Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study
Cardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nuclear cardiology 2018-06, Vol.25 (3), p.797-806 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 806 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 797 |
container_title | Journal of nuclear cardiology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo Alexanderson, Erick Dierckx, Rudi A. Boersma, Hendrikus H. Hillege, Johannes L. Zeebregts, Clark J. Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M. Jordán-Ríos, Antonio Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela Prakken, Niek Tio, Rene A. Slart, Riemer H. |
description | Cardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement is more related to ventricular function. We hypothesized that stress MBF correlates with ventricular function better than MPR in patients studied for suspected myocardial ischemia.
We studied 248 patients referred to a rest and adenosine-stress Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET. We performed a multivariate analysis using systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), diastolic function (mean filling rate in diastole, MFR/3), and synchrony (Entropy) as the outcome variables, and stress MBF, MPR, and relevant covariates as the predictors. Secondarily, we repeated the analysis for the subgroup of patients with and without a previous myocardial infarction (MI).
166 male and 82 female patients (mean age 63 ± 11 and 67 ± 11 year, respectively) were included. 60% of the patients presented hypertension, 57% dyslipidemia, 21% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 45% smoking, and 34.7% a previous MI. Mean stress MBF was 1.99 ± 0.75 mL/g/min, MPR = 2.55 ± 0.89, LVEF = 61.6 ± 15%, MFR/3 = 1.12 ± 0.38 EDV/s, and Entropy = 45.6 ± 11.3%. There was a significant correlation between stress MBF (P < .001) and ventricular function. This was stronger than the one for MPR (P = .063). Sex, age, diabetes, and extent of previous MI were also significant predictors. Results were similar for the analyses of the 2 subgroups.
Stress MBF is better correlated with ventricular function than MPR, as evaluated by Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET, independently from other relevant cardiovascular risk factors and clinical covariates. This relationship between coronary vasodilatory capacity and ventricular function is sustained across groups with and without a previous MI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5966471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1071358123022560</els_id><sourcerecordid>2043017839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9bd21c51fbe7b8f741c8de023bc9643a57b4207b56e0c68e27c83e97759f568f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1qFTEUhQdRbK0-gDcS8Mab0fxMkomCUEr9gaKC9TpkMnvOSZlJjknmlHkU39YcptbqRa8S2N9aey9WVT0n-DXBWL5JhDKOa0xEjYVQ9fKgOiac0VpwTh6WP5akZrwlR9WTlK4wxoop9bg6olK0RHF-XP36niOkhKYlWBN7Z0bUjSH0aBjDNbIhRhhNhoSuXd6iPfgcnZ1HE9Ewe5td8Mj4HqXF220MfkEd5AwR5a3xd013EIc5HfCyDuIe3qJT9MXlGDbga8KQmabgnUHfzi9RynO_PK0eDWZM8OzmPal-fDi_PPtUX3z9-Pns9KK2nNJcq66nxHIydCC7dpANsW0PmLLOKtEww2XXUCw7LgBb0QKVtmWgpORq4KId2En1fvXdzd0EvT1ENKPeRTeZuOhgnP534t1Wb8JecyVEI0kxeHVjEMPPGVLWk0sWxtF4CHPSpOVKMqE4LujL_9CrMEdf4mmKG4aJbJkqFFkpG0NKEYbbYwjWh-L1WrwuxetD8Xopmhd3U9wq_jRdALoCqYz8BuLf1fe5vltFUArYuyJK1oG30LsINus-uHvUvwHvWdD3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2043017839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo ; Alexanderson, Erick ; Dierckx, Rudi A. ; Boersma, Hendrikus H. ; Hillege, Johannes L. ; Zeebregts, Clark J. ; Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M. ; Jordán-Ríos, Antonio ; Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela ; Prakken, Niek ; Tio, Rene A. ; Slart, Riemer H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo ; Alexanderson, Erick ; Dierckx, Rudi A. ; Boersma, Hendrikus H. ; Hillege, Johannes L. ; Zeebregts, Clark J. ; Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M. ; Jordán-Ríos, Antonio ; Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela ; Prakken, Niek ; Tio, Rene A. ; Slart, Riemer H.</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement is more related to ventricular function. We hypothesized that stress MBF correlates with ventricular function better than MPR in patients studied for suspected myocardial ischemia.
We studied 248 patients referred to a rest and adenosine-stress Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET. We performed a multivariate analysis using systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), diastolic function (mean filling rate in diastole, MFR/3), and synchrony (Entropy) as the outcome variables, and stress MBF, MPR, and relevant covariates as the predictors. Secondarily, we repeated the analysis for the subgroup of patients with and without a previous myocardial infarction (MI).
