Revised cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis: analysis based on 1002 informative patients

Current cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is two-tiered: ‘favorable’ and ‘unfavorable’. Recent studies have suggested prognostic heterogeneity within the unfavorable risk category. In 1002 consecutive patients, we performed stepwise analysis of impact on survival from in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Leukemia 2018-05, Vol.32 (5), p.1189-1199
Hauptverfasser: Tefferi, Ayalew, Nicolosi, Maura, Mudireddy, Mythri, Lasho, Terra L., Gangat, Naseema, Begna, Kebede H., Hanson, Curtis A., Ketterling, Rhett P., Pardanani, Animesh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1199
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1189
container_title Leukemia
container_volume 32
creator Tefferi, Ayalew
Nicolosi, Maura
Mudireddy, Mythri
Lasho, Terra L.
Gangat, Naseema
Begna, Kebede H.
Hanson, Curtis A.
Ketterling, Rhett P.
Pardanani, Animesh
description Current cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is two-tiered: ‘favorable’ and ‘unfavorable’. Recent studies have suggested prognostic heterogeneity within the unfavorable risk category. In 1002 consecutive patients, we performed stepwise analysis of impact on survival from individual and prognostically ordered cytogenetic abnormalities, leading to a revised three-tiered risk model: ‘very high risk (VHR)’—single/multiple abnormalities of −7, i(17q), inv(3)/3q21, 12p−/12p11.2, 11q−/11q23, or other autosomal trisomies not including + 8/ + 9 (e.g., +21, +19); ‘favorable’—normal karyotype or sole abnormalities of 13q−, +9, 20q−, chromosome 1 translocation/duplication or sex chromosome abnormality including -Y; ‘unfavorable’—all other abnormalities. Median survivals for VHR ( n  = 75), unfavorable ( n  = 190) and favorable ( n  = 737) risk categories were 1.2 (HR 3.8, 95% CI 2.9–4.9), 2.9 (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and 4.4 years and survival impact was independent of clinically derived prognostic systems, driver and ASXL1 / SRSF2 mutations. The revised model was also effective in predicting leukemic transformation: HRs (95% CI) were 4.4 (2.0–9.4) for VHR and 2.0 (1.2–3.4) for unfavorable. The impact of driver mutations on survival was confined to favorable and that of ASXL1 / SRSF2 mutations to favorable/unfavorable cytogenetic risk categories. The current study clarifies the prognostic hierarchy of genetic risk factors in PMF and provides a more refined three-tiered cytogenetic risk model.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41375-018-0018-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5940654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2007984267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-d8d415208336448544d7590f128f892c781c3d73d2cb6a886e97bd8665ced2013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhkOp6Nb6A7yRQG96MzXJ5Gt6URBptSAIYq9DJsmssTOTbTK7sP56z7Bbawu9yQmc57zn40XolJJPlNT6vHBaK1ERqisyP09v0IJyJSshBH2LFkRrVcmG8SP0rpRHYCApD9ERa7hiiqoFGu7CJpbgsdtOaRnGMEWHcyw_cZmynWIXHbxpxHHEqxwHm7d42IY-dbHNqcTyGdvR9lv44dbOQsBSQhgUdCkPULwJeAUhjFN5jw4625dwso_H6Me3r_eX19XN7dX3y4ubyolaTpXXnlPBiK5rybkWnHslGtJRpjvdMKc0dbVXtWeulVZrGRrVei2lcMEzQutj9GWnu1q3Q_AOemfbm_0CJtlo_s6M8cEs08aIhhMpOAh83Avk9GsdymSGWFzoezuGtC6GEaIazZlUgH74B31M6ww3mSmYX0g4O1B0Rzm4WsmhexmGEjObaXZmGvDRzGaaJ6g5e73FS8Vv9wBgO6BAalyG_Kf1_1WfAUperC0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2036456014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revised cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis: analysis based on 1002 informative patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>Tefferi, Ayalew ; Nicolosi, Maura ; Mudireddy, Mythri ; Lasho, Terra L. ; Gangat, Naseema ; Begna, Kebede H. ; Hanson, Curtis A. ; Ketterling, Rhett P. ; Pardanani, Animesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Tefferi, Ayalew ; Nicolosi, Maura ; Mudireddy, Mythri ; Lasho, Terra L. ; Gangat, Naseema ; Begna, Kebede H. ; Hanson, Curtis A. ; Ketterling, Rhett P. ; Pardanani, Animesh</creatorcontrib><description>Current cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is two-tiered: ‘favorable’ and ‘unfavorable’. Recent studies have suggested prognostic heterogeneity within the unfavorable risk category. In 1002 consecutive patients, we performed stepwise analysis of impact on survival from individual and prognostically ordered cytogenetic abnormalities, leading to a revised three-tiered risk model: ‘very high risk (VHR)’—single/multiple abnormalities of −7, i(17q), inv(3)/3q21, 12p−/12p11.2, 11q−/11q23, or other autosomal trisomies not including + 8/ + 9 (e.g., +21, +19); ‘favorable’—normal karyotype or sole abnormalities of 13q−, +9, 20q−, chromosome 1 translocation/duplication or sex chromosome abnormality including -Y; ‘unfavorable’—all other abnormalities. Median survivals for VHR ( n  = 75), unfavorable ( n  = 190) and favorable ( n  = 737) risk categories were 1.2 (HR 3.8, 95% CI 2.9–4.9), 2.9 (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and 4.4 years and survival impact was independent of clinically derived prognostic systems, driver and ASXL1 / SRSF2 mutations. The revised model was also effective in predicting leukemic transformation: HRs (95% CI) were 4.4 (2.0–9.4) for VHR and 2.0 (1.2–3.4) for unfavorable. The impact of driver mutations on survival was confined to favorable and that of ASXL1 / SRSF2 mutations to favorable/unfavorable cytogenetic risk