Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery

Introduction The aim of this study was to compare kinetical data from gait analysis of patients who have undergone total and uni-condylar knee replacement. Materials and methods Thirteen patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 13 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), were included,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2018-04, Vol.100 (4), p.267-274
Hauptverfasser: Miller, S, Agarwal, A, Haddon, W B, Johnston, L, Arnold, G, Wang, W, Abboud, R J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 274
container_issue 4
container_start_page 267
container_title Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
container_volume 100
creator Miller, S
Agarwal, A
Haddon, W B
Johnston, L
Arnold, G
Wang, W
Abboud, R J
description Introduction The aim of this study was to compare kinetical data from gait analysis of patients who have undergone total and uni-condylar knee replacement. Materials and methods Thirteen patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 13 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), were included, all performed by the same surgeon more than one year prior. The Vicon gait analysis system was used. Statistical power was calculated using SPSS. Results No significant difference was found in the spatiotemporal parameters of gait and survival years of the knee prosthesis between the two groups. The UKA group was found to have significantly larger moments than the TKA group in knee adduction on the operated side and knee flexion moment on the unoperated side during the loading phase. The maximum and minimum sagittal plane moments of the operated sides in the TKA group were significantly lower than the unoperated side. The difference was most significant at pre-swing. The maximum and minimum moments on the operated sides in the UKA group were significantly lower for the knee flexion and adduction moments when compared with the unoperated side and were most prevalent during the loading phase. Conclusions These results are relevant in terms of prosthesis wear. The TKA knees had smaller magnitude moments than the UKA knees in the sagittal and coronal planes. This could explain the higher revision rates for UKA. In both groups, the non-operated knees had significantly larger moments than the operated knees, which implies that after unilateral knee replacement of either type, the non-operated knee is being put under greater stress.
doi_str_mv 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0226
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5958845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2207700811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6722f3aa42834474977e5821087324c5c57bd3ee8af14824fdab54b7af463e233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCnROyxIVLFnvsrJ1LpWpFP6QiLnC2Zp3J4jaxt3ZSaf89WW2pWk5zmGdezczD2CcpllIJ-y37gjEuQUizFACrN2whtbGVEVa9ZQshVF1Zq9UJOy3lTgjZGCvfsxNotNUN2AX7sU7DDnMoKfLU8S2Gkd-HSGPwhYfIxzRizzG2fIrBp9jue8z8PhLxTLsePQ0UR16mvKW8_8DeddgX-vhUz9jvy--_1tfV7c-rm_XFbeU16LFaGYBOIWqwSmujG2OotiCFNQq0r31tNq0isthJbUF3LW5qvTHY6ZUiUOqMnR9zd9NmoNbPK2Ts3S6HAfPeJQzudSeGP26bHl3d1PM_6jng61NATg8TldENoXjqe4yUpuJACGsbYSXM6Jf_0Ls05Tif5wCEMTMp5UyJI-VzKiVT97yMFO7gyh1duYMrd3A1j3x-ecTzwD856i8DYJF1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2207700811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Miller, S ; Agarwal, A ; Haddon, W B ; Johnston, L ; Arnold, G ; Wang, W ; Abboud, R J</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, S ; Agarwal, A ; Haddon, W B ; Johnston, L ; Arnold, G ; Wang, W ; Abboud, R J</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The aim of this study was to compare kinetical data from gait analysis of patients who have undergone total and uni-condylar knee replacement. Materials and methods Thirteen patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 13 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), were included, all performed by the same surgeon more than one year prior. The Vicon gait analysis system was used. Statistical power was calculated using SPSS. Results No significant difference was found in the spatiotemporal parameters of gait and survival years of the knee prosthesis between the two groups. The UKA group was found to have significantly larger moments than the TKA group in knee adduction on the operated side and knee flexion moment on the unoperated side during the loading phase. The maximum and minimum sagittal plane moments of the operated sides in the TKA group were significantly lower than the unoperated side. The difference was most significant at pre-swing. The maximum and minimum moments on the operated sides in the UKA group were significantly lower for the knee flexion and adduction moments when compared with the unoperated side and were most prevalent during the loading phase. Conclusions These results are relevant in terms of prosthesis wear. The TKA knees had smaller magnitude moments than the UKA knees in the sagittal and coronal planes. This could explain the higher revision rates for UKA. In both groups, the non-operated knees had significantly larger moments than the operated knees, which implies that after unilateral knee replacement of either type, the non-operated knee is being put under greater stress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0226</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29484928</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthritis ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Body Mass Index ; Ethics ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gait ; Gait - physiology ; Humans ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Kinematics ; Kinesis - physiology ; Kinetics ; Knee ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Knee Surgery ; Laboratories ; Male ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Failure ; Range of Motion, Articular</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018-04, Vol.100 (4), p.267-274</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal College of Surgeons of England Apr 2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018, All rights reserved by the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6722f3aa42834474977e5821087324c5c57bd3ee8af14824fdab54b7af463e233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6722f3aa42834474977e5821087324c5c57bd3ee8af14824fdab54b7af463e233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958845/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958845/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29484928$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddon, W B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abboud, R