CRAN-26. COMPARING SURGERY ALONE OR SURGERY PLUS RADIATION THERAPY IN CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA MANAGEMENT
Abstract BACKGROUND The management approach for craniopharyngioma has not reach a consensus between neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists for the past decades. We reviewed our experience and assessed the outcome of these 2 approaches. METHOD This is a retrospective review and children with oncolog...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2018-06, Vol.20 (suppl_2), p.i42-i42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | i42 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl_2 |
container_start_page | i42 |
container_title | Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Chan, Godfrey Chi-Fung Ku, Dennis Tak-Noi Luk, Chun Wing Ling, Alvin Siu-Cheung Shing, Matthew Ming-Kong Liu, Anthony Pak-Yin |
description | Abstract
BACKGROUND
The management approach for craniopharyngioma has not reach a consensus between neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists for the past decades. We reviewed our experience and assessed the outcome of these 2 approaches.
METHOD
This is a retrospective review and children with oncological conditions were admitted to 5 public hospitals. Their data were collected prospectively by 2 full time data managers. Patients’ progress was updated annually and the data were crossed checked by the principle investigators. Survival data was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier Analysis.
RESULT
From Jan 1994 to Dec 2016 (13-yrs), 21 children ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/neuonc/noy059.062 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6012806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/neuonc/noy059.062</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/neuonc/noy059.062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1772-9d15e3e0d63877ee41ee107b27d552f22de013ced5451789809da95e3f670e993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFOgzAUhhujiXP6AN71AWRry9rSG5NmIiOBQjp2sauGQdGZDRZwJnt7mZgl3nl1Ts4535ecH4BHjCYYCXda22NTF9O6OSEqJoiRKzDClLgO9Ri7_umJ41HMb8Fd130gRDBleAQ2cy2VQ9gEzpM4lTpUAVyudODrNZRRonyY6MsgjVZLqOVLKLMwUTBb-FqmaxgqeLaESbqQeq2CMIkljKWSgR_7KrsHN1W-6-zDbx2D1aufzRdOlAThXEZOgTknjigxta5FJXM9zq2dYWsx4hvCS0pJRUhpEXYLW9JZ_4YnPCTKXPRIxTiyQrhj8Dx4D8fN3paFrT_bfGcO7XaftyfT5Fvzd1Nv381b82UYwsRDrBfgQVC0Tde1trqwGJlzymZI2Qwpmz7lnnkamOZ4-Mf5Nwb_esA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>CRAN-26. COMPARING SURGERY ALONE OR SURGERY PLUS RADIATION THERAPY IN CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA MANAGEMENT</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chan, Godfrey Chi-Fung ; Ku, Dennis Tak-Noi ; Luk, Chun Wing ; Ling, Alvin Siu-Cheung ; Shing, Matthew Ming-Kong ; Liu, Anthony Pak-Yin</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Godfrey Chi-Fung ; Ku, Dennis Tak-Noi ; Luk, Chun Wing ; Ling, Alvin Siu-Cheung ; Shing, Matthew Ming-Kong ; Liu, Anthony Pak-Yin</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
BACKGROUND
The management approach for craniopharyngioma has not reach a consensus between neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists for the past decades. We reviewed our experience and assessed the outcome of these 2 approaches.
METHOD
This is a retrospective review and children with oncological conditions were admitted to 5 public hospitals. Their data were collected prospectively by 2 full time data managers. Patients’ progress was updated annually and the data were crossed checked by the principle investigators. Survival data was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier Analysis.
RESULT
From Jan 1994 to Dec 2016 (13-yrs), 21 children (<18yrs) with craniopharyngioma was identified. The estimated incidence was 1.47/million children<15yrs/yr. M:F=10:9 and median age was 9.7yrs (range 2mons to 16.5yrs). 12/21 (57%) children were treated with surgery alone as primary approach. Even statistically insignificant, the 6yrs relapse-free-survival was 80% vs 50.3% between surgery+radiation therapy (RT) vs surgery alone. 8/13(61.5%) children in one hospital (HospA) were treated with surgery+RT as primary approach if there was residual lesion post-operatively, but other hospitals (Others) mainly adopted surgery alone as primary approach. The relapsed rate was only 1/13 (7.7%) from HospA. However, 6/8 (75%) patients in Others relapsed and 3 patients eventually died (2 disease progression; 1 sepsis). The overall incidence of hypopituitarism was lower in the HospA (72% vs 87.5%). No other radiation induced complication was noted.
