Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine (Baltimore) 2018-06, Vol.97 (25), p.e11253-e11253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e11253 |
---|---|
container_issue | 25 |
container_start_page | e11253 |
container_title | Medicine (Baltimore) |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Jung, Peel Park, Su B. Kim, Hyung W. Kang, Dae H. W. Choi, Cheol Kim, Su J. Nam, Hyeong S. Ryu, Dae G. Hong, Joung B. Kim, Dong J. |
description | Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate whether cimetropium bromide could improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon.
Patients undergoing screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized to receive intravenous cimetropium bromide (5 mg) or placebo after cecal intubation. The primary outcomes were the number of polyps per patient (PPP) and adenomas per patient (APP); secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and advanced neoplasm detection rate (ANDR).
A total of 181 patients were analyzed; 91 patients received cimetropium bromide and 90 patients received placebo. Cimetropium bromide and placebo groups did not significantly differ in the PPP and APP for the colorectum (1.38 ± 1.58 vs 1.69 ± 2.28, P = .298; 0.96 ± 1.27 vs 1.11 ± 1.89, P = .517, respectively) and right colon (0.70 ± 0.95 vs 0.78 ± 1.21, P = .645; 0.47 ± 0.81 vs 0.51 ± 0.81, P = .757, respectively). Two groups also did not significantly differ in the PDR, ADR, and ANDR for the colorectum and right colon. Furthermore, there were no difference between groups in the PPP, APP, PDR, ADR, and ADNR in a sub-analysis of expert and non-expert endoscopists.
Cimetropium bromide did not improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon during colonoscope withdrawal, regardless of the expertness of the endoscopist. However, its use may be helpful in patients with active peristalsis or for beginning endoscopists during standard colonoscopy without a transparent cap. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/MD.0000000000011253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6023662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2057439442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3558-b029f4530653e618d9ce31207e6ab76472d2f9f6f2960b283bdfe071bca9ce173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtvFSEYhonR2Fr9BSaGpQunchlgcGHSnHpL2rjRNWHgmx6UGUaY6cnxd_iDpZ5aL2wI8HwPb_Ii9JSSU0q0enl5fkr-LEqZ4PfQMRVcNkLL9j46JoSJRmnVHqFHpXypEFesfYiOmNasJUIeox-bMMKS0xzWEfc5jcED9gkKntKCwzjndA14TnE_Yzt5bD1MabTYwwJuCWnCfs1husIuxTSl4tIMeBeWrc92Z-MrfIZznave7-BfVPPaR2j6GKZ6mqN10KfGpalGiBE8Lsvq94_Rg8HGAk9u9xP0-e2bT5v3zcXHdx82ZxeN40J0TU-YHlrBiRQcJO28dsApIwqk7ZVsFfNs0IMcmJakZx3v_QBE0d7ZSlLFT9Drg3de-xG8gxrDRjPnMNq8N8kG8-_LFLbmKl0bSRiXklXB81tBTt9WKIsZQ3EQo50grcUwIlTLddveoPyAupxKyTDcfUOJuenTXJ6b__usU8_-Tng387vACrQHYJfiArl8jesOstmCjcv2l08ozRpGaEckY6SpN13HfwItma8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2057439442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study</title><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jung, Peel ; Park, Su B. ; Kim, Hyung W. ; Kang, Dae H. ; W. Choi, Cheol ; Kim, Su J. ; Nam, Hyeong S. ; Ryu, Dae G. ; Hong, Joung B. ; Kim, Dong J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Peel ; Park, Su B. ; Kim, Hyung W. ; Kang, Dae H. ; W. Choi, Cheol ; Kim, Su J. ; Nam, Hyeong S. ; Ryu, Dae G. ; Hong, Joung B. ; Kim, Dong J.</creatorcontrib><description>Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate whether cimetropium bromide could improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon.
Patients undergoing screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized to receive intravenous cimetropium bromide (5 mg) or placebo after cecal intubation. The primary outcomes were the number of polyps per patient (PPP) and adenomas per patient (APP); secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and advanced neoplasm detection rate (ANDR).
