Efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer as a prophylactic agent for radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Preventive application of heparinoid moisturizer from the first day of WBRT significantly increased water content and helped to improve skin desquamation and dryness compared with no treatment. Abstract Background The application of heparinoid moisturizer for 2 weeks following whole-breast radiother...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of clinical oncology 2018-05, Vol.48 (5), p.450-457
Hauptverfasser: Sekiguchi, Kenji, Akahane, Keiko, Ogita, Mami, Haga, Chiori, Ito, Ryoko, Arai, Satoru, Ishida, Yasushi, Tsukada, Yoichiro, Kawamori, Jiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 457
container_issue 5
container_start_page 450
container_title Japanese journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 48
creator Sekiguchi, Kenji
Akahane, Keiko
Ogita, Mami
Haga, Chiori
Ito, Ryoko
Arai, Satoru
Ishida, Yasushi
Tsukada, Yoichiro
Kawamori, Jiro
description Preventive application of heparinoid moisturizer from the first day of WBRT significantly increased water content and helped to improve skin desquamation and dryness compared with no treatment. Abstract Background The application of heparinoid moisturizer for 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) was previously reported to significantly increase skin water content (WC) and help improve skin dryness and desquamation. The prospective open-label, randomized trial included an exploratory arm to investigate the preventive efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer for acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods Between April 2011 and April 2013, patients receiving WBRT were assigned (1:2:2) to receive either: moisturizer for prophylaxis (group P), moisturizer starting 2 weeks after WBRT for treatment (group M), and no moisturizer (group C). This paper presents the results of comparison between the exploratory arm and no moisturizer group. Skin WC was measured prior to WBRT, on the last day of WBRT, and 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 3 months following WBRT. Signs and symptoms were also assessed. Results Comparing two groups, WC values were significantly higher in group P until 4 weeks following WBRT. At 2 weeks following WBRT, mean WC values in group P and C were 38.5 ± 6.1 arbitrary units (a.u.) and 30.2 ± 7.8 a.u., respectively (P < 0.001). In group C, dryness was more severe at 2 and 4 weeks following WBRT and desquamation more severe until 3 months following WBRT. However, the erythema score showed no difference between the two groups. Regarding symptoms, group C pain scores on the last day of WBRT were significantly higher than in group P (P < 0.030). Conclusions The preventive application of heparinoid moisturizer has the potential of reducing skin desquamation and dryness in patients receiving WBRT.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jjco/hyy045
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5926546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jjco/hyy045</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jjco/hyy045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-56e4bff09d2300973e4285c4573d3239fac8e98f35e0d1dbf65dba28780ef8113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAUxEVpaLbbnnovOvUSnJUty2vnEAhhmwQWcmnP5ll_1lpsyzxpE5xvlG8ZbbZdkktOGpifZngMIT9Sdp6yii-2W-kW7TSxXHwiszQvRMKLLP38Rp-Sr95vGWOizJdfyGlWFVwIns_I88oYK0FO1Bna6hHQDs4q2jvrww7tk0YKngId0Y3t1IEMVlLY6CFQ45AiKAvBuoEqjX1UwfpodJ17tMPm1Xah1QjjRMGEmNagBh8S6Qav8WEP-R1uNE4XsQVhUK6PrYpGIGAMijKghe4bOTHQef393zsnf3-v_lzfJuv7m7vrq3UiBctCIgqdN8awSmWcsWrJdZ6VQuZiyRXPeGVAlroqDReaqVQ1phCqgaxclkybMk35nFwecsdd02sl46UIXT2i7QGn2oGt3zuDbeuNe6hFlRUiL2LA2SFAovMetTn-TVm9X6zeL1YfFov0z7d1R_b_RBH4dQDcbvww6QWDpqfP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer as a prophylactic agent for radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sekiguchi, Kenji ; Akahane, Keiko ; Ogita, Mami ; Haga, Chiori ; Ito, Ryoko ; Arai, Satoru ; Ishida, Yasushi ; Tsukada, Yoichiro ; Kawamori, Jiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Kenji ; Akahane, Keiko ; Ogita, Mami ; Haga, Chiori ; Ito, Ryoko ; Arai, Satoru ; Ishida, Yasushi ; Tsukada, Yoichiro ; Kawamori, Jiro</creatorcontrib><description>Preventive application of heparinoid moisturizer from the first day of WBRT significantly increased water content and helped to improve skin desquamation and dryness compared with no treatment. Abstract Background The application of heparinoid moisturizer for 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) was previously reported to significantly increase skin water content (WC) and help improve skin dryness and desquamation. The prospective open-label, randomized trial included an exploratory arm to investigate the preventive efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer for acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods Between April 2011 and April 2013, patients receiving WBRT were assigned (1:2:2) to receive either: moisturizer for prophylaxis (group P), moisturizer starting 2 weeks after WBRT for treatment (group M), and no moisturizer (group C). This paper presents the results of comparison between the exploratory arm and no moisturizer group. Skin WC was measured prior to WBRT, on the last