A Systematic Review of Attention Biases in Opioid, Cannabis, Stimulant Use Disorders
: Opiates, cannabis, and amphetamines are highly abused, and use of these substances are prevalent disorders. Psychological interventions are crucial given that they help individuals maintain abstinence following a lapse or relapse into substance use. Advances in experimental psychology have suggest...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2018-06, Vol.15 (6), p.1138 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1138 |
| container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Zhang, Melvyn Ying, Jiangbo Wing, Tracey Song, Guo Fung, Daniel S S Smith, Helen |
| description | : Opiates, cannabis, and amphetamines are highly abused, and use of these substances are prevalent disorders. Psychological interventions are crucial given that they help individuals maintain abstinence following a lapse or relapse into substance use. Advances in experimental psychology have suggested that automatic attention biases might be responsible for relapse. Prior reviews have provided evidence for the presence of these biases in addictive disorders and the effectiveness of bias modification. However, the prior studies are limited, as they failed to include trials involving participants with these prevalent addictive disorders or have failed to adopt a systematic approach in evidence synthesis.
: The primary aim of this current systematic review is to synthesise the current evidence for attention biases amongst opioid use, cannabis use, and stimulant use disorders. The secondary aim is to determine the efficacy of attention bias modification interventions and other addictions related outcomes.
: A search was conducted from November 2017 to January 2018 on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Science Direct, Cochrane Central, and Scopus. The selection process of the articles was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A qualitative synthesis was undertaken. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
: Six randomised trials were identified. The evidence synthesized from these trials have provided strong evidence that attentional biases are present in opioid and stimulant use disorders. Evidence synthesis for other secondary outcome measures could not be performed given the heterogeneity in the measures reported and the limited number of trials. The risk of bias assessment for the included trials revealed a high risk of selection and attrition bias.
: This review demonstrates the potential need for interventions targeting attention biases in opiate and cocaine use disorders. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph15061138 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6025086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2108404976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-61923cb85548971f9554bc9da78c9d15f15f3842ce03671a1426c800fb257ff23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEYhIMoWqtXjxLw4qGtSXaTzV6EWj-hULDtOWTTrKZ0NzXJVvrvTWmVVgjJC--TYYYB4AqjXpLk6M7MtVt-YooYxgk_Ai3MGOqmDOHjvfkMnHs_RyjhKctPwRnJOc0oZy0w6cPx2gddyWAUfNcro7-hLWE_BF0HY2v4YKTXHpoajpbGmlkHDmRdy8L4DhwHUzULWQc49Ro-Gm_dTDt_AU5KufD6cve2wfT5aTJ47Q5HL2-D_rCrUsxDl-GcJKrglKY8z3CZx6FQ-UxmPN6YlvFEx0RplLAMS5wSpjhCZUFoVpYkaYP7re6yKSo9U9GxkwuxdKaSbi2sNOJwU5tP8WFXgiFCEWdR4HYn4OxXo30QlfFKL2IkbRsvCEpzygjGG_TmHzq3jatjPEEw4mkksw3V21LKWe-dLv_MYCQ2hYnDwuKH6_0If_hvQ8kPfFORVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108404976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Systematic Review of Attention Biases in Opioid, Cannabis, Stimulant Use Disorders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Zhang, Melvyn ; Ying, Jiangbo ; Wing, Tracey ; Song, Guo ; Fung, Daniel S S ; Smith, Helen</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Melvyn ; Ying, Jiangbo ; Wing, Tracey ; Song, Guo ; Fung, Daniel S S ; Smith, Helen</creatorcontrib><description>: Opiates, cannabis, and amphetamines are highly abused, and use of these substances are prevalent disorders. Psychological interventions are crucial given that they help individuals maintain abstinence following a lapse or relapse into substance use. Advances in experimental psychology have suggested that automatic attention biases might be responsible for relapse. Prior reviews have provided evidence for the presence of these biases in addictive disorders and the effectiveness of bias modification. However, the prior studies are limited, as they failed to include trials involving participants with these prevalent addictive disorders or have failed to adopt a systematic approach in evidence synthesis.
