmann, Lisa S., Levi, Benjamin H., Green, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1167
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1161
container_title American journal of hospice & palliative medicine
container_volume 35
creator Schubart, Jane R.
Reading, Jean M.
Penrod, Janice
Stewart, Renee R.
Sampath, Ramya
Lehmann, Lisa S.
Levi, Benjamin H.
Green, Michael J.
description Background: Advance care planning (ACP) has been shown to benefit patients and families, yet little is known about how an ACP event impacts communication and conversation about end-of-life treatment wishes and the content of such conversations between patients and family caregivers. Objective: To characterize post-ACP conversations regarding medical wishes between seriously ill patients and their family caregivers. Participants: Patients with advanced illness and family caregivers. Outcome Measured: Post-ACP conversations. Design: As part of a larger randomized controlled trial, dyads consisting of seriously ill patients and their identified family caregiver engaged in ACP and created an advance directive for the patient. Approximately 4 to 6 weeks later, semistructured interviews were conducted with the family caregivers to elucidate the subsequent communications regarding medical wishes. If the dyad did not have any conversations post-ACP, reasons and barriers were explored. Results: The majority of dyads (131/188, 69.7%) had 2 to 3 conversations lasting 3 to 5 minutes each in the weeks immediately following ACP. These conversations most commonly addressed general patient wishes about quality of life and specific medical treatments. The most common reasons for not having conversations were a general discomfort with the topic (13/57, 22.8%) and previously having discussed medical wishes (16/57, 28.1%). Conclusion: The ACP events promote conversation regarding quality of life, general wishes at the end of life, and specific medical wishes. Barriers to conversation following ACP were similar to barriers to ACP in general, suggesting that a more intentional focus on addressing these barriers pre- and post-ACP may be necessary to improve communication.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1049909118760302
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6092939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1049909118760302</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2083726210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-a9fef239cf4d419fd63c6ca5039f06b8c76512881dcecd9a01e0122446aa982a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9OIzEMxiPEiv93TmiOXAbsZDozuSChUcsiFe0elnNk0kwJmiaQTIvgxGvwejzJprSgBWlPtvX9_NmyGTtEOEGsqlOEQkqQiHVVggC-wXZQijrnFQ42U57kfKlvs90Y7wAELwrcYtsCoMKqLnbY1YhmtnvKGgpmahcmxLeX16y5pUC6N8E-U2-9y3ybNd4t5fc6ZiPfdf7RumlGLjtvfmfDhXH9PvvRUhfNwTrusevR8E_zMx__urhszse5LkTR5yRb03IhdVtMCpTtpBS61DQAIVsob2pdlQPkdY0TbfREEqAB5Gn3kkjWnMQeO1v53s9vZiZRrg_UqftgZxSelCervirO3qqpX6gSJJdCJoPjtUHwD3MTezWzUZuuI2f8PCoOtah4yRESCitUBx9jMO3nGAS1_IL6_oXUcvTvep8NH2dPQL4CIk2NuvPz4NK5_m_4F0hskPE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2083726210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family Caregivers’ Characterization of Conversations Following an ACP Event</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Schubart, Jane R. ; Reading, Jean M. ; Penrod, Janice ; Stewart, Renee R. ; Sampath, Ramya ; Lehmann, Lisa S. ; Levi, Benjamin H. ; Green, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schubart, Jane R. ; Reading, Jean M. ; Penrod, Janice ; Stewart, Renee R. ; Sampath, Ramya ; Lehmann, Lisa S. ; Levi, Benjamin H. ; Green, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Advance care planning (ACP) has been shown to benefit patients and families, yet little is known about how an ACP event impacts communication and conversation about end-of-life treatment wishes and the content of such conversations between patients and family caregivers. Objective: To characterize post-ACP conversations regarding medical wishes between seriously ill patients and their family caregivers. Participants: Patients with advanced illness and family caregivers. Outcome Measured: Post-ACP conversations. Design: As part of a larger randomized controlled trial, dyads consisting of seriously ill patients and their identified family caregiver engaged in ACP and created an advance directive for the patient. Approximately 4 to 6 weeks later, semistructured interviews were conducted with the family caregivers to elucidate the subsequent communications regarding medical wishes. If the dyad did not have any conversations post-ACP, reasons and barriers were explored. Results: The majority of dyads (131/188, 69.7%) had 2 to 3 conversations lasting 3 to 5 minutes each in the weeks immediately following ACP. These conversations most commonly addressed general patient wishes about quality of life and specific medical treatments. The most common reasons for not having conversations were a general discomfort with the topic (13/57, 22.8%) and previously having discussed medical wishes (16/57, 28.1%). Conclusion: The ACP events promote conversation regarding quality of life, general wishes at the end of life, and specific medical wishes. Barriers to conversation following ACP were similar to barriers to ACP in general, suggesting that a more intentional focus on addressing these barriers pre- and post-ACP may be necessary to improve communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-9091</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2715</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049909118760302</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30071784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Advance Care Planning - organization &amp; administration ; Aged ; Caregivers - psychology ; Communication ; Decision Support Techniques ; Female ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nursing ; Patient Preference ; Patients - psychology ; Quality of Life ; Terminal Care ; United States</subject><ispartof>American journal of hospice &amp; palliative medicine, 2018-09, Vol.35 (9), p.1161-1167</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-a9fef239cf4d419fd63c6ca5039f06b8c76512881dcecd9a01e0122446aa982a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-a9fef239cf4d419fd63c6ca5039f06b8c76512881dcecd9a01e0122446aa982a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049909118760302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049909118760302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schubart, Jane R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reading, Jean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penrod, Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Renee R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampath, Ramya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Lisa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Benjamin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Family Caregivers’ Characterization of Conversations Following an ACP Event</title><title>American journal of hospice &amp; palliative medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Hosp Palliat Care</addtitle><description>Background: Advance care planning (ACP) has been shown to benefit patients and families, yet little is known about how an ACP event impacts communication and conversation about end-of-life treatment wishes and the content of such conversations between patients and family caregivers. Objective: To characterize post-ACP conversations regarding medical wishes between seriously ill patients and their family caregivers. Participants: Patients with advanced illness and family caregivers. Outcome Measured: Post-ACP conversations. Design: As part of a larger randomized controlled trial, dyads consisting of seriously ill patients and their identified family caregiver engaged in ACP and created an advance directive for the patient. Approximately 4 to 6 weeks later, semistructured interviews were conducted with the family caregivers to elucidate the subsequent communications regarding medical wishes. If the dyad did not have any conversations post-ACP, reasons and barriers were explored. Results: The majority of dyads (131/188, 69.7%) had 2 to 3 conversations lasting 3 to 5 minutes each in the weeks immediately following ACP. These conversations most commonly addressed general patient wishes about quality of life and specific medical treatments. The most common reasons for not having conversations were a general discomfort with the topic (13/57, 22.8%) and previously having discussed medical wishes (16/57, 28.1%). Conclusion: The ACP events promote conversation regarding quality of life, general wishes at the end of life, and specific medical wishes. Barriers to conversation following ACP were similar to barriers to ACP in general, suggesting that a more intentional focus on addressing these barriers pre- and post-ACP may be necessary to improve communication.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Advance Care Planning - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Patients - psychology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Terminal Care</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1049-9091</issn><issn>1938-2715</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9OIzEMxiPEiv93TmiOXAbsZDozuSChUcsiFe0elnNk0kwJmiaQTIvgxGvwejzJprSgBWlPtvX9_NmyGTtEOEGsqlOEQkqQiHVVggC-wXZQijrnFQ42U57kfKlvs90Y7wAELwrcYtsCoMKqLnbY1YhmtnvKGgpmahcmxLeX16y5pUC6N8E-U2-9y3ybNd4t5fc6ZiPfdf7RumlGLjtvfmfDhXH9PvvRUhfNwTrusevR8E_zMx__urhszse5LkTR5yRb03IhdVtMCpTtpBS61DQAIVsob2pdlQPkdY0TbfREEqAB5Gn3kkjWnMQeO1v53s9vZiZRrg_UqftgZxSelCervirO3qqpX6gSJJdCJoPjtUHwD3MTezWzUZuuI2f8PCoOtah4yRESCitUBx9jMO3nGAS1_IL6_oXUcvTvep8NH2dPQL4CIk2NuvPz4NK5_m_4F0hskPE</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Schubart, Jane R.</creator><creator>Reading, Jean M.</creator><creator>Penrod, Janice</creator><creator>Stewart, Renee R.</creator><creator>Sampath, Ramya</creator><creator>Lehmann, Lisa S.</creator><creator>Levi, Benjamin H.