CONCLUSION
If with residue, surgery alone approach for craniopharyngioma is associated with a high risk of relapse. Despite being a benign tumor, patients with multiple relapses can have fatal outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-8517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-5866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy059.062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2018-06, Vol.20 (suppl_2), p.i42-i42</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6012806/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6012806/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Godfrey Chi-Fung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku, Dennis Tak-Noi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luk, Chun Wing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Alvin Siu-Cheung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shing, Matthew Ming-Kong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Anthony Pak-Yin</creatorcontrib><title>CRAN-26. COMPARING SURGERY ALONE OR SURGERY PLUS RADIATION THERAPY IN CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA MANAGEMENT</title><title>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><description>Abstract
BACKGROUND
The management approach for craniopharyngioma has not reach a consensus between neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists for the past decades. We reviewed our experience and assessed the outcome of these 2 approaches.
METHOD
This is a retrospective review and children with oncological conditions were admitted to 5 public hospitals. Their data were collected prospectively by 2 full time data managers. Patients’ progress was updated annually and the data were crossed checked by the principle investigators. Survival data was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier Analysis.
RESULT
From Jan 1994 to Dec 2016 (13-yrs), 21 children (<18yrs) with craniopharyngioma was identified. The estimated incidence was 1.47/million children<15yrs/yr. M:F=10:9 and median age was 9.7yrs (range 2mons to 16.5yrs). 12/21 (57%) children were treated with surgery alone as primary approach. Even statistically insignificant, the 6yrs relapse-free-survival was 80% vs 50.3% between surgery+radiation therapy (RT) vs surgery alone. 8/13(61.5%) children in one hospital (HospA) were treated with surgery+RT as primary approach if there was residual lesion post-operatively, but other hospitals (Others) mainly adopted surgery alone as primary approach. The relapsed rate was only 1/13 (7.7%) from HospA. However, 6/8 (75%) patients in Others relapsed and 3 patients eventually died (2 disease progression; 1 sepsis). The overall incidence of hypopituitarism was lower in the HospA (72% vs 87.5%). No other radiation induced complication was noted.
CONCLUSION
If with residue, surgery alone approach for craniopharyngioma is associated with a high risk of relapse. Despite being a benign tumor, patients with multiple relapses can have fatal outcome.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>1522-8517</issn><issn>1523-5866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkNFOgzAUhhujiXP6AN71AWRry9rSG5NmIiOBQjp2sauGQdGZDRZwJnt7mZgl3nl1Ts4535ecH4BHjCYYCXda22NTF9O6OSEqJoiRKzDClLgO9Ri7_umJ41HMb8Fd130gRDBleAQ2cy2VQ9gEzpM4lTpUAVyudODrNZRRonyY6MsgjVZLqOVLKLMwUTBb-FqmaxgqeLaESbqQeq2CMIkljKWSgR_7KrsHN1W-6-zDbx2D1aufzRdOlAThXEZOgTknjigxta5FJXM9zq2dYWsx4hvCS0pJRUhpEXYLW9JZ_4YnPCTKXPRIxTiyQrhj8Dx4D8fN3paFrT_bfGcO7XaftyfT5Fvzd1Nv381b82UYwsRDrBfgQVC0Tde1trqwGJlzymZI2Qwpmz7lnnkamOZ4-Mf5Nwb_esA</recordid><startdate>20180622</startdate><enddate>20180622</enddate><creator>Chan, Godfrey Chi-Fung</creator><creator>Ku, Dennis Tak-Noi</creator><creator>Luk, Chun Wing</creator><creator>Ling, Alvin Siu-Cheung</creator><creator>Shing, Matthew Ming-Kong</creator><creator>Liu, Anthony Pak-Yin</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180622</creationdate><title>CRAN-26. COMPARING SURGERY ALONE OR SURGERY PLUS RADIATION THERAPY IN CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA MANAGEMENT</title><author>Chan, Godfrey Chi-Fung ; Ku, Dennis Tak-Noi ; Luk, Chun Wing ; Ling, Alvin Siu-Cheung ; Shing, Matthew Ming-Kong ; Liu, Anthony