Incorporating equity in economic evaluations: a multi-attribute equity state approach
In publicly funded health care systems, decision makers must continually balance often conflicting priorities of efficiency and equity. Health economists have developed a set of highly sophisticated analytical methods for assessing efficiency, but less attention has been paid to formally incorporati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The European journal of health economics 2018-05, Vol.19 (4), p.489-498 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 498 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 489 |
container_title | The European journal of health economics |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Round, Jeff Paulden, Mike |
description | In publicly funded health care systems, decision makers must continually balance often conflicting priorities of efficiency and equity. Health economists have developed a set of highly sophisticated analytical methods for assessing efficiency, but less attention has been paid to formally incorporating equity considerations into analyses. As a result, where equity is considered is often informal, ad hoc and/or simplistic. This paper is a proposal for a mechanism for formally incorporating equity within the decision process. It begins with an overview of the current literature on equity weighting. It then considers the case of a single equity domain and illustrates how this is currently applied in practice by the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. It then proposes a more comprehensive method for considering the multi-attribute equity state, where a population exhibits more than one trait considered worthy of differential weighting. Finally, the paper proposes a mechanism by which this could be applied in practice, and concludes with a discussion of the challenges for applying multi-attribute equity weighting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10198-017-0897-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5913380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45156376</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45156376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-cc4b6a46cdebf6aaf476acf5f59c0120446e705b44a5040df8d506b86270c3033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1rFDEYHkSxtfoDPCgDXryMvvlOPBSkWC0UvNhzyGQz2ywzyTTJFPrvzTLdtXowlyQ8H2-ePE3zFsEnBCA-ZwRIyQ6Q6EAq0ZFnzSniSHaCA3p-ODMlT5pXOe8AMBaYvGxOsGSC1HXa3FwFG9Mckyk-bFt3t_jy0PrQOhtDnLxt3b0Zl4rGkL-0pp2WsfjOlJJ8vxR3UORi6sXMc4rG3r5uXgxmzO7N437W3Fx--3Xxo7v--f3q4ut1ZxkTpbOW9txQbjeuH7gxAxXc2IENTFlAGCjlTgDrKTUMKGwGuWHAe8mxAEuAkLPmfPWdl35yG-tCSWbUc_KTSQ86Gq__RoK_1dt4r5lChEioBh8fDVK8W1wuevLZunE0wcUla6Sg_hRWlFXqh3-ou7ikUONpDFgRyZlSlYVWlk0x5-SG42MQ6H1pei1N19L0vjS9T_H-aYqj4tBSJeCVkCsUti79Gf0_13eraJdLTEdTyhDjRHDyG5KSrZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2029386599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incorporating equity in economic evaluations: a multi-attribute equity state approach</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Round, Jeff ; Paulden, Mike</creator><creatorcontrib>Round, Jeff ; Paulden, Mike</creatorcontrib><description>In publicly funded health care systems, decision makers must continually balance often conflicting priorities of efficiency and equity. Health economists have developed a set of highly sophisticated analytical methods for assessing efficiency, but less attention has been paid to formally incorporating equity considerations into analyses. As a result, where equity is considered is often informal, ad hoc and/or simplistic. This paper is a proposal for a mechanism for formally incorporating equity within the decision process. It begins with an overview of the current literature on equity weighting. It then considers the case of a single equity domain and illustrates how this is currently applied in practice by the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. It then proposes a more comprehensive method for considering the multi-attribute equity state, where a population exhibits more than one trait considered worthy of differential weighting. Finally, the paper proposes a mechanism by which this could be applied in practice, and concludes with a discussion of the challenges for applying multi-attribute equity weighting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-7598</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-7601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0897-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28573333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Decision Making ; Delivery of Health Care - economics ; Economic Policy ; Efficiency ; Equity ; Health care industry ; Health Care Management ; Health Economics ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Paper ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Public Finance ; Public Health ; Public Sector</subject><ispartof>The European journal of health economics, 2018-05, Vol.19 (4), p.489-498</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The European Journal of Health Economics is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-cc4b6a46cdebf6aaf476acf5f59c0120446e705b44a5040df8d506b86270c3033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-cc4b6a46cdebf6aaf476acf5f59c0120446e705b44a5040df8d506b86270c3033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3103-6984</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45156376$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45156376$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28573333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Round, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulden, Mike</creatorcontrib><title>Incorporating equity in economic evaluations: a multi-attribute equity state approach</title><title>The European journal of health economics</title><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><description>In publicly funded health care systems, decision