Assessment of structural similarity in CT using filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction: a phantom study with 3D printed lung vessels

To compare the performance of three generations of CT reconstruction techniques using structural similarity (SSIM) as a measure of image quality for CT scans of a chest phantom with 3D printed lung vessels. CT images of the chest phantom were acquired at seven dose levels by changing the tube curren...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2017-11, Vol.90 (1079), p.20160519-20160519
Hauptverfasser: Joemai, Raoul M S, Geleijns, Jacob
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20160519
container_issue 1079
container_start_page 20160519
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 90
creator Joemai, Raoul M S
Geleijns, Jacob
description To compare the performance of three generations of CT reconstruction techniques using structural similarity (SSIM) as a measure of image quality for CT scans of a chest phantom with 3D printed lung vessels. CT images of the chest phantom were acquired at seven dose levels by changing the tube current while other acquisition parameters were kept constant. Three CT reconstruction techniques were applied on each acquisition. The first technique was filtered backprojection (FBP), the second technique was FBP with iterative filtering (adaptive iteration dose reduction in 3 dimensions (AIDR 3D)) and the third technique was model-based iterative reconstruction (Forward projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST)). Image quality of the CT data was quantified in terms of SSIM. The SSIM index was used for image quality comparison between the dose levels and different reconstruction techniques. The SSIM index gives a value between 0 and 1, with 0 as the lowest image quality and 1 as an excellent image quality. The lowest SSIM index was observed for FBP at all dose levels. The reconstruction technique with the highest SSIM depends on the dose level. For tube currents higher than 80 mA, AIDR 3D showed the highest SSIM index, and for tube currents lower or equal to 80 mA FIRST showed the highest SSIM index. SSIM index is a robust quantity and is correlated to the image quality as perceived by the humans. Advanced CT reconstruction techniques provide better image quality in all conditions compared to FBP. Advances in knowledge: SSIM is a robust measure to compare CT image quality for advanced reconstruction techniques relative to a reference. The 3D print technology is an useful method for the development of dedicated phantoms for CT image quality evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr.20160519
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5963378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1931716743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1c50db01032dfbb8a9334dcd6f903b9c3c3b4ad9fd2360dee1b318303e395e1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtvFDEQhC0EIkvgxhn5yIEJ9vQ8bA5I0fKKFCmXROJmeeyerJcZe7E9i_Zv5BfjaJMITpZVpa-ruwh5y9kZr1v5cdjGs5rxjrVcPiMr3jeiEoL9fE5WjLG-4rVoT8irlLb331ayl-SkFgJYzdiK3J2nhCnN6DMNI005LiYvUU80udlNOrp8oM7T9TVdkvO3dHRTxoiWDtr82sWwRZNd8FR7S11RdHZ7pBFN8EdYET9RTXcb7XOYy4TFHugflzcUvtBddD4X2LQU9L4EwSm9Ji9GPSV88_CekptvX6_XP6rLq-8X6_PLyoBocsVNy-zAOIPajsMgtARorLHdKBkM0oCBodFWjraGjllEPgAvawOCbJGPcEo-H7m7ZZjRmnKCsrcqkWYdDypop_5XvNuo27BXrewAelEA7x8AMfxeMGU1u2RwmrTHsCTFJfCed30DxfrhaDUxpBRxfBrDmbqvUZUa1WONxf7u32hP5sfe4C8mKp41</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1931716743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of structural similarity in CT using filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction: a phantom study with 3D printed lung vessels</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Joemai, Raoul M S ; Geleijns, Jacob</creator><creatorcontrib>Joemai, Raoul M S ; Geleijns, Jacob</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the performance of three generations of CT reconstruction techniques using structural similarity (SSIM) as a measure of image quality for CT scans of a chest phantom with 3D printed lung vessels. CT images of the chest phantom were acquired at seven dose levels by changing the tube current while other acquisition parameters were kept constant. Three CT reconstruction techniques were applied on each acquisition. The first technique was filtered backprojection (FBP), the second technique was FBP with iterative filtering (adaptive iteration dose reduction in 3 dimensions (AIDR 3D)) and the third technique was model-based iterative reconstruction (Forward projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST)). Image quality of the CT data was quantified in terms of SSIM. The SSIM index was used for image quality comparison between the dose levels and different reconstruction techniques. The SSIM index gives a value between 0 and 1, with 0 as the lowest image quality and 1 as an excellent image quality. The lowest SSIM index was observed for FBP at all dose levels. The reconstruction technique with the highest SSIM depends on the dose level. For tube currents higher than 80 mA, AIDR 3D showed the highest SSIM index, and for tube currents lower or equal to 80 mA FIRST showed the highest SSIM index. SSIM index is a robust quantity and is correlated to the image quality as perceived by the humans. Advanced CT reconstruction techniques provide better image quality in all conditions compared to FBP. Advances in knowledge: SSIM is a robust measure to compare CT image quality for advanced reconstruction techniques relative to a reference. The 3D print technology is an useful method for the development of dedicated phantoms for CT image quality evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160519</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28830200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Image processing/perception/quality/image analysis ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Lung - blood supply ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Models, Anatomic ; Phantoms, Imaging - standards ; Physics &amp; Technology ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2017-11, Vol.90 (1079), p.20160519-20160519</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2017 The British Institute of Radiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1c50db01032dfbb8a9334dcd6f903b9c3c3b4ad9fd2360dee1b318303e395e1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1c50db01032dfbb8a9334dcd6f903b9c3c3b4ad9fd2360dee1b318303e395e1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28830200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joemai, Raoul M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geleijns, Jacob</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of structural similarity in CT using filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction: a phantom study with 3D printed lung vessels</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>To compare the performance of three generations of CT reconstruction techniques using structural similarity (SSIM) as a measure of image quality for CT scans of a chest phantom with 3D printed lung vessels. CT images of the chest phantom were acquired at seven dose levels by changing the