Non-thermal ablation of non-neoplastic Barrett’s esophagus with the novel EndoRotor® resection device
Background International guidelines suggest endoscopic resection for all patients with low-risk mucosal cancer. Ultimately, it is essential to treat the remaining Barrett’s esophagus as part of the treatment. Different thermal ablative therapies have been implemented to effect this treatment. They c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | United European gastroenterology journal 2018-06, Vol.6 (5), p.678-683 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
International guidelines suggest endoscopic resection for all patients with low-risk mucosal cancer. Ultimately, it is essential to treat the remaining Barrett’s esophagus as part of the treatment. Different thermal ablative therapies have been implemented to effect this treatment. They can lead to potential post-therapeutic stenosis. Furthermore, a histologic assessment of treated mucosa is not possible.
Objective
Clinical evaluation of a novel, non-thermal resection device (EndoRotor®) in the treatment of non-neoplastic Barrett’s esophagus was conducted.
Methods
Fourteen patients with early Barrett’s carcinoma were treated with endoscopic resection. Subsequently, EndoRotor® therapy was performed for resection of the remaining Barrett’s mucosa. Complications were assessed during the study. After a three-month period patients received follow-up endoscopy to evaluate post-therapeutic stenosis.
Results
On average, 674 mm2 (172 mm2 – 1600 mm2) of Barrett’s mucosa was treated with the novel device. In six (37.5%) cases, intra-procedural bleeding occurred with the need for hemostasis. All bleeding could be managed by endoscopic therapy alone. After a three-month follow-up there was no post-therapeutic stenosis registered.
Conclusion
EndoRotor® resection is a feasible non-thermal treatment of non-neoplastic Barrett’s esophagus. Larger trials have to evaluate risks and benefits of this novel device. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2050-6406 2050-6414 |
DOI: | 10.1177/2050640618758214 |