Good results with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee resurfacing after 10-year follow-up
The current study was designed to determine (1) 10-year implant survival and (2) patient’s self-reported functional outcome in a single surgeon’s consecutive cohort of patients who had undergone minimally invasive unicondylar resurfacing with a modified cementation technique utilizing a cobalt–chrom...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology 2018-07, Vol.28 (5), p.959-965 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 965 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 959 |
container_title | European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Redish, Martin H. Fennema, Peter |
description | The current study was designed to determine (1) 10-year implant survival and (2) patient’s self-reported functional outcome in a single surgeon’s consecutive cohort of patients who had undergone minimally invasive unicondylar resurfacing with a modified cementation technique utilizing a cobalt–chromium femur/inlaid all-PE tibia, fixed-bearing unicompartmental prosthesis. We included 344 consecutive patients (361 knees) who had received the study device between January 2002 and December 2005 in this retrospective study. After 10 years, 78 patients (78 knees) had died, 59 (59 knees) were lost to follow-up and four (four knees) did not participate. Thirteen knees (11 patients) were revised after a mean of 5.8 ± 1.9 years. Hence, the study population at follow-up comprised 192 patients (207 knees). Ten-year implant survival was 94.6% (95% confidence interval, 90.9–96.8%). The Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Knee Score were 68.9 ± 28.9 and 39 ± 9.1, respectively. Excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes were obtained with UKA with an inlaid all-PE tibia with a modified cementation technique. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00590-017-2079-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6003968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2351563222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3855-1659bd1e5a5038384dec106ab16ac1f7e86af1ac96bd1914f4dee41745e825503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9rFDEUxYMotq5-AF9kwBdfYnOTSSZ5EaTUtlDoi31tyM7e2aZmkjWZ2bLf3qxb6x-QPCRwf-fkHg4hb4F9BMa6k8KYNIwy6ChnnaHyGTmGVnAKTOnn9a2EoJopeURelXLPGEgD8iU54gZUZzpzTG7PU1o1GcscptI8-OmuGX30owth1_i4dcVvsZmj79O4cXkaMU4uNN8i4k9VHlzv47pxw4S5AUZ36HIzpBDSA503r8mLwYWCbx7vBbn5cvb19IJeXZ9fnn6-or3QUlJQ0ixXgNJJJrTQ7Qr7msEtQbkehg61cgO43qhKGWiHCmALXStRc1k1C_Lp4LuZlyOu-rpldsFuck2SdzY5b_-eRH9n12lrFWPCKF0NPjwa5PR9xjLZ0ZceQ3AR01wsGNVpJfZnQd7_g96nOccaz3IhQSrBOa8UHKg-p1IyDk_LALP79uyhPVvbs_v2rKyad3-meFL8qqsC_ACUOoprzL-__r_rDwJKppQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2351563222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Good results with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee resurfacing after 10-year follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Redish, Martin H. ; Fennema, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Redish, Martin H. ; Fennema, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>The current study was designed to determine (1) 10-year implant survival and (2) patient’s self-reported functional outcome in a single surgeon’s consecutive cohort of patients who had undergone minimally invasive unicondylar resurfacing with a modified cementation technique utilizing a cobalt–chromium femur/inlaid all-PE tibia, fixed-bearing unicompartmental prosthesis. We included 344 consecutive patients (361 knees) who had received the study device between January 2002 and December 2005 in this retrospective study. After 10 years, 78 patients (78 knees) had died, 59 (59 knees) were lost to follow-up and four (four knees) did not participate. Thirteen knees (11 patients) were revised after a mean of 5.8 ± 1.9 years. Hence, the study population at follow-up comprised 192 patients (207 knees). Ten-year implant survival was 94.6% (95% confidence interval, 90.9–96.8%). The Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Knee Score were 68.9 ± 28.9 and 39 ± 9.1, respectively. Excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes were obtained with UKA with an inlaid all-PE tibia with a modified cementation technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1633-8065</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2079-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29167979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthritis ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation ; Bone Cements ; Cementation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Knee ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - rehabilitation ; Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY ; Original • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Failure ; Questionnaires ; Recovery of Function ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Survival analysis ; Transplants & implants ; Traumatic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology, 2018-07, Vol.28 (5), p.959-965</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3855-1659bd1e5a5038384dec106ab16ac1f7e86af1ac96bd1914f4dee41745e825503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3855-1659bd1e5a5038384dec106ab16ac1f7e86af1ac96bd1914f4dee41745e825503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00590-017-2079-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00590-017-2079-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Redish, Martin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fennema, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Good results with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee resurfacing after 10-year follow-up</title><title>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><description>The current study was designed to determine (1) 10-year implant