Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study

Cardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nuclear cardiology 2018-06, Vol.25 (3), p.797-806
Hauptverfasser: Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo, Alexanderson, Erick, Dierckx, Rudi A., Boersma, Hendrikus H., Hillege, Johannes L., Zeebregts, Clark J., Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M., Jordán-Ríos, Antonio, Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela, Prakken, Niek, Tio, Rene A., Slart, Riemer H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 806
container_issue 3
container_start_page 797
container_title Journal of nuclear cardiology
container_volume 25
creator Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo
Alexanderson, Erick
Dierckx, Rudi A.
Boersma, Hendrikus H.
Hillege, Johannes L.
Zeebregts, Clark J.
Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M.
Jordán-Ríos, Antonio
Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela
Prakken, Niek
Tio, Rene A.
Slart, Riemer H.
description Cardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement is more related to ventricular function. We hypothesized that stress MBF correlates with ventricular function better than MPR in patients studied for suspected myocardial ischemia. We studied 248 patients referred to a rest and adenosine-stress Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET. We performed a multivariate analysis using systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), diastolic function (mean filling rate in diastole, MFR/3), and synchrony (Entropy) as the outcome variables, and stress MBF, MPR, and relevant covariates as the predictors. Secondarily, we repeated the analysis for the subgroup of patients with and without a previous myocardial infarction (MI). 166 male and 82 female patients (mean age 63 ± 11 and 67 ± 11 year, respectively) were included. 60% of the patients presented hypertension, 57% dyslipidemia, 21% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 45% smoking, and 34.7% a previous MI. Mean stress MBF was 1.99 ± 0.75 mL/g/min, MPR = 2.55 ± 0.89, LVEF = 61.6 ± 15%, MFR/3 = 1.12 ± 0.38 EDV/s, and Entropy = 45.6 ± 11.3%. There was a significant correlation between stress MBF (P < .001) and ventricular function. This was stronger than the one for MPR (P = .063). Sex, age, diabetes, and extent of previous MI were also significant predictors. Results were similar for the analyses of the 2 subgroups. Stress MBF is better correlated with ventricular function than MPR, as evaluated by Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET, independently from other relevant cardiovascular risk factors and clinical covariates. This relationship between coronary vasodilatory capacity and ventricular function is sustained across groups with and without a previous MI.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5966471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1071358123022560</els_id><sourcerecordid>2043017839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9bd21c51fbe7b8f741c8de023bc9643a57b4207b56e0c68e27c83e97759f568f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1qFTEUhQdRbK0-gDcS8Mab0fxMkomCUEr9gaKC9TpkMnvOSZlJjknmlHkU39YcptbqRa8S2N9aey9WVT0n-DXBWL5JhDKOa0xEjYVQ9fKgOiac0VpwTh6WP5akZrwlR9WTlK4wxoop9bg6olK0RHF-XP36niOkhKYlWBN7Z0bUjSH0aBjDNbIhRhhNhoSuXd6iPfgcnZ1HE9Ewe5td8Mj4HqXF220MfkEd5AwR5a3xd013EIc5HfCyDuIe3qJT9MXlGDbga8KQmabgnUHfzi9RynO_PK0eDWZM8OzmPal-fDi_PPtUX3z9-Pns9KK2nNJcq66nxHIydCC7dpANsW0PmLLOKtEww2XXUCw7LgBb0QKVtmWgpORq4KId2En1fvXdzd0EvT1ENKPeRTeZuOhgnP534t1Wb8JecyVEI0kxeHVjEMPPGVLWk0sWxtF4CHPSpOVKMqE4LujL_9CrMEdf4mmKG4aJbJkqFFkpG0NKEYbbYwjWh-L1WrwuxetD8Xopmhd3U9wq_jRdALoCqYz8BuLf1fe5vltFUArYuyJK1oG30LsINus-uHvUvwHvWdD3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2043017839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo ; Alexanderson, Erick ; Dierckx, Rudi A. ; Boersma, Hendrikus H. ; Hillege, Johannes L. ; Zeebregts, Clark J. ; Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M. ; Jordán-Ríos, Antonio ; Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela ; Prakken, Niek ; Tio, Rene A. ; Slart, Riemer H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo ; Alexanderson, Erick ; Dierckx, Rudi A. ; Boersma, Hendrikus H. ; Hillege, Johannes L. ; Zeebregts, Clark J. ; Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M. ; Jordán-Ríos, Antonio ; Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela ; Prakken, Niek ; Tio, Rene A. ; Slart, Riemer H.</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement is more related to ventricular function. We hypothesized that stress MBF correlates with ventricular function better than MPR in patients studied for suspected myocardial ischemia. We studied 248 patients referred to a rest and adenosine-stress Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET. We performed a multivariate analysis using systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), diastolic function (mean filling rate in diastole, MFR/3), and synchrony (Entropy) as the outcome variables, and stress MBF, MPR, and relevant covariates as the predictors. Secondarily, we repeated the analysis for the subgroup of patients with and without a previous myocardial infarction (MI). 166 male and 82 female patients (mean age 63 ± 11 and 67 ± 11 year, respectively) were included. 