categories. The current study clarifies the prognostic hierarchy of genetic risk factors in PMF and provides a more refined three-tiered cytogenetic risk model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-6924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0018-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29472717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/67/1990/2331 ; 692/699/1541/1990/2331 ; Abnormalities ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer Research ; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic - genetics ; Chromosomes ; Critical Care Medicine ; Cytogenetics - methods ; Female ; Hematology ; Humans ; Impact analysis ; Intensive ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Oncology ; Patient Generated Health Data ; Primary Myelofibrosis - diagnosis ; Primary Myelofibrosis - genetics ; Primary Myelofibrosis - mortality ; Prognosis ; Risk analysis ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; System effectiveness ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Leukemia, 2018-05, Vol.32 (5), p.1189-1199</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-d8d415208336448544d7590f128f892c781c3d73d2cb6a886e97bd8665ced2013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-d8d415208336448544d7590f128f892c781c3d73d2cb6a886e97bd8665ced2013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41375-018-0018-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41375-018-0018-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tefferi, Ayalew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolosi, Maura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudireddy, Mythri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasho, Terra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gangat, Naseema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begna, Kebede H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Curtis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketterling, Rhett P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardanani, Animesh</creatorcontrib><title>Revised cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis: analysis based on 1002 informative patients</title><title>Leukemia</title><addtitle>Leukemia</addtitle><addtitle>Leukemia</addtitle><description>Current cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is two-tiered: ‘favorable’ and ‘unfavorable’. Recent studies have suggested prognostic heterogeneity within the unfavorable risk category. In 1002 consecutive patients, we performed stepwise analysis of impact on survival from individual and prognostically ordered cytogenetic abnormalities, leading to a revised three-tiered risk model: ‘very high risk (VHR)’—single/multiple abnormalities of −7, i(17q), inv(3)/3q21, 12p−/12p11.2, 11q−/11q23, or other autosomal trisomies not including + 8/ + 9 (e.g., +21, +19); ‘favorable’—normal karyotype or sole abnormalities of 13q−, +9, 20q−, chromosome 1 translocation/duplication or sex chromosome abnormality including -Y; ‘unfavorable’—all other abnormalities. Median survivals for VHR ( n  = 75), unfavorable ( n  = 190) and favorable ( n  = 737) risk categories were 1.2 (HR 3.8, 95% CI 2.9–4.9), 2.9 (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and 4.4 years and survival impact was independent of clinically derived prognostic systems, driver and ASXL1 / SRSF2 mutations. The revised model was also effective in predicting leukemic transformation: HRs (95% CI) were 4.4 (2.0–9.4) for VHR and 2.0 (1.2–3.4) for unfavorable. The impact of driver mutations on survival was confined to favorable and that of ASXL1 / SRSF2 mutations to favorable/unfavorable cytogenetic risk categories. The current study clarifies the prognostic hierarchy of genetic risk factors in PMF and provides a more refined three-tiered cytogenetic risk model.</description><subject>631/67/1990/2331</subject><subject>692/699/1541/1990/2331</subject><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cell Transformation, Neoplastic - genetics</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Cytogenetics - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patient Generated Health Data</subject><subject>Primary Myelofibrosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Primary Myelofibrosis - genetics</subject><subject>Primary Myelofibrosis - mortality</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0887-6924</issn><issn>1476-5551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhkOp6Nb6A7yRQG96MzXJ5Gt6URBptSAIYq9DJsmssTOTbTK7sP56z7Bbawu9yQmc57zn40XolJJPlNT6vHBaK1ERqisyP09v0IJyJSshBH2LFkRrVcmG8SP0rpRHYCApD9ERa7hiiqoFGu7CJpbgsdtOaRnGMEWHcyw_cZmynWIXHbxpxHHEqxwHm7d42IY-dbHNqcTyGdvR9lv44dbOQsBSQhgUdCkPULwJeAUhjFN5jw4625dwso_H6Me3r_eX19XN7dX3y4ubyolaTpXXnlPBiK5rybkWnHslGtJRpjvdMKc0dbVXtWeulVZrGRrVei2lcMEzQutj9GWnu1q3Q_AOemfbm_0CJtlo_s6M8cEs08aIhhMpOAh83Avk9GsdymSGWFzoezuGtC6GEaIazZlUgH74B31M6ww3mSmYX0g4O1B0Rzm4WsmhexmGEjObaXZmGvDRzGaaJ6g5e73FS8Vv9wBgO6BAalyG_Kf1_1WfAUperC0</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Tefferi, Ayalew</creator><creator>Nicolosi, Maura</creator><creator>Mudireddy, Mythri</creator><creator>Lasho, Terra L.</creator><creator>Gangat, Naseema</creator><creator>Begna, Kebede H.</creator><creator>Hanson, Curtis A.</creator><creator>Ketterling, Rhett P.