Audiovisual Temporal Processing in Postlingually Deafened Adults with Cochlear Implants
For many cochlear implant (CI) users, visual cues are vitally important for interpreting the impoverished auditory speech information that an implant conveys. Although the temporal relationship between auditory and visual stimuli is crucial for how this information is integrated, audiovisual tempora...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2018-07, Vol.8 (1), p.11345-12, Article 11345 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 11345 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Butera, Iliza M. Stevenson, Ryan A. Mangus, Brannon D. Woynaroski, Tiffany G. Gifford, René H. Wallace, Mark T. |
description | For many cochlear implant (CI) users, visual cues are vitally important for interpreting the impoverished auditory speech information that an implant conveys. Although the temporal relationship between auditory and visual stimuli is crucial for how this information is integrated, audiovisual temporal processing in CI users is poorly understood. In this study, we tested unisensory (auditory alone, visual alone) and multisensory (audiovisual) temporal processing in postlingually deafened CI users (n = 48) and normal-hearing controls (n = 54) using simultaneity judgment (SJ) and temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks. We varied the timing onsets between the auditory and visual components of either a syllable/viseme or a simple flash/beep pairing, and participants indicated either which stimulus appeared first (TOJ) or if the pair occurred simultaneously (SJ). Results indicate that temporal binding windows—the interval within which stimuli are likely to be perceptually ‘bound’—are not significantly different between groups for either speech or non-speech stimuli. However, the point of subjective simultaneity for speech was less visually leading in CI users, who interestingly, also had improved visual-only TOJ thresholds. Further signal detection analysis suggests that this SJ shift may be due to greater visual bias within the CI group, perhaps reflecting heightened attentional allocation to visual cues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-018-29598-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6063927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2077457650</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-24a44b34a3ecfb2fa72aef8060a9aa759e7d8fd5605823f112285e6019114703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpqU2aL9BDWcill22kkbTSXgLGTZpAoDkYchTy7qwts7typd00-faR4_xxe4guejC_eTPDI-Qroz8Y5fo0CiZLnVOmcyh36v4DmQIVMgcO8PFAT8hxjBuanoRSsPIzmfCkhWQwJbezsXb-zsXRttkCu60PSdwEX2GMrl9lrs9ufBzapBPSPmQ_0TbYY53N6rEdYvbXDets7qt1izZkV922tf0Qv5BPjW0jHj__R2Rxcb6YX-bXv39dzWfXeSVBDTkIK8SSC8uxapbQWAUWG00LaktrlSxR1bqpZUGlBt4wBqAlFpSVjAlF-RE529tux2WHdYX9kPY32-A6Gx6Mt878W-nd2qz8nSlowUtQyeD7s0Hwf0aMg-lcrLBNR6AfowGqtNRSiSKhJ_-hGz-GPl23o5SQqpC7jWBPVcHHGLB5XYZRs0vO7JMzKTnzlJy5T03fDs94bXnJKQF8D8RU6lcY3ma_Y_sIGOClTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2077457650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Audiovisual Temporal Processing in Postlingually Deafened Adults with Cochlear Implants</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Butera, Iliza M. ; Stevenson, Ryan A. ; Mangus, Brannon D. ; Woynaroski, Tiffany G. ; Gifford, René H. ; Wallace, Mark T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Butera, Iliza M. ; Stevenson, Ryan A. ; Mangus, Brannon D. ; Woynaroski, Tiffany G. ; Gifford, René H. ; Wallace, Mark T.</creatorcontrib><description>For many cochlear implant (CI) users, visual cues are vitally important for interpreting the impoverished auditory speech information that an implant conveys. Although the temporal relationship between auditory and visual stimuli is crucial for how this information is integrated, audiovisual temporal processing in CI users is poorly understood. In this study, we tested unisensory (auditory alone, visual alone) and multisensory (audiovisual) temporal processing in postlingually deafened CI users (n = 48) and normal-hearing controls (n = 54) using simultaneity judgment (SJ) and temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks. We varied the timing onsets between the auditory and visual components of either a syllable/viseme or a simple flash/beep pairing, and participants indicated either which stimulus appeared first (TOJ) or if the pair occurred simultaneously (SJ). Results indicate that temporal binding windows—the interval within which stimuli are likely to be perceptually ‘bound’—are not significantly different between groups for either speech or non-speech stimuli. However, the point of subjective simultaneity for speech was less visually leading in CI users, who interestingly, also had improved visual-only TOJ thresholds. Further signal detection analysis suggests that this SJ shift may be due to greater visual bias within the CI group, perhaps reflecting heightened attentional allocation to visual cues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29598-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30054512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/378 ; 631/378/3917 ; Cochlea ; Cochlear implants ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Information processing ; multidisciplinary ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Sensory integration ; Speech ; Temporal variations ; Visual stimuli</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2018-07, Vol.8 (1), p.11345-12, Article 11345</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-24a44b34a3ecfb2fa72aef8060a9aa759e7d8fd5605823f112285e6019114703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-24a44b34a3ecfb2fa72aef8060a9aa759e7d8fd5605823f112285e6019114703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0166-906X ; 0000-0003-4060-5285 ; 0000-0003-1037-7736</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6063927/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6063927/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,27911,27912,41107,42176,51563,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30054512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butera, Iliza M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangus, Brannon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woynaroski, Tiffany G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, René H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Mark T.