Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis

The analytical performance of the AIX1000 system, a fully automated and recently FDA-cleared rapid plasma reagin (RPR) system, was evaluated by comparison to a manual RPR test in a traditional syphilis testing algorithm. A total of 1,028 consecutive serum samples submitted for syphilis testing to th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2018-08, Vol.56 (8)
Hauptverfasser: Sanfilippo, Alan M, Freeman, Kristie, Schmitz, John L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume 56
creator Sanfilippo, Alan M
Freeman, Kristie
Schmitz, John L
description The analytical performance of the AIX1000 system, a fully automated and recently FDA-cleared rapid plasma reagin (RPR) system, was evaluated by comparison to a manual RPR test in a traditional syphilis testing algorithm. A total of 1,028 consecutive serum samples submitted for syphilis testing to the University of North Carolina Hospitals Clinical Immunology Laboratory were tested per each manufacturer's instructions. Among those samples, 996 were nonreactive and 20 were reactive using both the ASI RPR card system and the AIX1000 system. Of the 12 discrepant specimens, 11 were AIX1000 reactive and ASI card nonreactive whereas 1 specimen was ASI card reactive and AIX1000 nonreactive. The sensitivity and specificity of the manual ASI card were 76.0% and 99.8%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the AIX100 were 100.0% and 99.4%, respectively (sensitivity = 0.03). Among the 20 concordant reactive specimens, 68.4% of the titers agreed within ±1 dilution between methods. Reproducibility testing of the AIX1000 system demonstrated qualitative and semiquantitative (within ±1 dilution) agreement between specimens tested on different days of 96.0% and 76.0%, respectively, and 100.0% agreement between replicates within the same run. One of 24 samples analyzed under other disease conditions was reactive on both the AIX1000 system and the ASI card. Overall, the fully automated AIX1000 system demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and specificity similar to that of the manual ASI RPR card test, making the AIX1000 system suitable for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis in a clinical laboratory setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/JCM.00214-18
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6062780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2022129673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d47ed4ec3627e6c72e2ffabc1983594e4d876ed05a216bea0ab7caca7d2674e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQRi0Eokvhxhn5yIGUsePYzgVptVAo2gpUQOrNmsTO1siJUztByr8nS0sFpznMp_eN5hHyksEZY1y__by7PAPgTBRMPyIbBrUupITrx2QDUFcFY6U6Ic9y_gnAhKiqp-SE15LpCmBDxl3sR0w-x4HGjl7iMGOgOFh6Poew0O08xR4nZ-n24poBAL3C0Vv6NWDukV45PPiBbnPGJdMuJrrHJiacYlroe4-HIWafj-Rvy3jjg8_PyZMOQ3Yv7ucp-XH-4fvuU7H_8vFit90XbanFVFihnBWuLSVXTraKO9512LSs1mVVCyesVtJZqJAz2TgEbFSLLSrLpRKuLE_JuzvuODe9s60bpoTBjMn3mBYT0Zv_N4O_MYf4y0hYKzWsgNf3gBRvZ5cn0_vcuhBwcHHOhgPnbH2kOna9uYu2KeacXPdQw8AcJZlVkvkjyTC9xl_9e9pD-K-V8jfaAY50</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2022129673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ASM_美国微生物学会期刊</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Sanfilippo, Alan M ; Freeman, Kristie ; Schmitz, John L</creator><contributor>Land, Geoffrey A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Alan M ; Freeman, Kristie ; Schmitz, John L ; Land, Geoffrey A.</creatorcontrib><description>The analytical performance of the AIX1000 system, a fully automated and recently FDA-cleared rapid plasma reagin (RPR) system, was evaluated by comparison to a manual RPR test in a traditional syphilis testing algorithm. A total of 1,028 consecutive serum samples submitted for syphilis testing to the University of North Carolina Hospitals Clinical Immunology Laboratory were tested per each manufacturer's instructions. Among those samples, 996 were nonreactive and 20 were reactive using both the ASI RPR card system and the AIX1000 system. Of the 12 discrepant specimens, 11 were AIX1000 reactive and ASI card nonreactive whereas 1 specimen was ASI card reactive and AIX1000 nonreactive. The sensitivity and specificity of the manual ASI card were 76.0% and 99.8%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the AIX100 were 100.0% and 99.4%, respectively (sensitivity = 0.03). Among the 20 concordant reactive specimens, 68.4% of the titers agreed within ±1 dilution between methods. Reproducibility testing of the AIX1000 system demonstrated qualitative and semiquantitative (within ±1 dilution) agreement between specimens tested on different days of 96.0% and 76.0%, respectively, and 100.0% agreement between replicates within the same run. One of 24 samples analyzed under other disease conditions was reactive on both the AIX1000 system and the ASI card. Overall, the fully automated AIX1000 system demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and specificity similar to that of the manual ASI RPR card test, making the AIX1000 system suitable for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis in a clinical laboratory setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00214-18</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29618500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood ; Automation, Laboratory ; Humans ; Immunoassays ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic - standards ; Reagins - blood ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Syphilis - diagnosis ; Syphilis Serodiagnosis - instrumentation ; Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods ; Treponema pallidum - immunology ; Treponema pallidum - isolation &amp; purification</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018-08, Vol.56 (8)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology. 