Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone

Delafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. The susceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2018-08, Vol.56 (8)
Hauptverfasser: Pfaller, M A, Flamm, R K, McCurdy, S P, Pillar, C M, Shortridge, D, Jones, R N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume 56
creator Pfaller, M A
Flamm, R K
McCurdy, S P
Pillar, C M
Shortridge, D
Jones, R N
description Delafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. The susceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MIC testing methods. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) susceptibility testing breakpoints and quality control ranges for routine broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods were confirmed. The delafloxacin MIC (% susceptibility) results were as follows: , including methicillin-resistant (MRSA), 0.008/0.25 μg/ml (92.8%); , 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (99.3%); , 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (100.0%); group, 0.008/0.016 μg/ml (100.0%); , 0.12/1 μg/ml (66.2%); and , 0.12/4 μg/ml (69.5%). The FDA clinical breakpoints were used to assess intermethod test agreement between delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion methods for the indicated pathogens. The intermethod susceptibility test categorical agreement for delafloxacin was acceptable, with only 0.4% very major, false-susceptible errors among strains. Across all FDA-indicated species, the selected breakpoints produced only 0.0 to 1.7% rates of serious (very major and major errors) intermethod error. Quality control ranges for these standardized delafloxacin susceptibility test methods were calculated from three multilaboratory (12 total sites) studies for six control organisms. In conclusion, the application of FDA MIC breakpoints for delafloxacin against contemporary (2014 to 2016) isolates of ABSSSI pathogens provides additional support for the use of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with ABSSSI. Delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods have been standardized for clinical application, achieving high intermethod categorical agreement.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/JCM.00339-18
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6062791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2047919896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d2677a1ea4fe5bf7a570dfb5ba7c1586f31a66c44f71faa2189265d305eb70743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkktv1DAUhS1ERYfCjjXykkXT2knsJCyQ2umDolYIWhA7y0ns6aWOHfxA7X_lx-CZlgrY-Eo-n849ujoIvaJkj9Ky3f-wvNgjpKq6grZP0IKSri04J9-eogUhHSsorZpt9DyE74TQumbsGdouu7ZuGa8X6NeRMlIbdysHsPjM4q8QvcOH3sVrfAGDdyOYFMFZLO2IjyDc5EfrFNZfBzbCtIZ6kAZfpjCoOUIPBuIdvlIhgl3h0wSjMmBVePs_cuiVvJkd2IiXHqLyIDdrPiW50ZfO5jQGf5Z2pQLWzmcZH9_OGVJjcTmrIfo05Rw5DQz4xCTn3Y8E1hln1Qu0paUJ6uXD3EFfTo6vlu-L84-nZ8uD82Ko2joWY8mbRlIla61YrxvJGjLqnvWyGShrua6o5Hyoa91QLWVJ267kbKwIU31DmrraQe_ufefUT2ocVE4tjZg9TNLfCSdB_KtYuBYr91Nwwsumo9ngzYPBOn2-m5ggH8oYaZVLQZSkzljXdjyju_dovnoIXunHNZSIdSFELoTYFELQNuOv_472CP9pQPUbcTq5Jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047919896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pfaller, M A ; Flamm, R K ; McCurdy, S P ; Pillar, C M ; Shortridge, D ; Jones, R N</creator><contributor>McAdam, Alexander J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pfaller, M A ; Flamm, R K ; McCurdy, S P ; Pillar, C M ; Shortridge, D ; Jones, R N ; McAdam, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><description>Delafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. The susceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MIC testing methods. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) susceptibility testing breakpoints and quality control ranges for routine broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods were confirmed. The delafloxacin MIC (% susceptibility) results were as follows: , including methicillin-resistant (MRSA), 0.008/0.25 μg/ml (92.8%); , 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (99.3%); , 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (100.0%); group, 0.008/0.016 μg/ml (100.0%); , 0.12/1 μg/ml (66.2%); and , 0.12/4 μg/ml (69.5%). The FDA clinical breakpoints were used to assess intermethod test agreement between delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion methods for the indicated pathogens. The intermethod susceptibility test categorical agreement for delafloxacin was acceptable, with only 0.4% very major, false-susceptible errors among strains. Across all FDA-indicated species, the selected breakpoints produced only 0.0 to 1.7% rates of serious (very major and major errors) intermethod error. Quality control ranges for these standardized delafloxacin susceptibility test methods were calculated from three multilaboratory (12 total sites) studies for six control organisms. In conclusion, the application of FDA MIC breakpoints for delafloxacin against contemporary (2014 to 2016) isolates of ABSSSI pathogens provides additional support for the use of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with ABSSSI. Delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods have been standardized for clinical application, achieving high intermethod categorical agreement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00339-18</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29848564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Bacteriology ; Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects ; Fluoroquinolones - pharmacology ; Humans ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests - standards ; Microbial Viability - drug effects ; Quality Control ; Staphylococcus - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018-08, Vol.56 (8)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Pfaller et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Pfaller et al. 2018 Pfaller et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d2677a1ea4fe5bf7a570dfb5ba7c1586f31a66c44f71faa2189265d305eb70743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d2677a1ea4fe5bf7a570dfb5ba7c1586f31a66c44f71faa2189265d305eb70743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062791/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062791/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3188,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29848564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>McAdam, Alexander J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pfaller, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flamm, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCurdy, S P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillar, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shortridge, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R N</creatorcontrib><title>Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Delafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. The susceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MIC testing methods. