Prospective, single UK centre, comparative study of the predictive values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared to time-resolved CT angiography in the detection and characterisation of endoleaks in high-risk patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: a protocol

IntroductionDiagnosis of endoleaks is imperative to prevent failure of endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs). The gold standard for diagnosis of endoleaks is catheter-directed subtraction angiography, which is not a practicable choice for surveillance. CT angiography (CTA) is the historical surveill...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2018-04, Vol.8 (4), p.e020835-e020835
Hauptverfasser: Roy, Iain Nicholas, Chan, Tze Yuan, Czanner, Gabriela, Wallace, Steve, Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa Rao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e020835
container_issue 4
container_start_page e020835
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 8
creator Roy, Iain Nicholas
Chan, Tze Yuan
Czanner, Gabriela
Wallace, Steve
Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa Rao
description IntroductionDiagnosis of endoleaks is imperative to prevent failure of endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs). The gold standard for diagnosis of endoleaks is catheter-directed subtraction angiography, which is not a practicable choice for surveillance. CT angiography (CTA) is the historical surveillance modality of choice. Concerns over cost, potential nephrotoxicity of contrast agents and repeated radiation exposure led to colour duplex ultrasound scan (CDUS) becoming an established alternative. CDUS has a lower sensitivity and specificity for endoleaks detection compared to CTA. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound scan (CEUS) represents an improvement of ultrasound imaging but comparisons against CTA report widely varying results, likely due to technical factors of CEUS and limitations of single-phase CTA.The development of time-resolved CTA (tCTA) offers timing information that much more closely mirrors the dynamic information available from CEUS. Theoretically, these two imaging modalities have the best potential for diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this study will be to compare CEUS to tCTA and investigate the utility of other measurements available from tCTA.Methods and analysisThis is a prospective, single UK centre, comparative study of paired binary diagnostic imaging modalities. Patients identified in routine post-EVAR surveillance as at risk of having a graft-related endoleak will undergo a CEUS and tCTA on the same day. This will allow the first comparison of CEUS to a semidynamic form of CTA. CEUS sensitivity and specificity to endoleak detection will be calculated.Ethics and disseminationThe study has achieved ethical approval. We hope the results will define the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in comparison to a semidynamic form of CTA, representing a methodological improvement from previous studies. Results will be submitted for presentation at national and international vascular surgeryandradiology meetings. The full results are planned to be published in a medical journal.Trial registration number NCT02688751.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020835
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5892749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2021731845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-7d68d08f06b8c7226279a6c793ea815ecd469266e16a1f0ce518bdfbb39c02043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk1v1TAQDAhEq9JfAEKWuHAgxXbifHBAQk98iUpwaM-R42wSvyZ2sJ1I79-zyXtUhRPJIdbszOxuPFH0gtErxpLsXT3u7QQm5pTlMeW0SMTj6JzTNI0zKsSTB-ez6NL7PcUnFaUQ_Fl0xsuMiVTQ80cvfzrrJ1BBL_CWeG26Acjtd6LABIeIsuMknVzLxIe5ORDbktADmRw0epORRQ4z-LWgLKqkDzGYXhoFDZmHFbCzaU5WiAVLgh4hduDtsCCwuyHSdNp2Tk79gWizdWggrHNZg0VU9ziGCuC0lxuI7cA0dgB551dJr7s-xuodmZCA43uCXcF1FpfaqIv0ah6kQz-Y3cGPxMEktSN-dgvoYVhHfk8k7maDVXZ4Hj1t5eDh8vS9iG4_f7rZfY2vf3z5tvt4HddpzkOcN1nR0KKlWV2onPOM56XMVF4mIAsmQDVpVvIsA5ZJ1lIFghV109Z1Uiq8ujS5iD4cfae5HqHZ_r0cqsnpUbpDZaWu_q4Y3VedXSpRlDxPSzR4czJw9hfeRahG7RWsG4GdfcUpZ3nCilQg9fU_1L2dncH1kFWWKb48QVZyZCmMh3fQ3g_DaLUGsDoFsFoDWB0DiKpXD_e41_yJGxKujgRU_5fjb78U8Is</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2099494923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective, single UK centre, comparative study of the predictive values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared to time-resolved CT angiography in the detection and characterisation of endoleaks in high-risk patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: a protocol</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Roy, Iain Nicholas ; Chan, Tze Yuan ; Czanner, Gabriela ; Wallace, Steve ; Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa Rao</creator><creatorcontrib>Roy, Iain Nicholas ; Chan, Tze Yuan ; Czanner, Gabriela ; Wallace, Steve ; Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa Rao</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionDiagnosis of endoleaks is imperative to prevent failure of endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs). The gold standard for diagnosis of endoleaks is catheter-directed subtraction angiography, which is not a practicable choice for surveillance. CT angiography (CTA) is the historical surveillance modality of choice. Concerns over cost, potential nephrotoxicity of contrast agents and repeated radiation exposure led to colour duplex ultrasound scan (CDUS) becoming an established alternative. CDUS has a lower sensitivity and specificity for endoleaks detection compared to CTA. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound scan (CEUS) represents an improvement of ultrasound imaging but comparisons against CTA report widely varying results, likely due to technical factors of CEUS and limitations of single-phase CTA.The development of time-resolved CTA (tCTA) offers timing information that much more closely mirrors the dynamic information available from CEUS. Theoretically, these two imaging modalities have the best potential for diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this study will be to compare CEUS to tCTA and investigate the utility of other measurements available from tCTA.Methods and analysisThis is a prospective, single UK centre, comparative study of paired binary diagnostic imaging modalities. Patients identified in routine post-EVAR surveillance as at risk of having a graft-related endoleak will undergo a CEUS and tCTA on the same day. This will allow the first comparison of CEUS to a semidynamic form of CTA. CEUS sensitivity and specificity to endoleak detection will be calculated.Ethics and disseminationThe study has achieved ethical approval. We hope the results will define the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in comparison to a semidynamic form of CTA, representing a methodological improvement from previous studies. Results will be submitted for presentation at national and international vascular surgeryandradiology meetings. The full results are planned to be published in a medical journal.Trial registration number NCT02688751.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020835</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29615450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Accuracy ; Aneurysms ; Comparative studies ; Health surveillance ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2018-04, Vol.8 (4), p.e020835-e020835</ispartof><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.</rights><rights>2018 Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-7d68d08f06b8c7226279a6c793ea815ecd469266e16a1f0ce518bdfbb39c02043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-7d68d08f06b8c7226279a6c793ea815ecd469266e16a1f0ce518bdfbb39c02043</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9701-8319</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/4/e020835.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/4/e020835.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27547,27548,27922,27923,53789,53791,77371,77402</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29615450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roy, Iain Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Tze Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czanner, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa Rao</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective, single UK centre, comparative study of the predictive values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared to time-resolved CT angiography in the detection and characterisation of endoleaks in high-risk patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: a protocol</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>IntroductionDiagnosis of endoleaks is imperative to prevent failure of endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs). The gold standard for diagnosis of endoleaks is catheter-directed subtraction angiography, which is not a practicable choice for surveillance. CT angiography (CTA) is the historical surveillance modality of choice. Concerns over cost, potential nephrotoxicity of contrast agents and repeated radiation exposure led to colour duplex ultrasound scan (CDUS) becoming an established alternative. CDUS has a lower sensitivity and specificity for endoleaks detection compared to CTA. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound scan (CEUS) represents an improvement of ultrasound imaging but comparisons against CTA report widely varying results, likely due to technical factors of CEUS and limitations of single-phase CTA.The development of time-resolved CTA (tCTA) offers timing information that much more closely mirrors the dynamic information available from CEUS. Theoretically, these two imaging modalities have the best potential for diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this study will be to compare CEUS to tCTA and investigate the utility of other measurements available from tCTA.Methods and analysisThis is a prospective, single UK centre, comparative study of paired binary diagnostic imaging modalities. Patients identified in routine post-EVAR surveillance as at risk of having a graft-related endoleak will undergo a CEUS and tCTA on the same day. This will allow the first comparison of CEUS to a semidynamic form of CTA. CEUS sensitivity and specificity to endoleak detection will be calculated.Ethics and disseminationThe study has achieved ethical approval. We hope the results will define the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in comparison to a semidynamic form of CTA, representing a methodological improvement from previous studies. Results will be submitted for presentation at national and international vascular surgeryandradiology meetings. The full results are planned to be published in a medical journal.Trial registration number NCT02688751.