Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems
Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physiology & behavior 2018-09, Vol.193 (Pt B), p.223-231 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 231 |
---|---|
container_issue | Pt B |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Physiology & behavior |
container_volume | 193 |
creator | Liu, Clarissa M. Kanoski, Scott E. |
description | Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categories: [1] homeostatic processes involving energy intake based on caloric and other metabolic deficits, and [2] non-homeostatic processes that involve feeding driven by environmental and cognitive factors. The present review summarizes both historic and recent research examining the homeostatic regulation of feeding with specific emphasis on hypothalamic and hindbrain circuitry that monitor and regulate various metabolic signals. Regarding non-homeostatic controls, we highlight higher-order brain structures that integrate feeding-relevant external, interoceptive, and cognitive factors, including sensory cortical processing, learned associations in the hippocampus, and reward-based processing in the nucleus accumbens and interconnected mesolimbic circuitry. Finally, the current review focuses on recent evidence that challenges the traditional view that distinct neural systems regulate homeostatic vs. non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior. Specifically, we highlight several feeding-related endocrine systems that act on both lower- and higher-order substrates, present evidence for the modulation of learned and cognitive feeding-relevant behaviors by lower-order brain regions, and highlight data showing that apparent homeostatic-based feeding behavior is modulated by higher-order brain regions. Our concluding perspective is that the classic dissociation between homeostatic and non-homeostatic constructs in relation to feeding behavior is limited with regards to understanding the complex integrated neurobiological systems that control energy balance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6077115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0031938418300556</els_id><sourcerecordid>2001060755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-939457f357d2d9c5834da203b32bc38bc49dd65cd9da6df6f24ded4e63cc97693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUhS0EomnhJ4C8ZDODn_PoohUqfSBVYgNSd67HvtM4mrFT24mUf4-jhKqs8MaS_d1zju5B6BMlNSW0-bqq18tdGmBZM0K7mrCaUPoGLWjX8kqS9uEtWhDCadXzTpyg05RWpBwu-Ht0wnrBqOy6BXq8CzOElHV2BmtvsQ--Wr56M8HnGKaEw4hHAOv8Ey6ueutCPMffXcrOm4y3qS7oPAePPWyinnDapQxz-oDejXpK8PF4n6HfN9e_ru6q-5-3P66-3VdGNG0uKXsh25HL1jLbG9lxYTUjfOBsMLwbjOitbaSxvdWNHZuRCQtWQMON6dum52fo4qC73gwzWAMltp7UOrpZx50K2ql_f7xbqqewVQ1pW0plEfhyFIjheQMpq9klA9OkPYRNUowQSgos96g8oCaGlCKMLzaUqH07aqWO7ah9O4owVdopc59fZ3yZ-ltHAS4PAJRNbR1ElYwDb8raI5isbHD_sfgD8kGm0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001060755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Liu, Clarissa M. ; Kanoski, Scott E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Clarissa M. ; Kanoski, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categories: [1] homeostatic processes involving energy intake based on caloric and other metabolic deficits, and [2] non-homeostatic processes that involve feeding driven by environmental and cognitive factors. The present review summarizes both historic and recent research examining the homeostatic regulation of feeding with specific emphasis on hypothalamic and hindbrain circuitry that monitor and regulate various metabolic signals. Regarding non-homeostatic controls, we highlight higher-order brain structures that integrate feeding-relevant external, interoceptive, and cognitive factors, including sensory cortical processing, learned associations in the hippocampus, and reward-based processing in the nucleus accumbens and interconnected mesolimbic circuitry. Finally, the current review focuses on recent evidence that challenges the traditional view that distinct neural systems regulate homeostatic vs. non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior. Specifically, we highlight several feeding-related endocrine systems that act on both lower- and higher-order substrates, present evidence for the modulation of learned and cognitive feeding-relevant behaviors by lower-order brain regions, and highlight data showing that apparent homeostatic-based feeding behavior is modulated by higher-order brain regions. Our concluding perspective is that the classic dissociation between homeostatic and non-homeostatic constructs in relation to feeding behavior is limited with regards to understanding the complex integrated neurobiological systems that control energy balance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-507X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29421588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Brain - physiology ; Dopamine ; Energy balance ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Food intake ; Food reward ; Hippocampus ; Homeostasis - physiology ; Humans ; Hypothalamus ; Obesity</subject><ispartof>Physiology & behavior, 2018-09, Vol.193 (Pt B), p.223-231</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-939457f357d2d9c5834da203b32bc38bc49dd65cd9da6df6f24ded4e63cc97693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-939457f357d2d9c5834da203b32bc38bc49dd65cd9da6df6f24ded4e63cc97693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3539,27913,27914,45984</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29421588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Clarissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanoski, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><title>Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems</title><title>Physiology & behavior</title><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><description>Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categories: [1] homeostatic processes involving energy intake based on caloric and other metabolic deficits, and [2] non-homeostatic processes that involve feeding driven by environmental and cognitive factors. The present review summarizes both historic and recent research examining the homeostatic regulation of feeding with specific emphasis on hypothalamic and hindbrain circuitry that monitor and regulate various metabolic signals. Regarding