Characterization of Resistance to Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in Barley Germplasm

Most barley cultivars have some degree of resistance to the wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Damage caused by WSS is currently observed in fields of barley grown in the Northern Great Plains, but the impact of WSS damage among cultivars due to genetic differenc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic entomology 2018-04, Vol.111 (2), p.923-930
Hauptverfasser: Varella, Andrea C, Talbert, Luther E, Achhami, Buddhi B, Blake, Nancy K, Hofland, Megan L, Sherman, Jamie D, Lamb, Peggy F, Reddy, Gadi V. P, Weaver, David K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 930
container_issue 2
container_start_page 923
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 111
creator Varella, Andrea C
Talbert, Luther E
Achhami, Buddhi B
Blake, Nancy K
Hofland, Megan L
Sherman, Jamie D
Lamb, Peggy F
Reddy, Gadi V. P
Weaver, David K
description Most barley cultivars have some degree of resistance to the wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Damage caused by WSS is currently observed in fields of barley grown in the Northern Great Plains, but the impact of WSS damage among cultivars due to genetic differences within the barley germplasm is not known. Specifically, little is known about the mechanisms underlying WSS resistance in barley. We characterized WSS resistance in a subset of the spring barley CAP (Coordinated Agricultural Project) germplasm panel containing 193 current and historically important breeding lines from six North American breeding programs. Panel lines were grown in WSS infested fields for two consecutive years. Lines were characterized for stem solidness, stem cutting, WSS infestation (antixenosis), larval mortality (antibiosis), and parasitism (indirect plant defense). Variation in resistance to WSS in barley was compared to observations made for solid-stemmed resistant and hollow-stemmed susceptible wheat lines. Results indicate that both antibiosis and antixenosis are involved in the resistance of barley to the WSS, but antibiosis seems to be more prevalent. Almost all of the barley lines had greater larval mortality than the hollow-stemmed wheat lines, and only a few barley lines had mortality as low as that observed in the solid-stemmed wheat line. Since barley lines lack solid stems, it is apparent that barley has a different form of antibiosis. Our results provide information for use of barley in rotation to control the WSS and may provide a basis for identification of new approaches for improving WSS resistance in wheat.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jee/toy025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6019026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jee/toy025</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2007988762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b469t-645d80b7b122ddd101a50ac2b69d8afb1d2f50f0eb0f3ac1aedbc355531c0b213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1rFDEUxYModlt98Q-QARGqMPYm8xkfhLpoKxQEUfBBCPm442aZSaZJRlj_elN3LepDn87D-d3DuRxCnlB4RYFXZ1vEs-R3wJp7ZEV51ZeM06_3yQqAsRJqXh2R4xi3ALRlFB6SI8brrm5rviLf1hsZpE4Y7E-ZrHeFH4pPGG1M0mkski_WOG-WWGjrdMp6ermb0Pk5n8jXv01rJL4orCveyjDirrjAMM2jjNMj8mCQY8THBz0hX96_-7y-LK8-XnxYn1-Vqm55Ktu6MT2oTlHGjDEUqGxAaqZabno5KGrY0MAAqGCopKYSjdJV0zQV1aAYrU7Im33uvKgJjUaXghzFHOwkw054acW_jrMb8d3_EC1QDqzNAaeHgOCvF4xJTDZqHEfp0C9RMICO933Xsow--w_d-iW4_F6mWF33TVfdNHq5p3TwMQYcbstQEDejiTya2I-W4ad_179F_6yUged7wC_z3UGHN5T13uFd6C9oaq9i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2024485731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of Resistance to Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in Barley Germplasm</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Varella, Andrea C ; Talbert, Luther E ; Achhami, Buddhi B ; Blake, Nancy K ; Hofland, Megan L ; Sherman, Jamie D ; Lamb, Peggy F ; Reddy, Gadi V. P ; Weaver, David K</creator><creatorcontrib>Varella, Andrea C ; Talbert, Luther E ; Achhami, Buddhi B ; Blake, Nancy K ; Hofland, Megan L ; Sherman, Jamie D ; Lamb, Peggy F ; Reddy, Gadi V. P ; Weaver, David K</creatorcontrib><description>Most barley cultivars have some degree of resistance to the wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Damage caused by WSS is currently observed in fields of barley grown in the Northern Great Plains, but the impact of WSS damage among cultivars due to genetic differences within the barley germplasm is not known. Specifically, little is known about the mechanisms underlying WSS resistance in barley. We characterized WSS resistance in a subset of the spring barley CAP (Coordinated Agricultural Project) germplasm panel containing 193 current and historically important breeding lines from six North American breeding programs. Panel lines were grown in WSS infested fields for two consecutive years. Lines were characterized for stem solidness, stem cutting, WSS infestation (antixenosis), larval mortality (antibiosis), and parasitism (indirect plant defense). Variation in resistance to WSS in barley was compared to observations made for solid-stemmed resistant and hollow-stemmed susceptible wheat lines. Results indicate that both antibiosis and antixenosis are involved in the