Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2018-06, Vol.97 (25), p.e11253-e11253
Hauptverfasser: Jung, Peel, Park, Su B., Kim, Hyung W., Kang, Dae H., W. Choi, Cheol, Kim, Su J., Nam, Hyeong S., Ryu, Dae G., Hong, Joung B., Kim, Dong J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e11253
container_issue 25
container_start_page e11253
container_title Medicine (Baltimore)
container_volume 97
creator Jung, Peel
Park, Su B.
Kim, Hyung W.
Kang, Dae H.
W. Choi, Cheol
Kim, Su J.
Nam, Hyeong S.
Ryu, Dae G.
Hong, Joung B.
Kim, Dong J.
description Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate whether cimetropium bromide could improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon. Patients undergoing screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized to receive intravenous cimetropium bromide (5 mg) or placebo after cecal intubation. The primary outcomes were the number of polyps per patient (PPP) and adenomas per patient (APP); secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and advanced neoplasm detection rate (ANDR). A total of 181 patients were analyzed; 91 patients received cimetropium bromide and 90 patients received placebo. Cimetropium bromide and placebo groups did not significantly differ in the PPP and APP for the colorectum (1.38 ± 1.58 vs 1.69 ± 2.28, P = .298; 0.96 ± 1.27 vs 1.11 ± 1.89, P = .517, respectively) and right colon (0.70 ± 0.95 vs 0.78 ± 1.21, P = .645; 0.47 ± 0.81 vs 0.51 ± 0.81, P = .757, respectively). Two groups also did not significantly differ in the PDR, ADR, and ANDR for the colorectum and right colon. Furthermore, there were no difference between groups in the PPP, APP, PDR, ADR, and ADNR in a sub-analysis of expert and non-expert endoscopists. Cimetropium bromide did not improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon during colonoscope withdrawal, regardless of the expertness of the endoscopist. However, its use may be helpful in patients with active peristalsis or for beginning endoscopists during standard colonoscopy without a transparent cap.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MD.0000000000011253
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6023662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2057439442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3558-b029f4530653e618d9ce31207e6ab76472d2f9f6f2960b283bdfe071bca9ce173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtvFSEYhonR2Fr9BSaGpQunchlgcGHSnHpL2rjRNWHgmx6UGUaY6cnxd_iDpZ5aL2wI8HwPb_Ii9JSSU0q0enl5fkr-LEqZ4PfQMRVcNkLL9j46JoSJRmnVHqFHpXypEFesfYiOmNasJUIeox-bMMKS0xzWEfc5jcED9gkKntKCwzjndA14TnE_Yzt5bD1MabTYwwJuCWnCfs1husIuxTSl4tIMeBeWrc92Z-MrfIZznave7-BfVPPaR2j6GKZ6mqN10KfGpalGiBE8Lsvq94_Rg8HGAk9u9xP0-e2bT5v3zcXHdx82ZxeN40J0TU-YHlrBiRQcJO28dsApIwqk7ZVsFfNs0IMcmJakZx3v_QBE0d7ZSlLFT9Drg3de-xG8gxrDRjPnMNq8N8kG8-_LFLbmKl0bSRiXklXB81tBTt9WKIsZQ3EQo50grcUwIlTLddveoPyAupxKyTDcfUOJuenTXJ6b__usU8_-Tng387vACrQHYJfiArl8jesOstmCjcv2l08ozRpGaEckY6SpN13HfwItma8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2057439442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study</title><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jung, Peel ; Park, Su B. ; Kim, Hyung W. ; Kang, Dae H. ; W. Choi, Cheol ; Kim, Su J. ; Nam, Hyeong S. ; Ryu, Dae G. ; Hong, Joung B. ; Kim, Dong J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Peel ; Park, Su B. ; Kim, Hyung W. ; Kang, Dae H. ; W. Choi, Cheol ; Kim, Su J. ; Nam, Hyeong S. ; Ryu, Dae G. ; Hong, Joung B. ; Kim, Dong J.</creatorcontrib><description>Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate whether cimetropium bromide could improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon. Patients undergoing screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized to receive intravenous cimetropium bromide (5 mg) or placebo after cecal intubation. The primary outcomes were the number of polyps per patient (PPP) and adenomas per patient (APP); secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and advanced neoplasm detection rate (ANDR). A total of 181 patients were analyzed; 91 patients received cimetropium bromide and 90 patients received placebo. Cimetropium bromide and placebo groups did not significantly differ in the PPP and APP for the colorectum (1.38 ± 1.58 vs 1.69 ± 2.28, P = .298; 0.96 ± 1.27 vs 1.11 ± 1.89, P = .517, respectively) and right colon (0.70 ± 0.95 vs 0.78 ± 1.21, P = .645; 0.47 ± 0.81 vs 0.51 ± 0.81, P = .757, respectively). Two groups also did not significantly differ in the PDR, ADR, and ANDR for the colorectum and right colon. Furthermore, there were no difference between groups in the PPP, APP, PDR, ADR, and ADNR in a sub-analysis of expert and non-expert endoscopists. Cimetropium