Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone
Delafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. The susceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical microbiology 2018-08, Vol.56 (8) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of clinical microbiology |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Pfaller, M A Flamm, R K McCurdy, S P Pillar, C M Shortridge, D Jones, R N |
description | Delafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. The
susceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MIC testing methods. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) susceptibility testing breakpoints and quality control ranges for routine broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods were confirmed. The delafloxacin MIC
(% susceptibility) results were as follows:
, including methicillin-resistant
(MRSA), 0.008/0.25 μg/ml (92.8%);
, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (99.3%);
, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (100.0%);
group, 0.008/0.016 μg/ml (100.0%);
, 0.12/1 μg/ml (66.2%); and
, 0.12/4 μg/ml (69.5%). The FDA clinical breakpoints were used to assess intermethod test agreement between delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion methods for the indicated pathogens. The intermethod susceptibility test categorical agreement for delafloxacin was acceptable, with only 0.4% very major, false-susceptible errors among
strains. Across all FDA-indicated species, the selected breakpoints produced only 0.0 to 1.7% rates of serious (very major and major errors) intermethod error. Quality control ranges for these standardized delafloxacin susceptibility test methods were calculated from three multilaboratory (12 total sites) studies for six control organisms. In conclusion, the application of FDA MIC breakpoints for delafloxacin against contemporary (2014 to 2016) isolates of ABSSSI pathogens provides additional support for the use of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with ABSSSI. Delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods have been standardized for clinical application, achieving high intermethod categorical agreement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/JCM.00339-18 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6062791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2047919896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d2677a1ea4fe5bf7a570dfb5ba7c1586f31a66c44f71faa2189265d305eb70743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkktv1DAUhS1ERYfCjjXykkXT2knsJCyQ2umDolYIWhA7y0ns6aWOHfxA7X_lx-CZlgrY-Eo-n849ujoIvaJkj9Ky3f-wvNgjpKq6grZP0IKSri04J9-eogUhHSsorZpt9DyE74TQumbsGdouu7ZuGa8X6NeRMlIbdysHsPjM4q8QvcOH3sVrfAGDdyOYFMFZLO2IjyDc5EfrFNZfBzbCtIZ6kAZfpjCoOUIPBuIdvlIhgl3h0wSjMmBVePs_cuiVvJkd2IiXHqLyIDdrPiW50ZfO5jQGf5Z2pQLWzmcZH9_OGVJjcTmrIfo05Rw5DQz4xCTn3Y8E1hln1Qu0paUJ6uXD3EFfTo6vlu-L84-nZ8uD82Ko2joWY8mbRlIla61YrxvJGjLqnvWyGShrua6o5Hyoa91QLWVJ267kbKwIU31DmrraQe_ufefUT2ocVE4tjZg9TNLfCSdB_KtYuBYr91Nwwsumo9ngzYPBOn2-m5ggH8oYaZVLQZSkzljXdjyju_dovnoIXunHNZSIdSFELoTYFELQNuOv_472CP9pQPUbcTq5Jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047919896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pfaller, M A ; Flamm, R K ; McCurdy, S P ; Pillar, C M ; Shortridge, D ; Jones, R N</creator><contributor>McAdam, Alexander J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pfaller, M A ; Flamm, R K ; McCurdy, S P ; Pillar, C M ; Shortridge, D ; Jones, R N ; McAdam, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><description>Delafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. The
susceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MIC testing methods. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) susceptibility testing breakpoints and quality control ranges for routine broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods were confirmed. The delafloxacin MIC
(% susceptibility) results were as follows:
, including methicillin-resistant
(MRSA), 0.008/0.25 μg/ml (92.8%);
, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (99.3%);
, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (100.0%);
group, 0.008/0.016 μg/ml (100.0%);
, 0.12/1 μg/ml (66.2%); and
, 0.12/4 μg/ml (69.5%). The FDA clinical breakpoints were used to assess intermethod test agreement between delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion methods for the indicated pathogens. The intermethod susceptibility test categorical agreement for delafloxacin was acceptable, with only 0.4% very major, false-susceptible errors among
strains. Across all FDA-indicated species, the selected breakpoints produced only 0.0 to 1.7% rates of serious (very major and major errors) intermethod error. Quality control ranges for these standardized delafloxacin susceptibility test methods were calculated from three multilaboratory (12 total sites) studies for six control organisms. In conclusion, the application of FDA MIC breakpoints for delafloxacin against contemporary (2014 to 2016) isolates of ABSSSI pathogens provides additional support for the use of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with ABSSSI. Delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods have been standardized for clinical application, achieving high intermethod categorical agreement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00339-18</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29848564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Bacteriology ; Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects ; Fluoroquinolones - pharmacology ; Humans ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests - standards ; Microbial Viability - drug effects ; Quality Control ; Staphylococcus - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018-08, Vol.56 (8)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Pfaller et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Pfaller et al. 2018 Pfaller et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d2677a1ea4fe5bf7a570dfb5ba7c1586f31a66c44f71faa2189265d305eb70743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d2677a1ea4fe5bf7a570dfb5ba7c1586f31a66c44f71faa2189265d305eb70743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062791/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062791/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3188,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29848564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>McAdam, Alexander J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pfaller, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flamm, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCurdy, S P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillar, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shortridge, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R N</creatorcontrib><title>Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Delafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. The
susceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MIC testing methods. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) susceptibility testing breakpoints and quality control ranges for routine broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods were confirmed. The delafloxacin MIC
(% susceptibility) results were as follows:
, including methicillin-resistant
(MRSA), 0.008/0.25 μg/ml (92.8%);
, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (99.3%);
, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (100.0%);
group, 0.008/0.016 μg/ml (100.0%);
, 0.12/1 μg/ml (66.2%); and
, 0.12/4 μg/ml (69.5%). The FDA clinical breakpoints were used to assess intermethod test agreement between delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion methods for the indicated pathogens. The intermethod susceptibility test categorical agreement for delafloxacin was acceptable, with only 0.4% very major, false-susceptible errors among
strains. Across all FDA-indicated species, the selected breakpoints produced only 0.0 to 1.7% rates of serious (very major and major errors) intermethod error. Quality control ranges for these standardized delafloxacin susceptibility test methods were calculated from three multilaboratory (12 total sites) studies for six control organisms. In conclusion, the application of FDA MIC breakpoints for delafloxacin against contemporary (2014 to 2016) isolates of ABSSSI pathogens provides additional support for the use of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with ABSSSI. Delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods have been standardized for clinical application, achieving high intermethod categorical agreement.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones - pharmacology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - standards</subject><subject>Microbial Viability - drug effects</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Staphylococcus - drug effects</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkktv1DAUhS1ERYfCjjXykkXT2knsJCyQ2umDolYIWhA7y0ns6aWOHfxA7X_lx-CZlgrY-Eo-n849ujoIvaJkj9Ky3f-wvNgjpKq6grZP0IKSri04J9-eogUhHSsorZpt9DyE74TQumbsGdouu7ZuGa8X6NeRMlIbdysHsPjM4q8QvcOH3sVrfAGDdyOYFMFZLO2IjyDc5EfrFNZfBzbCtIZ6kAZfpjCoOUIPBuIdvlIhgl3h0wSjMmBVePs_cuiVvJkd2IiXHqLyIDdrPiW50ZfO5jQGf5Z2pQLWzmcZH9_OGVJjcTmrIfo05Rw5DQz4xCTn3Y8E1hln1Qu0paUJ6uXD3EFfTo6vlu-L84-nZ8uD82Ko2joWY8mbRlIla61YrxvJGjLqnvWyGShrua6o5Hyoa91QLWVJ267kbKwIU31DmrraQe_ufefUT2ocVE4tjZg9TNLfCSdB_KtYuBYr91Nwwsumo9ngzYPBOn2-m5ggH8oYaZVLQZSkzljXdjyju_dovnoIXunHNZSIdSFELoTYFELQNuOv_472CP9pQPUbcTq5Jw</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Pfaller, M A</creator><creator>Flamm, R K</creator><creator>McCurdy, S P</creator><creator>Pillar, C M</creator><creator>Shortridge, D</creator><creator>Jones, R N</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone</title><author>Pfaller, M A ; Flamm, R K ; McCurdy, S P ; Pillar, C M ; Shortridge, D ; Jones, R N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d2677a1ea4fe5bf7a570dfb5ba7c1586f31a66c44f71faa2189265d305eb70743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones - pharmacology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests - standards</topic><topic>Microbial Viability - drug effects</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Staphylococcus - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfaller, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flamm, R K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCurdy, S P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillar, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shortridge, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfaller, M A</au><au>Flamm, R K</au><au>McCurdy, S P</au><au>Pillar, C M</au><au>Shortridge, D</au><au>Jones, R N</au><au>McAdam, Alexander J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Delafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. The
susceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MIC testing methods. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) susceptibility testing breakpoints and quality control ranges for routine broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods were confirmed. The delafloxacin MIC
(% susceptibility) results were as follows:
, including methicillin-resistant
(MRSA), 0.008/0.25 μg/ml (92.8%);
, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (99.3%);
, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (100.0%);
group, 0.008/0.016 μg/ml (100.0%);
, 0.12/1 μg/ml (66.2%); and
, 0.12/4 μg/ml (69.5%). The FDA clinical breakpoints were used to assess intermethod test agreement between delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion methods for the indicated pathogens. The intermethod susceptibility test categorical agreement for delafloxacin was acceptable, with only 0.4% very major, false-susceptible errors among
strains. Across all FDA-indicated species, the selected breakpoints produced only 0.0 to 1.7% rates of serious (very major and major errors) intermethod error. Quality control ranges for these standardized delafloxacin susceptibility test methods were calculated from three multilaboratory (12 total sites) studies for six control organisms. In conclusion, the application of FDA MIC breakpoints for delafloxacin against contemporary (2014 to 2016) isolates of ABSSSI pathogens provides additional support for the use of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with ABSSSI. Delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods have been standardized for clinical application, achieving high intermethod categorical agreement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>29848564</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.00339-18</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018-08, Vol.56 (8) |
issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6062791 |
source | American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Bacteriology Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects Fluoroquinolones - pharmacology Humans Microbial Sensitivity Tests - standards Microbial Viability - drug effects Quality Control Staphylococcus - drug effects |
title | Delafloxacin In Vitro Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A03%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delafloxacin%20In%20Vitro%20Broth%20Microdilution%20and%20Disk%20Diffusion%20Antimicrobial%20Susceptibility%20Testing%20Guidelines:%20Susceptibility%20Breakpoint%20Criteria%20and%20Quality%20Control%20Ranges%20for%20an%20Expanded-Spectrum%20Anionic%20Fluoroquinolone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Pfaller,%20M%20A&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.00339-18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2047919896%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047919896&rft_id=info:pmid/29848564&rfr_iscdi=true |