Image quality assessment of silent T2 PROPELLER sequence for brain imaging in infants
OBJECTIVEInfants are vulnerable to high acoustic noise. Acoustic noise generated by MR scanning can be reduced by a silent sequence. The purpose of this study is to compare the image quality of the conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences for brain imaging in infants.METHODSA total of 36 scans...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 2018-02, Vol.91 (1083), p.20170680-20170680 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20170680 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1083 |
container_start_page | 20170680 |
container_title | British journal of radiology |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Kim, Hyun Gi Choi, Jin Wook Yoon, Soo Han Lee, Sieun |
description | OBJECTIVEInfants are vulnerable to high acoustic noise. Acoustic noise generated by MR scanning can be reduced by a silent sequence. The purpose of this study is to compare the image quality of the conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences for brain imaging in infants.METHODSA total of 36 scans were acquired from 24 infants using a 3 T MR scanner. Each patient underwent both conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences. Acoustic noise level was measured. Quantitative and qualitative assessments were performed with the images taken with each sequence.RESULTSThe sound pressure level of the conventional T2 PROPELLER imaging sequence was 92.1 dB and that of the silent T2 PROPELLER imaging sequence was 73.3 dB (reduction of 20%). On quantitative assessment, the two sequences (conventional vs silent T2 PROPELLER) did not show significant difference in relative contrast (0.069 vs 0.068, p value = 0.536) and signal-to-noise ratio (75.4 vs 114.8, p value = 0.098). Qualitative assessment of overall image quality (p value = 0.572), grey-white differentiation (p value = 0.986), shunt-related artefact (p value > 0.999), motion artefact (p value = 0.801) and myelination degree in different brain regions (p values ≥ 0.092) did not show significant difference between the two sequences.CONCLUSIONThe silent T2 PROPELLER sequence reduces acoustic noise and generated comparable image quality to that of the conventional sequence. Advances in knowledge: This is the first report to compare silent T2 PROPELLER images with that of conventional T2 PROPELLER images in children. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/bjr.20170680 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5965488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1974014245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p888-f9097e259474c01b461ed35293ea787435caae7c478bbf30f82d30c035d938ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj89LwzAcxYMobk5v_gE5eun85teSXAQZUweFjTHBW0jbdGa06da0wv57O9zF03uPBx_eQ-iRwJRQoZ-zfTulQCTMFFyhMZFcJUrB1zUaA4BMCFVihO5i3J-j0HCLRlRTQpngY_S5rO3O4WNvK9-dsI3RxVi70OGmxNFXZ7eleL1ZrRdputjg6I69C7nDZdPirLU-YD8gfNjhsw2lDV28RzelraJ7uOgEbd8W2_lHkq7el_PXNDkopZJSg5Zu-MAlz4FkfEZcwQTVzFmpJGcit9bJnEuVZSWDUtGCQQ5MFJqpzLIJevnDHvqsdkU-jG1tZQ7tsKg9mcZ6878J_tvsmh8j9ExwpQbA0wXQNsOt2Jnax9xVlQ2u6aMhWnIgnHLBfgGclWwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1974014245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Image quality assessment of silent T2 PROPELLER sequence for brain imaging in infants</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kim, Hyun Gi ; Choi, Jin Wook ; Yoon, Soo Han ; Lee, Sieun</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Gi ; Choi, Jin Wook ; Yoon, Soo Han ; Lee, Sieun</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVEInfants are vulnerable to high acoustic noise. Acoustic noise generated by MR scanning can be reduced by a silent sequence. The purpose of this study is to compare the image quality of the conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences for brain imaging in infants.METHODSA total of 36 scans were acquired from 24 infants using a 3 T MR scanner. Each patient underwent both conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences. Acoustic noise level was measured. Quantitative and qualitative assessments were performed with the images taken with each sequence.RESULTSThe sound pressure level of the conventional T2 PROPELLER imaging sequence was 92.1 dB and that of the silent T2 PROPELLER imaging sequence was 73.3 dB (reduction of 20%). On quantitative assessment, the two sequences (conventional vs silent T2 PROPELLER) did not show significant difference in relative contrast (0.069 vs 0.068, p value = 0.536) and signal-to-noise ratio (75.4 vs 114.8, p value = 0.098). Qualitative assessment of overall image quality (p value = 0.572), grey-white differentiation (p value = 0.986), shunt-related artefact (p value > 0.999), motion artefact (p value = 0.801) and myelination degree in different brain regions (p values ≥ 0.092) did not show significant difference between the two sequences.CONCLUSIONThe silent T2 PROPELLER sequence reduces acoustic noise and generated comparable image quality to that of the conventional sequence. Advances in knowledge: This is the first report to compare silent T2 PROPELLER images with that of conventional T2 PROPELLER images in children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170680</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29212354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Physics & Technology ; QA/protection ; RADIODIAGNOSIS - Central nervous system</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2018-02, Vol.91 (1083), p.20170680-20170680</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2018 The Authors.