Endoscopy screening effect on stage distributions of esophageal cancer: A cluster randomized cohort study in China

Efficacy of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer is not sufficiently definitive and lacks randomized controlled trial evidence. The present study proved short‐term screening efficacy through describing and comparing disease stage distributions of intervention and control populations. Villages...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer science 2018-06, Vol.109 (6), p.1995-2002
Hauptverfasser: Guan, Chen‐Tao, Song, Guo‐Hui, Li, Bian‐Yun, Gong, Yan‐Wei, Hao, Chang‐Qing, Xue, Li‐Yan, Chen, Wan‐Qing, Wei, Wen‐Qiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2002
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1995
container_title Cancer science
container_volume 109
creator Guan, Chen‐Tao
Song, Guo‐Hui
Li, Bian‐Yun
Gong, Yan‐Wei
Hao, Chang‐Qing
Xue, Li‐Yan
Chen, Wan‐Qing
Wei, Wen‐Qiang
description Efficacy of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer is not sufficiently definitive and lacks randomized controlled trial evidence. The present study proved short‐term screening efficacy through describing and comparing disease stage distributions of intervention and control populations. Villages from Linzhou and Cixian were cluster randomly allocated to the intervention or to the control group and the target population of 52 729 and 43 068 individuals was 40‐69 years old, respectively, and the actual enrolled numbers were 18 316 and 21 178, respectively. TNM stage information and study‐defined stage information of esophageal cases from 2012 to 2016 were collected. Stage distributions were compared between the intervention and control groups in the total target population, as well as in the subgroup populations in terms of enrolment and before or after intervention. There were a total of 199 and 141 esophageal cancer cases in the intervention and control groups, respectively. For the target population, distributions of TNM stage were borderline significant between the two groups after intervention (P = .093). However, subgroup analysis of the enrolled population during the after‐intervention period had statistical significance for both TNM and study‐defined stage. Natural TNM stage distributions were approximately 32%, 41%, 24% and 3% for stages I to IV vs 71%, 19%, 7% and 3% in the intervention population. The natural study‐defined stage distributions from early, middle to advanced stages were approximately 18%, 49% and 33% vs 59%, 33% and 8%. Early‐stage esophageal cancer cases accounted for a higher proportion after endoscopy screening, and the efficacy in the target population depends on the intervention compliance. Other than incidence and mortality as endpoints, in the present cluster randomized controlled study, we took distributions of disease stage (TNM stage) as the short‐term endpoint in order to evaluate the effect of esophageal cancer screening by endoscopy. The results provided real‐world data of stage distributions from the natural population. However, the change of stage distributions proved the short‐term efficacy of endoscopy screening from another perspective.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cas.13606
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5989864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2024016022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4676-24e63fe868c49123e453e8508b0a22f328ea26ff642ba2a82f83c2921ce2829b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhhtR3HX14B-QgBc99G5SSacTDwvDsH7Aggf1HNLpykyWnmRMupXx1xt31kUF61IF9fBQxds0zxk9Z7UunC3njEsqHzSnjAvd9pTKh7dz32rK4aR5UsoNpVwKLR43J6Al73rWnzb5Ko6puLQ_kOIyYgxxQ9B7dDNJkZTZbpCMocw5DMscUiwkeYIl7bd1YyfibHSY35AVcdNSZswk26rchR84Epe2Kc_VsowHEiJZb0O0T5tH3k4Fn931s-bL26vP6_ft9cd3H9ar69YJ2csWBEruUUnlhGbAUXQcVUfVQC2A56DQgvReChgsWAVecQcamENQoAd-1lwevftl2OHoMM7ZTmafw87mg0k2mL83MWzNJn0znVZaSVEFr-4EOX1dsMxmF4rDabIR01IMUBCUSQpQ0Zf_oDdpybG-ZwCU7nrFBa3U6yPlciolo78_hlHzK0lTkzS3SVb2xZ_X35O_o6vAxRH4HiY8_N9k1qtPR-VPPgKpLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2289578340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endoscopy screening effect on stage distributions of esophageal cancer: A cluster randomized cohort study in China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Guan, Chen‐Tao ; Song, Guo‐Hui ; Li, Bian‐Yun ; Gong, Yan‐Wei ; Hao, Chang‐Qing ; Xue, Li‐Yan ; Chen, Wan‐Qing ; Wei, Wen‐Qiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Guan, Chen‐Tao ; Song, Guo‐Hui ; Li, Bian‐Yun ; Gong, Yan‐Wei ; Hao, Chang‐Qing ; Xue, Li‐Yan ; Chen, Wan‐Qing ; Wei, Wen‐Qiang</creatorcontrib><description>Efficacy of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer is not sufficiently definitive and lacks randomized controlled trial evidence. The present study proved short‐term screening efficacy through describing and comparing disease stage distributions of intervention and control populations. Villages from Linzhou and Cixian were cluster randomly allocated to the intervention or to the control group and the target population of 52 729 and 43 068 individuals was 40‐69 years old, respectively, and the actual enrolled numbers were 18 316 and 21 178, respectively. TNM stage information and study‐defined stage information of esophageal cases from 2012 to 2016 were collected. Stage distributions were compared between the intervention and control groups in the total target population, as well as in the subgroup populations in terms of enrolment and before or after intervention. There were a total of 199 and 141 esophageal cancer cases in the intervention and control groups, respectively. For the target population, distributions of TNM stage were borderline significant between the two groups after intervention (P = .093). However, subgroup analysis of the enrolled population during the after‐intervention period had statistical significance for both TNM and study‐defined stage. Natural TNM stage distributions were approximately 32%, 41%, 24% and 3% for stages I to IV vs 71%, 19%, 7% and 3% in the intervention population. The natural study‐defined stage distributions from early, middle to advanced stages were approximately 18%, 49% and 33% vs 59%, 33% and 8%. Early‐stage esophageal cancer cases accounted for a higher proportion after endoscopy screening, and the efficacy in the target population depends on the