Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery
Introduction The aim of this study was to compare kinetical data from gait analysis of patients who have undergone total and uni-condylar knee replacement. Materials and methods Thirteen patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 13 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), were included,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2018-04, Vol.100 (4), p.267-274 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 274 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 267 |
container_title | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Miller, S Agarwal, A Haddon, W B Johnston, L Arnold, G Wang, W Abboud, R J |
description | Introduction The aim of this study was to compare kinetical data from gait analysis of patients who have undergone total and uni-condylar knee replacement. Materials and methods Thirteen patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 13 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), were included, all performed by the same surgeon more than one year prior. The Vicon gait analysis system was used. Statistical power was calculated using SPSS. Results No significant difference was found in the spatiotemporal parameters of gait and survival years of the knee prosthesis between the two groups. The UKA group was found to have significantly larger moments than the TKA group in knee adduction on the operated side and knee flexion moment on the unoperated side during the loading phase. The maximum and minimum sagittal plane moments of the operated sides in the TKA group were significantly lower than the unoperated side. The difference was most significant at pre-swing. The maximum and minimum moments on the operated sides in the UKA group were significantly lower for the knee flexion and adduction moments when compared with the unoperated side and were most prevalent during the loading phase. Conclusions These results are relevant in terms of prosthesis wear. The TKA knees had smaller magnitude moments than the UKA knees in the sagittal and coronal planes. This could explain the higher revision rates for UKA. In both groups, the non-operated knees had significantly larger moments than the operated knees, which implies that after unilateral knee replacement of either type, the non-operated knee is being put under greater stress. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0226 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5958845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2207700811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6722f3aa42834474977e5821087324c5c57bd3ee8af14824fdab54b7af463e233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCnROyxIVLFnvsrJ1LpWpFP6QiLnC2Zp3J4jaxt3ZSaf89WW2pWk5zmGdezczD2CcpllIJ-y37gjEuQUizFACrN2whtbGVEVa9ZQshVF1Zq9UJOy3lTgjZGCvfsxNotNUN2AX7sU7DDnMoKfLU8S2Gkd-HSGPwhYfIxzRizzG2fIrBp9jue8z8PhLxTLsePQ0UR16mvKW8_8DeddgX-vhUz9jvy--_1tfV7c-rm_XFbeU16LFaGYBOIWqwSmujG2OotiCFNQq0r31tNq0isthJbUF3LW5qvTHY6ZUiUOqMnR9zd9NmoNbPK2Ts3S6HAfPeJQzudSeGP26bHl3d1PM_6jng61NATg8TldENoXjqe4yUpuJACGsbYSXM6Jf_0Ls05Tif5wCEMTMp5UyJI-VzKiVT97yMFO7gyh1duYMrd3A1j3x-ecTzwD856i8DYJF1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2207700811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Miller, S ; Agarwal, A ; Haddon, W B ; Johnston, L ; Arnold, G ; Wang, W ; Abboud, R J</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, S ; Agarwal, A ; Haddon, W B ; Johnston, L ; Arnold, G ; Wang, W ; Abboud, R J</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The aim of this study was to compare kinetical data from gait analysis of patients who have undergone total and uni-condylar knee replacement. Materials and methods Thirteen patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 13 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), were included, all performed by the same surgeon more than one year prior. The Vicon gait analysis system was used. Statistical power was calculated using SPSS. Results No significant difference was found in the spatiotemporal parameters of gait and survival years of the knee prosthesis between the two groups. The UKA group was found to have significantly larger moments than the TKA group in knee adduction on the operated side and knee flexion moment on the unoperated side during the loading phase. The maximum and minimum sagittal plane moments of the operated sides in the TKA group were significantly lower than the unoperated side. The difference was most significant at pre-swing. The maximum and minimum moments on the operated sides in the UKA group were significantly lower for the knee flexion and adduction moments when compared with the unoperated side and were most prevalent during the loading phase. Conclusions These results are relevant in terms of prosthesis wear. The TKA knees had smaller magnitude moments than the UKA knees in the sagittal and coronal planes. This could explain the higher revision rates for UKA. In both groups, the non-operated knees had significantly larger moments than the operated knees, which implies that after unilateral knee replacement of either type, the non-operated knee is being put under greater stress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0226</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29484928</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthritis ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Body Mass Index ; Ethics ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gait ; Gait - physiology ; Humans ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Kinematics ; Kinesis - physiology ; Kinetics ; Knee ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Knee Surgery ; Laboratories ; Male ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Failure ; Range of Motion, Articular</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018-04, Vol.100 (4), p.267-274</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal College of Surgeons of England Apr 2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018, All rights reserved by the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6722f3aa42834474977e5821087324c5c57bd3ee8af14824fdab54b7af463e233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6722f3aa42834474977e5821087324c5c57bd3ee8af14824fdab54b7af463e233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958845/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958845/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29484928$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddon, W B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abboud, R J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description>Introduction The aim of this study