makers must continually balance often conflicting priorities of efficiency and equity. Health economists have developed a set of highly sophisticated analytical methods for assessing efficiency, but less attention has been paid to formally incorporating equity considerations into analyses. As a result, where equity is considered is often informal, ad hoc and/or simplistic. This paper is a proposal for a mechanism for formally incorporating equity within the decision process. It begins with an overview of the current literature on equity weighting. It then considers the case of a single equity domain and illustrates how this is currently applied in practice by the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. It then proposes a more comprehensive method for considering the multi-attribute equity state, where a population exhibits more than one trait considered worthy of differential weighting. Finally, the paper proposes a mechanism by which this could be applied in practice, and concludes with a discussion of the challenges for applying multi-attribute equity weighting.</description><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - economics</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health Care Management</subject><subject>Health Economics</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public Sector</subject><issn>1618-7598</issn><issn>1618-7601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1rFDEYHkSxtfoDPCgDXryMvvlOPBSkWC0UvNhzyGQz2ywzyTTJFPrvzTLdtXowlyQ8H2-ePE3zFsEnBCA-ZwRIyQ6Q6EAq0ZFnzSniSHaCA3p-ODMlT5pXOe8AMBaYvGxOsGSC1HXa3FwFG9Mckyk-bFt3t_jy0PrQOhtDnLxt3b0Zl4rGkL-0pp2WsfjOlJJ8vxR3UORi6sXMc4rG3r5uXgxmzO7N437W3Fx--3Xxo7v--f3q4ut1ZxkTpbOW9txQbjeuH7gxAxXc2IENTFlAGCjlTgDrKTUMKGwGuWHAe8mxAEuAkLPmfPWdl35yG-tCSWbUc_KTSQ86Gq__RoK_1dt4r5lChEioBh8fDVK8W1wuevLZunE0wcUla6Sg_hRWlFXqh3-ou7ikUONpDFgRyZlSlYVWlk0x5-SG42MQ6H1pei1N19L0vjS9T_H-aYqj4tBSJeCVkCsUti79Gf0_13eraJdLTEdTyhDjRHDyG5KSrZE</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Round, Jeff</creator><creator>Paulden, Mike</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-6984</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Incorporating equity in economic evaluations: a multi-attribute equity state approach</title><author>Round, Jeff ; Paulden, Mike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-cc4b6a46cdebf6aaf476acf5f59c0120446e705b44a5040df8d506b86270c3033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - economics</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health Care Management</topic><topic>Health Economics</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public Sector</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Round, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulden, Mike</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Round, Jeff</au><au>Paulden, Mike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incorporating equity in economic evaluations: a multi-attribute equity state approach</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of health economics</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Health Econ</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Health Econ</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>489-498</pages><issn>1618-7598</issn><eissn>1618-7601</eissn><abstract>In publicly funded health care systems, decision makers must continually balance often conflicting priorities of efficiency and equity. Health economists have developed a set of highly sophisticated analytical methods for assessing efficiency, but less attention has been paid to formally incorporating equity considerations into analyses. As a result, where equity is considered is often informal, ad hoc and/or simplistic. This paper is a proposal for a mechanism for formally incorporating equity within the decision process. It begins with an overview of the current literature on equity weighting. It then considers the case of a single equity domain and illustrates how this is currently applied in practice by the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. It then proposes a more comprehensive method for considering the multi-attribute equity state, where a population exhibits more than one trait considered worthy of differential weighting. Finally, the paper proposes a mechanism by which this could be applied in practice, and concludes with a discussion of the challenges for applying multi-attribute equity weighting.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>28573333</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10198-017-0897-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-6984</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-7598 |
ispartof | The European journal of health economics, 2018-05, Vol.19 (4), p.489-498 |
issn | 1618-7598 1618-7601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5913380 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Cost-Benefit Analysis Decision Making Delivery of Health Care - economics Economic Policy Efficiency Equity Health care industry Health Care Management Health Economics Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Paper Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes Public Finance Public Health Public Sector |
title | Incorporating equity in economic evaluations: a multi-attribute equity state approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A01%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incorporating%20equity%20in%20economic%20evaluations:%20a%20multi-attribute%20equity%20state%20approach&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20health%20economics&rft.au=Round,%20Jeff&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=489-498&rft.issn=1618-7598&rft.eissn=1618-7601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10198-017-0897-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E45156376%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2029386599&rft_id=info:pmid/28573333&rft_jstor_id=45156376&rfr_iscdi=true |