intervention compliance. Other than incidence and mortality as endpoints, in the present cluster randomized controlled study, we took distributions of disease stage (TNM stage) as the short‐term endpoint in order to evaluate the effect of esophageal cancer screening by endoscopy. The results provided real‐world data of stage distributions from the natural population. However, the change of stage distributions proved the short‐term efficacy of endoscopy screening from another perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1347-9032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-7006</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cas.13606</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29635717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; China - epidemiology ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Compliance ; early detection of cancer ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Education ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy - methods ; Esophageal cancer ; esophageal neoplasm ; Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Esophageal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Esophageal Neoplasms - ethnology ; Esophagus ; Family medical history ; Female ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Iodine ; Male ; Medical records ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neoplasm Staging ; Original ; Population studies ; Prevention ; Questionnaires ; random allocation ; Studies ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Towns</subject><ispartof>Cancer science, 2018-06, Vol.109 (6), p.1995-2002</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.</rights><rights>2018 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4676-24e63fe868c49123e453e8508b0a22f328ea26ff642ba2a82f83c2921ce2829b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4676-24e63fe868c49123e453e8508b0a22f328ea26ff642ba2a82f83c2921ce2829b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2078-9056</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989864/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5989864/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29635717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guan, Chen‐Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Guo‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bian‐Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yan‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Chang‐Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Li‐Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wan‐Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wen‐Qiang</creatorcontrib><title>Endoscopy screening effect on stage distributions of esophageal cancer: A cluster randomized cohort study in China</title><title>Cancer science</title><addtitle>Cancer Sci</addtitle><description>Efficacy of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer is not sufficiently definitive and lacks randomized controlled trial evidence. The present study proved short‐term screening efficacy through describing and comparing disease stage distributions of intervention and control populations. Villages from Linzhou and Cixian were cluster randomly allocated to the intervention or to the control group and the target population of 52 729 and 43 068 individuals was 40‐69 years old, respectively, and the actual enrolled numbers were 18 316 and 21 178, respectively. TNM stage information and study‐defined stage information of esophageal cases from 2012 to 2016 were collected. Stage distributions were compared between the intervention and control groups in the total target population, as well as in the subgroup populations in terms of enrolment and before or after intervention. There were a total of 199 and 141 esophageal cancer cases in the intervention and control groups, respectively. For the target population, distributions of TNM stage were borderline significant between the two groups after intervention (P = .093). However, subgroup analysis of the enrolled population during the after‐intervention period had statistical significance for both TNM and study‐defined stage. Natural TNM stage distributions were approximately 32%, 41%, 24% and 3% for stages I to IV vs 71%, 19%, 7% and 3% in the intervention population. The natural study‐defined stage distributions from early, middle to advanced stages were approximately 18%, 49% and 33% vs 59%, 33% and 8%. Early‐stage esophageal cancer cases accounted for a higher proportion after endoscopy screening, and the efficacy in the target population depends on the intervention compliance. Other than incidence and mortality as endpoints, in the present cluster randomized controlled study, we took distributions of disease stage (TNM stage) as the short‐term endpoint in order to evaluate the effect of esophageal cancer screening by endoscopy. The results provided real‐world data of stage distributions from the natural population. However, the change of stage distributions proved the short‐term efficacy of endoscopy screening from another perspective.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Asian Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>China - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>early detection of cancer</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>esophageal neoplasm</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - ethnology</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iodine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>random allocation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Towns</subject><issn>1347-9032</issn><issn>1349-7006</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhhtR3HX14B-QgBc99G5SSacTDwvDsH7Aggf1HNLpykyWnmRMupXx1xt31kUF61IF9fBQxds0zxk9Z7UunC3njEsqHzSnjAvd9pTKh7dz32rK4aR5UsoNpVwKLR43J6Al73rWnzb5Ko6puLQ_kOIyYgxxQ9B7dDNJkZTZbpCMocw5DMscUiwkeYIl7bd1YyfibHSY35AVcdNSZswk26rchR84Epe2Kc_VsowHEiJZb0O0T5tH3k4Fn931s-bL26vP6_ft9cd3H9ar69YJ2csWBEruUUnlhGbAUXQcVUfVQC2A56DQgvReChgsWAVecQcamENQoAd-1lwevftl2OHoMM7ZTmafw87mg0k2mL83MWzNJn0znVZaSVEFr-4EOX1dsMxmF4rDabIR01IMUBCUSQpQ0Zf_oDdpybG-ZwCU7nrFBa3U6yPlciolo78_hlHzK0lTkzS3SVb2xZ_X35O_o6vAxRH4HiY8_N9k1qtPR-VPPgKpLQ</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Guan, Chen‐Tao</creator><creator>Song, Guo‐Hui</creator><creator>Li, Bian‐Yun</creator><creator>Gong, Yan‐Wei</creator><creator>Hao, Chang‐Qing</creator><creator>Xue, Li‐Yan</creator><creator>Chen, Wan‐Qing</creator><creator>Wei, Wen‐Qiang</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-9056</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Endoscopy