Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )
A full understanding of how cities shape adaptation requires characterizing genetically-based phenotypic and fitness differences between urban and rural populations under field conditions. We used a reciprocal transplant experiment with the native plant common ragweed, ( ), and found that urban and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2018-06, Vol.285 (1881), p.20180968-20180968 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20180968 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1881 |
container_start_page | 20180968 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 285 |
creator | Gorton, Amanda J Moeller, David A Tiffin, Peter |
description | A full understanding of how cities shape adaptation requires characterizing genetically-based phenotypic and fitness differences between urban and rural populations under field conditions. We used a reciprocal transplant experiment with the native plant common ragweed, (
), and found that urban and rural populations have diverged in flowering time, a trait that strongly affects fitness. Although urban populations flowered earlier than rural populations, plants growing in urban field sites flowered later than plants in rural field sites. This counter-gradient variation is consistent adaptive divergence between urban and rural populations. Also consistent with local adaptation, both urban and rural genotypes experienced stronger net selection in the foreign than in the local habitat, but this pattern was not significant for male fitness. Despite the evidence for local adaptation, rural populations had higher lifetime fitness at all sites, suggesting that selection has been stronger or more uniform in rural than urban populations. We also found that inter-population differences in both flowering time and fitness tended to be greater among urban than rural populations, which is consistent with greater drift or spatial variation in selection within urban environments. In summary, our results are consistent with adaptive divergence of urban and rural populations, but also suggest there may be greater environmental heterogeneity in urban environments which also affects evolution in urban landscapes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspb.2018.0968 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6030533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2078581785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fff3d085ec3ddb790dfd93d9a5e035492681164dcbce2be24f5b047d7821ed4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUUtrFTEYDaLY2-rWpQTcVHCued5JuhBKqQ-44EbXIc9rykwyJplK_725tBZ1k5DvOzmcBwCvMNpiJMX7UhezJQiLLZI78QRsMBvxQCRnT8Gmj8ggGCcn4LTWG4SQ5II_BycUIY4Fpxuw7GNrk4fLpFN7B008QBvb3QXUsPnaYA5QO7003WJOsGW4FqMT9Ok2lpxmn1qFMUGb57nviz788t7Bc3g5m5Jr1FCX5udYYwx56s-3L8CzoKfqXz7cZ-D7x-tvV5-H_ddPX64u94PlRLQhhEAdEtxb6pwZJXLBSeqk5h5RziTZCYx3zFljPTGesMANYqMbBcHeMUPPwId73mU1s3e2Ky16UkuJsy53Kuuo_t2k-EMd8q3aIYo4pZ3g_IGg5J9rz0J1G9ZPPSif16oIGgUXuB8d-uY_6E1eS-r2OopLJrtk0lHbe5TtydTiw6MYjNSxTHUsUx3LVMcy-4fXf1t4hP9pj_4GoXec_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2059490352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gorton, Amanda J ; Moeller, David A ; Tiffin, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Gorton, Amanda J ; Moeller, David A ; Tiffin, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>A full understanding of how cities shape adaptation requires characterizing genetically-based phenotypic and fitness differences between urban and rural populations under field conditions. We used a reciprocal transplant experiment with the native plant common ragweed, (
), and found that urban and rural populations have diverged in flowering time, a trait that strongly affects fitness. Although urban populations flowered earlier than rural populations, plants growing in urban field sites flowered later than plants in rural field sites. This counter-gradient variation is consistent adaptive divergence between urban and rural populations. Also consistent with local adaptation, both urban and rural genotypes experienced stronger net selection in the foreign than in the local habitat, but this pattern was not significant for male fitness. Despite the evidence for local adaptation, rural populations had higher lifetime fitness at all sites, suggesting that selection has been stronger or more uniform in rural than urban populations. We also found that inter-population differences in both flowering time and fitness tended to be greater among urban than rural populations, which is consistent with greater drift or spatial variation in selection within urban environments. In summary, our results are consistent with adaptive divergence of urban and rural populations, but also suggest there may be greater environmental heterogeneity in urban environments which also affects evolution in urban landscapes.</description><edition>Royal Society (Great Britain)</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0968</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30051853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society Publishing</publisher><subject>Acclimatization ; Adaptation ; Adaptation, Biological ; Ambrosia - growth & development ; Ambrosia artemisiifolia ; Cities ; Divergence ; Ecosystem ; Fitness ; Flowering ; Flowers - growth & development ; Genotypes ; Heterogeneity ; Indigenous plants ; Landscape ; Life History Traits ; Minnesota ; Phenotypes ; Plants (botany) ; Populations ; Reproductive fitness ; Rural areas ; Rural populations ; The Evolution of City Life ; Urban areas ; Urban environments ; Urban populations</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2018-06, Vol.285 (1881), p.20180968-20180968</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright The Royal Society Publishing Jun 27, 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fff3d085ec3ddb790dfd93d9a5e035492681164dcbce2be24f5b047d7821ed4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fff3d085ec3ddb790dfd93d9a5e035492681164dcbce2be24f5b047d7821ed4b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4101-2257</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030533/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030533/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gorton, Amanda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeller, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiffin, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>A full understanding of how cities shape adaptation requires characterizing genetically-based phenotypic and fitness differences between urban and rural populations under field conditions. We used a reciprocal transplant experiment with the native plant common ragweed, (
