Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis
The analytical performance of the AIX1000 system, a fully automated and recently FDA-cleared rapid plasma reagin (RPR) system, was evaluated by comparison to a manual RPR test in a traditional syphilis testing algorithm. A total of 1,028 consecutive serum samples submitted for syphilis testing to th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical microbiology 2018-08, Vol.56 (8) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of clinical microbiology |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Sanfilippo, Alan M Freeman, Kristie Schmitz, John L |
description | The analytical performance of the AIX1000 system, a fully automated and recently FDA-cleared rapid plasma reagin (RPR) system, was evaluated by comparison to a manual RPR test in a traditional syphilis testing algorithm. A total of 1,028 consecutive serum samples submitted for syphilis testing to the University of North Carolina Hospitals Clinical Immunology Laboratory were tested per each manufacturer's instructions. Among those samples, 996 were nonreactive and 20 were reactive using both the ASI RPR card system and the AIX1000 system. Of the 12 discrepant specimens, 11 were AIX1000 reactive and ASI card nonreactive whereas 1 specimen was ASI card reactive and AIX1000 nonreactive. The sensitivity and specificity of the manual ASI card were 76.0% and 99.8%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the AIX100 were 100.0% and 99.4%, respectively (sensitivity
= 0.03). Among the 20 concordant reactive specimens, 68.4% of the titers agreed within ±1 dilution between methods. Reproducibility testing of the AIX1000 system demonstrated qualitative and semiquantitative (within ±1 dilution) agreement between specimens tested on different days of 96.0% and 76.0%, respectively, and 100.0% agreement between replicates within the same run. One of 24 samples analyzed under other disease conditions was reactive on both the AIX1000 system and the ASI card. Overall, the fully automated AIX1000 system demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and specificity similar to that of the manual ASI RPR card test, making the AIX1000 system suitable for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis in a clinical laboratory setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/JCM.00214-18 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6062780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2022129673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d47ed4ec3627e6c72e2ffabc1983594e4d876ed05a216bea0ab7caca7d2674e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQRi0Eokvhxhn5yIGUsePYzgVptVAo2gpUQOrNmsTO1siJUztByr8nS0sFpznMp_eN5hHyksEZY1y__by7PAPgTBRMPyIbBrUupITrx2QDUFcFY6U6Ic9y_gnAhKiqp-SE15LpCmBDxl3sR0w-x4HGjl7iMGOgOFh6Poew0O08xR4nZ-n24poBAL3C0Vv6NWDukV45PPiBbnPGJdMuJrrHJiacYlroe4-HIWafj-Rvy3jjg8_PyZMOQ3Yv7ucp-XH-4fvuU7H_8vFit90XbanFVFihnBWuLSVXTraKO9512LSs1mVVCyesVtJZqJAz2TgEbFSLLSrLpRKuLE_JuzvuODe9s60bpoTBjMn3mBYT0Zv_N4O_MYf4y0hYKzWsgNf3gBRvZ5cn0_vcuhBwcHHOhgPnbH2kOna9uYu2KeacXPdQw8AcJZlVkvkjyTC9xl_9e9pD-K-V8jfaAY50</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2022129673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ASM_美国微生物学会期刊</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Sanfilippo, Alan M ; Freeman, Kristie ; Schmitz, John L</creator><contributor>Land, Geoffrey A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Alan M ; Freeman, Kristie ; Schmitz, John L ; Land, Geoffrey A.</creatorcontrib><description>The analytical performance of the AIX1000 system, a fully automated and recently FDA-cleared rapid plasma reagin (RPR) system, was evaluated by comparison to a manual RPR test in a traditional syphilis testing algorithm. A total of 1,028 consecutive serum samples submitted for syphilis testing to the University of North Carolina Hospitals Clinical Immunology Laboratory were tested per each manufacturer's instructions. Among those samples, 996 were nonreactive and 20 were reactive using both the ASI RPR card system and the AIX1000 system. Of the 12 discrepant specimens, 11 were AIX1000 reactive and ASI card nonreactive whereas 1 specimen was ASI card reactive and AIX1000 nonreactive. The sensitivity and specificity of the manual ASI card were 76.0% and 99.8%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the AIX100 were 100.0% and 99.4%, respectively (sensitivity
= 0.03). Among the 20 concordant reactive specimens, 68.4% of the titers agreed within ±1 dilution between methods. Reproducibility testing of the AIX1000 system demonstrated qualitative and semiquantitative (within ±1 dilution) agreement between specimens tested on different days of 96.0% and 76.0%, respectively, and 100.0% agreement between replicates within the same run. One of 24 samples analyzed under other disease conditions was reactive on both the AIX1000 system and the ASI card. Overall, the fully automated AIX1000 system demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and specificity similar to that of the manual ASI RPR card test, making the AIX1000 system suitable for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis in a clinical laboratory setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00214-18</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29618500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood ; Automation, Laboratory ; Humans ; Immunoassays ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic - standards ; Reagins - blood ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Syphilis - diagnosis ; Syphilis Serodiagnosis - instrumentation ; Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods ; Treponema pallidum - immunology ; Treponema pallidum - isolation & purification</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018-08, Vol.56 (8)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology. 2018 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d47ed4ec3627e6c72e2ffabc1983594e4d876ed05a216bea0ab7caca7d2674e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d47ed4ec3627e6c72e2ffabc1983594e4d876ed05a216bea0ab7caca7d2674e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062780/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062780/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3188,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29618500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Land, Geoffrey A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Alan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, John L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>The analytical performance of the AIX1000 system, a fully automated and recently FDA-cleared rapid plasma reagin (RPR) system, was evaluated by comparison to a manual RPR test in a traditional syphilis testing algorithm. A total of 1,028 consecutive serum samples submitted for syphilis testing to the University of North Carolina Hospitals Clinical Immunology Laboratory were tested per each manufacturer's instructions. Among those samples, 996 were nonreactive and 20 were reactive using both the ASI RPR card system and the AIX1000 system. Of the 12 discrepant specimens, 11 were AIX1000 reactive and ASI card nonreactive whereas 1 specimen was ASI card reactive and AIX1000 nonreactive. The sensitivity and specificity of the manual ASI card were 76.0% and 99.8%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the AIX100 were 100.0% and 99.4%, respectively (sensitivity