screening effect on stage distributions of esophageal cancer: A cluster randomized cohort study in China</title><author>Guan, Chen‐Tao ; Song, Guo‐Hui ; Li, Bian‐Yun ; Gong, Yan‐Wei ; Hao, Chang‐Qing ; Xue, Li‐Yan ; Chen, Wan‐Qing ; Wei, Wen‐Qiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4676-24e63fe868c49123e453e8508b0a22f328ea26ff642ba2a82f83c2921ce2829b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Asian Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>China - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>early detection of cancer</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>esophageal neoplasm</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - ethnology</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iodine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>random allocation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Towns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guan, Chen‐Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Guo‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bian‐Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yan‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Chang‐Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Li‐Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wan‐Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wen‐Qiang</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guan, Chen‐Tao</au><au>Song, Guo‐Hui</au><au>Li, Bian‐Yun</au><au>Gong, Yan‐Wei</au><au>Hao, Chang‐Qing</au><au>Xue, Li‐Yan</au><au>Chen, Wan‐Qing</au><au>Wei, Wen‐Qiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endoscopy screening effect on stage distributions of esophageal cancer: A cluster randomized cohort study in China</atitle><jtitle>Cancer science</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Sci</addtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1995</spage><epage>2002</epage><pages>1995-2002</pages><issn>1347-9032</issn><eissn>1349-7006</eissn><abstract>Efficacy of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer is not sufficiently definitive and lacks randomized controlled trial evidence. The present study proved short‐term screening efficacy through describing and comparing disease stage distributions of intervention and control populations. Villages from Linzhou and Cixian were cluster randomly allocated to the intervention or to the control group and the target population of 52 729 and 43 068 individuals was 40‐69 years old, respectively, and the actual enrolled numbers were 18 316 and 21 178, respectively. TNM stage information and study‐defined stage information of esophageal cases from 2012 to 2016 were collected. Stage distributions were compared between the intervention and control groups in the total target population, as well as in the subgroup populations in terms of enrolment and before or after intervention. There were a total of 199 and 141 esophageal cancer cases in the intervention and control groups, respectively. For the target population, distributions of TNM stage were borderline significant between the two groups after intervention (P = .093). However, subgroup analysis of the enrolled population during the after‐intervention period had statistical significance for both TNM and study‐defined stage. Natural TNM stage distributions were approximately 32%, 41%, 24% and 3% for stages I to IV vs 71%, 19%, 7% and 3% in the intervention population. The natural study‐defined stage distributions from early, middle to advanced stages were approximately 18%, 49% and 33% vs 59%, 33% and 8%. Early‐stage esophageal cancer cases accounted for a higher proportion after endoscopy screening, and the efficacy in the target population depends on the intervention compliance. Other than incidence and mortality as endpoints, in the present cluster randomized controlled study, we took distributions of disease stage (TNM stage) as the short‐term endpoint in order to evaluate the effect of esophageal cancer screening by endoscopy. The results provided real‐world data of stage distributions from the natural population. However, the change of stage distributions proved the short‐term efficacy of endoscopy screening from another perspective.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>29635717</pmid><doi>10.1111/cas.13606</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2078-9056</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1347-9032
ispartof Cancer science, 2018-06, Vol.109 (6), p.1995-2002
issn 1347-9032
1349-7006
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5989864
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Cancer
Cancer therapies
China - epidemiology
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Compliance
early detection of cancer
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Education
Endoscopy
Endoscopy - methods
Esophageal cancer
esophageal neoplasm
Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Esophageal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Esophageal Neoplasms - ethnology
Esophagus
Family medical history
Female
Health risk assessment
Humans
Iodine
Male
Medical records
Middle Aged
Mortality
Neoplasm Staging
Original
Population studies
Prevention
Questionnaires
random allocation
Studies
Surgery
Surveys and Questionnaires
Towns
title Endoscopy screening effect on stage distributions of esophageal cancer: A cluster randomized cohort study in China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A28%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endoscopy%20screening%20effect%20on%20stage%20distributions%20of%20esophageal%20cancer:%20A%20cluster%20randomized%20cohort%20study%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20science&rft.au=Guan,%20Chen%E2%80%90Tao&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1995&rft.epage=2002&rft.pages=1995-2002&rft.issn=1347-9032&rft.eissn=1349-7006&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cas.13606&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2024016022%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2289578340&rft_id=info:pmid/29635717&rfr_iscdi=true