non-homeostatic controls, we highlight higher-order brain structures that integrate feeding-relevant external, interoceptive, and cognitive factors, including sensory cortical processing, learned associations in the hippocampus, and reward-based processing in the nucleus accumbens and interconnected mesolimbic circuitry. Finally, the current review focuses on recent evidence that challenges the traditional view that distinct neural systems regulate homeostatic vs. non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior. Specifically, we highlight several feeding-related endocrine systems that act on both lower- and higher-order substrates, present evidence for the modulation of learned and cognitive feeding-relevant behaviors by lower-order brain regions, and highlight data showing that apparent homeostatic-based feeding behavior is modulated by higher-order brain regions. Our concluding perspective is that the classic dissociation between homeostatic and non-homeostatic constructs in relation to feeding behavior is limited with regards to understanding the complex integrated neurobiological systems that control energy balance.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Dopamine</subject><subject>Energy balance</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Food reward</subject><subject>Hippocampus</subject><subject>Homeostasis - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypothalamus</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><issn>0031-9384</issn><issn>1873-507X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUhS0EomnhJ4C8ZDODn_PoohUqfSBVYgNSd67HvtM4mrFT24mUf4-jhKqs8MaS_d1zju5B6BMlNSW0-bqq18tdGmBZM0K7mrCaUPoGLWjX8kqS9uEtWhDCadXzTpyg05RWpBwu-Ht0wnrBqOy6BXq8CzOElHV2BmtvsQ--Wr56M8HnGKaEw4hHAOv8Ey6ueutCPMffXcrOm4y3qS7oPAePPWyinnDapQxz-oDejXpK8PF4n6HfN9e_ru6q-5-3P66-3VdGNG0uKXsh25HL1jLbG9lxYTUjfOBsMLwbjOitbaSxvdWNHZuRCQtWQMON6dum52fo4qC73gwzWAMltp7UOrpZx50K2ql_f7xbqqewVQ1pW0plEfhyFIjheQMpq9klA9OkPYRNUowQSgos96g8oCaGlCKMLzaUqH07aqWO7ah9O4owVdopc59fZ3yZ-ltHAS4PAJRNbR1ElYwDb8raI5isbHD_sfgD8kGm0Q</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Liu, Clarissa M.</creator><creator>Kanoski, Scott E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems</title><author>Liu, Clarissa M. ; Kanoski, Scott E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-939457f357d2d9c5834da203b32bc38bc49dd65cd9da6df6f24ded4e63cc97693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Dopamine</topic><topic>Energy balance</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Food reward</topic><topic>Hippocampus</topic><topic>Homeostasis - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypothalamus</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Clarissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanoski, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Physiology & behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Clarissa M.</au><au>Kanoski, Scott E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems</atitle><jtitle>Physiology & behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Physiol Behav</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>193</volume><issue>Pt B</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>223-231</pages><issn>0031-9384</issn><eissn>1873-507X</eissn><abstract>Understanding the neurobiological controls of feeding behavior is critical in light of the growing obesity pandemic, a phenomenon largely based on excessive caloric consumption. Feeding behavior and its underlying biological substrates are frequently divided in the literature into two separate categories: [1] homeostatic processes involving energy intake based on caloric and other metabolic deficits, and [2] non-homeostatic processes that involve feeding driven by environmental and cognitive factors. The present review summarizes both historic and recent research examining the homeostatic regulation of feeding with specific emphasis on hypothalamic and hindbrain circuitry that monitor and regulate various metabolic signals. Regarding non-homeostatic controls, we highlight higher-order brain structures that integrate feeding-relevant external, interoceptive, and cognitive factors, including sensory cortical processing, learned associations in the hippocampus, and reward-based processing in the nucleus accumbens and interconnected mesolimbic circuitry. Finally, the current review focuses on recent evidence that challenges the traditional view that distinct neural systems regulate homeostatic vs. non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior. Specifically, we highlight several feeding-related endocrine systems that act on both lower- and higher-order substrates, present evidence for the modulation of learned and cognitive feeding-relevant behaviors by lower-order brain regions, and highlight data showing that apparent homeostatic-based feeding behavior is modulated by higher-order brain regions. Our concluding perspective is that the classic dissociation between homeostatic and non-homeostatic constructs in relation to feeding behavior is limited with regards to understanding the complex integrated neurobiological systems that control energy balance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29421588</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.011</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9384 |
ispartof | Physiology & behavior, 2018-09, Vol.193 (Pt B), p.223-231 |
issn | 0031-9384 1873-507X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6077115 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Animals Brain - physiology Dopamine Energy balance Feeding Behavior - physiology Food intake Food reward Hippocampus Homeostasis - physiology Humans Hypothalamus Obesity |
title | Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A06%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Homeostatic%20and%20non-homeostatic%20controls%20of%20feeding%20behavior:%20Distinct%20vs.%20common%20neural%20systems&rft.jtitle=Physiology%20&%20behavior&rft.au=Liu,%20Clarissa%20M.&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=Pt%20B&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=223-231&rft.issn=0031-9384&rft.eissn=1873-507X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2001060755%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001060755&rft_id=info:pmid/29421588&rft_els_id=S0031938418300556&rfr_iscdi=true |