2018 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d47ed4ec3627e6c72e2ffabc1983594e4d876ed05a216bea0ab7caca7d2674e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d47ed4ec3627e6c72e2ffabc1983594e4d876ed05a216bea0ab7caca7d2674e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062780/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6062780/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3188,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29618500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Land, Geoffrey A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Alan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, John L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>The analytical performance of the AIX1000 system, a fully automated and recently FDA-cleared rapid plasma reagin (RPR) system, was evaluated by comparison to a manual RPR test in a traditional syphilis testing algorithm. A total of 1,028 consecutive serum samples submitted for syphilis testing to the University of North Carolina Hospitals Clinical Immunology Laboratory were tested per each manufacturer's instructions. Among those samples, 996 were nonreactive and 20 were reactive using both the ASI RPR card system and the AIX1000 system. Of the 12 discrepant specimens, 11 were AIX1000 reactive and ASI card nonreactive whereas 1 specimen was ASI card reactive and AIX1000 nonreactive. The sensitivity and specificity of the manual ASI card were 76.0% and 99.8%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the AIX100 were 100.0% and 99.4%, respectively (sensitivity = 0.03). Among the 20 concordant reactive specimens, 68.4% of the titers agreed within ±1 dilution between methods. Reproducibility testing of the AIX1000 system demonstrated qualitative and semiquantitative (within ±1 dilution) agreement between specimens tested on different days of 96.0% and 76.0%, respectively, and 100.0% agreement between replicates within the same run. One of 24 samples analyzed under other disease conditions was reactive on both the AIX1000 system and the ASI card. Overall, the fully automated AIX1000 system demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and specificity similar to that of the manual ASI RPR card test, making the AIX1000 system suitable for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis in a clinical laboratory setting.</description><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>Automation, Laboratory</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassays</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic - standards</subject><subject>Reagins - blood</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Syphilis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum - immunology</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum - isolation &amp; purification</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQRi0Eokvhxhn5yIGUsePYzgVptVAo2gpUQOrNmsTO1siJUztByr8nS0sFpznMp_eN5hHyksEZY1y__by7PAPgTBRMPyIbBrUupITrx2QDUFcFY6U6Ic9y_gnAhKiqp-SE15LpCmBDxl3sR0w-x4HGjl7iMGOgOFh6Poew0O08xR4nZ-n24poBAL3C0Vv6NWDukV45PPiBbnPGJdMuJrrHJiacYlroe4-HIWafj-Rvy3jjg8_PyZMOQ3Yv7ucp-XH-4fvuU7H_8vFit90XbanFVFihnBWuLSVXTraKO9512LSs1mVVCyesVtJZqJAz2TgEbFSLLSrLpRKuLE_JuzvuODe9s60bpoTBjMn3mBYT0Zv_N4O_MYf4y0hYKzWsgNf3gBRvZ5cn0_vcuhBwcHHOhgPnbH2kOna9uYu2KeacXPdQw8AcJZlVkvkjyTC9xl_9e9pD-K-V8jfaAY50</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Sanfilippo, Alan M</creator><creator>Freeman, Kristie</creator><creator>Schmitz, John L</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis</title><author>Sanfilippo, Alan M ; Freeman, Kristie ; Schmitz, John L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d47ed4ec3627e6c72e2ffabc1983594e4d876ed05a216bea0ab7caca7d2674e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>Automation, Laboratory</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassays</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic - standards</topic><topic>Reagins - blood</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Syphilis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum - immunology</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum - isolation &amp; purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Alan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitz, John L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanfilippo, Alan M</au><au>Freeman, Kristie</au><au>Schmitz, John L</au><au>Land, Geoffrey A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>The analytical performance of the AIX1000 system, a fully automated and recently FDA-cleared rapid plasma reagin (RPR) system, was evaluated by comparison to a manual RPR test in a traditional syphilis testing algorithm. A total of 1,028 consecutive serum samples submitted for syphilis testing to the University of North Carolina Hospitals Clinical Immunology Laboratory were tested per each manufacturer's instructions. Among those samples, 996 were nonreactive and 20 were reactive using both the ASI RPR card system and the AIX1000 system. Of the 12 discrepant specimens, 11 were AIX1000 reactive and ASI card nonreactive whereas 1 specimen was ASI card reactive and AIX1000 nonreactive. The sensitivity and specificity of the manual ASI card were 76.0% and 99.8%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the AIX100 were 100.0% and 99.4%, respectively (sensitivity = 0.03). Among the 20 concordant reactive specimens, 68.4% of the titers agreed within ±1 dilution between methods. Reproducibility testing of the AIX1000 system demonstrated qualitative and semiquantitative (within ±1 dilution) agreement between specimens tested on different days of 96.0% and 76.0%, respectively, and 100.0% agreement between replicates within the same run. One of 24 samples analyzed under other disease conditions was reactive on both the AIX1000 system and the ASI card. Overall, the fully automated AIX1000 system demonstrated significantly enhanced sensitivity and specificity similar to that of the manual ASI RPR card test, making the AIX1000 system suitable for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis in a clinical laboratory setting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>29618500</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.00214-18</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018-08, Vol.56 (8)
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6062780
source PubMed (Medline); MEDLINE; ASM_美国微生物学会期刊; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Antibodies, Bacterial - blood
Automation, Laboratory
Humans
Immunoassays
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic - standards
Reagins - blood
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Syphilis - diagnosis
Syphilis Serodiagnosis - instrumentation
Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods
Treponema pallidum - immunology
Treponema pallidum - isolation & purification
title Comparison of Manual and Fully Automated AIX1000 Rapid Plasma Reagin Assays for Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A27%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Manual%20and%20Fully%20Automated%20AIX1000%20Rapid%20Plasma%20Reagin%20Assays%20for%20Laboratory%20Diagnosis%20of%20Syphilis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Sanfilippo,%20Alan%20M&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.00214-18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2022129673%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2022129673&rft_id=info:pmid/29618500&rfr_iscdi=true