Rho GTPases Mediate the Mechanosensitive Lineage Commitment of Neural Stem Cells
Adult neural stem cells (NSCs) play important roles in learning and memory and are negatively impacted by neurological disease. It is known that biochemical and genetic factors regulate self‐renewal and differentiation, and it has recently been suggested that mechanical and solid‐state cues, such as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) Ohio), 2011-11, Vol.29 (11), p.1886-1897 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1897 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1886 |
container_title | Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Keung, Albert J. de Juan‐Pardo, Elena M. Schaffer, David V. Kumar, Sanjay |
description | Adult neural stem cells (NSCs) play important roles in learning and memory and are negatively impacted by neurological disease. It is known that biochemical and genetic factors regulate self‐renewal and differentiation, and it has recently been suggested that mechanical and solid‐state cues, such as extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness, can also regulate the functions of NSCs and other stem cell types. However, relatively little is known of the molecular mechanisms through which stem cells transduce mechanical inputs into fate decisions, the extent to which mechanical inputs instruct fate decisions versus select for or against lineage‐committed blast populations, or the in vivo relevance of mechanotransductive signaling molecules in native stem cell niches. Here we demonstrate that ECM‐derived mechanical signals act through Rho GTPases to activate the cellular contractility machinery in a key early window during differentiation to regulate NSC lineage commitment. Furthermore, culturing NSCs on increasingly stiff ECMs enhances RhoA and Cdc42 activation, increases NSC stiffness, and suppresses neurogenesis. Likewise, inhibiting RhoA and Cdc42 or downstream regulators of cellular contractility rescues NSCs from stiff matrix‐ and Rho GTPase‐induced neurosuppression. Importantly, Rho GTPase expression and ECM stiffness do not alter proliferation or apoptosis rates indicating that an instructive rather than selective mechanism modulates lineage distributions. Finally, in the adult brain, RhoA activation in hippocampal progenitors suppresses neurogenesis, analogous to its effect in vitro. These results establish Rho GTPase‐based mechanotransduction and cellular stiffness as biophysical regulators of NSC fate in vitro and RhoA as an important regulatory protein in the hippocampal stem cell niche. STEM CELLS 2011;29:1886–1897 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/stem.746 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5990277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>900774364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4756-4679138c4d8b53e529862be373dca972a3fe6de05d38cd697f31a14081308a5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLwzAYhoMonsFfILnTm2rS5ngjSJkHmDrcvA5Z-9VF2kabbrJ_b8am6IVX-Ugenrzfi9AJJReUkPQy9NBcSCa20D7lTCdMU7UdZyJEwonWe-gghDdCKONK7aK9lGoulE730eh55vHtZGQDBPwApbM94H4GcS5mtvUB2uB6twA8dC3YV8C5bxrXN9D22Ff4EeadrfE4BsA51HU4QjuVrQMcb85D9HIzmOR3yfDp9j6_HiYFk1wkTEhNM1WwUk15BjzVSqRTyGRWFlbL1GYViBIILyNUCi2rjFrKiKIZUTbeHqKrtfd9Pm2gLGKeGMS8d66x3dJ468zfl9bNzKtfGK41SaWMgrONoPMfcwi9aVwo4gq2BT8PRhMiJcsEi-T5miw6H0IH1c8vlJhV_2bVv4n9R_T0d6of8LvwCCRr4NPVsPxXZMaTwcNK-AUoupAU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900774364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rho GTPases Mediate the Mechanosensitive Lineage Commitment of Neural Stem Cells</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Keung, Albert J. ; de Juan‐Pardo, Elena M. ; Schaffer, David V. ; Kumar, Sanjay</creator><creatorcontrib>Keung, Albert J. ; de Juan‐Pardo, Elena M. ; Schaffer, David V. ; Kumar, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><description>Adult neural stem cells (NSCs) play important roles in learning and memory and are negatively impacted by neurological disease. It is known that biochemical and genetic factors regulate self‐renewal and differentiation, and it has recently been suggested that mechanical and solid‐state cues, such as extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness, can also regulate the functions of NSCs and other stem cell types. However, relatively little is known of the molecular mechanisms through which stem cells transduce mechanical inputs into fate decisions, the extent to which mechanical inputs instruct fate decisions versus select for or against lineage‐committed blast populations, or the in vivo