bromide did not improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon during colonoscope withdrawal, regardless of the expertness of the endoscopist. However, its use may be helpful in patients with active peristalsis or for beginning endoscopists during standard colonoscopy without a transparent cap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011253</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29924056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis ; Adenoma - pathology ; Administration, Intravenous ; Aged ; Clinical Trial/Experimental Study ; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis ; Colonic Polyps - pathology ; Colonoscopes - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Parasympatholytics - administration &amp; dosage ; Peristalsis - drug effects ; Scopolamine Derivatives - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2018-06, Vol.97 (25), p.e11253-e11253</ispartof><rights>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3558-b029f4530653e618d9ce31207e6ab76472d2f9f6f2960b283bdfe071bca9ce173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023662/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023662/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Peel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Su B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyung W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dae H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W. Choi, Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Su J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Hyeong S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Dae G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Joung B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong J.</creatorcontrib><title>Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate whether cimetropium bromide could improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon. Patients undergoing screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized to receive intravenous cimetropium bromide (5 mg) or placebo after cecal intubation. The primary outcomes were the number of polyps per patient (PPP) and adenomas per patient (APP); secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and advanced neoplasm detection rate (ANDR). A total of 181 patients were analyzed; 91 patients received cimetropium bromide and 90 patients received placebo. Cimetropium bromide and placebo groups did not significantly differ in the PPP and APP for the colorectum (1.38 ± 1.58 vs 1.69 ± 2.28, P = .298; 0.96 ± 1.27 vs 1.11 ± 1.89, P = .517, respectively) and right colon (0.70 ± 0.95 vs 0.78 ± 1.21, P = .645; 0.47 ± 0.81 vs 0.51 ± 0.81, P = .757, respectively). Two groups also did not significantly differ in the PDR, ADR, and ANDR for the colorectum and right colon. Furthermore, there were no difference between groups in the PPP, APP, PDR, ADR, and ADNR in a sub-analysis of expert and non-expert endoscopists. Cimetropium bromide did not improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon during colonoscope withdrawal, regardless of the expertness of the endoscopist. However, its use may be helpful in patients with active peristalsis or for beginning endoscopists during standard colonoscopy without a transparent cap.</description><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenoma - pathology</subject><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Trial/Experimental Study</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - pathology</subject><subject>Colonoscopes - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Parasympatholytics - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Peristalsis - drug effects</subject><subject>Scopolamine Derivatives - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtvFSEYhonR2Fr9BSaGpQunchlgcGHSnHpL2rjRNWHgmx6UGUaY6cnxd_iDpZ5aL2wI8HwPb_Ii9JSSU0q0enl5fkr-LEqZ4PfQMRVcNkLL9j46JoSJRmnVHqFHpXypEFesfYiOmNasJUIeox-bMMKS0xzWEfc5jcED9gkKntKCwzjndA14TnE_Yzt5bD1MabTYwwJuCWnCfs1husIuxTSl4tIMeBeWrc92Z-MrfIZznave7-BfVPPaR2j6GKZ6mqN10KfGpalGiBE8Lsvq94_Rg8HGAk9u9xP0-e2bT5v3zcXHdx82ZxeN40J0TU-YHlrBiRQcJO28dsApIwqk7ZVsFfNs0IMcmJakZx3v_QBE0d7ZSlLFT9Drg3de-xG8gxrDRjPnMNq8N8kG8-_LFLbmKl0bSRiXklXB81tBTt9WKIsZQ3EQo50grcUwIlTLddveoPyAupxKyTDcfUOJuenTXJ6b__usU8_-Tng387vACrQHYJfiArl8jesOstmCjcv2l08ozRpGaEckY6SpN13HfwItma8U</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Jung, Peel</creator><creator>Park, Su B.</creator><creator>Kim, Hyung W.</creator><creator>Kang, Dae H.</creator><creator>W. Choi, Cheol</creator><creator>Kim, Su J.</creator><creator>Nam, Hyeong S.</creator><creator>Ryu, Dae G.</creator><creator>Hong, Joung B.</creator><creator>Kim, Dong J.