survival and (2) patient’s self-reported functional outcome in a single surgeon’s consecutive cohort of patients who had undergone minimally invasive unicondylar resurfacing with a modified cementation technique utilizing a cobalt–chromium femur/inlaid all-PE tibia, fixed-bearing unicompartmental prosthesis. We included 344 consecutive patients (361 knees) who had received the study device between January 2002 and December 2005 in this retrospective study. After 10 years, 78 patients (78 knees) had died, 59 (59 knees) were lost to follow-up and four (four knees) did not participate. Thirteen knees (11 patients) were revised after a mean of 5.8 ± 1.9 years. Hence, the study population at follow-up comprised 192 patients (207 knees). Ten-year implant survival was 94.6% (95% confidence interval, 90.9–96.8%). The Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Knee Score were 68.9 ± 28.9 and 39 ± 9.1, respectively. Excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes were obtained with UKA with an inlaid all-PE tibia with a modified cementation technique.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>Cementation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY</subject><subject>Original • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1633-8065</issn><issn>1432-1068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9rFDEUxYMotq5-AF9kwBdfYnOTSSZ5EaTUtlDoi31tyM7e2aZmkjWZ2bLf3qxb6x-QPCRwf-fkHg4hb4F9BMa6k8KYNIwy6ChnnaHyGTmGVnAKTOnn9a2EoJopeURelXLPGEgD8iU54gZUZzpzTG7PU1o1GcscptI8-OmuGX30owth1_i4dcVvsZmj79O4cXkaMU4uNN8i4k9VHlzv47pxw4S5AUZ36HIzpBDSA503r8mLwYWCbx7vBbn5cvb19IJeXZ9fnn6-or3QUlJQ0ixXgNJJJrTQ7Qr7msEtQbkehg61cgO43qhKGWiHCmALXStRc1k1C_Lp4LuZlyOu-rpldsFuck2SdzY5b_-eRH9n12lrFWPCKF0NPjwa5PR9xjLZ0ZceQ3AR01wsGNVpJfZnQd7_g96nOccaz3IhQSrBOa8UHKg-p1IyDk_LALP79uyhPVvbs_v2rKyad3-meFL8qqsC_ACUOoprzL-__r_rDwJKppQ</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Redish, Martin H.</creator><creator>Fennema, Peter</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Good results with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee resurfacing after 10-year follow-up</title><author>Redish, Martin H. ; Fennema, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3855-1659bd1e5a5038384dec106ab16ac1f7e86af1ac96bd1914f4dee41745e825503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>Cementation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY</topic><topic>Original • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redish, Martin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fennema, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redish, Martin H.</au><au>Fennema, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Good results with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee resurfacing after 10-year follow-up</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>965</epage><pages>959-965</pages><issn>1633-8065</issn><eissn>1432-1068</eissn><abstract>The current study was designed to determine (1) 10-year implant survival and (2) patient’s self-reported functional outcome in a single surgeon’s consecutive cohort of patients who had undergone minimally invasive unicondylar resurfacing with a modified cementation technique utilizing a cobalt–chromium femur/inlaid all-PE tibia, fixed-bearing unicompartmental prosthesis. We included 344 consecutive patients (361 knees) who had received the study device between January 2002 and December 2005 in this retrospective study. After 10 years, 78 patients (78 knees) had died, 59 (59 knees) were lost to follow-up and four (four knees) did not participate. Thirteen knees (11 patients) were revised after a mean of 5.8 ± 1.9 years. Hence, the study population at follow-up comprised 192 patients (207 knees). Ten-year implant survival was 94.6% (95% confidence interval, 90.9–96.8%). The Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Knee Score were 68.9 ± 28.9 and 39 ± 9.1, respectively. Excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes were obtained with UKA with an inlaid all-PE tibia with a modified cementation technique.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><pmid>29167979</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00590-017-2079-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1633-8065 |
ispartof | European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology, 2018-07, Vol.28 (5), p.959-965 |
issn | 1633-8065 1432-1068 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6003968 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Aged Arthritis Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation Bone Cements Cementation Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Joint replacement surgery Joint surgery Knee Knee Joint - surgery Knee Prosthesis Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - rehabilitation Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY Original • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patients Prostheses Prosthesis Failure Questionnaires Recovery of Function Retrospective Studies Surgical Orthopedics Survival analysis Transplants & implants Traumatic Surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Good results with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee resurfacing after 10-year follow-up |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A26%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Good%20results%20with%20minimally%20invasive%20unicompartmental%20knee%20resurfacing%20after%2010-year%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20&%20traumatology&rft.au=Redish,%20Martin%20H.&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=965&rft.pages=959-965&rft.issn=1633-8065&rft.eissn=1432-1068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00590-017-2079-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2351563222%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2351563222&rft_id=info:pmid/29167979&rfr_iscdi=true |