60% of the patients presented hypertension, 57% dyslipidemia, 21% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 45% smoking, and 34.7% a previous MI. Mean stress MBF was 1.99 ± 0.75 mL/g/min, MPR = 2.55 ± 0.89, LVEF = 61.6 ± 15%, MFR/3 = 1.12 ± 0.38 EDV/s, and Entropy = 45.6 ± 11.3%. There was a significant correlation between stress MBF (P &lt; .001) and ventricular function. This was stronger than the one for MPR (P = .063). Sex, age, diabetes, and extent of previous MI were also significant predictors. Results were similar for the analyses of the 2 subgroups. Stress MBF is better correlated with ventricular function than MPR, as evaluated by Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET, independently from other relevant cardiovascular risk factors and clinical covariates. This relationship between coronary vasodilatory capacity and ventricular function is sustained across groups with and without a previous MI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-3581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27681955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ammonia ; Cardiology ; coronary artery disease ; Coronary Circulation - physiology ; Diabetes ; Ejection fraction ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Myocardial Ischemia - diagnostic imaging ; Myocardial Ischemia - physiopathology ; myocardial perfusion reserve ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen Radioisotopes ; Nuclear Medicine ; Original ; Original Article ; PET ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; stress myocardial blood flow ; Stroke Volume - physiology ; ventricular function ; Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2018-06, Vol.25 (3), p.797-806</ispartof><rights>2018 THE AUTHORS. Published by ELSEVIER INC. on behalf of American Society of Nuclear Cardiology</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Nuclear Cardiology is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9bd21c51fbe7b8f741c8de023bc9643a57b4207b56e0c68e27c83e97759f568f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9bd21c51fbe7b8f741c8de023bc9643a57b4207b56e0c68e27c83e97759f568f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27681955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexanderson, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierckx, Rudi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Hendrikus H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillege, Johannes L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeebregts, Clark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordán-Ríos, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakken, Niek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tio, Rene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slart, Riemer H.</creatorcontrib><title>Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study</title><title>Journal of nuclear cardiology</title><addtitle>J. Nucl. Cardiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><description>Cardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement is more related to ventricular function. We hypothesized that stress MBF correlates with ventricular function better than MPR in patients studied for suspected myocardial ischemia. We studied 248 patients referred to a rest and adenosine-stress Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET. We performed a multivariate analysis using systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), diastolic function (mean filling rate in diastole, MFR/3), and synchrony (Entropy) as the outcome variables, and stress MBF, MPR, and relevant covariates as the predictors. Secondarily, we repeated the analysis for the subgroup of patients with and without a previous myocardial infarction (MI). 166 male and 82 female patients (mean age 63 ± 11 and 67 ± 11 year, respectively) were included. 60% of the patients presented hypertension, 57% dyslipidemia, 21% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 45% smoking, and 34.7% a previous MI. Mean stress MBF was 1.99 ± 0.75 mL/g/min, MPR = 2.55 ± 0.89, LVEF = 61.6 ± 15%, MFR/3 = 1.12 ± 0.38 EDV/s, and Entropy = 45.6 ± 11.3%. There was a significant correlation between stress MBF (P &lt; .001) and ventricular function. This was stronger than the one for MPR (P = .063). Sex, age, diabetes, and extent of previous MI were also significant predictors. Results were similar for the analyses of the 2 subgroups. Stress MBF is better correlated with ventricular function than MPR, as evaluated by Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET, independently from other relevant cardiovascular risk factors and clinical covariates. This relationship between coronary vasodilatory capacity and ventricular function is sustained across groups with and without a previous MI.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Ejection fraction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Myocardial Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Myocardial Ischemia - physiopathology</subject><subject>myocardial perfusion reserve</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>PET</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>stress myocardial blood flow</subject><subject>Stroke Volume - physiology</subject><subject>ventricular function</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><issn>1071-3581</issn><issn>1532-6551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1qFTEUhQdRbK0-gDcS8Mab0fxMkomCUEr9gaKC9TpkMnvOSZlJjknmlHkU39YcptbqRa8S2N9aey9WVT0n-DXBWL5JhDKOa0xEjYVQ9fKgOiac0VpwTh6WP5akZrwlR9WTlK4wxoop9bg6olK0RHF-XP36niOkhKYlWBN7Z0bUjSH0aBjDNbIhRhhNhoSuXd6iPfgcnZ1HE9Ewe5td8Mj4HqXF220MfkEd5AwR5a3xd013EIc5HfCyDuIe3qJT9MXlGDbga8KQmabgnUHfzi9RynO_PK0eDWZM8OzmPal-fDi_PPtUX3z9-Pns9KK2nNJcq66nxHIydCC7dpANsW0PmLLOKtEww2XXUCw7LgBb0QKVtmWgpORq4KId2En1fvXdzd0EvT1ENKPeRTeZuOhgnP534t1Wb8JecyVEI0kxeHVjEMPPGVLWk0sWxtF4CHPSpOVKMqE4LujL_9CrMEdf4mmKG4aJbJkqFFkpG0NKEYbbYwjWh-L1WrwuxetD8Xopmhd3U9wq_jRdALoCqYz8BuLf1fe5vltFUArYuyJK1oG30LsINus-uHvUvwHvWdD3</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo</creator><creator>Alexanderson, Erick</creator><creator>Dierckx, Rudi A.</creator><creator>Boersma, Hendrikus H.</creator><creator>Hillege, Johannes L.</creator><creator>Zeebregts, Clark J.</creator><creator>Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M.