relevance of mechanotransductive signaling molecules in native stem cell niches. Here we demonstrate that ECM‐derived mechanical signals act through Rho GTPases to activate the cellular contractility machinery in a key early window during differentiation to regulate NSC lineage commitment. Furthermore, culturing NSCs on increasingly stiff ECMs enhances RhoA and Cdc42 activation, increases NSC stiffness, and suppresses neurogenesis. Likewise, inhibiting RhoA and Cdc42 or downstream regulators of cellular contractility rescues NSCs from stiff matrix‐ and Rho GTPase‐induced neurosuppression. Importantly, Rho GTPase expression and ECM stiffness do not alter proliferation or apoptosis rates indicating that an instructive rather than selective mechanism modulates lineage distributions. Finally, in the adult brain, RhoA activation in hippocampal progenitors suppresses neurogenesis, analogous to its effect in vitro. These results establish Rho GTPase‐based mechanotransduction and cellular stiffness as biophysical regulators of NSC fate in vitro and RhoA as an important regulatory protein in the hippocampal stem cell niche. STEM CELLS 2011;29:1886–1897</description><identifier>ISSN: 1066-5099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/stem.746</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21956892</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adipose stem cells ; Animals ; Apoptosis - genetics ; Apoptosis - physiology ; cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein - genetics ; cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein - metabolism ; Cell Differentiation - genetics ; Cell Differentiation - physiology ; Cell Proliferation ; Cells, Cultured ; Cellular mechanotransduction ; Elastic modulus ; Extracellular matrix ; Extracellular Matrix - metabolism ; Female ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique ; Mechanotransduction, Cellular - genetics ; Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology ; Microscopy, Atomic Force ; Neural stem cells ; Neural Stem Cells - cytology ; Neural Stem Cells - metabolism ; Neurogenesis - genetics ; Neurogenesis - physiology ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred F344 ; rho GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics ; rho GTP-Binding Proteins - metabolism ; Rho GTP‐binding proteins ; rhoA GTP-Binding Protein - genetics ; rhoA GTP-Binding Protein - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2011-11, Vol.29 (11), p.1886-1897</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 AlphaMed Press</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 AlphaMed Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4756-4679138c4d8b53e529862be373dca972a3fe6de05d38cd697f31a14081308a5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4756-4679138c4d8b53e529862be373dca972a3fe6de05d38cd697f31a14081308a5d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21956892$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keung, Albert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Juan‐Pardo, Elena M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaffer, David V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><title>Rho GTPases Mediate the Mechanosensitive Lineage Commitment of Neural Stem Cells</title><title>Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)</title><addtitle>Stem Cells</addtitle><description>Adult neural stem cells (NSCs) play important roles in learning and memory and are negatively impacted by neurological disease. It is known that biochemical and genetic factors regulate self‐renewal and differentiation, and it has recently been suggested that mechanical and solid‐state cues, such as extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness, can also regulate the functions of NSCs and other stem cell types. However, relatively little is known of the molecular mechanisms through which stem cells transduce mechanical inputs into fate decisions, the extent to which mechanical inputs instruct fate decisions versus select for or against lineage‐committed blast populations, or the in vivo relevance of mechanotransductive signaling molecules in native stem cell niches. Here we demonstrate that ECM‐derived mechanical signals act through Rho GTPases to activate the cellular contractility machinery in a key early window during differentiation to regulate NSC lineage commitment. Furthermore, culturing NSCs on increasingly stiff ECMs enhances RhoA and Cdc42 activation, increases NSC stiffness, and suppresses neurogenesis. Likewise, inhibiting RhoA and Cdc42 or downstream regulators of cellular contractility