resistance of barley to the WSS, but antibiosis seems to be more prevalent. Almost all of the barley lines had greater larval mortality than the hollow-stemmed wheat lines, and only a few barley lines had mortality as low as that observed in the solid-stemmed wheat line. Since barley lines lack solid stems, it is apparent that barley has a different form of antibiosis. Our results provide information for use of barley in rotation to control the WSS and may provide a basis for identification of new approaches for improving WSS resistance in wheat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29474649</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Antibiosis ; antixenosis ; Barley ; Breeding ; Cephidae ; Cephus cinctus ; Cultivars ; Germplasm ; Hymenoptera ; Impact damage ; indirect plant defense ; Infestation ; Mortality ; Parasitism ; PLANT RESISTANCE ; Triticum ; Wheat ; wheat stem sawfly</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2018-04, Vol.111 (2), p.923-930</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b469t-645d80b7b122ddd101a50ac2b69d8afb1d2f50f0eb0f3ac1aedbc355531c0b213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b469t-645d80b7b122ddd101a50ac2b69d8afb1d2f50f0eb0f3ac1aedbc355531c0b213</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6377-0721</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29474649$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Varella, Andrea C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbert, Luther E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achhami, Buddhi B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blake, Nancy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofland, Megan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Jamie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Peggy F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Gadi V. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, David K</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of Resistance to Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in Barley Germplasm</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>Most barley cultivars have some degree of resistance to the wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Damage caused by WSS is currently observed in fields of barley grown in the Northern Great Plains, but the impact of WSS damage among cultivars due to genetic differences within the barley germplasm is not known. Specifically, little is known about the mechanisms underlying WSS resistance in barley. We characterized WSS resistance in a subset of the spring barley CAP (Coordinated Agricultural Project) germplasm panel containing 193 current and historically important breeding lines from six North American breeding programs. Panel lines were grown in WSS infested fields for two consecutive years. Lines were characterized for stem solidness, stem cutting, WSS infestation (antixenosis), larval mortality (antibiosis), and parasitism (indirect plant defense). Variation in resistance to WSS in barley was compared to observations made for solid-stemmed resistant and hollow-stemmed susceptible wheat lines. Results indicate that both antibiosis and antixenosis are involved in the resistance of barley to the WSS, but antibiosis seems to be more prevalent. Almost all of the barley lines had greater larval mortality than the hollow-stemmed wheat lines, and only a few barley lines had mortality as low as that observed in the solid-stemmed wheat line. Since barley lines lack solid stems, it is apparent that barley has a different form of antibiosis. Our results provide information for use of barley in rotation to control the WSS and may provide a basis for identification of new approaches for improving WSS resistance in wheat.</description><subject>Antibiosis</subject><subject>antixenosis</subject><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Cephidae</subject><subject>Cephus cinctus</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Germplasm</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Impact damage</subject><subject>indirect plant defense</subject><subject>Infestation</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>PLANT RESISTANCE</subject><subject>Triticum</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>wheat stem sawfly</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1rFDEUxYModlt98Q-QARGqMPYm8xkfhLpoKxQEUfBBCPm442aZSaZJRlj_elN3LepDn87D-d3DuRxCnlB4RYFXZ1vEs-R3wJp7ZEV51ZeM06_3yQqAsRJqXh2R4xi3ALRlFB6SI8brrm5rviLf1hsZpE4Y7E-ZrHeFH4pPGG1M0mkski_WOG-WWGjrdMp6ermb0Pk5n8jXv01rJL4orCveyjDirrjAMM2jjNMj8mCQY8THBz0hX96_-7y-LK8-XnxYn1-Vqm55Ktu6MT2oTlHGjDEUqGxAaqZabno5KGrY0MAAqGCopKYSjdJV0zQV1aAYrU7Im33uvKgJjUaXghzFHOwkw054acW_jrMb8d3_EC1QDqzNAaeHgOCvF4xJTDZqHEfp0C9RMICO933Xsow--w_d-iW4_F6mWF33TVfdNHq5p3TwMQYcbstQEDejiTya2I-W4ad_179F_6yUged7wC_z3UGHN5T13uFd6C9oaq9i</recordid><startdate>20180402</startdate><enddate>20180402</enddate><creator>Varella, Andrea C</creator><creator>Talbert, Luther E</creator><creator>Achhami, Buddhi B</creator><creator>Blake, Nancy K</creator><creator>Hofland, Megan L</creator><creator>Sherman, Jamie D</creator><creator>Lamb, Peggy F</creator><creator>Reddy, Gadi V. P</creator><creator>Weaver, David