Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?

Standardized approach to polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) is lacking since cold biopsy forceps have been associated with high levels of recurrence, hot biopsy forceps are considered inadequate and risky and cold snaring is currently under investigation for its efficacy and safety....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2018-04, Vol.24 (14), p.1579-1582
Hauptverfasser: Panteris, Vasileios, Vezakis, Antonios, Triantafillidis, J K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1582
container_issue 14
container_start_page 1579
container_title World journal of gastroenterology : WJG
container_volume 24
creator Panteris, Vasileios
Vezakis, Antonios
Triantafillidis, J K
description Standardized approach to polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) is lacking since cold biopsy forceps have been associated with high levels of recurrence, hot biopsy forceps are considered inadequate and risky and cold snaring is currently under investigation for its efficacy and safety. This has led to confusion and a gap in clinical practice. This article discusses the usefulness and contemporary practical applicability of hot biopsy forceps and provides well-intentioned criticism of the new European guidelines for the treatment of DCPs. Diminutive colorectal polyps are a source of frustration for the endoscopist since their small size is accompanied by a considerable risk of premalignant neoplasia and a small but non-negligible risk of advanced neoplasia and even cancer. Since the proportion of diminutive colorectal polyps is substantial and exceeds that of larger polyps, their effective removal poses a considerable workload and a therapeutic challenge. During the last decade, the introduction of cold snaring to routine endoscopy practice has attempted to overcome the use of prior techniques, such as hot biopsy forceps. It is important to recognize that with the exception of endoscopic methods that are obviously unsafe and inadequate to serve their purpose, all other interventional endoscopic methods are operator-dependent in the sense that specific expertise and training are obligatory for the success of any therapeutic intervention. Since relevant publications on hot biopsy forceps are still in favor of its careful use, as it has not yet demonstrated inferiority compared with newer techniques, it would be prudent for any medical practitioner to evaluate the available tools and judge any new proposed technique based on the evidence before it is adopted.
doi_str_mv 10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1579
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5897861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2026421392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4a82d60240e46ba62ebc3aef41f5c8eba88345a9d8b34bf09ba2a073214694103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtLxDAQx4Mouj7uniRHL12TSZomF0XEFwgeVDyGJE3dSNvUpl3Zb2-XVdHTwPwfM_BD6JiSOSu4PPt8f5svgc8D5XOaF2oLzQCoykByso1mlJAiUwyKPbSf0jshwFgOu2gPlBAAKp-h16dFHOsSL-KAbYhdWuEq9s53CVuPjTVtGVtfrpe4i_Wq826IzQrHCpehCe04hKXHLtaxnxRTb0zp4hDtVKZO_uh7HqCXm-vnq7vs4fH2_uryIXNMiSHjRkIpCHDiubBGgLeOGV9xWuVOemukZDw3qpSWcVsRZQ0YUjCgXChOCTtA55vebrSNL51vh97UuutDY_qVjibo_0obFvotLnUuVSEFnQpOvwv6-DH6NOgmJOfr2rQ-jkkDAcGBMgWTlWysro8p9b76PUOJXvPQEw898dATD73mMUVO_r73G_gBwL4ACi6KQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2026421392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?</title><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Panteris, Vasileios ; Vezakis, Antonios ; Triantafillidis, J K</creator><creatorcontrib>Panteris, Vasileios ; Vezakis, Antonios ; Triantafillidis, J K</creatorcontrib><description>Standardized approach to polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) is lacking since cold biopsy forceps have been associated with high levels of recurrence, hot biopsy forceps are considered inadequate and risky and cold snaring is currently under investigation for its efficacy and safety. This has led to confusion and a gap in clinical practice. This article discusses the usefulness and contemporary practical applicability of hot biopsy forceps and provides well-intentioned criticism of the new European guidelines for the treatment of DCPs. Diminutive colorectal polyps are a source of frustration for the endoscopist since their small size is accompanied by a considerable risk of premalignant neoplasia and a small but non-negligible risk of advanced neoplasia and even cancer. Since the proportion of diminutive colorectal polyps is substantial and exceeds that of larger polyps, their effective removal poses a considerable workload and a therapeutic challenge. During the last decade, the introduction of cold snaring to routine endoscopy practice has attempted to overcome the use of prior techniques, such as hot biopsy forceps. It is important to recognize that with the exception of endoscopic methods that are obviously unsafe and inadequate to serve their purpose, all other interventional endoscopic methods are operator-dependent in the sense that specific expertise and training are obligatory for the success of any therapeutic intervention. Since relevant publications on hot biopsy forceps are still in favor of its careful use, as it has not yet demonstrated inferiority compared with newer techniques, it would be prudent for any medical practitioner to evaluate the available tools and judge any new proposed technique based on the evidence before it is adopted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1007-9327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-2840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29662295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Letters To The Editor</subject><ispartof>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2018-04, Vol.24 (14), p.1579-1582</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2018</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4a82d60240e46ba62ebc3aef41f5c8eba88345a9d8b34bf09ba2a073214694103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4a82d60240e46ba62ebc3aef41f5c8eba88345a9d8b34bf09ba2a073214694103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897861/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897861/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29662295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panteris, Vasileios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vezakis, Antonios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triantafillidis, J K</creatorcontrib><title>Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?