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aneurysms</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk1v1TAQDAhEq9JfAEKWuHAgxXbifHBAQk98iUpwaM-R42wSvyZ2sJ1I79-zyXtUhRPJIdbszOxuPFH0gtErxpLsXT3u7QQm5pTlMeW0SMTj6JzTNI0zKsSTB-ez6NL7PcUnFaUQ_Fl0xsuMiVTQ80cvfzrrJ1BBL_CWeG26Acjtd6LABIeIsuMknVzLxIe5ORDbktADmRw0epORRQ4z-LWgLKqkDzGYXhoFDZmHFbCzaU5WiAVLgh4hduDtsCCwuyHSdNp2Tk79gWizdWggrHNZg0VU9ziGCuC0lxuI7cA0dgB551dJr7s-xuodmZCA43uCXcF1FpfaqIv0ah6kQz-Y3cGPxMEktSN-dgvoYVhHfk8k7maDVXZ4Hj1t5eDh8vS9iG4_f7rZfY2vf3z5tvt4HddpzkOcN1nR0KKlWV2onPOM56XMVF4mIAsmQDVpVvIsA5ZJ1lIFghV109Z1Uiq8ujS5iD4cfae5HqHZ_r0cqsnpUbpDZaWu_q4Y3VedXSpRlDxPSzR4czJw9hfeRahG7RWsG4GdfcUpZ3nCilQg9fU_1L2dncH1kFWWKb48QVZyZCmMh3fQ3g_DaLUGsDoFsFoDWB0DiKpXD_e41_yJGxKujgRU_5fjb78U8Is</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Roy, Iain Nicholas</creator><creator>Chan, Tze Yuan</creator><creator>Czanner, Gabriela</creator><creator>Wallace, Steve</creator><creator>Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa Rao</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9701-8319</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Prospective, single UK centre, comparative study of the predictive values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared to time-resolved CT angiography in the detection and characterisation of endoleaks in high-risk patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: a protocol</title><author>Roy, Iain Nicholas ; Chan, Tze Yuan ; Czanner, Gabriela ; Wallace, Steve ; Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa Rao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-7d68d08f06b8c7226279a6c793ea815ecd469266e16a1f0ce518bdfbb39c02043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aneurysms</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roy, Iain Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Tze Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czanner, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa Rao</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roy, Iain Nicholas</au><au>Chan, Tze Yuan</au><au>Czanner, Gabriela</au><au>Wallace, Steve</au><au>Vallabhaneni, Srinivasa Rao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective, single UK centre, comparative study of the predictive values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared to time-resolved CT angiography in the detection and characterisation of endoleaks in high-risk patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: a protocol</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e020835</spage><epage>e020835</epage><pages>e020835-e020835</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>IntroductionDiagnosis of endoleaks is imperative to prevent failure of endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs). The gold standard for diagnosis of endoleaks is catheter-directed subtraction angiography, which is not a practicable choice for surveillance. CT angiography (CTA) is the historical surveillance modality of choice. Concerns over cost, potential nephrotoxicity of contrast agents and repeated radiation exposure led to colour duplex ultrasound scan (CDUS) becoming an established alternative. CDUS has a lower sensitivity and specificity for endoleaks detection compared to CTA. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound scan (CEUS) represents an improvement of ultrasound imaging but comparisons against CTA report widely varying results, likely due to technical factors of CEUS and limitations of single-phase CTA.The development of time-resolved CTA (tCTA) offers timing information that much more closely mirrors the dynamic information available from CEUS. Theoretically, these two imaging modalities have the best potential for diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this study will be to compare CEUS to tCTA and investigate the utility of other measurements available from tCTA.Methods and analysisThis is a prospective, single UK centre, comparative study of paired binary diagnostic imaging modalities. Patients identified in routine post-EVAR surveillance as at risk of having a graft-related endoleak will undergo a CEUS and tCTA on the same day. This will allow the first comparison of CEUS to a semidynamic form of CTA. CEUS sensitivity and specificity to endoleak detection will be calculated.Ethics and disseminationThe study has achieved ethical approval. We hope the results will define the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in comparison to a semidynamic form of CTA, representing a methodological improvement from previous studies. Results will be submitted for presentation at national and international vascular surgeryandradiology meetings. The full results are planned to be published in a medical journal.Trial registration number NCT02688751.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>29615450</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020835</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9701-8319</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2018-04, Vol.8 (4), p.e020835-e020835
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5892749
source BMJ Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Abdomen
Accuracy
Aneurysms
Comparative studies
Health surveillance
Medical diagnosis
Medical imaging
Surgery
Systematic review
Ultrasonic imaging
title Prospective, single UK centre, comparative study of the predictive values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared to time-resolved CT angiography in the detection and characterisation of endoleaks in high-risk patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: a protocol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A52%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective,%20single%20UK%20centre,%20comparative%20study%20of%20the%20predictive%20values%20of%20contrast-enhanced%20ultrasound%20compared%20to%20time-resolved%20CT%20angiography%20in%20the%20detection%20and%20characterisation%20of%20endoleaks%20in%20high-risk%20patients%20undergoing%20endovascular%20aneurysm%20repair%20surveillance:%20a%20protocol&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Roy,%20Iain%20Nicholas&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e020835&rft.epage=e020835&rft.pages=e020835-e020835&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020835&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2021731845%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2099494923&rft_id=info:pmid/29615450&rfr_iscdi=true