REPLY TO HUANG ET AL: Avoiding “one-size-fits-all” approaches to variant discovery

Huang et al argue that variant calling methods less conservative than GATK's Best Practices workflow increased false-positive variant discovery in our study of wild and cultivated potatoes, impacting diversity estimates. We disagree with their conclusion and highlight the rationale for the vari...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2018-07, Vol.115 (28), p.E6394-E6395
Hauptverfasser: Hardigan, Michael A., Laimbeer, F. Parker E., Hamilton, John P., Vaillancourt, Brieanne, Douches, David S., Farré, Eva M., Veilleux, Richard E., Buell, C. Robin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E6395
container_issue 28
container_start_page E6394
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 115
creator Hardigan, Michael A.
Laimbeer, F. Parker E.
Hamilton, John P.
Vaillancourt, Brieanne
Douches, David S.
Farré, Eva M.
Veilleux, Richard E.
Buell, C. Robin
description Huang et al argue that variant calling methods less conservative than GATK's Best Practices workflow increased false-positive variant discovery in our study of wild and cultivated potatoes, impacting diversity estimates. We disagree with their conclusion and highlight the rationale for the variant calling methods used in our study. Estimates of nucleotide diversity in crop species depend not only on variant calling methods but also genetic bottlenecks, ploidy, and reproductive mode. Thus, it is not surprising that outcrossing maize, watermelon, and potato report higher nucleotide diversity than inbreeding species with strong genetic bottlenecks such as tomato and soybean. However, variant counts generated for potato using GATK hard filtering were lower than those for both tomato and soybean, an unlikely outcome considering the biology of these species.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.1807622115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6048505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26510919</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26510919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2885-dad6d853f82765d27542463e95b060bcd5d43565f3760596d1e5cca5a6068ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1PAjEQhhujEURvJp40JF68LEzbnW57MSEEwWQjxuDBU1N2iy6BXWxZE_-9JSB-nHqYZ97pPEPIBYUOhYR3V6XxHSohEYxRigekSUHRSMQKDkkTgCWRjFncICfezwFAoYRj0mBK8TgG1iTnT4PH9KU9GbdHz72HYXswaffSU3I0Mwtvz3Zvi0zuBpP-KErHw_t-L40yJiVGuclFLpHPJEsE5izBMEpwq3AKAqZZjnnMUeCMJwJQiZxazDKDRoCQ1vIWud3Grurp0uaZLdfOLPTKFUvjPnVlCv23UhZv-rX60AJiiYAh4GYX4Kr32vq1XhY-s4uFKW1Ve80AA5cwrgJ6_Q-dV7Urw3aaUQApaTASqO6WylzlvbOz_Wco6I1wvRGuf4SHjqvfO-z5b8MBuNwCc7-u3E9d4OZSin8BdEqBAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2100881934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>REPLY TO HUANG ET AL: Avoiding “one-size-fits-all” approaches to variant discovery</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hardigan, Michael A. ; Laimbeer, F. Parker E. ; Hamilton, John P. ; Vaillancourt, Brieanne ; Douches, David S. ; Farré, Eva M. ; Veilleux, Richard E. ; Buell, C. Robin</creator><creatorcontrib>Hardigan, Michael A. ; Laimbeer, F. Parker E. ; Hamilton, John P. ; Vaillancourt, Brieanne ; Douches, David S. ; Farré, Eva M. ; Veilleux, Richard E. ; Buell, C. Robin</creatorcontrib><description>Huang et al argue that variant calling methods less conservative than GATK's Best Practices workflow increased false-positive variant discovery in our study of wild and cultivated potatoes, impacting diversity estimates. We disagree with their conclusion and highlight the rationale for the variant calling methods used in our study. Estimates of nucleotide diversity in crop species depend not only on variant calling methods but also genetic bottlenecks, ploidy, and reproductive mode. Thus, it is not surprising that outcrossing maize, watermelon, and potato report higher nucleotide diversity than inbreeding species with strong genetic bottlenecks such as tomato and soybean. However, variant counts generated for potato using GATK hard filtering were lower than those for both tomato and soybean, an unlikely outcome considering the biology of these species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807622115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29934402</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Biodiversity ; Biological Sciences ; Corn ; Filtration ; Inbreeding ; LETTER ; Letters ; Ploidy ; Potatoes ; Soybeans ; Species diversity ; Tomatoes</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2018-07, Vol.115 (28), p.E6394-E6395</ispartof><rights>Volumes 1–89 and 106–115, copyright as a collective work only; author(s) retains copyright to individual articles</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Jul 10, 2018</rights><rights>2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2885-dad6d853f82765d27542463e95b060bcd5d43565f3760596d1e5cca5a6068ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2885-dad6d853f82765d27542463e95b060bcd5d43565f3760596d1e5cca5a6068ee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8682-5526 ; 0000-0002-6727-4677</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26510919$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26510919$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27903,27904,53770,53772,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29934402$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hardigan, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laimbeer, F. Parker E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaillancourt, Brieanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douches, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farré, Eva M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veilleux, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buell, C. Robin</creatorcontrib><title>REPLY TO HUANG ET AL: Avoiding “one-size-fits-all” approaches to variant discovery</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Huang et al argue that variant calling methods less conservative than GATK's Best Practices workflow increased false-positive variant discovery in our study of wild and cultivated potatoes, impacting diversity estimates. We disagree with their conclusion and highlight the rationale for the variant calling methods used in our study. Estimates of nucleotide diversity in crop species depend not only on variant calling methods but also genetic bottlenecks, ploidy, and reproductive mode. Thus, it is not surprising that outcrossing maize, watermelon, and potato report higher nucleotide diversity than inbreeding species with strong genetic bottlenecks such as tomato and soybean. However, variant counts generated for potato using GATK hard filtering were lower than those for both tomato and soybean, an unlikely outcome considering the biology of these species.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>LETTER</subject><subject>Letters</subject><subject>Ploidy</subject><subject>Potatoes</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkU1PAjEQhhujEURvJp40JF68LEzbnW57MSEEwWQjxuDBU1N2iy6BXWxZE_-9JSB-nHqYZ97pPEPIBYUOhYR3V6XxHSohEYxRigekSUHRSMQKDkkTgCWRjFncICfezwFAoYRj0mBK8TgG1iTnT4PH9KU9GbdHz72HYXswaffSU3I0Mwtvz3Zvi0zuBpP-KErHw_t-L40yJiVGuclFLpHPJEsE5izBMEpwq3AKAqZZjnnMUeCMJwJQiZxazDKDRoCQ1vIWud3Grurp0uaZLdfOLPTKFUvjPnVlCv23UhZv-rX60AJiiYAh4GYX4Kr32vq1XhY-s4uFKW1Ve80AA5cwrgJ6_Q-dV7Urw3aaUQApaTASqO6WylzlvbOz_Wco6I1wvRGuf4SHjqvfO-z5b8MBuNwCc7-u3E9d4OZSin8BdEqBAw</recordid><startdate>20180710</startdate><enddate>20180710</enddate><creator>Hardigan, Michael A.</creator><creator>Laimbeer, F. Parker E.</creator><creator>Hamilton, John P.</creator><creator>Vaillancourt, Brieanne</creator><creator>Douches, David S.</creator><creator>Farré, Eva M.</creator><creator>Veilleux, Richard E.</creator><creator>Buell, C. Robin</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8682-5526</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6727-4677</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180710</creationdate><title>REPLY TO HUANG ET AL</title><author>Hardigan, Michael A. ; Laimbeer, F. Parker E. ; Hamilton, John P. ; Vaillancourt, Brieanne ; Douches, David S. ; Farré, Eva M. ; Veilleux, Richard E. ; Buell, C. Robin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2885-dad6d853f82765d27542463e95b060bcd5d43565f3760596d1e5cca5a6068ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>LETTER</topic><topic>Letters</topic><topic>Ploidy</topic><topic>Potatoes</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardigan, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laimbeer, F. Parker E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaillancourt, Brieanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douches, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farré, Eva M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veilleux, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buell, C. Robin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardigan, Michael A.</au><au>Laimbeer, F. Parker E.</au><au>Hamilton, John P.</au><au>Vaillancourt, Brieanne</au><au>Douches, David S.</au><au>Farré, Eva M.</au><au>Veilleux, Richard E.</au><au>Buell, C. Robin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>REPLY TO HUANG ET AL: Avoiding “one-size-fits-all” approaches to variant discovery</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2018-07-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>28</issue><spage>E6394</spage><epage>E6395</epage><pages>E6394-E6395</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Huang et al argue that variant calling methods less conservative than GATK's Best Practices workflow increased false-positive variant discovery in our study of wild and cultivated potatoes, impacting diversity estimates. We disagree with their conclusion and highlight the rationale for the variant calling methods used in our study. Estimates of nucleotide diversity in crop species depend not only on variant calling methods but also genetic bottlenecks, ploidy, and reproductive mode. Thus, it is not surprising that outcrossing maize, watermelon, and potato report higher nucleotide diversity than inbreeding species with strong genetic bottlenecks such as tomato and soybean. However, variant counts generated for potato using GATK hard filtering were lower than those for both tomato and soybean, an unlikely outcome considering the biology of these species.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>29934402</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.1807622115</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8682-5526</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6727-4677</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2018-07, Vol.115 (28), p.E6394-E6395
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6048505
source Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Best practice
Biodiversity
Biological Sciences
Corn
Filtration
Inbreeding
LETTER
Letters
Ploidy
Potatoes
Soybeans
Species diversity
Tomatoes
title REPLY TO HUANG ET AL: Avoiding “one-size-fits-all” approaches to variant discovery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A32%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=REPLY%20TO%20HUANG%20ET%20AL:%20Avoiding%20%E2%80%9Cone-size-fits-all%E2%80%9D%20approaches%20to%20variant%20discovery&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Hardigan,%20Michael%20A.&rft.date=2018-07-10&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=28&rft.spage=E6394&rft.epage=E6395&rft.pages=E6394-E6395&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.1807622115&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26510919%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2100881934&rft_id=info:pmid/29934402&rft_jstor_id=26510919&rfr_iscdi=true