</title><title>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</title><addtitle>World J Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Standardized approach to polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) is lacking since cold biopsy forceps have been associated with high levels of recurrence, hot biopsy forceps are considered inadequate and risky and cold snaring is currently under investigation for its efficacy and safety. This has led to confusion and a gap in clinical practice. This article discusses the usefulness and contemporary practical applicability of hot biopsy forceps and provides well-intentioned criticism of the new European guidelines for the treatment of DCPs. Diminutive colorectal polyps are a source of frustration for the endoscopist since their small size is accompanied by a considerable risk of premalignant neoplasia and a small but non-negligible risk of advanced neoplasia and even cancer. Since the proportion of diminutive colorectal polyps is substantial and exceeds that of larger polyps, their effective removal poses a considerable workload and a therapeutic challenge. During the last decade, the introduction of cold snaring to routine endoscopy practice has attempted to overcome the use of prior techniques, such as hot biopsy forceps. It is important to recognize that with the exception of endoscopic methods that are obviously unsafe and inadequate to serve their purpose, all other interventional endoscopic methods are operator-dependent in the sense that specific expertise and training are obligatory for the success of any therapeutic intervention. Since relevant publications on hot biopsy forceps are still in favor of its careful use, as it has not yet demonstrated inferiority compared with newer techniques, it would be prudent for any medical practitioner to evaluate the available tools and judge any new proposed technique based on the evidence before it is adopted.</description><subject>Letters To The Editor</subject><issn>1007-9327</issn><issn>2219-2840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUtLxDAQx4Mouj7uniRHL12TSZomF0XEFwgeVDyGJE3dSNvUpl3Zb2-XVdHTwPwfM_BD6JiSOSu4PPt8f5svgc8D5XOaF2oLzQCoykByso1mlJAiUwyKPbSf0jshwFgOu2gPlBAAKp-h16dFHOsSL-KAbYhdWuEq9s53CVuPjTVtGVtfrpe4i_Wq826IzQrHCpehCe04hKXHLtaxnxRTb0zp4hDtVKZO_uh7HqCXm-vnq7vs4fH2_uryIXNMiSHjRkIpCHDiubBGgLeOGV9xWuVOemukZDw3qpSWcVsRZQ0YUjCgXChOCTtA55vebrSNL51vh97UuutDY_qVjibo_0obFvotLnUuVSEFnQpOvwv6-DH6NOgmJOfr2rQ-jkkDAcGBMgWTlWysro8p9b76PUOJXvPQEw898dATD73mMUVO_r73G_gBwL4ACi6KQw</recordid><startdate>20180414</startdate><enddate>20180414</enddate><creator>Panteris, Vasileios</creator><creator>Vezakis, Antonios</creator><creator>Triantafillidis, J K</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180414</creationdate><title>Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?</title><author>Panteris, Vasileios ; Vezakis, Antonios ; Triantafillidis, J K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4a82d60240e46ba62ebc3aef41f5c8eba88345a9d8b34bf09ba2a073214694103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Letters To The Editor</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panteris, Vasileios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vezakis, Antonios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triantafillidis, J K</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panteris, Vasileios</au><au>Vezakis, Antonios</au><au>Triantafillidis, J K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?</atitle><jtitle>World journal of gastroenterology : WJG</jtitle><addtitle>World J Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2018-04-14</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1579</spage><epage>1582</epage><pages>1579-1582</pages><issn>1007-9327</issn><eissn>2219-2840</eissn><abstract>Standardized approach to polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) is lacking since cold biopsy forceps have been associated with high levels of recurrence, hot biopsy forceps are considered inadequate and risky and cold snaring is currently under investigation for its efficacy and safety. This has led to confusion and a gap in clinical practice. This article discusses the usefulness and contemporary practical applicability of hot biopsy forceps and provides well-intentioned criticism of the new European guidelines for the treatment of DCPs. Diminutive colorectal polyps are a source of frustration for the endoscopist since their small size is accompanied by a considerable risk of premalignant neoplasia and a small but non-negligible risk of advanced neoplasia and even cancer. Since the proportion of diminutive colorectal polyps is substantial and exceeds that of larger polyps, their effective removal poses a considerable workload and a therapeutic challenge. During the last decade, the introduction of cold snaring to routine endoscopy practice has attempted to overcome the use of prior techniques, such as hot biopsy forceps. It is important to recognize that with the exception of endoscopic methods that are obviously unsafe and inadequate to serve their purpose, all other interventional endoscopic methods are operator-dependent in the sense that specific expertise and training are obligatory for the success of any therapeutic intervention. Since relevant publications on hot biopsy forceps are still in favor of its careful use, as it has not yet demonstrated inferiority compared with newer techniques, it would be prudent for any medical practitioner to evaluate the available tools and judge any new proposed technique based on the evidence before it is adopted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>29662295</pmid><doi>10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1579</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1007-9327
ispartof World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2018-04, Vol.24 (14), p.1579-1582
issn 1007-9327
2219-2840
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5897861
source Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Letters To The Editor
title Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A32%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20hot%20biopsy%20forceps%20be%20abandoned%20for%20polypectomy%20of%20diminutive%20colorectal%20polyps?&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20:%20WJG&rft.au=Panteris,%20Vasileios&rft.date=2018-04-14&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1579&rft.epage=1582&rft.pages=1579-1582&rft.issn=1007-9327&rft.eissn=2219-2840&rft_id=info:doi/10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2026421392%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2026421392&rft_id=info:pmid/29662295&rfr_iscdi=true