Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )

A full understanding of how cities shape adaptation requires characterizing genetically-based phenotypic and fitness differences between urban and rural populations under field conditions. We used a reciprocal transplant experiment with the native plant common ragweed, ( ), and found that urban and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2018-06, Vol.285 (1881), p.20180968-20180968
Hauptverfasser: Gorton, Amanda J, Moeller, David A, Tiffin, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20180968
container_issue 1881
container_start_page 20180968
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
container_volume 285
creator Gorton, Amanda J
Moeller, David A
Tiffin, Peter
description A full understanding of how cities shape adaptation requires characterizing genetically-based phenotypic and fitness differences between urban and rural populations under field conditions. We used a reciprocal transplant experiment with the native plant common ragweed, ( ), and found that urban and rural populations have diverged in flowering time, a trait that strongly affects fitness. Although urban populations flowered earlier than rural populations, plants growing in urban field sites flowered later than plants in rural field sites. This counter-gradient variation is consistent adaptive divergence between urban and rural populations. Also consistent with local adaptation, both urban and rural genotypes experienced stronger net selection in the foreign than in the local habitat, but this pattern was not significant for male fitness. Despite the evidence for local adaptation, rural populations had higher lifetime fitness at all sites, suggesting that selection has been stronger or more uniform in rural than urban populations. We also found that inter-population differences in both flowering time and fitness tended to be greater among urban than rural populations, which is consistent with greater drift or spatial variation in selection within urban environments. In summary, our results are consistent with adaptive divergence of urban and rural populations, but also suggest there may be greater environmental heterogeneity in urban environments which also affects evolution in urban landscapes.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rspb.2018.0968
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6030533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2078581785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fff3d085ec3ddb790dfd93d9a5e035492681164dcbce2be24f5b047d7821ed4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUUtrFTEYDaLY2-rWpQTcVHCued5JuhBKqQ-44EbXIc9rykwyJplK_725tBZ1k5DvOzmcBwCvMNpiJMX7UhezJQiLLZI78QRsMBvxQCRnT8Gmj8ggGCcn4LTWG4SQ5II_BycUIY4Fpxuw7GNrk4fLpFN7B008QBvb3QXUsPnaYA5QO7003WJOsGW4FqMT9Ok2lpxmn1qFMUGb57nviz788t7Bc3g5m5Jr1FCX5udYYwx56s-3L8CzoKfqXz7cZ-D7x-tvV5-H_ddPX64u94PlRLQhhEAdEtxb6pwZJXLBSeqk5h5RziTZCYx3zFljPTGesMANYqMbBcHeMUPPwId73mU1s3e2Ky16UkuJsy53Kuuo_t2k-EMd8q3aIYo4pZ3g_IGg5J9rz0J1G9ZPPSif16oIGgUXuB8d-uY_6E1eS-r2OopLJrtk0lHbe5TtydTiw6MYjNSxTHUsUx3LVMcy-4fXf1t4hP9pj_4GoXec_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2059490352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gorton, Amanda J ; Moeller, David A ; Tiffin, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Gorton, Amanda J ; Moeller, David A ; Tiffin, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>A full understanding of how cities shape adaptation requires characterizing genetically-based phenotypic and fitness differences between urban and rural populations under field conditions. We used a reciprocal transplant experiment with the native plant common ragweed, ( ), and found that urban and rural populations have diverged in flowering time, a trait that strongly affects fitness. Although urban populations flowered earlier than rural populations, plants growing in urban field sites flowered later than plants in rural field sites. This counter-gradient variation is consistent adaptive divergence between urban and rural populations. Also consistent with local adaptation, both urban and rural genotypes experienced stronger net selection in the foreign than in the local habitat, but this pattern was not significant for male fitness. Despite the evidence for local adaptation, rural populations had higher lifetime fitness at all sites, suggesting that selection has been stronger or more uniform in rural than urban populations. We also found that inter-population differences in both flowering time and fitness tended to be greater among urban than rural populations, which is consistent with greater drift or spatial variation in selection within urban environments. In summary, our results are consistent with adaptive divergence of urban and rural populations, but also suggest there may be greater environmental heterogeneity in urban environments which also affects evolution in urban landscapes.</description><edition>Royal Society (Great Britain)</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0968</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30051853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society Publishing</publisher><subject>Acclimatization ; Adaptation ; Adaptation, Biological ; Ambrosia - growth &amp; development ; Ambrosia artemisiifolia ; Cities ; Divergence ; Ecosystem ; Fitness ; Flowering ; Flowers - growth &amp; development ; Genotypes ; Heterogeneity ; Indigenous plants ; Landscape ; Life History Traits ; Minnesota ; Phenotypes ; Plants (botany) ; Populations ; Reproductive fitness ; Rural areas ; Rural populations ; The Evolution of City Life ; Urban areas ; Urban environments ; Urban populations</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2018-06, Vol.285 (1881), p.20180968-20180968</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright The Royal Society Publishing Jun 27, 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fff3d085ec3ddb790dfd93d9a5e035492681164dcbce2be24f5b047d7821ed4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fff3d085ec3ddb790dfd93d9a5e035492681164dcbce2be24f5b047d7821ed4b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4101-2257</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030533/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6030533/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gorton, Amanda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeller, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiffin, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><description>A full understanding of how cities shape adaptation requires characterizing genetically-based phenotypic and fitness differences between urban and rural populations under field conditions. We used a reciprocal transplant experiment with the native plant common ragweed, ( ), and found that urban and rural populations have diverged in flowering time, a trait that strongly affects fitness. Although urban populations flowered earlier than rural populations, plants growing in urban field sites flowered later than plants in rural field sites. This counter-gradient variation is consistent adaptive divergence between urban and rural populations. Also consistent with local adaptation, both urban and rural genotypes experienced stronger net selection in the foreign than in the local habitat, but this pattern was not significant for male fitness. Despite the evidence for local adaptation, rural populations had higher lifetime fitness at all sites, suggesting that selection has been stronger or more uniform in rural than urban populations. We also found that inter-population differences in both flowering time and fitness tended to be greater among urban than rural populations, which is consistent with greater drift or spatial variation in selection within urban environments. In summary, our results are consistent with adaptive divergence of urban and rural populations, but also suggest there may be greater environmental heterogeneity in urban environments which also affects evolution in urban landscapes.