Six-month follow-up of the injured trauma survivor screen: Clinical implications and future directions

The injured trauma survivor screen (ITSS) has been shown to predict posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression risk at 1 month after traumatic injury. This study explored the ability of the ITSS to predict chronic distress after injury, as well as the impact of combining the ITSS with an ad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 2018-08, Vol.85 (2), p.263-270
Hauptverfasser: Hunt, Joshua C, Chesney, Samantha A, Brasel, Karen, deRoon-Cassini, Terri A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 270
container_issue 2
container_start_page 263
container_title The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
container_volume 85
creator Hunt, Joshua C
Chesney, Samantha A
Brasel, Karen
deRoon-Cassini, Terri A
description The injured trauma survivor screen (ITSS) has been shown to predict posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression risk at 1 month after traumatic injury. This study explored the ability of the ITSS to predict chronic distress after injury, as well as the impact of combining the ITSS with an additional screening measure. Patients were enrolled following admission to a Level I trauma center. Baseline measurements were collected during initial hospitalization, and follow-up measures were collected an average of 6.5 months after injury. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were run to determine predictive accuracy, controlling for participants who had mental health intervention and for those who experienced additional potentially psychologically traumatic events since their injury event. Utilizing a cut score of 2, the ITSS PTSD scale had a sensitivity of 85.42%, specificity of 67.35%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.9% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 51.4%. The combined PTSD risk group (risk positive on the baseline ITSS and the PTSD checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition) had a sensitivity of 72.92%, specificity of 81.63%, NPV of 88.2%, and PPV of 61.6%. Also using a cut score of 2, the ITSS Depression Scale had a sensitivity of 72.50%, specificity of 70.29%, NPV of 91.1%, and PPV of 37.9%. The nine-item ITSS, which takes approximately 5 minutes to administer, is a stable screening tool for predicting those most at risk for PTSD and/or depression 6 months after admission to a Level I trauma center following traumatic injury. The combined PTSD risk group data provide evidence that symptom evaluation by a psychologist can improve specificity. These results further inform the recommendation of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma regarding PTSD and depression screening in trauma centers. Prognostic study, level III.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/TA.0000000000001944
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6081305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2028958172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-530387cf6962e22c765b452f8cddab3f82c517cf30fb05efb8f4d95f530b28b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUUtLAzEQDqLYUvsLBMnRy9Y8NvvwIJTiCwoerOeQzSY2JZvUZLfqv3dra1HnMsN8jxn4ADjHaIJRmV8tphP0q3CZpkdgSHBGE5Rn9PgwMzYA4xhXWxbLSsrYKRiQMstJmuIh0M_mI2m8a5dQe2v9e9KtodewXSpo3KoLqoZtEF0jYOzCxmx8gFEGpdw1nFnjjBQWmmZt-6E13kUoXA111_ZKWJug5Pf2DJxoYaMa7_sIvNzdLmYPyfzp_nE2nScyRaxNGEW0yKXOyowoQmSesSplRBeyrkVFdUEkwz1Oka4QU7oqdFqXTPe6ihQVoSNws_Ndd1Wjaqlc_7zl62AaET65F4b_RZxZ8le_4RkqMEWsN7jcGwT_1qnY8sZEqawVTvkucoJIUbIC59tbdEeVwccYlD6cwYhvQ-KLKf8fUq-6-P3hQfMTCf0CLr-PTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2028958172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Six-month follow-up of the injured trauma survivor screen: Clinical implications and future directions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Hunt, Joshua C ; Chesney, Samantha A ; Brasel, Karen ; deRoon-Cassini, Terri A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Joshua C ; Chesney, Samantha A ; Brasel, Karen ; deRoon-Cassini, Terri A</creatorcontrib><description>The injured trauma survivor screen (ITSS) has been shown to predict posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression risk at 1 month after traumatic injury. This study explored the ability of the ITSS to predict chronic distress after injury, as well as the impact of combining the ITSS with an additional screening measure. Patients were enrolled following admission to a Level I trauma center. Baseline measurements were collected during initial hospitalization, and follow-up measures were collected an average of 6.5 months after injury. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were run to determine predictive accuracy, controlling for participants who had mental health intervention and for those who experienced additional potentially psychologically traumatic events since their injury event. Utilizing a cut score of 2, the ITSS PTSD scale had a sensitivity of 85.42%, specificity of 67.35%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.9% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 51.4%. The combined PTSD risk group (risk positive on the baseline ITSS and the PTSD checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition) had a sensitivity of 72.92%, specificity of 81.63%, NPV of 88.2%, and PPV of 61.6%. Also using a cut score of 2, the ITSS Depression Scale had a sensitivity of 72.50%, specificity of 70.29%, NPV of 91.1%, and PPV of 37.9%. The nine-item ITSS, which takes approximately 5 minutes to administer, is a stable screening tool for predicting those most at risk for PTSD and/or depression 6 months after admission to a Level I trauma center following traumatic injury. The combined PTSD risk group data provide evidence that symptom evaluation by a psychologist can improve specificity. These results further inform the recommendation of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma regarding PTSD and depression screening in trauma centers. Prognostic study, level III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2163-0755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-0763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001944</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29672441</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Depression - diagnosis ; Depression - etiology ; Depression - psychology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glasgow Coma Scale ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Mass Screening - methods ; Middle Aged ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology ; Survivors - psychology ; Trauma Centers ; Wounds and Injuries - complications ; Wounds and Injuries - psychology</subject><ispartof>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2018-08, Vol.85 (2), p.263-270</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-530387cf6962e22c765b452f8cddab3f82c517cf30fb05efb8f4d95f530b28b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-530387cf6962e22c765b452f8cddab3f82c517cf30fb05efb8f4d95f530b28b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29672441$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Joshua C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesney, Samantha A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasel, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deRoon-Cassini, Terri A</creatorcontrib><title>Six-month follow-up of the injured trauma survivor screen: Clinical implications and future directions</title><title>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</title><addtitle>J Trauma Acute Care Surg</addtitle><description>The injured trauma survivor screen (ITSS) has been shown to predict posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression risk at 1 month after traumatic injury. This study explored the ability of the ITSS to predict chronic distress after injury, as well as the impact of combining the ITSS with an additional screening measure. Patients were enrolled following admission to a Level I trauma center. Baseline measurements were collected during initial hospitalization, and follow-up measures were collected an average of 6.5 months after injury. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were run to determine predictive accuracy, controlling for participants who had mental health intervention and for those who experienced additional potentially psychologically traumatic events since their injury event. Utilizing a cut score of 2, the ITSS PTSD scale had a sensitivity of 85.42%, specificity of 67.35%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.9% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 51.4%. The combined PTSD risk group (risk positive on the baseline ITSS and the PTSD checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition) had a sensitivity of 72.92%, specificity of 81.63%, NPV of 88.2%, and PPV of 61.6%. Also using a cut score of 2, the ITSS Depression Scale had a sensitivity of 72.50%, specificity of 70.29%, NPV of 91.1%, and PPV of 37.9%. The nine-item ITSS, which takes approximately 5 minutes to administer, is a stable screening tool for predicting those most at risk for PTSD and/or depression 6 months after admission to a Level I trauma center following traumatic injury. The combined PTSD risk group data provide evidence that symptom evaluation by a psychologist can improve specificity. These results further inform the recommendation of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma regarding PTSD and depression screening in trauma centers. Prognostic study, level III.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression - etiology</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glasgow Coma Scale</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</subject><subject>Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Trauma Centers</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - psychology</subject><issn>2163-0755</issn><issn>2163-0763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUUtLAzEQDqLYUvsLBMnRy9Y8NvvwIJTiCwoerOeQzSY2JZvUZLfqv3dra1HnMsN8jxn4ADjHaIJRmV8tphP0q3CZpkdgSHBGE5Rn9PgwMzYA4xhXWxbLSsrYKRiQMstJmuIh0M_mI2m8a5dQe2v9e9KtodewXSpo3KoLqoZtEF0jYOzCxmx8gFEGpdw1nFnjjBQWmmZt-6E13kUoXA111_ZKWJug5Pf2DJxoYaMa7_sIvNzdLmYPyfzp_nE2nScyRaxNGEW0yKXOyowoQmSesSplRBeyrkVFdUEkwz1Oka4QU7oqdFqXTPe6ihQVoSNws_Ndd1Wjaqlc_7zl62AaET65F4b_RZxZ8le_4RkqMEWsN7jcGwT_1qnY8sZEqawVTvkucoJIUbIC59tbdEeVwccYlD6cwYhvQ-KLKf8fUq-6-P3hQfMTCf0CLr-PTA</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Hunt, Joshua