Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems

Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiology & behavior 2018-09, Vol.193 (Pt B), p.223-231
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Clarissa M., Kanoski, Scott E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue Pt B
container_start_page 223
container_title Physiology & behavior
container_volume 193
creator Liu, Clarissa M.
Kanoski, Scott E.
description Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categories: [1] homeostatic processes involving energy intake based on caloric and other metabolic deficits, and [2] non-homeostatic processes that involve feeding driven by environmental and cognitive factors. The present review summarizes both historic and recent research examining the homeostatic regulation of feeding with specific emphasis on hypothalamic and hindbrain circuitry that monitor and regulate various metabolic signals. Regarding non-homeostatic controls, we highlight higher-order brain structures that integrate feeding-relevant external, interoceptive, and cognitive factors, including sensory cortical processing, learned associations in the hippocampus, and reward-based processing in the nucleus accumbens and interconnected mesolimbic circuitry. Finally, the current review focuses on recent evidence that challenges the traditional view that distinct neural systems regulate homeostatic vs. non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior. Specifically, we highlight several feeding-related endocrine systems that act on both lower- and higher-order substrates, present evidence for the modulation of learned and cognitive feeding-relevant behaviors by lower-order brain regions, and highlight data showing that apparent homeostatic-based feeding behavior is modulated by higher-order brain regions. Our concluding perspective is that the classic dissociation between homeostatic and non-homeostatic constructs in relation to feeding behavior is limited with regards to understanding the complex integrated neurobiological systems that control energy balance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6077115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0031938418300556</els_id><sourcerecordid>2001060755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-939457f357d2d9c5834da203b32bc38bc49dd65cd9da6df6f24ded4e63cc97693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUhS0EomnhJ4C8ZDODn_PoohUqfSBVYgNSd67HvtM4mrFT24mUf4-jhKqs8MaS_d1zju5B6BMlNSW0-bqq18tdGmBZM0K7mrCaUPoGLWjX8kqS9uEtWhDCadXzTpyg05RWpBwu-Ht0wnrBqOy6BXq8CzOElHV2BmtvsQ--Wr56M8HnGKaEw4hHAOv8Ey6ueutCPMffXcrOm4y3qS7oPAePPWyinnDapQxz-oDejXpK8PF4n6HfN9e_ru6q-5-3P66-3VdGNG0uKXsh25HL1jLbG9lxYTUjfOBsMLwbjOitbaSxvdWNHZuRCQtWQMON6dum52fo4qC73gwzWAMltp7UOrpZx50K2ql_f7xbqqewVQ1pW0plEfhyFIjheQMpq9klA9OkPYRNUowQSgos96g8oCaGlCKMLzaUqH07aqWO7ah9O4owVdopc59fZ3yZ-ltHAS4PAJRNbR1ElYwDb8raI5isbHD_sfgD8kGm0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001060755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Liu, Clarissa M. ; Kanoski, Scott E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Clarissa M. ; Kanoski, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categories: [1] homeostatic processes involving energy intake based on caloric and other metabolic deficits, and [2] non-homeostatic processes that involve feeding driven by environmental and cognitive factors. The present review summarizes both historic and recent research examining the homeostatic regulation of feeding with specific emphasis on hypothalamic and hindbrain circuitry that monitor and regulate various metabolic signals. Regarding non-homeostatic controls, we highlight higher-order brain structures that integrate feeding-relevant external, interoceptive, and cognitive factors, including sensory cortical processing, learned associations in the hippocampus, and reward-based processing in the nucleus accumbens and interconnected mesolimbic circuitry. Finally, the current review focuses on recent evidence that challenges the traditional view that distinct neural systems regulate homeostatic vs. non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior. Specifically, we highlight several feeding-related endocrine systems that act on both lower- and higher-order substrates, present evidence for the modulation of learned and cognitive feeding-relevant behaviors by lower-order brain regions, and highlight data showing that apparent homeostatic-based feeding behavior is modulated by higher-order brain regions. Our concluding perspective is that the classic dissociation between homeostatic and non-homeostatic constructs in relation to feeding behavior is limited with regards to understanding the complex integrated neurobiological systems that control energy balance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-507X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29421588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Brain - physiology ; Dopamine ; Energy balance ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Food intake ; Food reward ; Hippocampus ; Homeostasis - physiology ; Humans ; Hypothalamus ; Obesity</subject><ispartof>Physiology &amp; behavior, 2018-09, Vol.193 (Pt B), p.223-231</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-939457f357d2d9c5834da203b32bc38bc49dd65cd9da6df6f24ded4e63cc97693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-939457f357d2d9c5834da203b32bc38bc49dd65cd9da6df6f24ded4e63cc97693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3539,27913,27914,45984</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29421588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Clarissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanoski, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><title>Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems</title><title>Physiology &amp; behavior</title><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><description>Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categories: [1] homeostatic processes involving energy intake based on caloric and other metabolic deficits, and [2] non-homeostatic processes that involve feeding driven by environmental and cognitive factors. The present review summarizes both historic and recent