Proton Beam Therapy Alone for Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Institutional Prospective Cohort Study

The role of proton beam therapy (PBT) as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of PBT alone for these patients. Between January 2011 and July 2014, 218 patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancers 2018-04, Vol.10 (4), p.116
Hauptverfasser: Arimura, Takeshi, Yoshiura, Takashi, Matsukawa, Kyoko, Kondo, Naoaki, Kitano, Ikumi, Ogino, Takashi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 116
container_title Cancers
container_volume 10
creator Arimura, Takeshi
Yoshiura, Takashi
Matsukawa, Kyoko
Kondo, Naoaki
Kitano, Ikumi
Ogino, Takashi
description The role of proton beam therapy (PBT) as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of PBT alone for these patients. Between January 2011 and July 2014, 218 patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa who declined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were enrolled to the study and were treated with PBT following one of the following protocols: 74 Gray (GyE) with 37 fractions (fr) (74 GyE/37 fr), 78 GyE/39 fr, and 70 GyE/28 fr. The 5-year progression-free survival rate in the intermediate- and high-risk groups was 97% and 83%, respectively ( = 0.002). The rate of grade 2 or higher late gastrointestinal toxicity was 3.9%, and a significant increased incidence was noted in those who received the 78 GyE/39 fr protocol ( < 0.05). Grade 2 or higher acute and late genitourinary toxicities were observed in 23.5% and 3.4% of patients, respectively. Our results indicated that PBT monotherapy can be a beneficial treatment for localized PCa. Furthermore, it can preserve the quality of life of these patients. We believe that this study provides crucial hypotheses for further study and for establishing new treatment strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cancers10040116
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5923371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2024469193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-efb5d61d042448d5f3cac2d686f1e33de50e178d9ab5ecf2a1fa608b1d0d0c843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9LHDEUx0NpqWI99yYBL72M5tdkJh6E7dKqILSoPYds8saNziZrkhH2v29WrVhzSXj5vC_f974IfaXkiHNFjq0JFlKmhAhCqfyAdhnpWCOlEh_fvHfQfs53pB7OaSe7z2iHKSmYpGoX5d8plhjwdzArfLOEZNYbPBtjADzEhC9CgbQC502BBtfCub9dNlc-3-PamEst4_mTjRM8CxXPxZep-BjM-ESswRb_WKG4jKng6zK5zRf0aTBjhv2Xew_9-fnjZn7eXP46u5jPLhsr-q40MCxaJ6kjggnRu3bg1ljmZC8HCpw7aAnQrnfKLFqwAzN0MJL0i9rhiO0F30Onz7rraVFnsBBKMqNeJ78yaaOj8fr_n-CX-jY-6lYxzjtaBb69CKT4MEEueuWzhXE0AeKUNSPVmVRU8YoevkPv4pTqFraUIIoTpraOjp8pW1eTEwyvZijR20z1u0xrx8HbGV75fwnyv1ZloBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2040930294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proton Beam Therapy Alone for Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Institutional Prospective Cohort Study</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Arimura, Takeshi ; Yoshiura, Takashi ; Matsukawa, Kyoko ; Kondo, Naoaki ; Kitano, Ikumi ; Ogino, Takashi</creator><creatorcontrib>Arimura, Takeshi ; Yoshiura, Takashi ; Matsukawa, Kyoko ; Kondo, Naoaki ; Kitano, Ikumi ; Ogino, Takashi</creatorcontrib><description>The role of proton beam therapy (PBT) as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of PBT alone for these patients. Between January 2011 and July 2014, 218 patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa who declined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were enrolled to the study and were treated with PBT following one of the following protocols: 74 Gray (GyE) with 37 fractions (fr) (74 GyE/37 fr), 78 GyE/39 fr, and 70 GyE/28 fr. The 5-year progression-free survival rate in the intermediate- and high-risk groups was 97% and 83%, respectively ( = 0.002). The rate of grade 2 or higher late gastrointestinal toxicity was 3.9%, and a significant increased incidence was noted in those who received the 78 GyE/39 fr protocol ( &lt; 0.05). Grade 2 or higher acute and late genitourinary toxicities were observed in 23.5% and 3.4% of patients, respectively. Our results indicated that PBT monotherapy can be a beneficial treatment for localized PCa. Furthermore, it can preserve the quality of life of these patients. We believe that this study provides crucial hypotheses for further study and for establishing new treatment strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers10040116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29642619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Cohort analysis ; Patients ; Prostate cancer ; Quality of life ; Risk groups ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2018-04, Vol.10 (4), p.116</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2018</rights><rights>2018 by the authors. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-efb5d61d042448d5f3cac2d686f1e33de50e178d9ab5ecf2a1fa608b1d0d0c843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-efb5d61d042448d5f3cac2d686f1e33de50e178d9ab5ecf2a1fa608b1d0d0c843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923371/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923371/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29642619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arimura, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshiura, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsukawa, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondo, Naoaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Ikumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogino, Takashi</creatorcontrib><title>Proton Beam Therapy Alone for Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Institutional