rescues NSCs from stiff matrix‐ and Rho GTPase‐induced neurosuppression. Importantly, Rho GTPase expression and ECM stiffness do not alter proliferation or apoptosis rates indicating that an instructive rather than selective mechanism modulates lineage distributions. Finally, in the adult brain, RhoA activation in hippocampal progenitors suppresses neurogenesis, analogous to its effect in vitro. These results establish Rho GTPase‐based mechanotransduction and cellular stiffness as biophysical regulators of NSC fate in vitro and RhoA as an important regulatory protein in the hippocampal stem cell niche. STEM CELLS 2011;29:1886–1897</description><subject>Adipose stem cells</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis - genetics</subject><subject>Apoptosis - physiology</subject><subject>cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein - genetics</subject><subject>cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein - metabolism</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation - genetics</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation - physiology</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Cellular mechanotransduction</subject><subject>Elastic modulus</subject><subject>Extracellular matrix</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</subject><subject>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - genetics</subject><subject>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology</subject><subject>Microscopy, Atomic Force</subject><subject>Neural stem cells</subject><subject>Neural Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Neural Stem Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>Neurogenesis - genetics</subject><subject>Neurogenesis - physiology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred F344</subject><subject>rho GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>rho GTP-Binding Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Rho GTP‐binding proteins</subject><subject>rhoA GTP-Binding Protein - genetics</subject><subject>rhoA GTP-Binding Protein - metabolism</subject><issn>1066-5099</issn><issn>1549-4918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtLwzAYhoMonsFfILnTm2rS5ngjSJkHmDrcvA5Z-9VF2kabbrJ_b8am6IVX-Ugenrzfi9AJJReUkPQy9NBcSCa20D7lTCdMU7UdZyJEwonWe-gghDdCKONK7aK9lGoulE730eh55vHtZGQDBPwApbM94H4GcS5mtvUB2uB6twA8dC3YV8C5bxrXN9D22Ff4EeadrfE4BsA51HU4QjuVrQMcb85D9HIzmOR3yfDp9j6_HiYFk1wkTEhNM1WwUk15BjzVSqRTyGRWFlbL1GYViBIILyNUCi2rjFrKiKIZUTbeHqKrtfd9Pm2gLGKeGMS8d66x3dJ468zfl9bNzKtfGK41SaWMgrONoPMfcwi9aVwo4gq2BT8PRhMiJcsEi-T5miw6H0IH1c8vlJhV_2bVv4n9R_T0d6of8LvwCCRr4NPVsPxXZMaTwcNK-AUoupAU</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Keung, Albert J.</creator><creator>de Juan‐Pardo, Elena M.</creator><creator>Schaffer, David V.</creator><creator>Kumar, Sanjay</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>Rho GTPases Mediate the Mechanosensitive Lineage Commitment of Neural Stem Cells</title><author>Keung, Albert J. ; de Juan‐Pardo, Elena M. ; Schaffer, David V. ; Kumar, Sanjay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4756-4679138c4d8b53e529862be373dca972a3fe6de05d38cd697f31a14081308a5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adipose stem cells</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis - genetics</topic><topic>Apoptosis - physiology</topic><topic>cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein - genetics</topic><topic>cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein - metabolism</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation - genetics</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation - physiology</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Cellular mechanotransduction</topic><topic>Elastic modulus</topic><topic>Extracellular matrix</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</topic><topic>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - genetics</topic><topic>Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology</topic><topic>Microscopy, Atomic Force</topic><topic>Neural stem cells</topic><topic>Neural Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Neural Stem Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>Neurogenesis - genetics</topic><topic>Neurogenesis - physiology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred F344</topic><topic>rho GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>rho GTP-Binding Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Rho GTP‐binding proteins</topic><topic>rhoA GTP-Binding Protein - genetics</topic><topic>rhoA GTP-Binding Protein - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keung, Albert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Juan‐Pardo, Elena M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaffer, David V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keung, Albert J.