A total of 181 patients were analyzed; 91 patients received cimetropium bromide and 90 patients received placebo. Cimetropium bromide and placebo groups did not significantly differ in the PPP and APP for the colorectum (1.38 ± 1.58 vs 1.69 ± 2.28, P = .298; 0.96 ± 1.27 vs 1.11 ± 1.89, P = .517, respectively) and right colon (0.70 ± 0.95 vs 0.78 ± 1.21, P = .645; 0.47 ± 0.81 vs 0.51 ± 0.81, P = .757, respectively). Two groups also did not significantly differ in the PDR, ADR, and ANDR for the colorectum and right colon. Furthermore, there were no difference between groups in the PPP, APP, PDR, ADR, and ADNR in a sub-analysis of expert and non-expert endoscopists.
Cimetropium bromide did not improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon during colonoscope withdrawal, regardless of the expertness of the endoscopist. However, its use may be helpful in patients with active peristalsis or for beginning endoscopists during standard colonoscopy without a transparent cap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011253</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29924056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis ; Adenoma - pathology ; Administration, Intravenous ; Aged ; Clinical Trial/Experimental Study ; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis ; Colonic Polyps - pathology ; Colonoscopes - statistics & numerical data ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Parasympatholytics - administration & dosage ; Peristalsis - drug effects ; Scopolamine Derivatives - administration & dosage</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2018-06, Vol.97 (25), p.e11253-e11253</ispartof><rights>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3558-b029f4530653e618d9ce31207e6ab76472d2f9f6f2960b283bdfe071bca9ce173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023662/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6023662/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Peel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Su B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyung W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dae H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W. Choi, Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Su J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Hyeong S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Dae G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Joung B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong J.</creatorcontrib><title>Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate whether cimetropium bromide could improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon.
Patients undergoing screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized to receive intravenous cimetropium bromide (5 mg) or placebo after cecal intubation. The primary outcomes were the number of polyps per patient (PPP) and adenomas per patient (APP); secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and advanced neoplasm detection rate (ANDR).
A total of 181 patients were analyzed; 91 patients received cimetropium bromide and 90 patients received placebo. Cimetropium bromide and placebo groups did not significantly differ in the PPP and APP for the colorectum (1.38 ± 1.58 vs 1.69 ± 2.28, P = .298; 0.96 ± 1.27 vs 1.11 ± 1.89, P = .517, respectively) and right colon (0.70 ± 0.95 vs 0.78 ± 1.21, P = .645; 0.47 ± 0.81 vs 0.51 ± 0.81, P = .757, respectively). Two groups also did not significantly differ in the PDR, ADR, and ANDR for the colorectum and right colon. Furthermore, there were no difference between groups in the PPP, APP, PDR, ADR, and ADNR in a sub-analysis of expert and non-expert endoscopists.
Cimetropium bromide did not improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon during colonoscope withdrawal, regardless of the expertness of the endoscopist. However, its use may be helpful in patients with active peristalsis or for beginning endoscopists during standard colonoscopy without a transparent cap.</description><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenoma - pathology</subject><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Trial/Experimental Study</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - pathology</subject><subject>Colonoscopes - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Parasympatholytics - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Peristalsis - drug effects</subject><subject>Scopolamine Derivatives - administration & dosage</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtvFSEYhonR2Fr9BSaGpQunchlgcGHSnHpL2rjRNWHgmx6UGUaY6cnxd_iDpZ5aL2wI8HwPb_Ii9JSSU0q0enl5fkr-LEqZ4PfQMRVcNkLL9j46JoSJRmnVHqFHpXypEFesfYiOmNasJUIeox-bMMKS0xzWEfc5jcED9gkKntKCwzjndA14TnE_Yzt5bD1MabTYwwJuCWnCfs1husIuxTSl4tIMeBeWrc92Z-MrfIZznave7-BfVPPaR2j6GKZ6mqN10KfGpalGiBE8Lsvq94_Rg8HGAk9u9xP0-e2bT5v3zcXHdx82ZxeN40J0TU-YHlrBiRQcJO28dsApIwqk7ZVsFfNs0IMcmJakZx3v_QBE0d7ZSlLFT9Drg3de-xG8gxrDRjPnMNq8N8kG8-_LFLbmKl0bSRiXklXB81tBTt9WKIsZQ3EQo50grcUwIlTLddveoPyAupxKyTDcfUOJuenTXJ6b__usU8_-Tng387vACrQHYJfiArl8jesOstmCjcv2l08ozRpGaEckY6SpN13HfwItma8U</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Jung, Peel</creator><creator>Park, Su B.</creator><creator>Kim, Hyung W.</creator><creator>Kang, Dae H.</creator><creator>W. Choi, Cheol</creator><creator>Kim, Su J.