Prospective Cohort Study</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>The role of proton beam therapy (PBT) as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of PBT alone for these patients. Between January 2011 and July 2014, 218 patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa who declined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were enrolled to the study and were treated with PBT following one of the following protocols: 74 Gray (GyE) with 37 fractions (fr) (74 GyE/37 fr), 78 GyE/39 fr, and 70 GyE/28 fr. The 5-year progression-free survival rate in the intermediate- and high-risk groups was 97% and 83%, respectively ( = 0.002). The rate of grade 2 or higher late gastrointestinal toxicity was 3.9%, and a significant increased incidence was noted in those who received the 78 GyE/39 fr protocol ( &lt; 0.05). Grade 2 or higher acute and late genitourinary toxicities were observed in 23.5% and 3.4% of patients, respectively. Our results indicated that PBT monotherapy can be a beneficial treatment for localized PCa. Furthermore, it can preserve the quality of life of these patients. We believe that this study provides crucial hypotheses for further study and for establishing new treatment strategies.</description><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9LHDEUx0NpqWI99yYBL72M5tdkJh6E7dKqILSoPYds8saNziZrkhH2v29WrVhzSXj5vC_f974IfaXkiHNFjq0JFlKmhAhCqfyAdhnpWCOlEh_fvHfQfs53pB7OaSe7z2iHKSmYpGoX5d8plhjwdzArfLOEZNYbPBtjADzEhC9CgbQC502BBtfCub9dNlc-3-PamEst4_mTjRM8CxXPxZep-BjM-ESswRb_WKG4jKng6zK5zRf0aTBjhv2Xew_9-fnjZn7eXP46u5jPLhsr-q40MCxaJ6kjggnRu3bg1ljmZC8HCpw7aAnQrnfKLFqwAzN0MJL0i9rhiO0F30Onz7rraVFnsBBKMqNeJ78yaaOj8fr_n-CX-jY-6lYxzjtaBb69CKT4MEEueuWzhXE0AeKUNSPVmVRU8YoevkPv4pTqFraUIIoTpraOjp8pW1eTEwyvZijR20z1u0xrx8HbGV75fwnyv1ZloBg</recordid><startdate>20180410</startdate><enddate>20180410</enddate><creator>Arimura, Takeshi</creator><creator>Yoshiura, Takashi</creator><creator>Matsukawa, Kyoko</creator><creator>Kondo, Naoaki</creator><creator>Kitano, Ikumi</creator><creator>Ogino, Takashi</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180410</creationdate><title>Proton Beam Therapy Alone for Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Institutional Prospective Cohort Study</title><author>Arimura, Takeshi ; Yoshiura, Takashi ; Matsukawa, Kyoko ; Kondo, Naoaki ; Kitano, Ikumi ; Ogino, Takashi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-efb5d61d042448d5f3cac2d686f1e33de50e178d9ab5ecf2a1fa608b1d0d0c843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arimura, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshiura, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsukawa, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondo, Naoaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Ikumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogino, Takashi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arimura, Takeshi</au><au>Yoshiura, Takashi</au><au>Matsukawa, Kyoko</au><au>Kondo, Naoaki</au><au>Kitano, Ikumi</au><au>Ogino, Takashi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proton Beam Therapy Alone for Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Institutional Prospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2018-04-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>116</spage><pages>116-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>The role of proton beam therapy (PBT) as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of PBT alone for these patients. Between January 2011 and July 2014, 218 patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa who declined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were enrolled to the study and were treated with PBT following one of the following protocols: 74 Gray (GyE) with 37 fractions (fr) (74 GyE/37 fr), 78 GyE/39 fr, and 70 GyE/28 fr. The 5-year progression-free survival rate in the intermediate- and high-risk groups was 97% and 83%, respectively ( = 0.002). The rate of grade 2 or higher late gastrointestinal toxicity was 3.9%, and a significant increased incidence was noted in those who received the 78 GyE/39 fr protocol ( &lt; 0.05). Grade 2 or higher acute and late genitourinary toxicities were observed in 23.5% and 3.4% of patients, respectively. Our results indicated that PBT monotherapy can be a beneficial treatment for localized PCa. Furthermore, it can preserve the quality of life of these patients. We believe that this study provides crucial hypotheses for further study and for establishing new treatment strategies.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>29642619</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers10040116</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6694
ispartof Cancers, 2018-04, Vol.10 (4), p.116
issn 2072-6694
2072-6694
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5923371
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Cohort analysis
Patients
Prostate cancer
Quality of life
Risk groups
Toxicity
title Proton Beam Therapy Alone for Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Institutional Prospective Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A10%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proton%20Beam%20Therapy%20Alone%20for%20Intermediate-%20or%20High-Risk%20Prostate%20Cancer:%20An%20Institutional%20Prospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Arimura,%20Takeshi&rft.date=2018-04-10&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=116&rft.pages=116-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers10040116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2024469193%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2040930294&rft_id=info:pmid/29642619&rfr_iscdi=true