Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector

The biomedical industry relies on the skills of animal technologists (ATs) to put laboratory animal welfare into practice. This is the first study to explore how this is achieved in relation to their participation in implementing refinement and reduction, two of the three key guiding ethical princip...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science, technology, & human values technology, & human values, 2018-07, Vol.43 (4), p.694-722
Hauptverfasser: Greenhough, Beth, Roe, Emma
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 722
container_issue 4
container_start_page 694
container_title Science, technology, & human values
container_volume 43
creator Greenhough, Beth
Roe, Emma
description The biomedical industry relies on the skills of animal technologists (ATs) to put laboratory animal welfare into practice. This is the first study to explore how this is achieved in relation to their participation in implementing refinement and reduction, two of the three key guiding ethical principles—the “3Rs”—of what is deemed to be humane animal experimentation. The interpretative approach contributes to emerging work within the social sciences and humanities exploring care and ethics in practice. Based on qualitative analysis of participant observation within animal research facilities in UK universities, in-depth interviews with ATs, facility managers, and other stakeholders, and analysis of regulatory guidelines, we draw a contrast between the minimum required of ATs by law and how their care work not only meets but often exceeds these requirements. We outline how ATs constitute a key source of innovation and insight into the refinement of animal care and the reduction of animal use, hitherto not formally acknowledged. Exploring AT care work as an example of ethics in practice makes an original contribution to broader debates within health care and animal welfare about how technology, regulation, and behavior can foster and sustain a “culture of care”.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0162243917718066
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6027776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26580460</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0162243917718066</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26580460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-2e2fc95d7e70baa9eba435d2c97aaa2f49bf413a41bcd18cfc29d7229f68a9493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaLYWt27UWbpZjSvSSYbQUvVQkEodR0ymUw7JTOpyVT0703pA3Xh3dwL53EPB4BLBG8R4vwOIoYxJSLeKIeMHYE-yjKc5jhDx6C_gdMN3gNnISxhnByTU9Ajm4sK2gePo8-Vdb5u50m3MMnUWZO4Knlo60bZZGb0onXWzevQhaRuk3GzsqYxbbcXkGk4ByeVssFc7PYAvD2NZsOXdPL6PB4-TFJNGO9SbHClRVZyw2GhlDCFoiQrsRZcKYUrKoqKIqIoKnSJcl1pLEqOsahYrgQVZADut76rddGYUscUXlm58jGq_5JO1fI30tYLOXcfkkHMOWfR4GZn4N372oRONnXQxlrVGrcOEkMOueACZpEKt1TtXQjeVIc3CMpN9fJv9VFy_TPeQbDvOhLSLSGouZFLt_ZtrOs_w6stfxk65w9-mGU5pAySb-vwld8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2070797905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Greenhough, Beth ; Roe, Emma</creator><creatorcontrib>Greenhough, Beth ; Roe, Emma</creatorcontrib><description>The biomedical industry relies on the skills of animal technologists (ATs) to put laboratory animal welfare into practice. This is the first study to explore how this is achieved in relation to their participation in implementing refinement and reduction, two of the three key guiding ethical principles—the “3Rs”—of what is deemed to be humane animal experimentation. The interpretative approach contributes to emerging work within the social sciences and humanities exploring care and ethics in practice. Based on qualitative analysis of participant observation within animal research facilities in UK universities, in-depth interviews with ATs, facility managers, and other stakeholders, and analysis of regulatory guidelines, we draw a contrast between the minimum required of ATs by law and how their care work not only meets but often exceeds these requirements. We outline how ATs constitute a key source of innovation and insight into the refinement of animal care and the reduction of animal use, hitherto not formally acknowledged. Exploring AT care work as an example of ethics in practice makes an original contribution to broader debates within health care and animal welfare about how technology, regulation, and behavior can foster and sustain a “culture of care”.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-2439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8251</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0162243917718066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30008494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE</publisher><ispartof>Science, technology, &amp; human values, 2018-07, Vol.43 (4), p.694-722</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017 2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-2e2fc95d7e70baa9eba435d2c97aaa2f49bf413a41bcd18cfc29d7229f68a9493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26580460$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26580460$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30008494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greenhough, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roe, Emma</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector</title><title>Science, technology, &amp; human