Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has risen sharply in the past decade. The current study was designed to examine social network, surgeon, and media influence on patients' CPM decision-making, examining not only who influenced the decision, and to what extent, but also the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of clinical oncology 2018-06, Vol.41 (6), p.519-525
Hauptverfasser: Venetis, Maria K, MacGeorge, Erina L, Baptiste, Dadrie F, Mouton, Ashton, Friley, Lorin B, Pastor, Rebekah, Hatten, Kristen, Lagoo, Janaka, Bowling, Monet W, Clare, Susan E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 525
container_issue 6
container_start_page 519
container_title American journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 41
creator Venetis, Maria K
MacGeorge, Erina L
Baptiste, Dadrie F
Mouton, Ashton
Friley, Lorin B
Pastor, Rebekah
Hatten, Kristen
Lagoo, Janaka
Bowling, Monet W
Clare, Susan E
description The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has risen sharply in the past decade. The current study was designed to examine social network, surgeon, and media influence on patients' CPM decision-making, examining not only who influenced the decision, and to what extent, but also the type of influence exerted. Patients (N=113) who underwent CPM at 4 Indiana University-affiliated hospitals between 2008 and 2012 completed structured telephone interviews in 2013. Questions addressed the involvement and influence of the social network (family, friends, and nonsurgeon health professionals), surgeon, and media on the CPM decision. Spouses, children, family, friends, and health professionals were reported as exerting a meaningful degree of influence on patients' decisions, largely in ways that were positive or neutral toward CPM. Most surgeons were regarded as providing options rather than encouraging or discouraging CPM. Media influence was present, but limited. Patients who choose CPM do so with influence and support from members of their social networks. Reversing the increasing choice of CPM will require educating these influential others, which can be accomplished by encouraging patients to include them in clinical consultations, and by providing patients with educational materials that can be shared with their social networks. Surgeons need to be perceived as having an opinion, specifically that CPM should be reserved for those patients for whom it is medically indicated.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/COC.0000000000000321
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5976223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826735905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f8ad8a109c6c44e3eb3933b629fb63092f50191c88f848f2de57f7cb74f48a6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1v1DAQtRAVXQr_ACEfOTSt4-9ckFCgUKmlSKUSN8txxruGJF5sh2r_PemnCnOY0WjevHmjh9CbmhzVpFHH7UV7RJ4Go_UztKoFUxUX7MdztCJUqYopRvfRy5x_LhghiXqB9qniUkihVmi8jC7YAX-Fch3Tr0N8Oac1xOkQ26nH59AHi08nP8wwOcBxwmUD-CO4kMNNE_HV1ENaR9zGqSQ72AJLxt9S3G52g3UlOHxucwFX4rh7hfa8HTK8vq8H6Ork0_f2S3V28fm0_XBWOU50qby2vbbLl046zoFBxxrGOkkb30lGGuoFqZvaae011572IJRXrlPcc22lYwfo_R3vdu5G6B3cajPbFEabdibaYP6dTGFj1vGPEY2SlLKF4N09QYq_Z8jFjCE7GAY7QZyzqTWViomGiAXK76AuxZwT-MczNTE3TpnFKfO_U8va26cSH5cerGF_ATLnkMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826735905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Venetis, Maria K ; MacGeorge, Erina L ; Baptiste, Dadrie F ; Mouton, Ashton ; Friley, Lorin B ; Pastor, Rebekah ; Hatten, Kristen ; Lagoo, Janaka ; Bowling, Monet W ; Clare, Susan E</creator><creatorcontrib>Venetis, Maria K ; MacGeorge, Erina L ; Baptiste, Dadrie F ; Mouton, Ashton ; Friley, Lorin B ; Pastor, Rebekah ; Hatten, Kristen ; Lagoo, Janaka ; Bowling, Monet W ; Clare, Susan E</creatorcontrib><description>The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has risen sharply in the past decade. The current study was designed to examine social network, surgeon, and media influence on patients' CPM decision-making, examining not only who influenced the decision, and to what extent, but also the type of influence exerted. Patients (N=113) who underwent CPM at 4 Indiana University-affiliated hospitals between 2008 and 2012 completed structured telephone interviews in 2013. Questions addressed the involvement and influence of the social network (family, friends, and nonsurgeon health professionals), surgeon, and media on the CPM decision. Spouses, children, family, friends, and health professionals were reported as exerting a meaningful degree of influence on patients' decisions, largely in ways that were positive or neutral toward CPM. Most surgeons were regarded as providing options rather than encouraging or discouraging CPM. Media influence was present, but limited. Patients who choose CPM do so with influence and support from members of their social networks. Reversing the increasing choice of CPM will require educating these influential others, which can be accomplished by encouraging patients to include them in clinical consultations, and by providing patients with educational materials that can be shared with their social networks. Surgeons need to be perceived as having an opinion, specifically that CPM should be reserved for those patients for whom it is medically indicated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-3732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-453X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000321</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27465657</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Original : Breast</subject><ispartof>American journal of clinical oncology, 2018-06, Vol.41 (6), p.519-525</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f8ad8a109c6c44e3eb3933b629fb63092f50191c88f848f2de57f7cb74f48a6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f8ad8a109c6c44e3eb3933b629fb63092f50191c88f848f2de57f7cb74f48a6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465657$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Venetis, Maria K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacGeorge, Erina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baptiste, Dadrie F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouton, Ashton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friley, Lorin B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatten, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagoo, Janaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowling, Monet W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clare, Susan E</creatorcontrib><title>Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy</title><title>American journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>Am J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has risen sharply in the past decade. The current study was designed to examine social network, surgeon, and media influence on patients' CPM decision-making, examining not only who influenced the decision, and to what extent, but also the type of influence exerted. Patients (N=113) who underwent CPM at 4 Indiana University-affiliated hospitals between 2008 and 2012 completed structured telephone interviews in 2013. Questions addressed the involvement and influence of the social network (family, friends, and nonsurgeon health professionals), surgeon, and media on the CPM decision. Spouses, children, family, friends, and health professionals were reported as exerting a meaningful degree of influence on patients' decisions, largely in ways that were positive or neutral toward CPM. Most surgeons were regarded as providing options rather than encouraging or discouraging CPM. Media influence was present, but limited. Patients who choose CPM do so with influence and support from members of their social networks. Reversing the increasing choice of CPM will require educating these influential others, which can be accomplished by encouraging patients to include them in clinical consultations, and by providing patients with educational materials that can be shared with their social networks. Surgeons need to be perceived as having an opinion, specifically that CPM should be reserved for those patients for whom it is medically indicated.</description><subject>Original : Breast</subject><issn>0277-3732</issn><issn>1537-453X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUU1v1DAQtRAVXQr_ACEfOTSt4-9ckFCgUKmlSKUSN8txxruGJF5sh2r_PemnCnOY0WjevHmjh9CbmhzVpFHH7UV7RJ4Go_UztKoFUxUX7MdztCJUqYopRvfRy5x_LhghiXqB9qniUkihVmi8jC7YAX-Fch3Tr0N8Oac1xOkQ26nH59AHi08nP8wwOcBxwmUD-CO4kMNNE_HV1ENaR9zGqSQ72AJLxt9S3G52g3UlOHxucwFX4rh7hfa8HTK8vq8H6Ork0_f2S3V28fm0_XBWOU50qby2vbbLl046zoFBxxrGOkkb30lGGuoFqZvaae011572IJRXrlPcc22lYwfo_R3vdu5G6B3cajPbFEabdibaYP6dTGFj1vGPEY2SlLKF4N09QYq_Z8jFjCE7GAY7QZyzqTWViomGiAXK76AuxZwT-MczNTE3TpnFKfO_U8va26cSH5cerGF_ATLnkMk</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Venetis, Maria K</creator><creator>MacGeorge, Erina L</creator><creator>Baptiste, Dadrie F</creator><creator>Mouton, Ashton</creator><creator>Friley, Lorin B</creator><creator>Pastor, Rebekah</creator><creator>Hatten, Kristen</creator><creator>Lagoo, Janaka</creator><creator>Bowling, Monet W</creator><creator>Clare, Susan E</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy</title><author>Venetis, Maria K ; MacGeorge, Erina L ; Baptiste, Dadrie F ; Mouton, Ashton ; Friley, Lorin B ; Pastor, Rebekah ; Hatten, Kristen ; Lagoo, Janaka ; Bowling, Monet W ; Clare, Susan E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f8ad8a109c6c44e3eb3933b629fb63092f50191c88f848f2de57f7cb74f48a6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Original : Breast</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Venetis, Maria K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacGeorge, Erina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baptiste, Dadrie F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouton, Ashton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friley, Lorin B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatten, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagoo, Janaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowling, Monet W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clare, Susan E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Venetis, Maria K</au><au>MacGeorge, Erina L</au><au>Baptiste, Dadrie F</au><au>Mouton, Ashton</au><au>Friley, Lorin B</au><au>Pastor, Rebekah</au><au>Hatten, Kristen</au><au>Lagoo, Janaka</au><au>Bowling, Monet W</au><au>Clare, Susan E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy</atitle><jtitle>American journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>519</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>519-525</pages><issn>0277-3732</issn><eissn>1537-453X</eissn><abstract>The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has risen sharply in the past decade. The current study was designed to examine social network, surgeon, and media influence on patients' CPM decision-making, examining not only who influenced the decision, and to what extent, but also the type of influence exerted. Patients (N=113) who underwent CPM at 4 Indiana University-affiliated hospitals between 2008 and 2012 completed structured telephone interviews in 2013. Questions addressed the involvement and influence of the social network (family, friends, and nonsurgeon health professionals), surgeon, and media on the CPM decision. Spouses, children, family, friends, and health professionals were reported as exerting a meaningful degree of influence on patients' decisions, largely in ways that were positive or neutral toward CPM. Most surgeons were regarded as providing options rather than encouraging or discouraging CPM. Media influence was present, but limited. Patients who choose CPM do so with influence and support from members of their social networks. Reversing the increasing choice of CPM will require educating these influential others, which can be accomplished by encouraging patients to include them in clinical consultations, and by providing patients with educational materials that can be shared with their social networks. Surgeons need to be perceived as having an opinion, specifically that CPM should be reserved for those patients for whom it is medically indicated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>27465657</pmid><doi>10.1097/COC.0000000000000321</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-3732
ispartof American journal of clinical oncology, 2018-06, Vol.41 (6), p.519-525
issn 0277-3732
1537-453X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5976223
source Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Original : Breast
title Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A00%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Network,%20Surgeon,%20and%20Media%20Influence%20on%20the%20Decision%20to%20Undergo%20Contralateral%20Prophylactic%20Mastectomy&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Venetis,%20Maria%20K&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=519&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=519-525&rft.issn=0277-3732&rft.eissn=1537-453X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/COC.0000000000000321&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1826735905%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826735905&rft_id=info:pmid/27465657&rfr_iscdi=true