Effect of Lung Transplantation on Health‐Related Quality of Life in the Era of the Lung Allocation Score: A U.S. Prospective Cohort Study

Under the U.S. Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system, older and sicker patients are prioritized for lung transplantation (LT). The impact of these changes on health‐related quality of life (HRQL) after transplant has not been determined. In a single‐center prospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016, we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of transplantation 2017-05, Vol.17 (5), p.1334-1345
Hauptverfasser: Singer, J. P., Katz, P. P., Soong, A., Shrestha, P., Huang, D., Ho, J., Mindo, M., Greenland, J. R., Hays, S. R., Golden, J., Kukreja, J., Kleinhenz, M. E., Shah, R. J., Blanc, P. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1345
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1334
container_title American journal of transplantation
container_volume 17
creator Singer, J. P.
Katz, P. P.
Soong, A.
Shrestha, P.
Huang, D.
Ho, J.
Mindo, M.
Greenland, J. R.
Hays, S. R.
Golden, J.
Kukreja, J.
Kleinhenz, M. E.
Shah, R. J.
Blanc, P. D.
description Under the U.S. Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system, older and sicker patients are prioritized for lung transplantation (LT). The impact of these changes on health‐related quality of life (HRQL) after transplant has not been determined. In a single‐center prospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016, we assessed HRQL before and repeatedly after LT for up to 3 years using the SF12‐Physical and Mental Health, the respiratory‐specific Airway Questionnaire 20‐Revised, and the Euroqol 5D/Visual Analog Scale utility measures by multivariate linear mixed models jointly modeled with death. We also tested changes in LT‐Valued Life Activities disability, BMI, allograft function, and 6‐min walk test exercise capacity as predictors of HRQL change. Among 211 initial participants (92% of those eligible), LT improved HRQL by all 5 measures (p < 0.05) and all but SF12‐Mental Health improved by threefold or greater than the minimally clinically important difference. Compared to younger participants, those aged ≥65 improved less in SF12‐Physical and Mental Health (p < 0.01). Improvements in disability accounted for much of the HRQL improvement. In the LAS era, LT affords meaningful and durable HRQL improvements, mediated by amelioration of disability. Identifying factors limiting HRQL improvement in selected subgroups, especially those aged ≥65, are needed to maximize the net benefits of LT. In a prospective longitudinal adult cohort, the authors find that lung transplantation substantially improves health‐related quality of life and that this improvement is largely mediated by amelioration of physical disability, though older adults and those undergoing transplantation for diagnoses other than cystic fibrosis derive a smaller benefit in health‐related quality of life.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajt.14081
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6085872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835419120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-ad2de91d059c7cf0b4c2b76a48d9bd68ebac44e16d91d1a29e5eb10a146e70213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv0zAUgCPExMbgwB9AlrjAoZ2f4yQOB6SqKoyp0oB2Z8txXlZXblwcZ6g37lz4jfwS3GarAAnLkp_sz5-f30uSF0DHEMeFWocxcCrgUXIGOaWjHHj6-Bin2WnytOvWlELBBHuSnLKi4CkX4iz5MWsa1IG4hsz79pYsvWq7rVVtUMG4lsR5icqG1a_vP7-gVQFr8rlX1oTd4Y5pkJiWhBWSmVf7rX14UE2sdXqwLLTz-JZMyM14MSafvOu28VFzh2TqVs4Hsgh9vXuWnDTKdvj8fj1Pbt7PltPL0fz6w8fpZD7SGS1hpGpWYwk1zUpd6IZWXLOqyBUXdVnVucBKac4R8jpCoFiJGVZAFfAcC8ogPU_eDd5tX22w1tgGr6zcerNRfiedMvLvk9as5K27kzkVmShYFLy-F3j3tccuyI3pNNpYNnR9J0GkGYcSGI3oq3_Qtet9G78XqZIVnFPIIvVmoHQsTeexOSYDVO5bLGOL5aHFkX35Z_ZH8qGnEbgYgG_G4u7_Jjm5Wg7K30rNseo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1892744015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Lung Transplantation on Health‐Related Quality of Life in the Era of the Lung Allocation Score: A U.S. Prospective Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Singer, J. P. ; Katz, P. P. ; Soong, A. ; Shrestha, P. ; Huang, D. ; Ho, J. ; Mindo, M. ; Greenland, J. R. ; Hays, S. R. ; Golden, J. ; Kukreja, J. ; Kleinhenz, M. E. ; Shah, R. J. ; Blanc, P. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Singer, J. P. ; Katz, P. P. ; Soong, A. ; Shrestha, P. ; Huang, D. ; Ho, J. ; Mindo, M. ; Greenland, J. R. ; Hays, S. R. ; Golden, J. ; Kukreja, J. ; Kleinhenz, M. E. ; Shah, R. J. ; Blanc, P. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Under the U.S. Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system, older and sicker patients are prioritized for lung transplantation (LT). The impact of these changes on health‐related quality of life (HRQL) after transplant has not been determined. In a single‐center prospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016, we assessed HRQL before and repeatedly after LT for up to 3 years using the SF12‐Physical and Mental Health, the respiratory‐specific Airway Questionnaire 20‐Revised, and the Euroqol 5D/Visual Analog Scale utility measures by multivariate linear mixed models jointly modeled with death. We also tested changes in LT‐Valued Life Activities disability, BMI, allograft function, and 6‐min walk test exercise capacity as predictors of HRQL change. Among 211 initial participants (92% of those eligible), LT improved HRQL by all 5 measures (p &lt; 0.05) and all but SF12‐Mental Health improved by threefold or greater than the minimally clinically important difference. Compared to younger participants, those aged ≥65 improved less in SF12‐Physical and Mental Health (p &lt; 0.01). Improvements in disability accounted for much of the HRQL improvement. In the LAS era, LT affords meaningful and durable HRQL improvements, mediated by amelioration of disability. Identifying factors limiting HRQL improvement in selected subgroups, especially