</creator><creator>Jordán-Ríos, Antonio</creator><creator>Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela</creator><creator>Prakken, Niek</creator><creator>Tio, Rene A.</creator><creator>Slart, Riemer H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study</title><author>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo ; Alexanderson, Erick ; Dierckx, Rudi A. ; Boersma, Hendrikus H. ; Hillege, Johannes L. ; Zeebregts, Clark J. ; Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M. ; Jordán-Ríos, Antonio ; Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela ; Prakken, Niek ; Tio, Rene A. ; Slart, Riemer H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9bd21c51fbe7b8f741c8de023bc9643a57b4207b56e0c68e27c83e97759f568f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Ejection fraction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Myocardial Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Myocardial Ischemia - physiopathology</topic><topic>myocardial perfusion reserve</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>PET</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>stress myocardial blood flow</topic><topic>Stroke Volume - physiology</topic><topic>ventricular function</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexanderson, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierckx, Rudi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Hendrikus H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillege, Johannes L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeebregts, Clark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordán-Ríos, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakken, Niek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tio, Rene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slart, Riemer H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo</au><au>Alexanderson, Erick</au><au>Dierckx, Rudi A.</au><au>Boersma, Hendrikus H.</au><au>Hillege, Johannes L.</au><au>Zeebregts, Clark J.</au><au>Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M.</au><au>Jordán-Ríos, Antonio</au><au>Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela</au><au>Prakken, Niek</au><au>Tio, Rene A.</au><au>Slart, Riemer H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle><stitle>J. Nucl. Cardiol</stitle><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>797</spage><epage>806</epage><pages>797-806</pages><issn>1071-3581</issn><eissn>1532-6551</eissn><abstract>Cardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement is more related to ventricular function. We hypothesized that stress MBF correlates with ventricular function better than MPR in patients studied for suspected myocardial ischemia. We studied 248 patients referred to a rest and adenosine-stress Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET. We performed a multivariate analysis using systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), diastolic function (mean filling rate in diastole, MFR/3), and synchrony (Entropy) as the outcome variables, and stress MBF, MPR, and relevant covariates as the predictors. Secondarily, we repeated the analysis for the subgroup of patients with and without a previous myocardial infarction (MI). 166 male and 82 female patients (mean age 63 ± 11 and 67 ± 11 year, respectively) were included. 60% of the patients presented hypertension, 57% dyslipidemia, 21% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 45% smoking, and 34.7% a previous MI. Mean stress MBF was 1.99 ± 0.75 mL/g/min, MPR = 2.55 ± 0.89, LVEF = 61.6 ± 15%, MFR/3 = 1.12 ± 0.38 EDV/s, and Entropy = 45.6 ± 11.3%. There was a significant correlation between stress MBF (P &lt; .001) and ventricular function. This was stronger than the one for MPR (P = .063). Sex, age, diabetes, and extent of previous MI were also significant predictors. Results were similar for the analyses of the 2 subgroups. Stress MBF is better correlated with ventricular function than MPR, as evaluated by Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET, independently from other relevant cardiovascular risk factors and clinical covariates. This relationship between coronary vasodilatory capacity and ventricular function is sustained across groups with and without a previous MI.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27681955</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-3581
ispartof Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2018-06, Vol.25 (3), p.797-806
issn 1071-3581
1532-6551
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5966471
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Aged
Ammonia
Cardiology
coronary artery disease
Coronary Circulation - physiology
Diabetes
Ejection fraction
Female
Humans
Imaging
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Multivariate analysis
Myocardial Ischemia - diagnostic imaging
Myocardial Ischemia - physiopathology
myocardial perfusion reserve
Nitrogen
Nitrogen Radioisotopes
Nuclear Medicine
Original
Original Article
PET
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Radiology
Retrospective Studies
stress myocardial blood flow
Stroke Volume - physiology
ventricular function
Ventricular Function, Left - physiology
title Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A20%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress%20myocardial%20blood%20flow%20correlates%20with%20ventricular%20function%20and%20synchrony%20better%20than%20myocardial%20perfusion%20reserve:%20A%20Nitrogen-13%20ammonia%20PET%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nuclear%20cardiology&rft.au=Ju%C3%A1rez-Orozco,%20Luis%20Eduardo&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=797&rft.epage=806&rft.pages=797-806&rft.issn=1071-3581&rft.eissn=1532-6551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2043017839%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2043017839&rft_id=info:pmid/27681955&rft_els_id=S1071358123022560&rfr_iscdi=true