tube current while other acquisition parameters were kept constant. Three CT reconstruction techniques were applied on each acquisition. The first technique was filtered backprojection (FBP), the second technique was FBP with iterative filtering (adaptive iteration dose reduction in 3 dimensions (AIDR 3D)) and the third technique was model-based iterative reconstruction (Forward projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST)). Image quality of the CT data was quantified in terms of SSIM. The SSIM index was used for image quality comparison between the dose levels and different reconstruction techniques. The SSIM index gives a value between 0 and 1, with 0 as the lowest image quality and 1 as an excellent image quality. The lowest SSIM index was observed for FBP at all dose levels. The reconstruction technique with the highest SSIM depends on the dose level. For tube currents higher than 80 mA, AIDR 3D showed the highest SSIM index, and for tube currents lower or equal to 80 mA FIRST showed the highest SSIM index. SSIM index is a robust quantity and is correlated to the image quality as perceived by the humans. Advanced CT reconstruction techniques provide better image quality in all conditions compared to FBP. Advances in knowledge: SSIM is a robust measure to compare CT image quality for advanced reconstruction techniques relative to a reference. The 3D print technology is an useful method for the development of dedicated phantoms for CT image quality evaluation.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Image processing/perception/quality/image analysis</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Lung - blood supply</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging - standards</subject><subject>Physics &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Printing, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards</subject><subject>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtvFDEQhC0EIkvgxhn5yIEJ9vQ8bA5I0fKKFCmXROJmeeyerJcZe7E9i_Zv5BfjaJMITpZVpa-ruwh5y9kZr1v5cdjGs5rxjrVcPiMr3jeiEoL9fE5WjLG-4rVoT8irlLb331ayl-SkFgJYzdiK3J2nhCnN6DMNI005LiYvUU80udlNOrp8oM7T9TVdkvO3dHRTxoiWDtr82sWwRZNd8FR7S11RdHZ7pBFN8EdYET9RTXcb7XOYy4TFHugflzcUvtBddD4X2LQU9L4EwSm9Ji9GPSV88_CekptvX6_XP6rLq-8X6_PLyoBocsVNy-zAOIPajsMgtARorLHdKBkM0oCBodFWjraGjllEPgAvawOCbJGPcEo-H7m7ZZjRmnKCsrcqkWYdDypop_5XvNuo27BXrewAelEA7x8AMfxeMGU1u2RwmrTHsCTFJfCed30DxfrhaDUxpBRxfBrDmbqvUZUa1WONxf7u32hP5sfe4C8mKp41</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Joemai, Raoul M S</creator><creator>Geleijns, Jacob</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Assessment of structural similarity in CT using filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction: a phantom study with 3D printed lung vessels</title><author>Joemai, Raoul M S ; Geleijns, Jacob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1c50db01032dfbb8a9334dcd6f903b9c3c3b4ad9fd2360dee1b318303e395e1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Image processing/perception/quality/image analysis</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Lung - blood supply</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging - standards</topic><topic>Physics &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Printing, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards</topic><topic>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joemai, Raoul M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geleijns, Jacob</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joemai, Raoul M S</au><au>Geleijns, Jacob</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of structural similarity in CT using filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction: a phantom study with 3D printed lung vessels</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1079</issue><spage>20160519</spage><epage>20160519</epage><pages>20160519-20160519</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>To compare the performance of three generations of CT reconstruction techniques using structural similarity (SSIM) as a measure of image quality for CT scans of a chest phantom with 3D printed lung vessels. CT images of the chest phantom were acquired at seven dose levels by changing the tube current while other acquisition parameters were kept constant. Three CT reconstruction techniques were applied on each acquisition. The first technique was filtered backprojection (FBP), the second technique was FBP with iterative filtering (adaptive iteration dose reduction in 3 dimensions (AIDR 3D)) and the third technique was model-based iterative reconstruction (Forward projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST)). Image quality of the CT data was quantified in terms of SSIM. The SSIM index was used for image quality comparison between the dose levels and different reconstruction techniques. The SSIM index gives a value between 0 and 1, with 0 as the lowest image quality and 1 as an excellent image quality. The lowest SSIM index was observed for FBP at all dose levels. The reconstruction technique with the highest SSIM depends on the dose level. For tube currents higher than 80 mA, AIDR 3D showed the highest SSIM index, and for tube currents lower or equal to 80 mA FIRST showed the highest SSIM index. SSIM index is a robust quantity and is correlated to the image quality as perceived by the humans. Advanced CT reconstruction techniques provide better image quality in all conditions compared to FBP. Advances in knowledge: SSIM is a robust measure to compare CT image quality for advanced reconstruction techniques relative to a reference. The 3D print technology is an useful method for the development of dedicated phantoms for CT image quality evaluation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>28830200</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20160519</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2017-11, Vol.90 (1079), p.20160519-20160519
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5963378
source MEDLINE; Oxford Journals Online; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Image processing/perception/quality/image analysis
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Lung - blood supply
Lung - diagnostic imaging
Models, Anatomic
Phantoms, Imaging - standards
Physics & Technology
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards
title Assessment of structural similarity in CT using filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction: a phantom study with 3D printed lung vessels
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A02%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20structural%20similarity%20in%20CT%20using%20filtered%20backprojection%20and%20iterative%20reconstruction:%20a%20phantom%20study%20with%203D%20printed%20lung%20vessels&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Joemai,%20Raoul%20M%20S&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1079&rft.spage=20160519&rft.epage=20160519&rft.pages=20160519-20160519&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20160519&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1931716743%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1931716743&rft_id=info:pmid/28830200&rfr_iscdi=true