C</creator><creator>Chesney, Samantha A</creator><creator>Brasel, Karen</creator><creator>deRoon-Cassini, Terri A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Six-month follow-up of the injured trauma survivor screen: Clinical implications and future directions</title><author>Hunt, Joshua C ; Chesney, Samantha A ; Brasel, Karen ; deRoon-Cassini, Terri A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-530387cf6962e22c765b452f8cddab3f82c517cf30fb05efb8f4d95f530b28b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression - etiology</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glasgow Coma Scale</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</topic><topic>Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Trauma Centers</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Joshua C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesney, Samantha A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasel, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deRoon-Cassini, Terri A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunt, Joshua C</au><au>Chesney, Samantha A</au><au>Brasel, Karen</au><au>deRoon-Cassini, Terri A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Six-month follow-up of the injured trauma survivor screen: Clinical implications and future directions</atitle><jtitle>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Trauma Acute Care Surg</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>263-270</pages><issn>2163-0755</issn><eissn>2163-0763</eissn><abstract>The injured trauma survivor screen (ITSS) has been shown to predict posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression risk at 1 month after traumatic injury. This study explored the ability of the ITSS to predict chronic distress after injury, as well as the impact of combining the ITSS with an additional screening measure. Patients were enrolled following admission to a Level I trauma center. Baseline measurements were collected during initial hospitalization, and follow-up measures were collected an average of 6.5 months after injury. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were run to determine predictive accuracy, controlling for participants who had mental health intervention and for those who experienced additional potentially psychologically traumatic events since their injury event. Utilizing a cut score of 2, the ITSS PTSD scale had a sensitivity of 85.42%, specificity of 67.35%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.9% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 51.4%. The combined PTSD risk group (risk positive on the baseline ITSS and the PTSD checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition) had a sensitivity of 72.92%, specificity of 81.63%, NPV of 88.2%, and PPV of 61.6%. Also using a cut score of 2, the ITSS Depression Scale had a sensitivity of 72.50%, specificity of 70.29%, NPV of 91.1%, and PPV of 37.9%. The nine-item ITSS, which takes approximately 5 minutes to administer, is a stable screening tool for predicting those most at risk for PTSD and/or depression 6 months after admission to a Level I trauma center following traumatic injury. The combined PTSD risk group data provide evidence that symptom evaluation by a psychologist can improve specificity. These results further inform the recommendation of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma regarding PTSD and depression screening in trauma centers. Prognostic study, level III.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>29672441</pmid><doi>10.1097/TA.0000000000001944</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2163-0755
ispartof The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2018-08, Vol.85 (2), p.263-270
issn 2163-0755
2163-0763
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6081305
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Depression - diagnosis
Depression - etiology
Depression - psychology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glasgow Coma Scale
Hospitalization
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Mass Screening - methods
Middle Aged
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Risk Factors
ROC Curve
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - etiology
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology
Survivors - psychology
Trauma Centers
Wounds and Injuries - complications
Wounds and Injuries - psychology
title Six-month follow-up of the injured trauma survivor screen: Clinical implications and future directions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A19%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Six-month%20follow-up%20of%20the%20injured%20trauma%20survivor%20screen:%20Clinical%20implications%20and%20future%20directions&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20trauma%20and%20acute%20care%20surgery&rft.au=Hunt,%20Joshua%20C&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=263-270&rft.issn=2163-0755&rft.eissn=2163-0763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/TA.0000000000001944&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2028958172%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2028958172&rft_id=info:pmid/29672441&rfr_iscdi=true