K</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-0721</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180402</creationdate><title>Characterization of Resistance to Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in Barley Germplasm</title><author>Varella, Andrea C ; Talbert, Luther E ; Achhami, Buddhi B ; Blake, Nancy K ; Hofland, Megan L ; Sherman, Jamie D ; Lamb, Peggy F ; Reddy, Gadi V. P ; Weaver, David K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b469t-645d80b7b122ddd101a50ac2b69d8afb1d2f50f0eb0f3ac1aedbc355531c0b213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antibiosis</topic><topic>antixenosis</topic><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Cephidae</topic><topic>Cephus cinctus</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Germplasm</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Impact damage</topic><topic>indirect plant defense</topic><topic>Infestation</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>PLANT RESISTANCE</topic><topic>Triticum</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>wheat stem sawfly</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Varella, Andrea C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbert, Luther E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achhami, Buddhi B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blake, Nancy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofland, Megan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Jamie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Peggy F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Gadi V. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, David K</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Varella, Andrea C</au><au>Talbert, Luther E</au><au>Achhami, Buddhi B</au><au>Blake, Nancy K</au><au>Hofland, Megan L</au><au>Sherman, Jamie D</au><au>Lamb, Peggy F</au><au>Reddy, Gadi V. P</au><au>Weaver, David K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of Resistance to Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in Barley Germplasm</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2018-04-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>923</spage><epage>930</epage><pages>923-930</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><abstract>Most barley cultivars have some degree of resistance to the wheat stem sawfly (WSS), Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). Damage caused by WSS is currently observed in fields of barley grown in the Northern Great Plains, but the impact of WSS damage among cultivars due to genetic differences within the barley germplasm is not known. Specifically, little is known about the mechanisms underlying WSS resistance in barley. We characterized WSS resistance in a subset of the spring barley CAP (Coordinated Agricultural Project) germplasm panel containing 193 current and historically important breeding lines from six North American breeding programs. Panel lines were grown in WSS infested fields for two consecutive years. Lines were characterized for stem solidness, stem cutting, WSS infestation (antixenosis), larval mortality (antibiosis), and parasitism (indirect plant defense). Variation in resistance to WSS in barley was compared to observations made for solid-stemmed resistant and hollow-stemmed susceptible wheat lines. Results indicate that both antibiosis and antixenosis are involved in the resistance of barley to the WSS, but antibiosis seems to be more prevalent. Almost all of the barley lines had greater larval mortality than the hollow-stemmed wheat lines, and only a few barley lines had mortality as low as that observed in the solid-stemmed wheat line. Since barley lines lack solid stems, it is apparent that barley has a different form of antibiosis. Our results provide information for use of barley in rotation to control the WSS and may provide a basis for identification of new approaches for improving WSS resistance in wheat.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>29474649</pmid><doi>10.1093/jee/toy025</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6377-0721</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2018-04, Vol.111 (2), p.923-930
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6019026
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Antibiosis
antixenosis
Barley
Breeding
Cephidae
Cephus cinctus
Cultivars
Germplasm
Hymenoptera
Impact damage
indirect plant defense
Infestation
Mortality
Parasitism
PLANT RESISTANCE
Triticum
Wheat
wheat stem sawfly
title Characterization of Resistance to Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) in Barley Germplasm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A01%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20Resistance%20to%20Cephus%20cinctus%20(Hymenoptera:%20Cephidae)%20in%20Barley%20Germplasm&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Varella,%20Andrea%20C&rft.date=2018-04-02&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=923&rft.epage=930&rft.pages=923-930&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/toy025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2007988762%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2024485731&rft_id=info:pmid/29474649&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jee/toy025&rfr_iscdi=true