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Gi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Soo Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sieun</creatorcontrib><title>Image quality assessment of silent T2 PROPELLER sequence for brain imaging in infants</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><description>OBJECTIVEInfants are vulnerable to high acoustic noise. Acoustic noise generated by MR scanning can be reduced by a silent sequence. The purpose of this study is to compare the image quality of the conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences for brain imaging in infants.METHODSA total of 36 scans were acquired from 24 infants using a 3 T MR scanner. Each patient underwent both conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences. Acoustic noise level was measured. Quantitative and qualitative assessments were performed with the images taken with each sequence.RESULTSThe sound pressure level of the conventional T2 PROPELLER imaging sequence was 92.1 dB and that of the silent T2 PROPELLER imaging sequence was 73.3 dB (reduction of 20%). On quantitative assessment, the two sequences (conventional vs silent T2 PROPELLER) did not show significant difference in relative contrast (0.069 vs 0.068, p value = 0.536) and signal-to-noise ratio (75.4 vs 114.8, p value = 0.098). Qualitative assessment of overall image quality (p value = 0.572), grey-white differentiation (p value = 0.986), shunt-related artefact (p value > 0.999), motion artefact (p value = 0.801) and myelination degree in different brain regions (p values ≥ 0.092) did not show significant difference between the two sequences.CONCLUSIONThe silent T2 PROPELLER sequence reduces acoustic noise and generated comparable image quality to that of the conventional sequence. Advances in knowledge: This is the first report to compare silent T2 PROPELLER images with that of conventional T2 PROPELLER images in children.</description><subject>Physics & Technology</subject><subject>QA/protection</subject><subject>RADIODIAGNOSIS - Central nervous system</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVj89LwzAcxYMobk5v_gE5eun85teSXAQZUweFjTHBW0jbdGa06da0wv57O9zF03uPBx_eQ-iRwJRQoZ-zfTulQCTMFFyhMZFcJUrB1zUaA4BMCFVihO5i3J-j0HCLRlRTQpngY_S5rO3O4WNvK9-dsI3RxVi70OGmxNFXZ7eleL1ZrRdputjg6I69C7nDZdPirLU-YD8gfNjhsw2lDV28RzelraJ7uOgEbd8W2_lHkq7el_PXNDkopZJSg5Zu-MAlz4FkfEZcwQTVzFmpJGcit9bJnEuVZSWDUtGCQQ5MFJqpzLIJevnDHvqsdkU-jG1tZQ7tsKg9mcZ6878J_tvsmh8j9ExwpQbA0wXQNsOt2Jnax9xVlQ2u6aMhWnIgnHLBfgGclWwA</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Kim, Hyun Gi</creator><creator>Choi, Jin Wook</creator><creator>Yoon, Soo Han</creator><creator>Lee, Sieun</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Image quality assessment of silent T2 PROPELLER sequence for brain imaging in infants</title><author>Kim, Hyun Gi ; Choi, Jin Wook ; Yoon, Soo Han ; Lee, Sieun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p888-f9097e259474c01b461ed35293ea787435caae7c478bbf30f82d30c035d938ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Physics & Technology</topic><topic>QA/protection</topic><topic>RADIODIAGNOSIS - Central nervous system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Gi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Soo Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sieun</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hyun Gi</au><au>Choi, Jin Wook</au><au>Yoon, Soo Han</au><au>Lee, Sieun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Image quality assessment of silent T2 PROPELLER sequence for brain imaging in infants</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>1083</issue><spage>20170680</spage><epage>20170680</epage><pages>20170680-20170680</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVEInfants are vulnerable to high acoustic noise. Acoustic noise generated by MR scanning can be reduced by a silent sequence. The purpose of this study is to compare the image quality of the conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences for brain imaging in infants.METHODSA total of 36 scans were acquired from 24 infants using a 3 T MR scanner. Each patient underwent both conventional and silent T2 PROPELLER sequences. Acoustic noise level was measured. Quantitative and qualitative assessments were performed with the images taken with each sequence.RESULTSThe sound pressure level of the conventional T2 PROPELLER imaging sequence was 92.1 dB and that of the silent T2 PROPELLER imaging sequence was 73.3 dB (reduction of 20%). On quantitative assessment, the two sequences (conventional vs silent T2 PROPELLER) did not show significant difference in relative contrast (0.069 vs 0.068, p value = 0.536) and signal-to-noise ratio (75.4 vs 114.8, p value = 0.098). Qualitative assessment of overall image quality (p value = 0.572), grey-white differentiation (p value = 0.986), shunt-related artefact (p value > 0.999), motion artefact (p value = 0.801) and myelination degree in different brain regions (p values ≥ 0.092) did not show significant difference between the two sequences.CONCLUSIONThe silent T2 PROPELLER sequence reduces acoustic noise and generated comparable image quality to that of the conventional sequence. Advances in knowledge: This is the first report to compare silent T2 PROPELLER images with that of conventional T2 PROPELLER images in children.</abstract><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>29212354</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20170680</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
ispartof | British journal of radiology, 2018-02, Vol.91 (1083), p.20170680-20170680 |
issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5965488 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Physics & Technology QA/protection RADIODIAGNOSIS - Central nervous system |
title | Image quality assessment of silent T2 PROPELLER sequence for brain imaging in infants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A31%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Image%20quality%20assessment%20of%20silent%20T2%20PROPELLER%20sequence%20for%20brain%20imaging%20in%20infants&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Kim,%20Hyun%20Gi&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=1083&rft.spage=20170680&rft.epage=20170680&rft.pages=20170680-20170680&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20170680&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1974014245%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1974014245&rft_id=info:pmid/29212354&rfr_iscdi=true |