values</title><addtitle>Sci Technol Human Values</addtitle><description>The biomedical industry relies on the skills of animal technologists (ATs) to put laboratory animal welfare into practice. This is the first study to explore how this is achieved in relation to their participation in implementing refinement and reduction, two of the three key guiding ethical principles—the “3Rs”—of what is deemed to be humane animal experimentation. The interpretative approach contributes to emerging work within the social sciences and humanities exploring care and ethics in practice. Based on qualitative analysis of participant observation within animal research facilities in UK universities, in-depth interviews with ATs, facility managers, and other stakeholders, and analysis of regulatory guidelines, we draw a contrast between the minimum required of ATs by law and how their care work not only meets but often exceeds these requirements. We outline how ATs constitute a key source of innovation and insight into the refinement of animal care and the reduction of animal use, hitherto not formally acknowledged. Exploring AT care work as an example of ethics in practice makes an original contribution to broader debates within health care and animal welfare about how technology, regulation, and behavior can foster and sustain a “culture of care”.</description><issn>0162-2439</issn><issn>1552-8251</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaLYWt27UWbpZjSvSSYbQUvVQkEodR0ymUw7JTOpyVT0703pA3Xh3dwL53EPB4BLBG8R4vwOIoYxJSLeKIeMHYE-yjKc5jhDx6C_gdMN3gNnISxhnByTU9Ajm4sK2gePo8-Vdb5u50m3MMnUWZO4Knlo60bZZGb0onXWzevQhaRuk3GzsqYxbbcXkGk4ByeVssFc7PYAvD2NZsOXdPL6PB4-TFJNGO9SbHClRVZyw2GhlDCFoiQrsRZcKYUrKoqKIqIoKnSJcl1pLEqOsahYrgQVZADut76rddGYUscUXlm58jGq_5JO1fI30tYLOXcfkkHMOWfR4GZn4N372oRONnXQxlrVGrcOEkMOueACZpEKt1TtXQjeVIc3CMpN9fJv9VFy_TPeQbDvOhLSLSGouZFLt_ZtrOs_w6stfxk65w9-mGU5pAySb-vwld8</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Greenhough, Beth</creator><creator>Roe, Emma</creator><general>SAGE</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs</title><author>Greenhough, Beth ; Roe, Emma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-2e2fc95d7e70baa9eba435d2c97aaa2f49bf413a41bcd18cfc29d7229f68a9493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greenhough, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roe, Emma</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Science, technology, &amp; human values</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greenhough, Beth</au><au>Roe, Emma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector</atitle><jtitle>Science, technology, &amp; human values</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Technol Human Values</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>694</spage><epage>722</epage><pages>694-722</pages><issn>0162-2439</issn><eissn>1552-8251</eissn><abstract>The biomedical industry relies on the skills of animal technologists (ATs) to put laboratory animal welfare into practice. This is the first study to explore how this is achieved in relation to their participation in implementing refinement and reduction, two of the three key guiding ethical principles—the “3Rs”—of what is deemed to be humane animal experimentation. The interpretative approach contributes to emerging work within the social sciences and humanities exploring care and ethics in practice. Based on qualitative analysis of participant observation within animal research facilities in UK universities, in-depth interviews with ATs, facility managers, and other stakeholders, and analysis of regulatory guidelines, we draw a contrast between the minimum required of ATs by law and how their care work not only meets but often exceeds these requirements. We outline how ATs constitute a key source of innovation and insight into the refinement of animal care and the reduction of animal use, hitherto not formally acknowledged. Exploring AT care work as an example of ethics in practice makes an original contribution to broader debates within health care and animal welfare about how technology, regulation, and behavior can foster and sustain a “culture of care”.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE</pub><pmid>30008494</pmid><doi>10.1177/0162243917718066</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0162-2439
ispartof Science, technology, & human values, 2018-07, Vol.43 (4), p.694-722
issn 0162-2439
1552-8251
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6027776
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs: An Ethnographic Investigation of the UK University Sector
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A02%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20Role%20of%20Animal%20Technologists%20in%20Implementing%20the%203Rs:%20An%20Ethnographic%20Investigation%20of%20the%20UK%20University%20Sector&rft.jtitle=Science,%20technology,%20&%20human%20values&rft.au=Greenhough,%20Beth&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=694&rft.epage=722&rft.pages=694-722&rft.issn=0162-2439&rft.eissn=1552-8251&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0162243917718066&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26580460%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2070797905&rft_id=info:pmid/30008494&rft_jstor_id=26580460&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0162243917718066&rfr_iscdi=true