research examining the homeostatic regulation of feeding with specific emphasis on hypothalamic and hindbrain circuitry that monitor and regulate various metabolic signals. Regarding non-homeostatic controls, we highlight higher-order brain structures that integrate feeding-relevant external, interoceptive, and cognitive factors, including sensory cortical processing, learned associations in the hippocampus, and reward-based processing in the nucleus accumbens and interconnected mesolimbic circuitry. Finally, the current review focuses on recent evidence that challenges the traditional view that distinct neural systems regulate homeostatic vs. non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior. Specifically, we highlight several feeding-related endocrine systems that act on both lower- and higher-order substrates, present evidence for the modulation of learned and cognitive feeding-relevant behaviors by lower-order brain regions, and highlight data showing that apparent homeostatic-based feeding behavior is modulated by higher-order brain regions. Our concluding perspective is that the classic dissociation between homeostatic and non-homeostatic constructs in relation to feeding behavior is limited with regards to understanding the complex integrated neurobiological systems that control energy balance.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Dopamine</subject><subject>Energy balance</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Food reward</subject><subject>Hippocampus</subject><subject>Homeostasis - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypothalamus</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><issn>0031-9384</issn><issn>1873-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUhS0EomnhJ4C8ZDODn_PoohUqfSBVYgNSd67HvtM4mrFT24mUf4-jhKqs8MaS_d1zju5B6BMlNSW0-bqq18tdGmBZM0K7mrCaUPoGLWjX8kqS9uEtWhDCadXzTpyg05RWpBwu-Ht0wnrBqOy6BXq8CzOElHV2BmtvsQ--Wr56M8HnGKaEw4hHAOv8Ey6ueutCPMffXcrOm4y3qS7oPAePPWyinnDapQxz-oDejXpK8PF4n6HfN9e_ru6q-5-3P66-3VdGNG0uKXsh25HL1jLbG9lxYTUjfOBsMLwbjOitbaSxvdWNHZuRCQtWQMON6dum52fo4qC73gwzWAMltp7UOrpZx50K2ql_f7xbqqewVQ1pW0plEfhyFIjheQMpq9klA9OkPYRNUowQSgos96g8oCaGlCKMLzaUqH07aqWO7ah9O4owVdopc59fZ3yZ-ltHAS4PAJRNbR1ElYwDb8raI5isbHD_sfgD8kGm0Q</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Liu, Clarissa M.</creator><creator>Kanoski, Scott E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems</title><author>Liu, Clarissa M. ; Kanoski, Scott E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-939457f357d2d9c5834da203b32bc38bc49dd65cd9da6df6f24ded4e63cc97693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Dopamine</topic><topic>Energy balance</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Food reward</topic><topic>Hippocampus</topic><topic>Homeostasis - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypothalamus</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Clarissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanoski, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Physiology &amp; behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Clarissa M.</au><au>Kanoski, Scott E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems</atitle><jtitle>Physiology &amp; behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>193</volume><issue>Pt B</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>223-231</pages><issn>0031-9384</issn><eissn>1873-507X</eissn><abstract>Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categories: [1] homeostatic processes involving energy intake based on caloric and other metabolic deficits, and [2] non-homeostatic processes that involve feeding driven by environmental and cognitive factors. The present review summarizes both historic and recent research examining the homeostatic regulation of feeding with specific emphasis on hypothalamic and hindbrain circuitry that monitor and regulate various metabolic signals. Regarding non-homeostatic controls, we highlight higher-order brain structures that integrate feeding-relevant external, interoceptive, and cognitive factors, including sensory cortical processing, learned associations in the hippocampus, and reward-based processing in the nucleus accumbens and interconnected mesolimbic circuitry. Finally, the current review focuses on recent evidence that challenges the traditional view that distinct neural systems regulate homeostatic vs. non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior. Specifically, we highlight several feeding-related endocrine systems that act on both lower- and higher-order substrates, present evidence for the modulation of learned and cognitive feeding-relevant behaviors by lower-order brain regions, and highlight data showing that apparent homeostatic-based feeding behavior is modulated by higher-order brain regions. Our concluding perspective is that the classic dissociation between homeostatic and non-homeostatic constructs in relation to feeding behavior is limited with regards to understanding the complex integrated neurobiological systems that control energy balance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29421588</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.011</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9384
ispartof Physiology & behavior, 2018-09, Vol.193 (Pt B), p.223-231
issn 0031-9384
1873-507X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6077115
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Animals
Brain - physiology
Dopamine
Energy balance
Feeding Behavior - physiology
Food intake
Food reward
Hippocampus
Homeostasis - physiology
Humans
Hypothalamus
Obesity
title Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A06%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Homeostatic%20and%20non-homeostatic%20controls%20of%20feeding%20behavior:%20Distinct%20vs.%20common%20neural%20systems&rft.jtitle=Physiology%20&%20behavior&rft.au=Liu,%20Clarissa%20M.&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=Pt%20B&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=223-231&rft.issn=0031-9384&rft.eissn=1873-507X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2001060755%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001060755&rft_id=info:pmid/29421588&rft_els_id=S0031938418300556&rfr_iscdi=true