</creator><general>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study</title><author>Jung, Peel ; Park, Su B. ; Kim, Hyung W. ; Kang, Dae H. ; W. Choi, Cheol ; Kim, Su J. ; Nam, Hyeong S. ; Ryu, Dae G. ; Hong, Joung B. ; Kim, Dong J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3558-b029f4530653e618d9ce31207e6ab76472d2f9f6f2960b283bdfe071bca9ce173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenoma - pathology</topic><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Trial/Experimental Study</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - pathology</topic><topic>Colonoscopes - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Parasympatholytics - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Peristalsis - drug effects</topic><topic>Scopolamine Derivatives - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Peel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Su B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyung W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dae H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W. Choi, Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Su J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Hyeong S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Dae G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Joung B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Peel</au><au>Park, Su B.</au><au>Kim, Hyung W.</au><au>Kang, Dae H.</au><au>W. Choi, Cheol</au><au>Kim, Su J.</au><au>Nam, Hyeong S.</au><au>Ryu, Dae G.</au><au>Hong, Joung B.</au><au>Kim, Dong J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>25</issue><spage>e11253</spage><epage>e11253</epage><pages>e11253-e11253</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate whether cimetropium bromide could improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon. Patients undergoing screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized to receive intravenous cimetropium bromide (5 mg) or placebo after cecal intubation. The primary outcomes were the number of polyps per patient (PPP) and adenomas per patient (APP); secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and advanced neoplasm detection rate (ANDR). A total of 181 patients were analyzed; 91 patients received cimetropium bromide and 90 patients received placebo. Cimetropium bromide and placebo groups did not significantly differ in the PPP and APP for the colorectum (1.38 ± 1.58 vs 1.69 ± 2.28, P = .298; 0.96 ± 1.27 vs 1.11 ± 1.89, P = .517, respectively) and right colon (0.70 ± 0.95 vs 0.78 ± 1.21, P = .645; 0.47 ± 0.81 vs 0.51 ± 0.81, P = .757, respectively). Two groups also did not significantly differ in the PDR, ADR, and ANDR for the colorectum and right colon. Furthermore, there were no difference between groups in the PPP, APP, PDR, ADR, and ADNR in a sub-analysis of expert and non-expert endoscopists. Cimetropium bromide did not improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon during colonoscope withdrawal, regardless of the expertness of the endoscopist. However, its use may be helpful in patients with active peristalsis or for beginning endoscopists during standard colonoscopy without a transparent cap.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>29924056</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000011253</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7974
ispartof Medicine (Baltimore), 2018-06, Vol.97 (25), p.e11253-e11253
issn 0025-7974
1536-5964
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6023662
source Wolters Kluwer Open Health; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adenoma - diagnosis
Adenoma - pathology
Administration, Intravenous
Aged
Clinical Trial/Experimental Study
Colonic Polyps - diagnosis
Colonic Polyps - pathology
Colonoscopes - statistics & numerical data
Colonoscopy - methods
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Parasympatholytics - administration & dosage
Peristalsis - drug effects
Scopolamine Derivatives - administration & dosage
title Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A34%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cimetropium%20bromide%20does%20not%20improve%20polyp%20and%20adenoma%20detection%20during%20colonoscope%20withdrawal:%20A%20randomized,%20double-blind,%20placebo-controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Jung,%20Peel&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=25&rft.spage=e11253&rft.epage=e11253&rft.pages=e11253-e11253&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000011253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2057439442%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2057439442&rft_id=info:pmid/29924056&rfr_iscdi=true