those aged ≥65, are needed to maximize the net benefits of LT. In a prospective longitudinal adult cohort, the authors find that lung transplantation substantially improves health‐related quality of life and that this improvement is largely mediated by amelioration of physical disability, though older adults and those undergoing transplantation for diagnoses other than cystic fibrosis derive a smaller benefit in health‐related quality of life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14081</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27743488</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; clinical decision‐making ; clinical research/practice ; epidemiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; geriatrics ; Health Care Rationing ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Lung Transplantation ; lung transplantation/pulmonology ; Male ; Mental health ; Middle Aged ; organ allocation ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; quality of life (QOL) ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Resource Allocation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2017-05, Vol.17 (5), p.1334-1345</ispartof><rights>2016 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><rights>2016 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.</rights><rights>2017 the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-ad2de91d059c7cf0b4c2b76a48d9bd68ebac44e16d91d1a29e5eb10a146e70213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-ad2de91d059c7cf0b4c2b76a48d9bd68ebac44e16d91d1a29e5eb10a146e70213</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1422-8367</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajt.14081$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajt.14081$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27743488$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singer, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, P. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soong, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mindo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenland, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golden, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukreja, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinhenz, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, P. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Lung Transplantation on Health‐Related Quality of Life in the Era of the Lung Allocation Score: A U.S. Prospective Cohort Study</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>Under the U.S. Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system, older and sicker patients are prioritized for lung transplantation (LT). The impact of these changes on health‐related quality of life (HRQL) after transplant has not been determined. In a single‐center prospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016, we assessed HRQL before and repeatedly after LT for up to 3 years using the SF12‐Physical and Mental Health, the respiratory‐specific Airway Questionnaire 20‐Revised, and the Euroqol 5D/Visual Analog Scale utility measures by multivariate linear mixed models jointly modeled with death. We also tested changes in LT‐Valued Life Activities disability, BMI, allograft function, and 6‐min walk test exercise capacity as predictors of HRQL change. Among 211 initial participants (92% of those eligible), LT improved HRQL by all 5 measures (p &lt; 0.05) and all but SF12‐Mental Health improved by threefold or greater than the minimally clinically important difference. Compared to younger participants, those aged ≥65 improved less in SF12‐Physical and Mental Health (p &lt; 0.01). Improvements in disability accounted for much of the HRQL improvement. In the LAS era, LT affords meaningful and durable HRQL improvements, mediated by amelioration of disability. Identifying factors limiting HRQL improvement in selected subgroups, especially those aged ≥65, are needed to maximize the net benefits of LT. In a prospective longitudinal adult cohort, the authors find that lung transplantation substantially improves health‐related quality of life and that this improvement is largely mediated by amelioration of physical disability, though older adults and those undergoing transplantation for diagnoses other than cystic fibrosis derive a smaller benefit in health‐related quality of life.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>clinical decision‐making</subject><subject>clinical research/practice</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>geriatrics</subject><subject>Health Care Rationing</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Lung Transplantation</subject><subject>lung transplantation/pulmonology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>organ allocation</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>quality of life (QOL)</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Resource Allocation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv0zAUgCPExMbgwB9AlrjAoZ2f4yQOB6SqKoyp0oB2Z8txXlZXblwcZ6g37lz4jfwS3GarAAnLkp_sz5-f30uSF0DHEMeFWocxcCrgUXIGOaWjHHj6-Bin2WnytOvWlELBBHuSnLKi4CkX4iz5MWsa1IG4hsz79pYsvWq7rVVtUMG4lsR5icqG1a_vP7-gVQFr8rlX1oTd4Y5pkJiWhBWSmVf7rX14UE2sdXqwLLTz-JZMyM14MSafvOu28VFzh2TqVs4Hsgh9vXuWnDTKdvj8fj1Pbt7PltPL0fz6w8fpZD7SGS1hpGpWYwk1zUpd6IZWXLOqyBUXdVnVucBKac4R8jpCoFiJGVZAFfAcC8ogPU_eDd5tX22w1tgGr6zcerNRfiedMvLvk9as5K27kzkVmShYFLy-F3j3tccuyI3pNNpYNnR9J0GkGYcSGI3oq3_Qtet9G78XqZIVnFPIIvVmoHQsTeexOSYDVO5bLGOL5aHFkX35Z_ZH8qGnEbgYgG_G4u7_Jjm5Wg7K30rNseo</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Singer, J. P.</creator><creator>Katz, P. P.</creator><creator>Soong, A.</creator><creator>Shrestha, P.</creator><creator>Huang, D.</creator><creator>Ho, J.</creator><creator>Mindo, M.</creator><creator>Greenland, J. R.</creator><creator>Hays, S. R.</creator><creator>Golden, J.</creator><creator>Kukreja, J.</creator><creator>Kleinhenz, M. E.