</creator><creator>Green, Michael J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Family Caregivers’ Characterization of Conversations Following an ACP Event</title><author>Schubart, Jane R. ; Reading, Jean M. ; Penrod, Janice ; Stewart, Renee R. ; Sampath, Ramya ; Lehmann, Lisa S. ; Levi, Benjamin H. ; Green, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-a9fef239cf4d419fd63c6ca5039f06b8c76512881dcecd9a01e0122446aa982a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Advance Care Planning - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Patients - psychology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Terminal Care</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schubart, Jane R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reading, Jean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penrod, Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Renee R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampath, Ramya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehmann, Lisa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Benjamin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of hospice &amp; palliative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schubart, Jane R.</au><au>Reading, Jean M.</au><au>Penrod, Janice</au><au>Stewart, Renee R.</au><au>Sampath, Ramya</au><au>Lehmann, Lisa S.</au><au>Levi, Benjamin H.</au><au>Green, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family Caregivers’ Characterization of Conversations Following an ACP Event</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hospice &amp; palliative medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Hosp Palliat Care</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1161</spage><epage>1167</epage><pages>1161-1167</pages><issn>1049-9091</issn><eissn>1938-2715</eissn><abstract>Background: Advance care planning (ACP) has been shown to benefit patients and families, yet little is known about how an ACP event impacts communication and conversation about end-of-life treatment wishes and the content of such conversations between patients and family caregivers. Objective: To characterize post-ACP conversations regarding medical wishes between seriously ill patients and their family caregivers. Participants: Patients with advanced illness and family caregivers. Outcome Measured: Post-ACP conversations. Design: As part of a larger randomized controlled trial, dyads consisting of seriously ill patients and their identified family caregiver engaged in ACP and created an advance directive for the patient. Approximately 4 to 6 weeks later, semistructured interviews were conducted with the family caregivers to elucidate the subsequent communications regarding medical wishes. If the dyad did not have any conversations post-ACP, reasons and barriers were explored. Results: The majority of dyads (131/188, 69.7%) had 2 to 3 conversations lasting 3 to 5 minutes each in the weeks immediately following ACP. These conversations most commonly addressed general patient wishes about quality of life and specific medical treatments. The most common reasons for not having conversations were a general discomfort with the topic (13/57, 22.8%) and previously having discussed medical wishes (16/57, 28.1%). Conclusion: The ACP events promote conversation regarding quality of life, general wishes at the end of life, and specific medical wishes. Barriers to conversation following ACP were similar to barriers to ACP in general, suggesting that a more intentional focus on addressing these barriers pre- and post-ACP may be necessary to improve communication.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30071784</pmid><doi>10.1177/1049909118760302</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-9091
ispartof American journal of hospice & palliative medicine, 2018-09, Vol.35 (9), p.1161-1167
issn 1049-9091
1938-2715
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6092939
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Adult
Advance Care Planning - organization & administration
Aged
Caregivers - psychology
Communication
Decision Support Techniques
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Nursing
Patient Preference
Patients - psychology
Quality of Life
Terminal Care
United States
title Family Caregivers’ Characterization of Conversations Following an ACP Event
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A53%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family%20Caregivers%E2%80%99%20Characterization%20of%20Conversations%20Following%20an%20ACP%20Event&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hospice%20&%20palliative%20medicine&rft.au=Schubart,%20Jane%20R.&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1161&rft.epage=1167&rft.pages=1161-1167&rft.issn=1049-9091&rft.eissn=1938-2715&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049909118760302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2083726210%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2083726210&rft_id=info:pmid/30071784&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049909118760302&rfr_iscdi=true