Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Mammography is less effective in detecting cancer in dense than in fatty breasts. Methods We undertook a systematic search in PubMed to identify studies on women with dense breasts who underwent screening with mammography supplemented with ultrasound. A meta-analysis was undertaken on the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of cancer 2018-06, Vol.118 (12), p.1559-1570
Hauptverfasser: Rebolj, Matejka, Assi, Valentina, Brentnall, Adam, Parmar, Dharmishta, Duffy, Stephen W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1570
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1559
container_title British journal of cancer
container_volume 118
creator Rebolj, Matejka
Assi, Valentina
Brentnall, Adam
Parmar, Dharmishta
Duffy, Stephen W.
description Background Mammography is less effective in detecting cancer in dense than in fatty breasts. Methods We undertook a systematic search in PubMed to identify studies on women with dense breasts who underwent screening with mammography supplemented with ultrasound. A meta-analysis was undertaken on the proportion of cancers detected only by ultrasound, out of all screen-detected cancers, and the proportion of women with negative mammography who were referred for assessment following ultrasound screening. Results Twenty-nine studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. The proportion of total cancers detected only by ultrasound was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.27–0.31), consistent with an approximately 40% increase in the detection of cancers compared to mammography. In the studied populations, this translated into an additional 3.8 (95% CI: 3.4–4.2) screen-detected cases per 1000 mammography-negative women. About 13% (32/248) of cancers were in situ from 17 studies with information on this subgroup. Ultrasound approximately doubled the referral for assessment in three studies with these data. Conclusions Studies have consistently shown an increased detection of breast cancer by supplementary ultrasound screening. An inclusion of supplementary ultrasound into routine screening will need to consider the availability of ultrasound and diagnostic assessment capacities.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41416-018-0080-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6008336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2057086629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-d3abbee4eeae920a36f060ca00342dfaf1d8cddc4a232bf29a9350d0a34fd7483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpabbb_oBeiqCXXtyMJK8_eiiE0C8I9JKcxdga7yrY1lYjp-y_r5ZN0w8IQkjDPPNqRq8QrxW8V2Cacy5VqaoCVFMANFCYJ2KlNkYXqtH1U7ECgLqAVsOZeMF8m8MWmvq5ONNtbaocrcR04ZxPPswyDHIZU0QOy-xkCnLCaQrbiPvdQfpZph3JHpmOoKM5X7pIyEkmz7zQB8kHTjRh8r2MdOfpp8QsNFHCAmccD-z5pXg24Mj06v5ci5vPn64vvxZX3798u7y4KvqyhlQ4g11HVBIh5e7RVANU0COAKbUbcFCu6Z3rS9RGd4NusTUbcBksB1eXjVmLjyfd_dJN5Hqa82Cj3Uc_YTzYgN7-m5n9zm7Dnc2f0hhTZYF39wIx_FiIk5089zSOOFNY2GowVd5lXmvx9j_0NiwxD3ykNjU0VaXbTKkT1cfAHGl4aEaBPZppT2babKY9mmlNrnnz9xQPFb_dy4A-AZxT85bin6cfV_0FYYys9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2057086629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rebolj, Matejka ; Assi, Valentina ; Brentnall, Adam ; Parmar, Dharmishta ; Duffy, Stephen W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rebolj, Matejka ; Assi, Valentina ; Brentnall, Adam ; Parmar, Dharmishta ; Duffy, Stephen W.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Mammography is less effective in detecting cancer in dense than in fatty breasts. Methods We undertook a systematic search in PubMed to identify studies on women with dense breasts who underwent screening with mammography supplemented with ultrasound. A meta-analysis was undertaken on the proportion of cancers detected only by ultrasound, out of all screen-detected cancers, and the proportion of women with negative mammography who were referred for assessment following ultrasound screening. Results Twenty-nine studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. The proportion of total cancers detected only by ultrasound was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.27–0.31), consistent with an approximately 40% increase in the detection of cancers compared to mammography. In the studied populations, this translated into an additional 3.8 (95% CI: 3.4–4.2) screen-detected cases per 1000 mammography-negative women. About 13% (32/248) of cancers were in situ from 17 studies with information on this subgroup. Ultrasound approximately doubled the referral for assessment in three studies with these data. Conclusions Studies have consistently shown an increased detection of breast cancer by supplementary ultrasound screening. An inclusion of supplementary ultrasound into routine screening will need to consider the availability of ultrasound and diagnostic assessment capacities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0080-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29736009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/4028/67/1347 ; 692/700 ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Breast cancer ; Breast Density ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Cancer Research ; Carcinoma in Situ - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Drug Resistance ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Mammography ; Mammography - methods ; Meta-analysis ; Molecular Medicine ; Multimodal Imaging - methods ; Oncology ; Population studies ; Systematic review ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>British journal of cancer, 2018-06, Vol.118 (12), p.1559-1570</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-d3abbee4eeae920a36f060ca00342dfaf1d8cddc4a232bf29a9350d0a34fd7483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-d3abbee4eeae920a36f060ca00342dfaf1d8cddc4a232bf29a9350d0a34fd7483</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9597-645X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6008336/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6008336/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736009$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rebolj, Matejka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assi, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brentnall, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Dharmishta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Stephen W.