Pak-Yin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1772-9d15e3e0d63877ee41ee107b27d552f22de013ced5451789809da95e3f670e993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Godfrey Chi-Fung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku, Dennis Tak-Noi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luk, Chun Wing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Alvin Siu-Cheung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shing, Matthew Ming-Kong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Anthony Pak-Yin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Godfrey Chi-Fung</au><au>Ku, Dennis Tak-Noi</au><au>Luk, Chun Wing</au><au>Ling, Alvin Siu-Cheung</au><au>Shing, Matthew Ming-Kong</au><au>Liu, Anthony Pak-Yin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CRAN-26. COMPARING SURGERY ALONE OR SURGERY PLUS RADIATION THERAPY IN CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA MANAGEMENT</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><date>2018-06-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>suppl_2</issue><spage>i42</spage><epage>i42</epage><pages>i42-i42</pages><issn>1522-8517</issn><eissn>1523-5866</eissn><abstract>Abstract
BACKGROUND
The management approach for craniopharyngioma has not reach a consensus between neurosurgeons and radiation oncologists for the past decades. We reviewed our experience and assessed the outcome of these 2 approaches.
METHOD
This is a retrospective review and children with oncological conditions were admitted to 5 public hospitals. Their data were collected prospectively by 2 full time data managers. Patients’ progress was updated annually and the data were crossed checked by the principle investigators. Survival data was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier Analysis.
RESULT
From Jan 1994 to Dec 2016 (13-yrs), 21 children (<18yrs) with craniopharyngioma was identified. The estimated incidence was 1.47/million children<15yrs/yr. M:F=10:9 and median age was 9.7yrs (range 2mons to 16.5yrs). 12/21 (57%) children were treated with surgery alone as primary approach. Even statistically insignificant, the 6yrs relapse-free-survival was 80% vs 50.3% between surgery+radiation therapy (RT) vs surgery alone. 8/13(61.5%) children in one hospital (HospA) were treated with surgery+RT as primary approach if there was residual lesion post-operatively, but other hospitals (Others) mainly adopted surgery alone as primary approach. The relapsed rate was only 1/13 (7.7%) from HospA. However, 6/8 (75%) patients in Others relapsed and 3 patients eventually died (2 disease progression; 1 sepsis). The overall incidence of hypopituitarism was lower in the HospA (72% vs 87.5%). No other radiation induced complication was noted.
CONCLUSION
If with residue, surgery alone approach for craniopharyngioma is associated with a high risk of relapse. Despite being a benign tumor, patients with multiple relapses can have fatal outcome.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/neuonc/noy059.062</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-8517 |
ispartof | Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2018-06, Vol.20 (suppl_2), p.i42-i42 |
issn | 1522-8517 1523-5866 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6012806 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Abstracts |
title | CRAN-26. COMPARING SURGERY ALONE OR SURGERY PLUS RADIATION THERAPY IN CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA MANAGEMENT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A29%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CRAN-26.%20COMPARING%20SURGERY%20ALONE%20OR%20SURGERY%20PLUS%20RADIATION%20THERAPY%20IN%20CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA%20MANAGEMENT&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Chan,%20Godfrey%20Chi-Fung&rft.date=2018-06-22&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=suppl_2&rft.spage=i42&rft.epage=i42&rft.pages=i42-i42&rft.issn=1522-8517&rft.eissn=1523-5866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/neuonc/noy059.062&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/neuonc/noy059.062%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/neuonc/noy059.062&rfr_iscdi=true |