Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C screening and treatment linkage intervention in US methadone maintenance treatment programs

•Data are from a randomized trial of hepatitis C virus (HCV) care coordination in US methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) clinics.•HCV care coordination in MMT with active linkage to care is likely cost-effective.•This finding holds true for HCV mono-infected and HCV/HIV co-infected patients. We ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug and alcohol dependence 2018-04, Vol.185, p.411-420
Hauptverfasser: Schackman, Bruce R., Gutkind, Sarah, Morgan, Jake R., Leff, Jared A., Behrends, Czarina N., Delucchi, Kevin L., McKnight, Courtney, Perlman, David C., Masson, Carmen L., Linas, Benjamin P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Data are from a randomized trial of hepatitis C virus (HCV) care coordination in US methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) clinics.•HCV care coordination in MMT with active linkage to care is likely cost-effective.•This finding holds true for HCV mono-infected and HCV/HIV co-infected patients. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a hepatitis C (HCV) screening and active linkage to care intervention in US methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) patients using data from a randomized trial conducted in New York City and San Francisco. We used a decision analytic model to compare 1) no intervention; 2) HCV screening and education (control); and 3) HCV screening, education, and care coordination (active linkage intervention). We also explored an alternative strategy wherein HCV/HIV co-infected participants linked elsewhere. Trial data include population characteristics (67% male, mean age 48, 58% HCV infected) and linkage rates. Data from published sources include treatment efficacy and HCV re-infection risk. We projected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime medical costs using an established model of HCV (HEP-CE). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are in 2015 US$/QALY discounted 3% annually. The control strategy resulted in a projected 35% linking to care within 6 months and 31% achieving sustained virologic response (SVR). The intervention resulted in 60% linking and 54% achieving SVR with an ICER of $24,600/QALY compared to no intervention from the healthcare sector perspective and was a more efficient use of resources than the control strategy. The intervention had an ICER of $76,500/QALY compared to the alternative strategy. From a societal perspective, the intervention had a net monetary benefit of $511,000–$975,600. HCV care coordination interventions that include screening, education and active linkage to care in MMT settings are likely cost-effective at a conventional $100,000/QALY threshold for both HCV mono-infected and HIV co-infected patients.
ISSN:0376-8716
1879-0046
DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.11.031