</creatorcontrib><title>Audiovisual Temporal Processing in Postlingually Deafened Adults with Cochlear Implants</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>For many cochlear implant (CI) users, visual cues are vitally important for interpreting the impoverished auditory speech information that an implant conveys. Although the temporal relationship between auditory and visual stimuli is crucial for how this information is integrated, audiovisual temporal processing in CI users is poorly understood. In this study, we tested unisensory (auditory alone, visual alone) and multisensory (audiovisual) temporal processing in postlingually deafened CI users (n = 48) and normal-hearing controls (n = 54) using simultaneity judgment (SJ) and temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks. We varied the timing onsets between the auditory and visual components of either a syllable/viseme or a simple flash/beep pairing, and participants indicated either which stimulus appeared first (TOJ) or if the pair occurred simultaneously (SJ). Results indicate that temporal binding windows—the interval within which stimuli are likely to be perceptually ‘bound’—are not significantly different between groups for either speech or non-speech stimuli. However, the point of subjective simultaneity for speech was less visually leading in CI users, who interestingly, also had improved visual-only TOJ thresholds. Further signal detection analysis suggests that this SJ shift may be due to greater visual bias within the CI group, perhaps reflecting heightened attentional allocation to visual cues.</description><subject>631/378</subject><subject>631/378/3917</subject><subject>Cochlea</subject><subject>Cochlear implants</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpqU2aL9BDWcill22kkbTSXgLGTZpAoDkYchTy7qwts7typd00-faR4_xxe4guejC_eTPDI-Qroz8Y5fo0CiZLnVOmcyh36v4DmQIVMgcO8PFAT8hxjBuanoRSsPIzmfCkhWQwJbezsXb-zsXRttkCu60PSdwEX2GMrl9lrs9ufBzapBPSPmQ_0TbYY53N6rEdYvbXDets7qt1izZkV922tf0Qv5BPjW0jHj__R2Rxcb6YX-bXv39dzWfXeSVBDTkIK8SSC8uxapbQWAUWG00LaktrlSxR1bqpZUGlBt4wBqAlFpSVjAlF-RE529tux2WHdYX9kPY32-A6Gx6Mt878W-nd2qz8nSlowUtQyeD7s0Hwf0aMg-lcrLBNR6AfowGqtNRSiSKhJ_-hGz-GPl23o5SQqpC7jWBPVcHHGLB5XYZRs0vO7JMzKTnzlJy5T03fDs94bXnJKQF8D8RU6lcY3ma_Y_sIGOClTA</recordid><startdate>20180727</startdate><enddate>20180727</enddate><creator>Butera, Iliza M.</creator><creator>Stevenson, Ryan A.</creator><creator>Mangus, Brannon D.</creator><creator>Woynaroski, Tiffany G.</creator><creator>Gifford, René H.</creator><creator>Wallace, Mark T.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-906X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4060-5285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1037-7736</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180727</creationdate><title>Audiovisual Temporal Processing in Postlingually Deafened Adults with Cochlear Implants</title><author>Butera, Iliza M. ; Stevenson, Ryan A. ; Mangus, Brannon D. ; Woynaroski, Tiffany G. ; Gifford, René H. ; Wallace, Mark T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-24a44b34a3ecfb2fa72aef8060a9aa759e7d8fd5605823f112285e6019114703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>631/378</topic><topic>631/378/3917</topic><topic>Cochlea</topic><topic>Cochlear implants</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butera, Iliza M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangus, Brannon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woynaroski, Tiffany G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, René H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Mark T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butera, Iliza M.</au><au>Stevenson, Ryan A.</au><au>Mangus, Brannon D.</au><au>Woynaroski, Tiffany G.</au><au>Gifford, René H.</au><au>Wallace, Mark T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Audiovisual Temporal Processing in Postlingually Deafened Adults with Cochlear Implants</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2018-07-27</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11345</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>11345-12</pages><artnum>11345</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>For many cochlear implant (CI) users, visual cues are vitally important for interpreting the impoverished auditory speech information that an implant conveys. Although the temporal relationship between auditory and visual stimuli is crucial for how this information is integrated, audiovisual temporal processing in CI users is poorly understood. In this study, we tested unisensory (auditory alone, visual alone) and multisensory (audiovisual) temporal processing in postlingually deafened CI users (n = 48) and normal-hearing controls (n = 54) using simultaneity judgment (SJ) and temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks. We varied the timing onsets between the auditory and visual components of either a syllable/viseme or a simple flash/beep pairing, and participants indicated either which stimulus appeared first (TOJ) or if the pair occurred simultaneously (SJ). Results indicate that temporal binding windows—the interval within which stimuli are likely to be perceptually ‘bound’—are not significantly different between groups for either speech or non-speech stimuli. However, the point of subjective simultaneity for speech was less visually leading in CI users, who interestingly, also had improved visual-only TOJ thresholds. Further signal detection analysis suggests that this SJ shift may be due to greater visual bias within the CI group, perhaps reflecting heightened attentional allocation to visual cues.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>30054512</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-018-29598-x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-906X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4060-5285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1037-7736</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2018-07, Vol.8 (1), p.11345-12, Article 11345 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6063927 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | 631/378 631/378/3917 Cochlea Cochlear implants Humanities and Social Sciences Information processing multidisciplinary Science Science (multidisciplinary) Sensory integration Speech Temporal variations Visual stimuli |
title | Audiovisual Temporal Processing in Postlingually Deafened Adults with Cochlear Implants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Audiovisual%20Temporal%20Processing%20in%20Postlingually%20Deafened%20Adults%20with%20Cochlear%20Implants&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Butera,%20Iliza%20M.&rft.date=2018-07-27&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11345&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=11345-12&rft.artnum=11345&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-018-29598-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2077457650%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2077457650&rft_id=info:pmid/30054512&rfr_iscdi=true |