</creator><creator>Pardanani, Animesh</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Revised cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis: analysis based on 1002 informative patients</title><author>Tefferi, Ayalew ; Nicolosi, Maura ; Mudireddy, Mythri ; Lasho, Terra L. ; Gangat, Naseema ; Begna, Kebede H. ; Hanson, Curtis A. ; Ketterling, Rhett P. ; Pardanani, Animesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-d8d415208336448544d7590f128f892c781c3d73d2cb6a886e97bd8665ced2013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>631/67/1990/2331</topic><topic>692/699/1541/1990/2331</topic><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cell Transformation, Neoplastic - genetics</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Cytogenetics - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patient Generated Health Data</topic><topic>Primary Myelofibrosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Primary Myelofibrosis - genetics</topic><topic>Primary Myelofibrosis - mortality</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tefferi, Ayalew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolosi, Maura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudireddy, Mythri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasho, Terra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gangat, Naseema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begna, Kebede H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Curtis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketterling, Rhett P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardanani, Animesh</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Leukemia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tefferi, Ayalew</au><au>Nicolosi, Maura</au><au>Mudireddy, Mythri</au><au>Lasho, Terra L.</au><au>Gangat, Naseema</au><au>Begna, Kebede H.</au><au>Hanson, Curtis A.</au><au>Ketterling, Rhett P.</au><au>Pardanani, Animesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revised cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis: analysis based on 1002 informative patients</atitle><jtitle>Leukemia</jtitle><stitle>Leukemia</stitle><addtitle>Leukemia</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1189</spage><epage>1199</epage><pages>1189-1199</pages><issn>0887-6924</issn><eissn>1476-5551</eissn><abstract>Current cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is two-tiered: ‘favorable’ and ‘unfavorable’. Recent studies have suggested prognostic heterogeneity within the unfavorable risk category. In 1002 consecutive patients, we performed stepwise analysis of impact on survival from individual and prognostically ordered cytogenetic abnormalities, leading to a revised three-tiered risk model: ‘very high risk (VHR)’—single/multiple abnormalities of −7, i(17q), inv(3)/3q21, 12p−/12p11.2, 11q−/11q23, or other autosomal trisomies not including + 8/ + 9 (e.g., +21, +19); ‘favorable’—normal karyotype or sole abnormalities of 13q−, +9, 20q−, chromosome 1 translocation/duplication or sex chromosome abnormality including -Y; ‘unfavorable’—all other abnormalities. Median survivals for VHR ( n  = 75), unfavorable ( n  = 190) and favorable ( n  = 737) risk categories were 1.2 (HR 3.8, 95% CI 2.9–4.9), 2.9 (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and 4.4 years and survival impact was independent of clinically derived prognostic systems, driver and ASXL1 / SRSF2 mutations. The revised model was also effective in predicting leukemic transformation: HRs (95% CI) were 4.4 (2.0–9.4) for VHR and 2.0 (1.2–3.4) for unfavorable. The impact of driver mutations on survival was confined to favorable and that of ASXL1 / SRSF2 mutations to favorable/unfavorable cytogenetic risk categories. The current study clarifies the prognostic hierarchy of genetic risk factors in PMF and provides a more refined three-tiered cytogenetic risk model.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>29472717</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41375-018-0018-z</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-6924
ispartof Leukemia, 2018-05, Vol.32 (5), p.1189-1199
issn 0887-6924
1476-5551
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5940654
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Nature Journals Online
subjects 631/67/1990/2331
692/699/1541/1990/2331
Abnormalities
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cancer Research
Cell Transformation, Neoplastic - genetics
Chromosomes
Critical Care Medicine
Cytogenetics - methods
Female
Hematology
Humans
Impact analysis
Intensive
Internal Medicine
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Mutation
Oncology
Patient Generated Health Data
Primary Myelofibrosis - diagnosis
Primary Myelofibrosis - genetics
Primary Myelofibrosis - mortality
Prognosis
Risk analysis
Risk Assessment - methods
Survival
Survival Analysis
System effectiveness
Young Adult
title Revised cytogenetic risk stratification in primary myelofibrosis: analysis based on 1002 informative patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T14%3A28%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revised%20cytogenetic%20risk%20stratification%20in%20primary%20myelofibrosis:%20analysis%20based%20on%201002%20informative%20patients&rft.jtitle=Leukemia&rft.au=Tefferi,%20Ayalew&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1189&rft.epage=1199&rft.pages=1189-1199&rft.issn=0887-6924&rft.eissn=1476-5551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41375-018-0018-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2007984267%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2036456014&rft_id=info:pmid/29472717&rfr_iscdi=true