</creator><creator>Shah, R. J.</creator><creator>Blanc, P. D.</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-8367</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Effect of Lung Transplantation on Health‐Related Quality of Life in the Era of the Lung Allocation Score: A U.S. Prospective Cohort Study</title><author>Singer, J. P. ; Katz, P. P. ; Soong, A. ; Shrestha, P. ; Huang, D. ; Ho, J. ; Mindo, M. ; Greenland, J. R. ; Hays, S. R. ; Golden, J. ; Kukreja, J. ; Kleinhenz, M. E. ; Shah, R. J. ; Blanc, P. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5091-ad2de91d059c7cf0b4c2b76a48d9bd68ebac44e16d91d1a29e5eb10a146e70213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>clinical decision‐making</topic><topic>clinical research/practice</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>geriatrics</topic><topic>Health Care Rationing</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Lung Transplantation</topic><topic>lung transplantation/pulmonology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>organ allocation</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>quality of life (QOL)</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Resource Allocation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singer, J. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, P. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soong, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mindo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenland, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golden, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukreja, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinhenz, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, P. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singer, J. P.</au><au>Katz, P. P.</au><au>Soong, A.</au><au>Shrestha, P.</au><au>Huang, D.</au><au>Ho, J.</au><au>Mindo, M.</au><au>Greenland, J. R.</au><au>Hays, S. R.</au><au>Golden, J.</au><au>Kukreja, J.</au><au>Kleinhenz, M. E.</au><au>Shah, R. J.</au><au>Blanc, P. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Lung Transplantation on Health‐Related Quality of Life in the Era of the Lung Allocation Score: A U.S. Prospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1334</spage><epage>1345</epage><pages>1334-1345</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>Under the U.S. Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system, older and sicker patients are prioritized for lung transplantation (LT). The impact of these changes on health‐related quality of life (HRQL) after transplant has not been determined. In a single‐center prospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016, we assessed HRQL before and repeatedly after LT for up to 3 years using the SF12‐Physical and Mental Health, the respiratory‐specific Airway Questionnaire 20‐Revised, and the Euroqol 5D/Visual Analog Scale utility measures by multivariate linear mixed models jointly modeled with death. We also tested changes in LT‐Valued Life Activities disability, BMI, allograft function, and 6‐min walk test exercise capacity as predictors of HRQL change. Among 211 initial participants (92% of those eligible), LT improved HRQL by all 5 measures (p &lt; 0.05) and all but SF12‐Mental Health improved by threefold or greater than the minimally clinically important difference. Compared to younger participants, those aged ≥65 improved less in SF12‐Physical and Mental Health (p &lt; 0.01). Improvements in disability accounted for much of the HRQL improvement. In the LAS era, LT affords meaningful and durable HRQL improvements, mediated by amelioration of disability. Identifying factors limiting HRQL improvement in selected subgroups, especially those aged ≥65, are needed to maximize the net benefits of LT. In a prospective longitudinal adult cohort, the authors find that lung transplantation substantially improves health‐related quality of life and that this improvement is largely mediated by amelioration of physical disability, though older adults and those undergoing transplantation for diagnoses other than cystic fibrosis derive a smaller benefit in health‐related quality of life.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>27743488</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajt.14081</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-8367</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1600-6135
ispartof American journal of transplantation, 2017-05, Vol.17 (5), p.1334-1345
issn 1600-6135
1600-6143
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6085872
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
clinical decision‐making
clinical research/practice
epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
geriatrics
Health Care Rationing
Health risk assessment
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Lung Transplantation
lung transplantation/pulmonology
Male
Mental health
Middle Aged
organ allocation
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
quality of life (QOL)
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Resource Allocation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Transplants & implants
Young Adult
title Effect of Lung Transplantation on Health‐Related Quality of Life in the Era of the Lung Allocation Score: A U.S. Prospective Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T11%3A38%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Lung%20Transplantation%20on%20Health%E2%80%90Related%20Quality%20of%20Life%20in%20the%20Era%20of%20the%20Lung%20Allocation%20Score:%20A%20U.S.%20Prospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Singer,%20J.%20P.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1334&rft.epage=1345&rft.pages=1334-1345&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajt.14081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1835419120%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1892744015&rft_id=info:pmid/27743488&rfr_iscdi=true