166 male and 82 female patients (mean age 63 ± 11 and 67 ± 11 year, respectively) were included. 60% of the patients presented hypertension, 57% dyslipidemia, 21% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 45% smoking, and 34.7% a previous MI. Mean stress MBF was 1.99 ± 0.75 mL/g/min, MPR = 2.55 ± 0.89, LVEF = 61.6 ± 15%, MFR/3 = 1.12 ± 0.38 EDV/s, and Entropy = 45.6 ± 11.3%. There was a significant correlation between stress MBF (P < .001) and ventricular function. This was stronger than the one for MPR (P = .063). Sex, age, diabetes, and extent of previous MI were also significant predictors. Results were similar for the analyses of the 2 subgroups.
Stress MBF is better correlated with ventricular function than MPR, as evaluated by Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET, independently from other relevant cardiovascular risk factors and clinical covariates. This relationship between coronary vasodilatory capacity and ventricular function is sustained across groups with and without a previous MI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-3581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27681955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ammonia ; Cardiology ; coronary artery disease ; Coronary Circulation - physiology ; Diabetes ; Ejection fraction ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Myocardial Ischemia - diagnostic imaging ; Myocardial Ischemia - physiopathology ; myocardial perfusion reserve ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen Radioisotopes ; Nuclear Medicine ; Original ; Original Article ; PET ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; stress myocardial blood flow ; Stroke Volume - physiology ; ventricular function ; Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2018-06, Vol.25 (3), p.797-806</ispartof><rights>2018 THE AUTHORS. Published by ELSEVIER INC. on behalf of American Society of Nuclear Cardiology</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Nuclear Cardiology is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9bd21c51fbe7b8f741c8de023bc9643a57b4207b56e0c68e27c83e97759f568f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9bd21c51fbe7b8f741c8de023bc9643a57b4207b56e0c68e27c83e97759f568f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27681955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexanderson, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierckx, Rudi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Hendrikus H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillege, Johannes L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeebregts, Clark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordán-Ríos, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakken, Niek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tio, Rene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slart, Riemer H.</creatorcontrib><title>Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study</title><title>Journal of nuclear cardiology</title><addtitle>J. Nucl. Cardiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><description>Cardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement is more related to ventricular function. We hypothesized that stress MBF correlates with ventricular function better than MPR in patients studied for suspected myocardial ischemia.
We studied 248 patients referred to a rest and adenosine-stress Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET. We performed a multivariate analysis using systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), diastolic function (mean filling rate in diastole, MFR/3), and synchrony (Entropy) as the outcome variables, and stress MBF, MPR, and relevant covariates as the predictors. Secondarily, we repeated the analysis for the subgroup of patients with and without a previous myocardial infarction (MI).
166 male and 82 female patients (mean age 63 ± 11 and 67 ± 11 year, respectively) were included. 60% of the patients presented hypertension, 57% dyslipidemia, 21% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 45% smoking, and 34.7% a previous MI. Mean stress MBF was 1.99 ± 0.75 mL/g/min, MPR = 2.55 ± 0.89, LVEF = 61.6 ± 15%, MFR/3 = 1.12 ± 0.38 EDV/s, and Entropy = 45.6 ± 11.3%. There was a significant correlation between stress MBF (P < .001) and ventricular function. This was stronger than the one for MPR (P = .063). Sex, age, diabetes, and extent of previous MI were also significant predictors. Results were similar for the analyses of the 2 subgroups.
Stress MBF is better correlated with ventricular function than MPR, as evaluated by Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET, independently from other relevant cardiovascular risk factors and clinical covariates. This relationship between coronary vasodilatory capacity and ventricular function is sustained across groups with and without a previous MI.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Ejection fraction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Myocardial Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Myocardial Ischemia - physiopathology</subject><subject>myocardial perfusion reserve</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>PET</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>stress myocardial blood flow</subject><subject>Stroke Volume - physiology</subject><subject>ventricular function</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><issn>1071-3581</issn><issn>1532-6551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1qFTEUhQdRbK0-gDcS8Mab0fxMkomCUEr9gaKC9TpkMnvOSZlJjknmlHkU39YcptbqRa8S2N9aey9WVT0n-DXBWL5JhDKOa0xEjYVQ9fKgOiac0VpwTh6WP5akZrwlR9WTlK4wxoop9bg6olK0RHF-XP36niOkhKYlWBN7Z0bUjSH0aBjDNbIhRhhNhoSuXd6iPfgcnZ1HE9Ewe5td8Mj4HqXF220MfkEd5AwR5a3xd013EIc5HfCyDuIe3qJT9MXlGDbga8KQmabgnUHfzi9RynO_PK0eDWZM8OzmPal-fDi_PPtUX3z9-Pns9KK2nNJcq66nxHIydCC7dpANsW0PmLLOKtEww2XXUCw7LgBb0QKVtmWgpORq4KId2En1fvXdzd0EvT1ENKPeRTeZuOhgnP534t1Wb8JecyVEI0kxeHVjEMPPGVLWk0sWxtF4CHPSpOVKMqE4LujL_9CrMEdf4mmKG4aJbJkqFFkpG0NKEYbbYwjWh-L1WrwuxetD8Xopmhd3U9wq_jRdALoCqYz8BuLf1fe5vltFUArYuyJK1oG30LsINus-uHvUvwHvWdD3</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo</creator><creator>Alexanderson, Erick</creator><creator>Dierckx, Rudi A.