= 0.03). Among the 20 concordant reactive specimens, 68.4% of the titers agreed within ±1 dilution between methods. Reproducibility testing of the AIX1000 system demonstrated qualitative and semiquantitative (within ±1 dilution) agreement between specimens tested on different days of 96.0% and 76.0%, respectively, and 100.0% agreement between replicates within the same run. One of 24 samples analyzed under other disease conditions was reactive on both the AIX1000 system and the ASI card. Overall, the fully automated AIX1000 system demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and specificity similar to that of the manual ASI RPR card test, making the AIX1000 system suitable for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis in a clinical laboratory setting.</description><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>Automation, Laboratory</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassays</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic - standards</subject><subject>Reagins - blood</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Syphilis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum - immunology</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum - isolation & purification</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQRi0Eokvhxhn5yIGUsePYzgVptVAo2gpUQOrNmsTO1siJUztByr8nS0sFpznMp_eN5hHyksEZY1y__by7PAPgTBRMPyIbBrUupITrx2QDUFcFY6U6Ic9y_gnAhKiqp-SE15LpCmBDxl3sR0w-x4HGjl7iMGOgOFh6Poew0O08xR4nZ-n24poBAL3C0Vv6NWDukV45PPiBbnPGJdMuJrrHJiacYlroe4-HIWafj-Rvy3jjg8_PyZMOQ3Yv7ucp-XH-4fvuU7H_8vFit90XbanFVFihnBWuLSVXTraKO9512LSs1mVVCyesVtJZqJAz2TgEbFSLLSrLpRKuLE_JuzvuODe9s60bpoTBjMn3mBYT0Zv_N4O_MYf4y0hYKzWsgNf3gBRvZ5cn0_vcuhBwcHHOhgPnbH2kOna9uYu2KeacXPdQw8AcJZlVkvkjyTC9xl_9e9pD-K-V8jfaAY50</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Sanfilippo, Alan M</creator><creator>Freeman, Kristie</creator><creator>Schmitz, John L</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis</title><author>Sanfilippo, Alan M ; Freeman, Kristie ; Schmitz, John L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d47ed4ec3627e6c72e2ffabc1983594e4d876ed05a216bea0ab7caca7d2674e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>Automation, Laboratory</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassays</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic - standards</topic><topic>Reagins - blood</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Syphilis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum - immunology</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum - isolation & purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Alan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, John L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanfilippo, Alan M</au><au>Freeman, Kristie</au><au>Schmitz, John L</au><au>Land, Geoffrey A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>The analytical performance of the AIX1000 system, a fully automated and recently FDA-cleared rapid plasma reagin (RPR) system, was evaluated by comparison to a manual RPR test in a traditional syphilis testing algorithm. A total of 1,028 consecutive serum samples submitted for syphilis testing to the University of North Carolina Hospitals Clinical Immunology Laboratory were tested per each manufacturer's instructions. Among those samples, 996 were nonreactive and 20 were reactive using both the ASI RPR card system and the AIX1000 system. Of the 12 discrepant specimens, 11 were AIX1000 reactive and ASI card nonreactive whereas 1 specimen was ASI card reactive and AIX1000 nonreactive. The sensitivity and specificity of the manual ASI card were 76.0% and 99.8%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the AIX100 were 100.0% and 99.4%, respectively (sensitivity
= 0.03). Among the 20 concordant reactive specimens, 68.4% of the titers agreed within ±1 dilution between methods. Reproducibility testing of the AIX1000 system demonstrated qualitative and semiquantitative (within ±1 dilution) agreement between specimens tested on different days of 96.0% and 76.0%, respectively, and 100.0% agreement between replicates within the same run. One of 24 samples analyzed under other disease conditions was reactive on both the AIX1000 system and the ASI card. Overall, the fully automated AIX1000 system demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and specificity similar to that of the manual ASI RPR card test, making the AIX1000 system suitable for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis in a clinical laboratory setting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>29618500</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.00214-18</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018-08, Vol.56 (8) |
issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6062780 |
source | PubMed (Medline); MEDLINE; ASM_美国微生物学会期刊; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Antibodies, Bacterial - blood Automation, Laboratory Humans Immunoassays Reagent Kits, Diagnostic - standards Reagins - blood Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Syphilis - diagnosis Syphilis Serodiagnosis - instrumentation Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods Treponema pallidum - immunology Treponema pallidum - isolation & purification |
title | Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A27%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Manual%20and%20Fully%20Automated%20AIX1000%20Rapid%20Plasma%20Reagin%20Assays%20for%20Laboratory%20Diagnosis%20of%20Syphilis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Sanfilippo,%20Alan%20M&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.00214-18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2022129673%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2022129673&rft_id=info:pmid/29618500&rfr_iscdi=true |