day of WBRT, and 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 3 months following WBRT. Signs and symptoms were also assessed. Results Comparing two groups, WC values were significantly higher in group P until 4 weeks following WBRT. At 2 weeks following WBRT, mean WC values in group P and C were 38.5 ± 6.1 arbitrary units (a.u.) and 30.2 ± 7.8 a.u., respectively (P &lt; 0.001). In group C, dryness was more severe at 2 and 4 weeks following WBRT and desquamation more severe until 3 months following WBRT. However, the erythema score showed no difference between the two groups. Regarding symptoms, group C pain scores on the last day of WBRT were significantly higher than in group P (P &lt; 0.030). Conclusions The preventive application of heparinoid moisturizer has the potential of reducing skin desquamation and dryness in patients receiving WBRT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1465-3621</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0368-2811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyy045</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29635534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Heparinoids - pharmacology ; Heparinoids - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Mastectomy, Segmental - adverse effects ; Mastectomy, Segmental - methods ; Middle Aged ; Original article ; Prospective Studies ; Radiodermatitis - drug therapy</subject><ispartof>Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2018-05, Vol.48 (5), p.450-457</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-56e4bff09d2300973e4285c4573d3239fac8e98f35e0d1dbf65dba28780ef8113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-56e4bff09d2300973e4285c4573d3239fac8e98f35e0d1dbf65dba28780ef8113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29635534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akahane, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogita, Mami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haga, Chiori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Ryoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsukada, Yoichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamori, Jiro</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer as a prophylactic agent for radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled trial</title><title>Japanese journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>Jpn J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Preventive application of heparinoid moisturizer from the first day of WBRT significantly increased water content and helped to improve skin desquamation and dryness compared with no treatment. Abstract Background The application of heparinoid moisturizer for 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) was previously reported to significantly increase skin water content (WC) and help improve skin dryness and desquamation. The prospective open-label, randomized trial included an exploratory arm to investigate the preventive efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer for acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods Between April 2011 and April 2013, patients receiving WBRT were assigned (1:2:2) to receive either: moisturizer for prophylaxis (group P), moisturizer starting 2 weeks after WBRT for treatment (group M), and no moisturizer (group C). This paper presents the results of comparison between the exploratory arm and no moisturizer group. Skin WC was measured prior to WBRT, on the last day of WBRT, and 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 3 months following WBRT. Signs and symptoms were also assessed. Results Comparing two groups, WC values were significantly higher in group P until 4 weeks following WBRT. At 2 weeks following WBRT, mean WC values in group P and C were 38.5 ± 6.1 arbitrary units (a.u.) and 30.2 ± 7.8 a.u., respectively (P &lt; 0.001). In group C, dryness was more severe at 2 and 4 weeks following WBRT and desquamation more severe until 3 months following WBRT. However, the erythema score showed no difference between the two groups. Regarding symptoms, group C pain scores on the last day of WBRT were significantly higher than in group P (P &lt; 0.030). Conclusions The preventive application of heparinoid moisturizer has the potential of reducing skin desquamation and dryness in patients receiving WBRT.</description><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heparinoids - pharmacology</subject><subject>Heparinoids - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original article</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiodermatitis - drug therapy</subject><issn>1465-3621</issn><issn>0368-2811</issn><issn>1465-3621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAUxEVpaLbbnnovOvUSnJUty2vnEAhhmwQWcmnP5ll_1lpsyzxpE5xvlG8ZbbZdkktOGpifZngMIT9Sdp6yii-2W-kW7TSxXHwiszQvRMKLLP38Rp-Sr95vGWOizJdfyGlWFVwIns_I88oYK0FO1Bna6hHQDs4q2jvrww7tk0YKngId0Y3t1IEMVlLY6CFQ45AiKAvBuoEqjX1UwfpodJ17tMPm1Xah1QjjRMGEmNagBh8S6Qav8WEP-R1uNE4XsQVhUK6PrYpGIGAMijKghe4bOTHQef393zsnf3-v_lzfJuv7m7vrq3UiBctCIgqdN8awSmWcsWrJdZ6VQuZiyRXPeGVAlroqDReaqVQ1phCqgaxclkybMk35nFwecsdd02sl46UIXT2i7QGn2oGt3zuDbeuNe6hFlRUiL2LA2SFAovMetTn-TVm9X6zeL1YfFov0z7d1R_b_RBH4dQDcbvww6QWDpqfP</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Sekiguchi, Kenji</creator><creator>Akahane, Keiko</creator><creator>Ogita, Mami</creator><creator>Haga, Chiori</creator><creator>Ito, Ryoko</creator><creator>Arai, Satoru</creator><creator>Ishida, Yasushi</creator><creator>Tsukada, Yoichiro</creator><creator>Kawamori, Jiro</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer as a prophylactic agent for radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Sekiguchi, Kenji ; Akahane, Keiko ; Ogita, Mami ; Haga, Chiori ; Ito, Ryoko ; Arai, Satoru ; Ishida, Yasushi ; Tsukada, Yoichiro ; Kawamori, Jiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-56e4bff09d2300973e4285c4573d3239fac8e98f35e0d1dbf65dba28780ef8113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heparinoids - pharmacology</topic><topic>Heparinoids - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original article</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiodermatitis - drug therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akahane, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogita, Mami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haga, Chiori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Ryoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arai, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishida, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsukada, Yoichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamori, Jiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Japanese journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sekiguchi, Kenji</au><au>Akahane, Keiko</au><au>Ogita, Mami</au><au>Haga, Chiori</au><au>Ito, Ryoko</au><au>Arai, Satoru</au><au>Ishida, Yasushi</au><au>Tsukada, Yoichiro</au><au>Kawamori, Jiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer as a prophylactic agent for radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Japanese journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>450</spage><epage>457</epage><pages>450-457</pages><issn>1465-3621</issn><issn>0368-2811</issn><eissn>1465-3621</eissn><abstract>Preventive application of heparinoid moisturizer from the first day of WBRT significantly increased water content and helped to improve skin desquamation and dryness compared with no treatment. Abstract Background The application of heparinoid moisturizer for 2 weeks following whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) was previously reported to significantly increase skin water content (WC) and help improve skin dryness and desquamation. The prospective open-label, randomized trial included an exploratory arm to investigate the preventive efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer for acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods Between April 2011 and April 2013, patients receiving WBRT were assigned (1:2:2) to receive either: moisturizer for prophylaxis (group P), moisturizer starting 2 weeks after WBRT for treatment (group M), and no moisturizer (group C). This paper presents the results of comparison between the exploratory arm and no moisturizer group. Skin WC was measured prior to WBRT, on the last day of WBRT, and 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 3 months following WBRT. Signs and symptoms were also assessed. Results Comparing two groups, WC values were significantly higher in group P until 4 weeks following WBRT. At 2 weeks following WBRT, mean WC values in group P and C were 38.5 ± 6.1 arbitrary units (a.u.) and 30.2 ± 7.8 a.u., respectively (P &lt; 0.001). In group C, dryness was more severe at 2 and 4 weeks following WBRT and desquamation more severe until 3 months following WBRT. However, the erythema score showed no difference between the two groups. Regarding symptoms, group C pain scores on the last day of WBRT were significantly higher than in group P (P &lt; 0.030). Conclusions The preventive application of heparinoid moisturizer has the potential of reducing skin desquamation and dryness in patients receiving WBRT.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29635534</pmid><doi>10.1093/jjco/hyy045</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1465-3621
ispartof Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2018-05, Vol.48 (5), p.450-457
issn 1465-3621
0368-2811
1465-3621
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5926546
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Heparinoids - pharmacology
Heparinoids - therapeutic use
Humans
Mastectomy, Segmental - adverse effects
Mastectomy, Segmental - methods
Middle Aged
Original article
Prospective Studies
Radiodermatitis - drug therapy
title Efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer as a prophylactic agent for radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A10%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20heparinoid%20moisturizer%20as%20a%20prophylactic%20agent%20for%20radiation%20dermatitis%20following%20radiotherapy%20after%20breast-conserving%20surgery:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Sekiguchi,%20Kenji&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=450&rft.epage=457&rft.pages=450-457&rft.issn=1465-3621&rft.eissn=1465-3621&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jjco/hyy045&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/jjco/hyy045%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29635534&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jjco/hyy045&rfr_iscdi=true