</au><au>de Juan‐Pardo, Elena M.</au><au>Schaffer, David V.</au><au>Kumar, Sanjay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rho GTPases Mediate the Mechanosensitive Lineage Commitment of Neural Stem Cells</atitle><jtitle>Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)</jtitle><addtitle>Stem Cells</addtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1886</spage><epage>1897</epage><pages>1886-1897</pages><issn>1066-5099</issn><eissn>1549-4918</eissn><abstract>Adult neural stem cells (NSCs) play important roles in learning and memory and are negatively impacted by neurological disease. It is known that biochemical and genetic factors regulate self‐renewal and differentiation, and it has recently been suggested that mechanical and solid‐state cues, such as extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness, can also regulate the functions of NSCs and other stem cell types. However, relatively little is known of the molecular mechanisms through which stem cells transduce mechanical inputs into fate decisions, the extent to which mechanical inputs instruct fate decisions versus select for or against lineage‐committed blast populations, or the in vivo relevance of mechanotransductive signaling molecules in native stem cell niches. Here we demonstrate that ECM‐derived mechanical signals act through Rho GTPases to activate the cellular contractility machinery in a key early window during differentiation to regulate NSC lineage commitment. Furthermore, culturing NSCs on increasingly stiff ECMs enhances RhoA and Cdc42 activation, increases NSC stiffness, and suppresses neurogenesis. Likewise, inhibiting RhoA and Cdc42 or downstream regulators of cellular contractility rescues NSCs from stiff matrix‐ and Rho GTPase‐induced neurosuppression. Importantly, Rho GTPase expression and ECM stiffness do not alter proliferation or apoptosis rates indicating that an instructive rather than selective mechanism modulates lineage distributions. Finally, in the adult brain, RhoA activation in hippocampal progenitors suppresses neurogenesis, analogous to its effect in vitro. These results establish Rho GTPase‐based mechanotransduction and cellular stiffness as biophysical regulators of NSC fate in vitro and RhoA as an important regulatory protein in the hippocampal stem cell niche. STEM CELLS 2011;29:1886–1897</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>21956892</pmid><doi>10.1002/stem.746</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1066-5099 |
ispartof | Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2011-11, Vol.29 (11), p.1886-1897 |
issn | 1066-5099 1549-4918 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5990277 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adipose stem cells Animals Apoptosis - genetics Apoptosis - physiology cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein - genetics cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein - metabolism Cell Differentiation - genetics Cell Differentiation - physiology Cell Proliferation Cells, Cultured Cellular mechanotransduction Elastic modulus Extracellular matrix Extracellular Matrix - metabolism Female Fluorescent Antibody Technique Mechanotransduction, Cellular - genetics Mechanotransduction, Cellular - physiology Microscopy, Atomic Force Neural stem cells Neural Stem Cells - cytology Neural Stem Cells - metabolism Neurogenesis - genetics Neurogenesis - physiology Rats Rats, Inbred F344 rho GTP-Binding Proteins - genetics rho GTP-Binding Proteins - metabolism Rho GTP‐binding proteins rhoA GTP-Binding Protein - genetics rhoA GTP-Binding Protein - metabolism |
title | Rho GTPases Mediate the Mechanosensitive Lineage Commitment of Neural Stem Cells |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T03%3A18%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rho%20GTPases%20Mediate%20the%20Mechanosensitive%20Lineage%20Commitment%20of%20Neural%20Stem%20Cells&rft.jtitle=Stem%20cells%20(Dayton,%20Ohio)&rft.au=Keung,%20Albert%20J.&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1886&rft.epage=1897&rft.pages=1886-1897&rft.issn=1066-5099&rft.eissn=1549-4918&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/stem.746&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E900774364%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900774364&rft_id=info:pmid/21956892&rfr_iscdi=true |