</description><subject>Acclimatization</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adaptation, Biological</subject><subject>Ambrosia - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Ambrosia artemisiifolia</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Flowers - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Life History Traits</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural populations</subject><subject>The Evolution of City Life</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Urban populations</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUUtrFTEYDaLY2-rWpQTcVHCued5JuhBKqQ-44EbXIc9rykwyJplK_725tBZ1k5DvOzmcBwCvMNpiJMX7UhezJQiLLZI78QRsMBvxQCRnT8Gmj8ggGCcn4LTWG4SQ5II_BycUIY4Fpxuw7GNrk4fLpFN7B008QBvb3QXUsPnaYA5QO7003WJOsGW4FqMT9Ok2lpxmn1qFMUGb57nviz788t7Bc3g5m5Jr1FCX5udYYwx56s-3L8CzoKfqXz7cZ-D7x-tvV5-H_ddPX64u94PlRLQhhEAdEtxb6pwZJXLBSeqk5h5RziTZCYx3zFljPTGesMANYqMbBcHeMUPPwId73mU1s3e2Ky16UkuJsy53Kuuo_t2k-EMd8q3aIYo4pZ3g_IGg5J9rz0J1G9ZPPSif16oIGgUXuB8d-uY_6E1eS-r2OopLJrtk0lHbe5TtydTiw6MYjNSxTHUsUx3LVMcy-4fXf1t4hP9pj_4GoXec_Q</recordid><startdate>20180627</startdate><enddate>20180627</enddate><creator>Gorton, Amanda J</creator><creator>Moeller, David A</creator><creator>Tiffin, Peter</creator><general>The Royal Society Publishing</general><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-2257</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180627</creationdate><title>Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )</title><author>Gorton, Amanda J ; Moeller, David A ; Tiffin, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-fff3d085ec3ddb790dfd93d9a5e035492681164dcbce2be24f5b047d7821ed4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acclimatization</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adaptation, Biological</topic><topic>Ambrosia - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Ambrosia artemisiifolia</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Flowers - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Life History Traits</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural populations</topic><topic>The Evolution of City Life</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Urban populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gorton, Amanda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeller, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiffin, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gorton, Amanda J</au><au>Moeller, David A</au><au>Tiffin, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2018-06-27</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>285</volume><issue>1881</issue><spage>20180968</spage><epage>20180968</epage><pages>20180968-20180968</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><abstract>A full understanding of how cities shape adaptation requires characterizing genetically-based phenotypic and fitness differences between urban and rural populations under field conditions. We used a reciprocal transplant experiment with the native plant common ragweed, ( ), and found that urban and rural populations have diverged in flowering time, a trait that strongly affects fitness. Although urban populations flowered earlier than rural populations, plants growing in urban field sites flowered later than plants in rural field sites. This counter-gradient variation is consistent adaptive divergence between urban and rural populations. Also consistent with local adaptation, both urban and rural genotypes experienced stronger net selection in the foreign than in the local habitat, but this pattern was not significant for male fitness. Despite the evidence for local adaptation, rural populations had higher lifetime fitness at all sites, suggesting that selection has been stronger or more uniform in rural than urban populations. We also found that inter-population differences in both flowering time and fitness tended to be greater among urban than rural populations, which is consistent with greater drift or spatial variation in selection within urban environments. In summary, our results are consistent with adaptive divergence of urban and rural populations, but also suggest there may be greater environmental heterogeneity in urban environments which also affects evolution in urban landscapes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society Publishing</pub><pmid>30051853</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2018.0968</doi><tpages>1</tpages><edition>Royal Society (Great Britain)</edition><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-2257</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8452
ispartof Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2018-06, Vol.285 (1881), p.20180968-20180968
issn 0962-8452
1471-2954
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6030533
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Acclimatization
Adaptation
Adaptation, Biological
Ambrosia - growth & development
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Cities
Divergence
Ecosystem
Fitness
Flowering
Flowers - growth & development
Genotypes
Heterogeneity
Indigenous plants
Landscape
Life History Traits
Minnesota
Phenotypes
Plants (botany)
Populations
Reproductive fitness
Rural areas
Rural populations
The Evolution of City Life
Urban areas
Urban environments
Urban populations
title Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed ( Ambrosia artemisiifolia )
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A18%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Little%20plant,%20big%20city:%20a%20test%20of%20adaptation%20to%20urban%20environments%20in%20common%20ragweed%20(%20Ambrosia%20artemisiifolia%20)&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Gorton,%20Amanda%20J&rft.date=2018-06-27&rft.volume=285&rft.issue=1881&rft.spage=20180968&rft.epage=20180968&rft.pages=20180968-20180968&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2018.0968&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2078581785%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2059490352&rft_id=info:pmid/30051853&rfr_iscdi=true