was to compare kinetical data from gait analysis of patients who have undergone total and uni-condylar knee replacement. Materials and methods Thirteen patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 13 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), were included, all performed by the same surgeon more than one year prior. The Vicon gait analysis system was used. Statistical power was calculated using SPSS. Results No significant difference was found in the spatiotemporal parameters of gait and survival years of the knee prosthesis between the two groups. The UKA group was found to have significantly larger moments than the TKA group in knee adduction on the operated side and knee flexion moment on the unoperated side during the loading phase. The maximum and minimum sagittal plane moments of the operated sides in the TKA group were significantly lower than the unoperated side. The difference was most significant at pre-swing. The maximum and minimum moments on the operated sides in the UKA group were significantly lower for the knee flexion and adduction moments when compared with the unoperated side and were most prevalent during the loading phase. Conclusions These results are relevant in terms of prosthesis wear. The TKA knees had smaller magnitude moments than the UKA knees in the sagittal and coronal planes. This could explain the higher revision rates for UKA. In both groups, the non-operated knees had significantly larger moments than the operated knees, which implies that after unilateral knee replacement of either type, the non-operated knee is being put under greater stress.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Kinesis - physiology</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Knee Surgery</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><issn>1478-7083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCnROyxIVLFnvsrJ1LpWpFP6QiLnC2Zp3J4jaxt3ZSaf89WW2pWk5zmGdezczD2CcpllIJ-y37gjEuQUizFACrN2whtbGVEVa9ZQshVF1Zq9UJOy3lTgjZGCvfsxNotNUN2AX7sU7DDnMoKfLU8S2Gkd-HSGPwhYfIxzRizzG2fIrBp9jue8z8PhLxTLsePQ0UR16mvKW8_8DeddgX-vhUz9jvy--_1tfV7c-rm_XFbeU16LFaGYBOIWqwSmujG2OotiCFNQq0r31tNq0isthJbUF3LW5qvTHY6ZUiUOqMnR9zd9NmoNbPK2Ts3S6HAfPeJQzudSeGP26bHl3d1PM_6jng61NATg8TldENoXjqe4yUpuJACGsbYSXM6Jf_0Ls05Tif5wCEMTMp5UyJI-VzKiVT97yMFO7gyh1duYMrd3A1j3x-ecTzwD856i8DYJF1</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Miller, S</creator><creator>Agarwal, A</creator><creator>Haddon, W B</creator><creator>Johnston, L</creator><creator>Arnold, G</creator><creator>Wang, W</creator><creator>Abboud, R J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>Royal College of Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery</title><author>Miller, S ; Agarwal, A ; Haddon, W B ; Johnston, L ; Arnold, G ; Wang, W ; Abboud, R J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6722f3aa42834474977e5821087324c5c57bd3ee8af14824fdab54b7af463e233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Kinesis - physiology</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Knee Surgery</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddon, W B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abboud, R J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, S</au><au>Agarwal, A</au><au>Haddon, W B</au><au>Johnston, L</au><au>Arnold, G</au><au>Wang, W</au><au>Abboud, R J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>267-274</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><eissn>1478-7083</eissn><abstract>Introduction The aim of this study was to compare kinetical data from gait analysis of patients who have undergone total and uni-condylar knee replacement. Materials and methods Thirteen patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 13 unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), were included, all performed by the same surgeon more than one year prior. The Vicon gait analysis system was used. Statistical power was calculated using SPSS. Results No significant difference was found in the spatiotemporal parameters of gait and survival years of the knee prosthesis between the two groups. The UKA group was found to have significantly larger moments than the TKA group in knee adduction on the operated side and knee flexion moment on the unoperated side during the loading phase. The maximum and minimum sagittal plane moments of the operated sides in the TKA group were significantly lower than the unoperated side. The difference was most significant at pre-swing. The maximum and minimum moments on the operated sides in the UKA group were significantly lower for the knee flexion and adduction moments when compared with the unoperated side and were most prevalent during the loading phase. Conclusions These results are relevant in terms of prosthesis wear. The TKA knees had smaller magnitude moments than the UKA knees in the sagittal and coronal planes. This could explain the higher revision rates for UKA. In both groups, the non-operated knees had significantly larger moments than the operated knees, which implies that after unilateral knee replacement of either type, the non-operated knee is being put under greater stress.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>29484928</pmid><doi>10.1308/rcsann.2017.0226</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-8843 |
ispartof | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018-04, Vol.100 (4), p.267-274 |
issn | 0035-8843 1478-7083 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5958845 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Aged Arthritis Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Biomechanical Phenomena Body Mass Index Ethics Female Follow-Up Studies Gait Gait - physiology Humans Joint replacement surgery Joint surgery Kinematics Kinesis - physiology Kinetics Knee Knee Joint - physiology Knee Joint - surgery Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects Knee Surgery Laboratories Male Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery Patients Prostheses Prosthesis Failure Range of Motion, Articular |
title | Comparison of gait kinetics in total and unicondylar knee replacement surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T17%3A33%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20gait%20kinetics%20in%20total%20and%20unicondylar%20knee%20replacement%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Miller,%20S&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=267-274&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft.eissn=1478-7083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0226&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2207700811%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2207700811&rft_id=info:pmid/29484928&rfr_iscdi=true |