Circulating cell free DNA as the diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Quantitative analyses of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are suggested to be a promising method for the detection of colorectal cancer, validated clinical relevance of cfDNA has not been published so far. Though some of the inconsistent results were published. This study is the first meta-analysis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oncotarget 2018-05, Vol.9 (36), p.24514-24524
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Xin, Shi, Xia-Qing, Zeng, Peng-Wei, Mo, Fong-Ming, Chen, Zi-Hua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24524
container_issue 36
container_start_page 24514
container_title Oncotarget
container_volume 9
creator Wang, Xin
Shi, Xia-Qing
Zeng, Peng-Wei
Mo, Fong-Ming
Chen, Zi-Hua
description Quantitative analyses of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are suggested to be a promising method for the detection of colorectal cancer, validated clinical relevance of cfDNA has not been published so far. Though some of the inconsistent results were published. This study is the first meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA as non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Fourteen studies concerning a quantitative analysis of circulating cfDNA for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer met the inclusion criteria. Data includes 1,258 patients with colorectal cancer and 803 healthy individuals as control was analyzed. The summary estimates were as follow: sensitivity, 0.735 (95% CI 0.713-0.757); specificity, 0.918 (95% CI, 0.900-0.934); positive likelihood ratio, 8.295 (95% CI, 5.037-13.659); negative likelihood ratio, 0.300 (95% CI, 0.231-0.391); diagnostic odds ratio, 30.783 (95% CI, 16.965-55.856); and area under the curve, 0.8818 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), respectively. Publication bias was not evident with Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test ( = 0.197). A systematic literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from their inception to August 07, 2017. Analyses were conducted by Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata 12.0. Diagnostic accuracy in sensitivity, specificity and aspects were pooled. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Clinical utility of the cfDNA was evaluated by Fagan nomogram. Our meta-analysis suggested that the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA has unsatisfactory sensitivity but acceptable specificity for diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the integrity index (ALU247/ALU115) is better than absolute DNA concentration in diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.18632/ONCOTARGET.25314
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5966252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2047941467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3144-2e32259d6b9d78016637bfd94498b5c389e1c9e90ea6f32a8141dd4e19cd1c603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1vFDEMjRCIVm1_QC8oRy5TJp8z4YC0WkpBqroS2p4jb-LZBmaSkmSL9t8z_aBqfbElPz_7-RFyytoz1mvBP62ulqv14ufF-fqMK8HkG3LIjDQNV0q8fVEfkJNSfrVzKNn13LwnB9z00hjVHZK0DNntRqghbqnDcaRDRqRfrxYUCq03SH2AbUylBkcnyL8x0yFl6tKYMroKI3UQHebPFGjZl4oT3EMz3gX8SyF6OmGFBiKM-xLKMXk3wFjw5Ckfketv5-vl9-ZydfFjubhs3KxENhwF58p4vTG-61umteg2gzdSmn6jnOgNMmfQtAh6EBx6Jpn3EplxnjndiiPy5ZH3dreZ0DuMNcNob3OYRextgmBfd2K4sdt0Z5XRmis-E3x8Isjpzw5LtVMo9w-CiGlXLG9lZySTupuh7BHqciol4_C8hrX2wSuboksV8harffBqnvnw8r7nif_OiH8iuJM_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047941467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Circulating cell free DNA as the diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wang, Xin ; Shi, Xia-Qing ; Zeng, Peng-Wei ; Mo, Fong-Ming ; Chen, Zi-Hua</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin ; Shi, Xia-Qing ; Zeng, Peng-Wei ; Mo, Fong-Ming ; Chen, Zi-Hua</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative analyses of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are suggested to be a promising method for the detection of colorectal cancer, validated clinical relevance of cfDNA has not been published so far. Though some of the inconsistent results were published. This study is the first meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA as non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Fourteen studies concerning a quantitative analysis of circulating cfDNA for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer met the inclusion criteria. Data includes 1,258 patients with colorectal cancer and 803 healthy individuals as control was analyzed. The summary estimates were as follow: sensitivity, 0.735 (95% CI 0.713-0.757); specificity, 0.918 (95% CI, 0.900-0.934); positive likelihood ratio, 8.295 (95% CI, 5.037-13.659); negative likelihood ratio, 0.300 (95% CI, 0.231-0.391); diagnostic odds ratio, 30.783 (95% CI, 16.965-55.856); and area under the curve, 0.8818 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), respectively. Publication bias was not evident with Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test ( = 0.197). A systematic literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from their inception to August 07, 2017. Analyses were conducted by Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata 12.0. Diagnostic accuracy in sensitivity, specificity and aspects were pooled. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Clinical utility of the cfDNA was evaluated by Fagan nomogram. Our meta-analysis suggested that the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA has unsatisfactory sensitivity but acceptable specificity for diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the integrity index (ALU247/ALU115) is better than absolute DNA concentration in diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-2553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-2553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18632/ONCOTARGET.25314</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29849957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Impact Journals LLC</publisher><subject>Meta-Analysis</subject><ispartof>Oncotarget, 2018-05, Vol.9 (36), p.24514-24524</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2018 Wang et al. 2018</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3144-2e32259d6b9d78016637bfd94498b5c389e1c9e90ea6f32a8141dd4e19cd1c603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3144-2e32259d6b9d78016637bfd94498b5c389e1c9e90ea6f32a8141dd4e19cd1c603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966252/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5966252/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29849957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xia-Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Peng-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Fong-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zi-Hua</creatorcontrib><title>Circulating cell free DNA as the diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Oncotarget</title><addtitle>Oncotarget</addtitle><description>Quantitative analyses of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are suggested to be a promising method for the detection of colorectal cancer, validated clinical relevance of cfDNA has not been published so far. Though some of the inconsistent results were published. This study is the first meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA as non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Fourteen studies concerning a quantitative analysis of circulating cfDNA for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer met the inclusion criteria. Data includes 1,258 patients with colorectal cancer and 803 healthy individuals as control was analyzed. The summary estimates were as follow: sensitivity, 0.735 (95% CI 0.713-0.757); specificity, 0.918 (95% CI, 0.900-0.934); positive likelihood ratio, 8.295 (95% CI, 5.037-13.659); negative likelihood ratio, 0.300 (95% CI, 0.231-0.391); diagnostic odds ratio, 30.783 (95% CI, 16.965-55.856); and area under the curve, 0.8818 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), respectively. Publication bias was not evident with Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test ( = 0.197). A systematic literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from their inception to August 07, 2017. Analyses were conducted by Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata 12.0. Diagnostic accuracy in sensitivity, specificity and aspects were pooled. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Clinical utility of the cfDNA was evaluated by Fagan nomogram. Our meta-analysis suggested that the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA has unsatisfactory sensitivity but acceptable specificity for diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the integrity index (ALU247/ALU115) is better than absolute DNA concentration in diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer.</description><subject>Meta-Analysis</subject><issn>1949-2553</issn><issn>1949-2553</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1vFDEMjRCIVm1_QC8oRy5TJp8z4YC0WkpBqroS2p4jb-LZBmaSkmSL9t8z_aBqfbElPz_7-RFyytoz1mvBP62ulqv14ufF-fqMK8HkG3LIjDQNV0q8fVEfkJNSfrVzKNn13LwnB9z00hjVHZK0DNntRqghbqnDcaRDRqRfrxYUCq03SH2AbUylBkcnyL8x0yFl6tKYMroKI3UQHebPFGjZl4oT3EMz3gX8SyF6OmGFBiKM-xLKMXk3wFjw5Ckfketv5-vl9-ZydfFjubhs3KxENhwF58p4vTG-61umteg2gzdSmn6jnOgNMmfQtAh6EBx6Jpn3EplxnjndiiPy5ZH3dreZ0DuMNcNob3OYRextgmBfd2K4sdt0Z5XRmis-E3x8Isjpzw5LtVMo9w-CiGlXLG9lZySTupuh7BHqciol4_C8hrX2wSuboksV8harffBqnvnw8r7nif_OiH8iuJM_</recordid><startdate>20180511</startdate><enddate>20180511</enddate><creator>Wang, Xin</creator><creator>Shi, Xia-Qing</creator><creator>Zeng, Peng-Wei</creator><creator>Mo, Fong-Ming</creator><creator>Chen, Zi-Hua</creator><general>Impact Journals LLC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180511</creationdate><title>Circulating cell free DNA as the diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Wang, Xin ; Shi, Xia-Qing ; Zeng, Peng-Wei ; Mo, Fong-Ming ; Chen, Zi-Hua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3144-2e32259d6b9d78016637bfd94498b5c389e1c9e90ea6f32a8141dd4e19cd1c603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Meta-Analysis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xia-Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Peng-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Fong-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zi-Hua</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Oncotarget</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xin</au><au>Shi, Xia-Qing</au><au>Zeng, Peng-Wei</au><au>Mo, Fong-Ming</au><au>Chen, Zi-Hua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Circulating cell free DNA as the diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Oncotarget</jtitle><addtitle>Oncotarget</addtitle><date>2018-05-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>36</issue><spage>24514</spage><epage>24524</epage><pages>24514-24524</pages><issn>1949-2553</issn><eissn>1949-2553</eissn><abstract>Quantitative analyses of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are suggested to be a promising method for the detection of colorectal cancer, validated clinical relevance of cfDNA has not been published so far. Though some of the inconsistent results were published. This study is the first meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA as non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Fourteen studies concerning a quantitative analysis of circulating cfDNA for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer met the inclusion criteria. Data includes 1,258 patients with colorectal cancer and 803 healthy individuals as control was analyzed. The summary estimates were as follow: sensitivity, 0.735 (95% CI 0.713-0.757); specificity, 0.918 (95% CI, 0.900-0.934); positive likelihood ratio, 8.295 (95% CI, 5.037-13.659); negative likelihood ratio, 0.300 (95% CI, 0.231-0.391); diagnostic odds ratio, 30.783 (95% CI, 16.965-55.856); and area under the curve, 0.8818 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), respectively. Publication bias was not evident with Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test ( = 0.197). A systematic literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from their inception to August 07, 2017. Analyses were conducted by Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata 12.0. Diagnostic accuracy in sensitivity, specificity and aspects were pooled. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Clinical utility of the cfDNA was evaluated by Fagan nomogram. Our meta-analysis suggested that the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA has unsatisfactory sensitivity but acceptable specificity for diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the integrity index (ALU247/ALU115) is better than absolute DNA concentration in diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Impact Journals LLC</pub><pmid>29849957</pmid><doi>10.18632/ONCOTARGET.25314</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1949-2553
ispartof Oncotarget, 2018-05, Vol.9 (36), p.24514-24524
issn 1949-2553
1949-2553
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5966252
source Freely Accessible Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Meta-Analysis
title Circulating cell free DNA as the diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T19%3A04%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Circulating%20cell%20free%20DNA%20as%20the%20diagnostic%20marker%20for%20colorectal%20cancer:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Oncotarget&rft.au=Wang,%20Xin&rft.date=2018-05-11&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=36&rft.spage=24514&rft.epage=24524&rft.pages=24514-24524&rft.issn=1949-2553&rft.eissn=1949-2553&rft_id=info:doi/10.18632/ONCOTARGET.25314&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2047941467%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047941467&rft_id=info:pmid/29849957&rfr_iscdi=true