: The primary aim of this current systematic review is to synthesise the current evidence for attention biases amongst opioid use, cannabis use, and stimulant use disorders. The secondary aim is to determine the efficacy of attention bias modification interventions and other addictions related outcomes.
: A search was conducted from November 2017 to January 2018 on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Science Direct, Cochrane Central, and Scopus. The selection process of the articles was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A qualitative synthesis was undertaken. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
: Six randomised trials were identified. The evidence synthesized from these trials have provided strong evidence that attentional biases are present in opioid and stimulant use disorders. Evidence synthesis for other secondary outcome measures could not be performed given the heterogeneity in the measures reported and the limited number of trials. The risk of bias assessment for the included trials revealed a high risk of selection and attrition bias.
: This review demonstrates the potential need for interventions targeting attention biases in opiate and cocaine use disorders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15061138</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29857586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Addictions ; Alcohol ; Amphetamines ; Analgesics, Opioid ; Attentional Bias ; Behavior modification ; Bias ; Cannabis ; Central Nervous System Stimulants ; Cocaine ; Cocaine-Related Disorders ; Drug abuse ; Drug addiction ; Drug use ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Marijuana ; Mental health ; Narcotics ; Opioids ; Psychiatry ; Qualitative analysis ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Review ; Reviews ; Risk assessment ; Substance use ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018-06, Vol.15 (6), p.1138</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2018 by the authors. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-61923cb85548971f9554bc9da78c9d15f15f3842ce03671a1426c800fb257ff23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-61923cb85548971f9554bc9da78c9d15f15f3842ce03671a1426c800fb257ff23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025086/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6025086/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29857586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Melvyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Jiangbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wing, Tracey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Guo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fung, Daniel S S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Helen</creatorcontrib><title>A Systematic Review of Attention Biases in Opioid, Cannabis, Stimulant Use Disorders</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>: Opiates, cannabis, and amphetamines are highly abused, and use of these substances are prevalent disorders. Psychological interventions are crucial given that they help individuals maintain abstinence following a lapse or relapse into substance use. Advances in experimental psychology have suggested that automatic attention biases might be responsible for relapse. Prior reviews have provided evidence for the presence of these biases in addictive disorders and the effectiveness of bias modification. However, the prior studies are limited, as they failed to include trials involving participants with these prevalent addictive disorders or have failed to adopt a systematic approach in evidence synthesis.
: The primary aim of this current systematic review is to synthesise the current evidence for attention biases amongst opioid use, cannabis use, and stimulant use disorders. The secondary aim is to determine the efficacy of attention bias modification interventions and other addictions related outcomes.
: A search was conducted from November 2017 to January 2018 on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Science Direct, Cochrane Central, and Scopus. The selection process of the articles was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A qualitative synthesis was undertaken. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
: Six randomised trials were identified. The evidence synthesized from these trials have provided strong evidence that attentional biases are present in opioid and stimulant use disorders. Evidence synthesis for other secondary outcome measures could not be performed given the heterogeneity in the measures reported and the limited number of trials. The risk of bias assessment for the included trials revealed a high risk of selection and attrition bias.