), and found that urban and rural populations have diverged in flowering time, a trait that strongly affects fitness. Although urban populations flowered earlier than rural populations, plants growing in urban field sites flowered later than plants in rural field sites. This counter-gradient variation is consistent adaptive divergence between urban and rural populations. Also consistent with local adaptation, both urban and rural genotypes experienced stronger net selection in the foreign than in the local habitat, but this pattern was not significant for male fitness. Despite the evidence for local adaptation, rural populations had higher lifetime fitness at all sites, suggesting that selection has been stronger or more uniform in rural than urban populations. We also found that inter-population differences in both flowering time and fitness tended to be greater among urban than rural populations, which is consistent with greater drift or spatial variation in selection within urban environments. In summary, our results are consistent with adaptive divergence of urban and rural populations, but also suggest there may be greater environmental heterogeneity in urban environments which also affects evolution in urban landscapes.</description><subject>Acclimatization</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adaptation, Biological</subject><subject>Ambrosia - growth & development</subject><subject>Ambrosia artemisiifolia</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Flowers - growth & development</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Life History Traits</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>The Evolution of City Life</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Urban populations</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUUtrFTEYDaLY2-rWpQTcVHCued5JuhBKqQ-44EbXIc9rykwyJplK_725tBZ1k5DvOzmcBwCvMNpiJMX7UhezJQiLLZI78QRsMBvxQCRnT8Gmj8ggGCcn4LTWG4SQ5II_BycUIY4Fpxuw7GNrk4fLpFN7B008QBvb3QXUsPnaYA5QO7003WJOsGW4FqMT9Ok2lpxmn1qFMUGb57nviz788t7Bc3g5m5Jr1FCX5udYYwx56s-3L8CzoKfqXz7cZ-D7x-tvV5-H_ddPX64u94PlRLQhhEAdEtxb6pwZJXLBSeqk5h5RziTZCYx3zFljPTGesMANYqMbBcHeMUPPwId73mU1s3e2Ky16UkuJsy53Kuuo_t2k-EMd8q3aIYo4pZ3g_IGg5J9rz0J1G9ZPPSif16oIGgUXuB8d-uY_6E1eS-r2OopLJrtk0lHbe5TtydTiw6MYjNSxTHUsUx3LVMcy-4fXf1t4hP9pj_4GoXec_Q</recordid><startdate>20180627</startdate><enddate>20180627</enddate><creator>Gorton, Amanda J</creator><creator>Moeller, David A</creator><creator>Tiffin, Peter</creator><general>The Royal Society Publishing</general><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-2257</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180627</creationdate><title>Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )</title><author>Gorton, Amanda J ; Moeller, David A ; Tiffin, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fff3d085ec3ddb790dfd93d9a5e035492681164dcbce2be24f5b047d7821ed4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acclimatization</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adaptation, Biological</topic><topic>Ambrosia - growth & development</topic><topic>Ambrosia artemisiifolia</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Flowers - growth & development</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Life History Traits</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>The Evolution of City Life</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Urban populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gorton, Amanda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeller, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiffin, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gorton, Amanda J</au><au>Moeller, David A</au><au>Tiffin, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2018-06-27</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>285</volume><issue>1881</issue><spage>20180968</spage><epage>20180968</epage><pages>20180968-20180968</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>A full understanding of how cities shape adaptation requires characterizing genetically-based phenotypic and fitness differences between urban and rural populations under field conditions. We used a reciprocal transplant experiment with the native plant common ragweed, (
), and found that urban and rural populations have diverged in flowering time, a trait that strongly affects fitness. Although urban populations flowered earlier than rural populations, plants growing in urban field sites flowered later than plants in rural field sites. This counter-gradient variation is consistent adaptive divergence between urban and rural populations. Also consistent with local adaptation, both urban and rural genotypes experienced stronger net selection in the foreign than in the local habitat, but this pattern was not significant for male fitness. Despite the evidence for local adaptation, rural populations had higher lifetime fitness at all sites, suggesting that selection has been stronger or more uniform in rural than urban populations. We also found that inter-population differences in both flowering time and fitness tended to be greater among urban than rural populations, which is consistent with greater drift or spatial variation in selection within urban environments. In summary, our results are consistent with adaptive divergence of urban and rural populations, but also suggest there may be greater environmental heterogeneity in urban environments which also affects evolution in urban landscapes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society Publishing</pub><pmid>30051853</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2018.0968</doi><tpages>1</tpages><edition>Royal Society (Great Britain)</edition><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-2257</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2018-06, Vol.285 (1881), p.20180968-20180968 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6030533 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PubMed Central |
subjects | Acclimatization Adaptation Adaptation, Biological Ambrosia - growth & development Ambrosia artemisiifolia Cities Divergence Ecosystem Fitness Flowering Flowers - growth & development Genotypes Heterogeneity Indigenous plants Landscape Life History Traits Minnesota Phenotypes Plants (botany) Populations Reproductive fitness Rural areas Rural populations The Evolution of City Life Urban areas Urban environments Urban populations |
title | Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia ) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A18%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Little%20plant,%20big%20city:%20a%20test%20of%20adaptation%20to%20urban%20environments%20in%20common%20ragweed%20(%20Ambrosia%20artemisiifolia%20)&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Gorton,%20Amanda%20J&rft.date=2018-06-27&rft.volume=285&rft.issue=1881&rft.spage=20180968&rft.epage=20180968&rft.pages=20180968-20180968&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2018.0968&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2078581785%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2059490352&rft_id=info:pmid/30051853&rfr_iscdi=true |