</creator><creator>Nam, Hyeong S.</creator><creator>Ryu, Dae G.</creator><creator>Hong, Joung B.</creator><creator>Kim, Dong J.</creator><general>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study</title><author>Jung, Peel ; Park, Su B. ; Kim, Hyung W. ; Kang, Dae H. ; W. Choi, Cheol ; Kim, Su J. ; Nam, Hyeong S. ; Ryu, Dae G. ; Hong, Joung B. ; Kim, Dong J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3558-b029f4530653e618d9ce31207e6ab76472d2f9f6f2960b283bdfe071bca9ce173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenoma - pathology</topic><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Trial/Experimental Study</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - pathology</topic><topic>Colonoscopes - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Parasympatholytics - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Peristalsis - drug effects</topic><topic>Scopolamine Derivatives - administration & dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Peel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Su B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyung W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dae H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W. Choi, Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Su J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Hyeong S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Dae G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Joung B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Peel</au><au>Park, Su B.</au><au>Kim, Hyung W.</au><au>Kang, Dae H.</au><au>W. Choi, Cheol</au><au>Kim, Su J.</au><au>Nam, Hyeong S.</au><au>Ryu, Dae G.</au><au>Hong, Joung B.</au><au>Kim, Dong J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>25</issue><spage>e11253</spage><epage>e11253</epage><pages>e11253-e11253</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Endoscopic inspection of colonic mucosa is disturbed by colonic folds and peristalsis, which may result in missed polyps. Cimetropium bromide, an antispasmodic agent, inhibits peristalsis and colonic spasms, which may improve polyp detection. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate whether cimetropium bromide could improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon.
Patients undergoing screening or diagnostic colonoscopy were randomized to receive intravenous cimetropium bromide (5 mg) or placebo after cecal intubation. The primary outcomes were the number of polyps per patient (PPP) and adenomas per patient (APP); secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and advanced neoplasm detection rate (ANDR).
A total of 181 patients were analyzed; 91 patients received cimetropium bromide and 90 patients received placebo. Cimetropium bromide and placebo groups did not significantly differ in the PPP and APP for the colorectum (1.38 ± 1.58 vs 1.69 ± 2.28, P = .298; 0.96 ± 1.27 vs 1.11 ± 1.89, P = .517, respectively) and right colon (0.70 ± 0.95 vs 0.78 ± 1.21, P = .645; 0.47 ± 0.81 vs 0.51 ± 0.81, P = .757, respectively). Two groups also did not significantly differ in the PDR, ADR, and ANDR for the colorectum and right colon. Furthermore, there were no difference between groups in the PPP, APP, PDR, ADR, and ADNR in a sub-analysis of expert and non-expert endoscopists.
Cimetropium bromide did not improve polyp and adenoma detection in the colorectum and right colon during colonoscope withdrawal, regardless of the expertness of the endoscopist. However, its use may be helpful in patients with active peristalsis or for beginning endoscopists during standard colonoscopy without a transparent cap.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>29924056</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000011253</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7974 |
ispartof | Medicine (Baltimore), 2018-06, Vol.97 (25), p.e11253-e11253 |
issn | 0025-7974 1536-5964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6023662 |
source | Wolters Kluwer Open Health; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adenoma - diagnosis Adenoma - pathology Administration, Intravenous Aged Clinical Trial/Experimental Study Colonic Polyps - diagnosis Colonic Polyps - pathology Colonoscopes - statistics & numerical data Colonoscopy - methods Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Early Detection of Cancer - methods Female Humans Male Middle Aged Outcome Assessment, Health Care Parasympatholytics - administration & dosage Peristalsis - drug effects Scopolamine Derivatives - administration & dosage |
title | Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A34%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cimetropium%20bromide%20does%20not%20improve%20polyp%20and%20adenoma%20detection%20during%20colonoscope%20withdrawal:%20A%20randomized,%20double-blind,%20placebo-controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Jung,%20Peel&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=25&rft.spage=e11253&rft.epage=e11253&rft.pages=e11253-e11253&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000011253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2057439442%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2057439442&rft_id=info:pmid/29924056&rfr_iscdi=true |