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) susceptibility testing breakpoints and quality control ranges for routine broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods were confirmed. The delafloxacin MIC (% susceptibility) results were as follows: , including methicillin-resistant (MRSA), 0.008/0.25 μg/ml (92.8%); , 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (99.3%); , 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (100.0%); group, 0.008/0.016 μg/ml (100.0%); , 0.12/1 μg/ml (66.2%); and , 0.12/4 μg/ml (69.5%). The FDA clinical breakpoints were used to assess intermethod test agreement between delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion methods for the indicated pathogens. The intermethod susceptibility test categorical agreement for delafloxacin was acceptable, with only 0.4% very major, false-susceptible errors among strains. Across all FDA-indicated species, the selected breakpoints produced only 0.0 to 1.7% rates of serious (very major and major errors) intermethod error. Quality control ranges for these standardized delafloxacin susceptibility test methods were calculated from three multilaboratory (12 total sites) studies for six control organisms. In conclusion, the application of FDA MIC breakpoints for delafloxacin against contemporary (2014 to 2016) isolates of ABSSSI pathogens provides additional support for the use of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with ABSSSI. Delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods have been standardized for clinical application, achieving high intermethod categorical agreement.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones - pharmacology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - standards</subject><subject>Microbial Viability - drug effects</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Staphylococcus - drug effects</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkktv1DAUhS1ERYfCjjXykkXT2knsJCyQ2umDolYIWhA7y0ns6aWOHfxA7X_lx-CZlgrY-Eo-n849ujoIvaJkj9Ky3f-wvNgjpKq6grZP0IKSri04J9-eogUhHSsorZpt9DyE74TQumbsGdouu7ZuGa8X6NeRMlIbdysHsPjM4q8QvcOH3sVrfAGDdyOYFMFZLO2IjyDc5EfrFNZfBzbCtIZ6kAZfpjCoOUIPBuIdvlIhgl3h0wSjMmBVePs_cuiVvJkd2IiXHqLyIDdrPiW50ZfO5jQGf5Z2pQLWzmcZH9_OGVJjcTmrIfo05Rw5DQz4xCTn3Y8E1hln1Qu0paUJ6uXD3EFfTo6vlu-L84-nZ8uD82Ko2joWY8mbRlIla61YrxvJGjLqnvWyGShrua6o5Hyoa91QLWVJ267kbKwIU31DmrraQe_ufefUT2ocVE4tjZg9TNLfCSdB_KtYuBYr91Nwwsumo9ngzYPBOn2-m5ggH8oYaZVLQZSkzljXdjyju_dovnoIXunHNZSIdSFELoTYFELQNuOv_472CP9pQPUbcTq5Jw</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Pfaller, M A</creator><creator>Flamm, R K</creator><creator>McCurdy, S P</creator><creator>Pillar, C M</creator><creator>Shortridge, D</creator><creator>Jones, R N</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone</title><author>Pfaller, M A ; Flamm, R K ; McCurdy, S P ; Pillar, C M ; Shortridge, D ; Jones, R N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d2677a1ea4fe5bf7a570dfb5ba7c1586f31a66c44f71faa2189265d305eb70743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones - pharmacology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - standards</topic><topic>Microbial Viability - drug effects</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Staphylococcus - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfaller, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flamm, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCurdy, S P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillar, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shortridge, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfaller, M A</au><au>Flamm, R K</au><au>McCurdy, S P</au><au>Pillar, C M</au><au>Shortridge, D</au><au>Jones, R N</au><au>McAdam, Alexander J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Delafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. The susceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MIC testing methods. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) susceptibility testing breakpoints and quality control ranges for routine broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods were confirmed. The delafloxacin MIC (% susceptibility) results were as follows: , including methicillin-resistant (MRSA), 0.008/0.25 μg/ml (92.8%); , 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (99.3%); , 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (100.0%); group, 0.008/0.016 μg/ml (100.0%); , 0.12/1 μg/ml (66.2%); and , 0.12/4 μg/ml (69.5%). The FDA clinical breakpoints were used to assess intermethod test agreement between delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion methods for the indicated pathogens. The intermethod susceptibility test categorical agreement for delafloxacin was acceptable, with only 0.4% very major, false-susceptible errors among strains. Across all FDA-indicated species, the selected breakpoints produced only 0.0 to 1.7% rates of serious (very major and major errors) intermethod error. Quality control ranges for these standardized delafloxacin susceptibility test methods were calculated from three multilaboratory (12 total sites) studies for six control organisms. In conclusion, the application of FDA MIC breakpoints for delafloxacin against contemporary (2014 to 2016) isolates of ABSSSI pathogens provides additional support for the use of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with ABSSSI. Delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods have been standardized for clinical application, achieving high intermethod categorical agreement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>29848564</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.00339-18</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018-08, Vol.56 (8)
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6062791
source American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Bacteriology
Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects
Fluoroquinolones - pharmacology
Humans
Microbial Sensitivity Tests - standards
Microbial Viability - drug effects
Quality Control
Staphylococcus - drug effects
title Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A03%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delafloxacin%20In%20Vitro%20Broth%20Microdilution%20and%20Disk%20Diffusion%20Antimicrobial%20Susceptibility%20Testing%20Guidelines:%20Susceptibility%20Breakpoint%20Criteria%20and%20Quality%20Control%20Ranges%20for%20an%20Expanded-Spectrum%20Anionic%20Fluoroquinolone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Pfaller,%20M%20A&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.00339-18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2047919896%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047919896&rft_id=info:pmid/29848564&rfr_iscdi=true