J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description>Introduction The aim of this study was to compare kinetical data from gait analysis of patients who have undergone total and uni-condylar knee replacement. Materials and methods Thirteen patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 13 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), were included, all performed by the same surgeon more than one year prior. The Vicon gait analysis system was used. Statistical power was calculated using SPSS. Results No significant difference was found in the spatiotemporal parameters of gait and survival years of the knee prosthesis between the two groups. The UKA group was found to have significantly larger moments than the TKA group in knee adduction on the operated side and knee flexion moment on the unoperated side during the loading phase. The maximum and minimum sagittal plane moments of the operated sides in the TKA group were significantly lower than the unoperated side. The difference was most significant at pre-swing. The maximum and minimum moments on the operated sides in the UKA group were significantly lower for the knee flexion and adduction moments when compared with the unoperated side and were most prevalent during the loading phase. Conclusions These results are relevant in terms of prosthesis wear. The TKA knees had smaller magnitude moments than the UKA knees in the sagittal and coronal planes. This could explain the higher revision rates for UKA. In both groups, the non-operated knees had significantly larger moments than the operated knees, which implies that after unilateral knee replacement of either type, the non-operated knee is being put under greater stress.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Kinesis - physiology</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Knee Surgery</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><issn>1478-7083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCnROyxIVLFnvsrJ1LpWpFP6QiLnC2Zp3J4jaxt3ZSaf89WW2pWk5zmGdezczD2CcpllIJ-y37gjEuQUizFACrN2whtbGVEVa9ZQshVF1Zq9UJOy3lTgjZGCvfsxNotNUN2AX7sU7DDnMoKfLU8S2Gkd-HSGPwhYfIxzRizzG2fIrBp9jue8z8PhLxTLsePQ0UR16mvKW8_8DeddgX-vhUz9jvy--_1tfV7c-rm_XFbeU16LFaGYBOIWqwSmujG2OotiCFNQq0r31tNq0isthJbUF3LW5qvTHY6ZUiUOqMnR9zd9NmoNbPK2Ts3S6HAfPeJQzudSeGP26bHl3d1PM_6jng61NATg8TldENoXjqe4yUpuJACGsbYSXM6Jf_0Ls05Tif5wCEMTMp5UyJI-VzKiVT97yMFO7gyh1duYMrd3A1j3x-ecTzwD856i8DYJF1</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Miller, S</creator><creator>Agarwal, A</creator><creator>Haddon, W B</creator><creator>Johnston, L</creator><creator>Arnold, G</creator><creator>Wang, W</creator><creator>Abboud, R J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>Royal College of Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery</title><author>Miller, S ; Agarwal, A ; Haddon, W B ; Johnston, L ; Arnold, G ; Wang, W ; Abboud, R J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6722f3aa42834474977e5821087324c5c57bd3ee8af14824fdab54b7af463e233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Kinesis - physiology</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Knee Surgery</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddon, W B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abboud, R J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, S</au><au>Agarwal, A</au><au>Haddon, W B</au><au>Johnston, L</au><au>Arnold, G</au><au>Wang, W</au><au>Abboud, R J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>267-274</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><eissn>1478-7083</eissn><abstract>Introduction The aim of this study was to compare kinetical data from gait analysis of patients who have undergone total and uni-condylar knee replacement. Materials and methods Thirteen patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 13 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), were included, all performed by the same surgeon more than one year prior. The Vicon gait analysis system was used. Statistical power was calculated using SPSS. Results No significant difference was found in the spatiotemporal parameters of gait and survival years of the knee prosthesis between the two groups. The UKA group was found to have significantly larger moments than the TKA group in knee adduction on the operated side and knee flexion moment on the unoperated side during the loading phase. The maximum and minimum sagittal plane moments of the operated sides in the TKA group were significantly lower than the unoperated side. The difference was most significant at pre-swing. The maximum and minimum moments on the operated sides in the UKA group were significantly lower for the knee flexion and adduction moments when compared with the unoperated side and were most prevalent during the loading phase. Conclusions These results are relevant in terms of prosthesis wear. The TKA knees had smaller magnitude moments than the UKA knees in the sagittal and coronal planes. This could explain the higher revision rates for UKA. In both groups, the non-operated knees had significantly larger moments than the operated knees, which implies that after unilateral knee replacement of either type, the non-operated knee is being put under greater stress.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>29484928</pmid><doi>10.1308/rcsann.2017.0226</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-8843
ispartof Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018-04, Vol.100 (4), p.267-274
issn 0035-8843
1478-7083
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5958845
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Aged
Arthritis
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Biomechanical Phenomena
Body Mass Index
Ethics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gait
Gait - physiology
Humans
Joint replacement surgery
Joint surgery
Kinematics
Kinesis - physiology
Kinetics
Knee
Knee Joint - physiology
Knee Joint - surgery
Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects
Knee Surgery
Laboratories
Male
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Patients
Prostheses
Prosthesis Failure
Range of Motion, Articular
title Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T17%3A33%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20gait%20kinetics%20in%20total%20and%20unicondylar%20knee%20replacement%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Miller,%20S&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=267-274&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft.eissn=1478-7083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0226&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2207700811%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2207700811&rft_id=info:pmid/29484928&rfr_iscdi=true