</creator><creator>Boersma, Hendrikus H.</creator><creator>Hillege, Johannes L.</creator><creator>Zeebregts, Clark J.</creator><creator>Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M.</creator><creator>Jordán-Ríos, Antonio</creator><creator>Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela</creator><creator>Prakken, Niek</creator><creator>Tio, Rene A.</creator><creator>Slart, Riemer H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study</title><author>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo ; Alexanderson, Erick ; Dierckx, Rudi A. ; Boersma, Hendrikus H. ; Hillege, Johannes L. ; Zeebregts, Clark J. ; Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M. ; Jordán-Ríos, Antonio ; Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela ; Prakken, Niek ; Tio, Rene A. ; Slart, Riemer H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9bd21c51fbe7b8f741c8de023bc9643a57b4207b56e0c68e27c83e97759f568f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Ejection fraction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Myocardial Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Myocardial Ischemia - physiopathology</topic><topic>myocardial perfusion reserve</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>PET</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>stress myocardial blood flow</topic><topic>Stroke Volume - physiology</topic><topic>ventricular function</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexanderson, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierckx, Rudi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Hendrikus H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillege, Johannes L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeebregts, Clark J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordán-Ríos, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakken, Niek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tio, Rene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slart, Riemer H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Juárez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo</au><au>Alexanderson, Erick</au><au>Dierckx, Rudi A.</au><au>Boersma, Hendrikus H.</au><au>Hillege, Johannes L.</au><au>Zeebregts, Clark J.</au><au>Martínez-Aguilar, Myriam M.</au><au>Jordán-Ríos, Antonio</au><au>Ayala-German, Ana Gabriela</au><au>Prakken, Niek</au><au>Tio, Rene A.</au><au>Slart, Riemer H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle><stitle>J. Nucl. Cardiol</stitle><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>797</spage><epage>806</epage><pages>797-806</pages><issn>1071-3581</issn><eissn>1532-6551</eissn><abstract>Cardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement is more related to ventricular function. We hypothesized that stress MBF correlates with ventricular function better than MPR in patients studied for suspected myocardial ischemia.
We studied 248 patients referred to a rest and adenosine-stress Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET. We performed a multivariate analysis using systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), diastolic function (mean filling rate in diastole, MFR/3), and synchrony (Entropy) as the outcome variables, and stress MBF, MPR, and relevant covariates as the predictors. Secondarily, we repeated the analysis for the subgroup of patients with and without a previous myocardial infarction (MI).
166 male and 82 female patients (mean age 63 ± 11 and 67 ± 11 year, respectively) were included. 60% of the patients presented hypertension, 57% dyslipidemia, 21% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 45% smoking, and 34.7% a previous MI. Mean stress MBF was 1.99 ± 0.75 mL/g/min, MPR = 2.55 ± 0.89, LVEF = 61.6 ± 15%, MFR/3 = 1.12 ± 0.38 EDV/s, and Entropy = 45.6 ± 11.3%. There was a significant correlation between stress MBF (P < .001) and ventricular function. This was stronger than the one for MPR (P = .063). Sex, age, diabetes, and extent of previous MI were also significant predictors. Results were similar for the analyses of the 2 subgroups.
Stress MBF is better correlated with ventricular function than MPR, as evaluated by Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET, independently from other relevant cardiovascular risk factors and clinical covariates. This relationship between coronary vasodilatory capacity and ventricular function is sustained across groups with and without a previous MI.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27681955</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1071-3581 |
ispartof | Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2018-06, Vol.25 (3), p.797-806 |
issn | 1071-3581 1532-6551 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5966471 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Aged Ammonia Cardiology coronary artery disease Coronary Circulation - physiology Diabetes Ejection fraction Female Humans Imaging Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Multivariate analysis Myocardial Ischemia - diagnostic imaging Myocardial Ischemia - physiopathology myocardial perfusion reserve Nitrogen Nitrogen Radioisotopes Nuclear Medicine Original Original Article PET Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography Radiology Retrospective Studies stress myocardial blood flow Stroke Volume - physiology ventricular function Ventricular Function, Left - physiology |
title | Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A20%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress%20myocardial%20blood%20flow%20correlates%20with%20ventricular%20function%20and%20synchrony%20better%20than%20myocardial%20perfusion%20reserve:%20A%20Nitrogen-13%20ammonia%20PET%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nuclear%20cardiology&rft.au=Ju%C3%A1rez-Orozco,%20Luis%20Eduardo&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=797&rft.epage=806&rft.pages=797-806&rft.issn=1071-3581&rft.eissn=1532-6551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2043017839%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2043017839&rft_id=info:pmid/27681955&rft_els_id=S1071358123022560&rfr_iscdi=true |