: This review demonstrates the potential need for interventions targeting attention biases in opiate and cocaine use disorders.</description><subject>Addictions</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Amphetamines</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid</subject><subject>Attentional Bias</subject><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Stimulants</subject><subject>Cocaine</subject><subject>Cocaine-Related Disorders</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug addiction</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Substance use</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEYhIMoWqtXjxLw4qGtSXaTzV6EWj-hULDtOWTTrKZ0NzXJVvrvTWmVVgjJC--TYYYB4AqjXpLk6M7MtVt-YooYxgk_Ai3MGOqmDOHjvfkMnHs_RyjhKctPwRnJOc0oZy0w6cPx2gddyWAUfNcro7-hLWE_BF0HY2v4YKTXHpoajpbGmlkHDmRdy8L4DhwHUzULWQc49Ro-Gm_dTDt_AU5KufD6cve2wfT5aTJ47Q5HL2-D_rCrUsxDl-GcJKrglKY8z3CZx6FQ-UxmPN6YlvFEx0RplLAMS5wSpjhCZUFoVpYkaYP7re6yKSo9U9GxkwuxdKaSbi2sNOJwU5tP8WFXgiFCEWdR4HYn4OxXo30QlfFKL2IkbRsvCEpzygjGG_TmHzq3jatjPEEw4mkksw3V21LKWe-dLv_MYCQ2hYnDwuKH6_0If_hvQ8kPfFORVw</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Zhang, Melvyn</creator><creator>Ying, Jiangbo</creator><creator>Wing, Tracey</creator><creator>Song, Guo</creator><creator>Fung, Daniel S S</creator><creator>Smith, Helen</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>A Systematic Review of Attention Biases in Opioid, Cannabis, Stimulant Use Disorders</title><author>Zhang, Melvyn ; Ying, Jiangbo ; Wing, Tracey ; Song, Guo ; Fung, Daniel S S ; Smith, Helen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-61923cb85548971f9554bc9da78c9d15f15f3842ce03671a1426c800fb257ff23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Addictions</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Amphetamines</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid</topic><topic>Attentional Bias</topic><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Stimulants</topic><topic>Cocaine</topic><topic>Cocaine-Related Disorders</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug addiction</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Substance use</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Melvyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Jiangbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wing, Tracey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Guo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fung, Daniel S S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Helen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Melvyn</au><au>Ying, Jiangbo</au><au>Wing, Tracey</au><au>Song, Guo</au><au>Fung, Daniel S S</au><au>Smith, Helen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Systematic Review of Attention Biases in Opioid, Cannabis, Stimulant Use Disorders</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1138</spage><pages>1138-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>: Opiates, cannabis, and amphetamines are highly abused, and use of these substances are prevalent disorders. Psychological interventions are crucial given that they help individuals maintain abstinence following a lapse or relapse into substance use. Advances in experimental psychology have suggested that automatic attention biases might be responsible for relapse. Prior reviews have provided evidence for the presence of these biases in addictive disorders and the effectiveness of bias modification. However, the prior studies are limited, as they failed to include trials involving participants with these prevalent addictive disorders or have failed to adopt a systematic approach in evidence synthesis.
: The primary aim of this current systematic review is to synthesise the current evidence for attention biases amongst opioid use, cannabis use, and stimulant use disorders. The secondary aim is to determine the efficacy of attention bias modification interventions and other addictions related outcomes.
: A search was conducted from November 2017 to January 2018 on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Science Direct, Cochrane Central, and Scopus. The selection process of the articles was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A qualitative synthesis was undertaken. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
: Six randomised trials were identified. The evidence synthesized from these trials have provided strong evidence that attentional biases are present in opioid and stimulant use disorders. Evidence synthesis for other secondary outcome measures could not be performed given the heterogeneity in the measures reported and the limited number of trials. The risk of bias assessment for the included trials revealed a high risk of selection and attrition bias.
: This review demonstrates the potential need for interventions targeting attention biases in opiate and cocaine use disorders.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>29857586</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph15061138</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018-06, Vol.15 (6), p.1138 |
| issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6025086 |
| source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Addictions Alcohol Amphetamines Analgesics, Opioid Attentional Bias Behavior modification Bias Cannabis Central Nervous System Stimulants Cocaine Cocaine-Related Disorders Drug abuse Drug addiction Drug use Heterogeneity Humans Literature reviews Marijuana Mental health Narcotics Opioids Psychiatry Qualitative analysis Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Review Reviews Risk assessment Substance use Systematic review |
| title | A Systematic Review of Attention Biases in Opioid, Cannabis, Stimulant Use Disorders |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A09%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Attention%20Biases%20in%20Opioid,%20Cannabis,%20Stimulant%20Use%20Disorders&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Zhang,%20Melvyn&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1138&rft.pages=1138-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph15061138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2108404976%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108404976&rft_id=info:pmid/29857586&rfr_iscdi=true |