</creatorcontrib><title>Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>British journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><description>Background Mammography is less effective in detecting cancer in dense than in fatty breasts. Methods We undertook a systematic search in PubMed to identify studies on women with dense breasts who underwent screening with mammography supplemented with ultrasound. A meta-analysis was undertaken on the proportion of cancers detected only by ultrasound, out of all screen-detected cancers, and the proportion of women with negative mammography who were referred for assessment following ultrasound screening. Results Twenty-nine studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. The proportion of total cancers detected only by ultrasound was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.27–0.31), consistent with an approximately 40% increase in the detection of cancers compared to mammography. In the studied populations, this translated into an additional 3.8 (95% CI: 3.4–4.2) screen-detected cases per 1000 mammography-negative women. About 13% (32/248) of cancers were in situ from 17 studies with information on this subgroup. Ultrasound approximately doubled the referral for assessment in three studies with these data. Conclusions Studies have consistently shown an increased detection of breast cancer by supplementary ultrasound screening. An inclusion of supplementary ultrasound into routine screening will need to consider the availability of ultrasound and diagnostic assessment capacities.</description><subject>692/4028/67/1347</subject><subject>692/700</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Density</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Drug Resistance</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Multimodal Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0007-0920</issn><issn>1532-1827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpabbb_oBeiqCXXtyMJK8_eiiE0C8I9JKcxdga7yrY1lYjp-y_r5ZN0w8IQkjDPPNqRq8QrxW8V2Cacy5VqaoCVFMANFCYJ2KlNkYXqtH1U7ECgLqAVsOZeMF8m8MWmvq5ONNtbaocrcR04ZxPPswyDHIZU0QOy-xkCnLCaQrbiPvdQfpZph3JHpmOoKM5X7pIyEkmz7zQB8kHTjRh8r2MdOfpp8QsNFHCAmccD-z5pXg24Mj06v5ci5vPn64vvxZX3798u7y4KvqyhlQ4g11HVBIh5e7RVANU0COAKbUbcFCu6Z3rS9RGd4NusTUbcBksB1eXjVmLjyfd_dJN5Hqa82Cj3Uc_YTzYgN7-m5n9zm7Dnc2f0hhTZYF39wIx_FiIk5089zSOOFNY2GowVd5lXmvx9j_0NiwxD3ykNjU0VaXbTKkT1cfAHGl4aEaBPZppT2babKY9mmlNrnnz9xQPFb_dy4A-AZxT85bin6cfV_0FYYys9A</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Rebolj, Matejka</creator><creator>Assi, Valentina</creator><creator>Brentnall, Adam</creator><creator>Parmar, Dharmishta</creator><creator>Duffy, Stephen W.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-645X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Rebolj, Matejka ; Assi, Valentina ; Brentnall, Adam ; Parmar, Dharmishta ; Duffy, Stephen W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-d3abbee4eeae920a36f060ca00342dfaf1d8cddc4a232bf29a9350d0a34fd7483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>692/4028/67/1347</topic><topic>692/700</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Density</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Drug Resistance</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Multimodal Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rebolj, Matejka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assi, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brentnall, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Dharmishta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Stephen W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rebolj, Matejka</au><au>Assi, Valentina</au><au>Brentnall, Adam</au><au>Parmar, Dharmishta</au><au>Duffy, Stephen W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>British journal of cancer</jtitle><stitle>Br J Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Br J Cancer</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1559</spage><epage>1570</epage><pages>1559-1570</pages><issn>0007-0920</issn><eissn>1532-1827</eissn><abstract>Background Mammography is less effective in detecting cancer in dense than in fatty breasts. Methods We undertook a systematic search in PubMed to identify studies on women with dense breasts who underwent screening with mammography supplemented with ultrasound. A meta-analysis was undertaken on the proportion of cancers detected only by ultrasound, out of all screen-detected cancers, and the proportion of women with negative mammography who were referred for assessment following ultrasound screening. Results Twenty-nine studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. The proportion of total cancers detected only by ultrasound was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.27–0.31), consistent with an approximately 40% increase in the detection of cancers compared to mammography. In the studied populations, this translated into an additional 3.8 (95% CI: 3.4–4.2) screen-detected cases per 1000 mammography-negative women. About 13% (32/248) of cancers were in situ from 17 studies with information on this subgroup. Ultrasound approximately doubled the referral for assessment in three studies with these data. Conclusions Studies have consistently shown an increased detection of breast cancer by supplementary ultrasound screening. An inclusion of supplementary ultrasound into routine screening will need to consider the availability of ultrasound and diagnostic assessment capacities.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>29736009</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41416-018-0080-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-645X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0920
ispartof British journal of cancer, 2018-06, Vol.118 (12), p.1559-1570
issn 0007-0920
1532-1827
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6008336
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Nature Journals Online; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects 692/4028/67/1347
692/700
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Breast - diagnostic imaging
Breast cancer
Breast Density
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Cancer Research
Carcinoma in Situ - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging
Drug Resistance
Epidemiology
Female
Health risk assessment
Humans
Mammography
Mammography - methods
Meta-analysis
Molecular Medicine
Multimodal Imaging - methods
Oncology
Population studies
Systematic review
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods
Ultrasound
title Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A06%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Addition%20of%20ultrasound%20to%20mammography%20in%20the%20case%20of%20dense%20breast%20tissue:%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Rebolj,%20Matejka&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1559&rft.epage=1570&rft.pages=1559-1570&rft.issn=0007-0920&rft.eissn=1532-1827&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41416-018-0080-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2057086629%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2057086629&rft_id=info:pmid/29736009&rfr_iscdi=true